ports dev testing with Poudriere, Just noticed 8.4 is no longer supported
So, I've not been paying attention to FreeBSD announcements for a while. I am just teaching myself how to use Poudriere in order to submit my first ports. I noticed there is no 8.4 RELEASE for poudriere's create jail command. There only appears to be images for 9.3, 10.1 and 10.2. Well, that's makes life _so_ much easier for creating ports! So, can I assume that I only need to target the versions available from the following URL in order to get a port accepted? http://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/amd64/ -- Regards, Euan Thoms ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ports dev testing with Poudriere, Just noticed 8.4 is no longer supported
Hello, So, I've not been paying attention to FreeBSD announcements for a while. I am just teaching myself how to use Poudriere in order to submit my first ports. I noticed there is no 8.4 RELEASE for poudriere's create jail command. There only appears to be images for 9.3, 10.1 and 10.2. Yes. 8.4 was EOL'ed on the 31st of July and is therefore no longer supported. So, can I assume that I only need to target the versions available from the following URL in order to get a port accepted? http://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/amd64/ Yes, or from the list of supported releases here: https://www.freebsd.org/security/security.html#sup -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Running ''portmaster ghostscript9-9.06_10'' takes a lot of time
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Peter Jeremy pe...@rulingia.com wrote: On my E3-1230v2 system (not a slouch), the difference is 1s to 110s - which is in line with Matthew's results. Yes, this change makes ports almost unusable on FreeBSD 9.3-stable. A two-orders-of-magnitude slowdown in make startup is unreasonable and I formally request r394573 be backed out. I can see the benefits of the functionality but the current cost is too high. Thanks, I'll be eagerly awaiting this change. -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/po...@freebsd.org.html Port| Current version | New version +-+ devel/gdcm | 2.4.4 | 2.4.5 +-+ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Removal of print/ghostscript*-nox11
I switched to the new ghostscript port using portmaster as follows # portmaster -o print/ghostscript9-x11 print/ghostscript9 but it's necessary to ignore the creation of the old ghostscript package. After all above, I ran # portmaster -a -- Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina c...@fbsd.es PGP fingerprint = C60E 9497 5302 793B CC2D BB89 A1F3 5D66 E6D0 5453 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Recent changes to /usr/ports/Mk breaks /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/p5-FreeBSD-Portindex
On 20/08/2015 00:13, Naram Qashat wrote: The changes to port Mk files breaks /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/p5-FreeBSD-Portindex: When doing cache-init I get this: Processing make describe output for path /usr/ports: Can't locate object method mark_used_by via package FreeBSD::Portindex::Category at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/FreeBSD/Portindex/Tree.pm line 431. portindex worked fine till the changes I've actually already sent the information about this to Matthew, he said he will look into it as soon as he can. Yes, indeed. I've just managed to work out what the problem was and release FreeBSD::Portindex-3.5 with a fix. Turned out I was trying to use the now obsolete variable $OPTIONSFILE when I should have been using $OPTIONS_FILE instead. Thanks to Naram and Ion-Mihal who independently reported the problem to me. Cheers, Matthew signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: print/cups: PageLog remains empty
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 16:01:12 -1000 Kevin Oberman rkober...@gmail.com wrote: I just took a look and I have the same issue. Last entry in page_log was back on May 16, so it's been broken for a while. Thanks for quick feedback. I've submitted a corresponding PR: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202606 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
