FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/po...@freebsd.org.html Port| Current version | New version +-+ graphics/opencollada| 1.6.37 | v1.6.41 +-+ multimedia/obs-studio | 17.0.2 | 18.0.1 +-+ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: buzilla 214400: is is ports/head/base/binutils that is being reported on, freebsd-powe...@freebsd.org assignee is wrong
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 04:31:34PM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > May I ask what exactly makes you think that freebsd-ports-b...@freebsd.org > is correct assignee in this case? I'm away from my systems right now but I do know that this problem also affects sparc64. The original assignments of those 3 PRs were correct. mcl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: new port needs committer -- sysutils/lava - apache couchdb view heater & databases/p5-Store-CouchDB
Hi! > I also added a new perl-based port for Store::CouchDB yesterday, which > as my first perl port may not be as error free as sysutils/lava, but > feedback would be welcome. > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217597 Done. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go ! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: manpath change for ports ?
On 07/03/17 12:24, Diane Bruce wrote: > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 06:29:19AM +, Jan Beich wrote: >> Baptiste Daroussin writes: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I would like to propose a change in the localbase hier for ports >>> >>> I think we should add /usr/local/share/man in the manpath along with at >>> first >>> and maybe instead of in long term. >>> >>> The reason is: >>> - /usr/local/share/man seems more consistent to me with base which have: >>> /usr/share/man >>> - It will remove lots of patches from the ports tree where were we need to >>> patch >>> upstream build system to install in a non usual path. >> Can you also move /usr/local/info to /usr/local/share/info? texinfo is >> gone since 11.0-RELEASE (or r276551) but hier(7) and BSD.usr.dist still >> try to encroach on GNU defaults. > A big yes from me for both of these proposals. > +1 -- Renato Botelho ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: new port needs committer -- sysutils/lava - apache couchdb view heater & databases/p5-Store-CouchDB
Hi! > This very simple (and therefore hopefully error-free on my part :D) port > from December would like a committer: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215508 Done. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go ! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
new port needs committer -- sysutils/lava - apache couchdb view heater & databases/p5-Store-CouchDB
hi all, This very simple (and therefore hopefully error-free on my part :D) port from December would like a committer: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215508 It ensures that all couchdb indexes (views) are kept up to date, even if not directly used by the application. I also added a new perl-based port for Store::CouchDB yesterday, which as my first perl port may not be as error free as sysutils/lava, but feedback would be welcome. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217597 A+ Dave ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: manpath change for ports ?
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 09:51:14 -0600 Eric van Gyzen wrote: > On 03/06/2017 17:56, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> I would like to propose a change in the localbase hier for ports > > [...] > >> Which will also remove tons of hacks from the ports tree. >> >> What do you think? > > This sounds good to me. > > I seem to recall that most(?) Linux distros used /usr/man many years > ago, but they switched to /usr/share/man, I think in the early 2000s. > If that's correct, then I consider our /usr/local/man path a historical > curiosity that should finally be changed to /usr/local/share/man. Yes, we used PREFIX/man because that's what software developed for Linux used at the time. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: manpath change for ports ?
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 00:56:10 +0100 Baptiste Daroussin wrote > Hi all, > > I would like to propose a change in the localbase hier for ports > > I think we should add /usr/local/share/man in the manpath along with at first > and maybe instead of in long term. > > The reason is: > - /usr/local/share/man seems more consistent to me with base which have: > /usr/share/man > - It will remove lots of patches from the ports tree where were we need to > patch upstream build system to install in a non usual path. > > My proposal is to add to the manpath /usr/local/share/man in default man(1) > command in FreeBSD 12 (MFCed to 11-STABLE) > > and either provide an errata for 11.0/10.3 or a > /usr/local/etc/man.d/something.conf via a port or something like that for > those two, what do you think? > > For the same reason I would like to allow porters to stop patching (with > pathfix or anything else) the path for pkgconfig files and allow > /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig along with the current > /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig:/usr/libdata/pkgconfig > > Which will also remove tons of hacks from the ports tree. > > What do you think? +1 please do. I can't think of any (good) reason not to. Thanks! --Chris > > Best regards, > Bapt ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: buzilla 214400: is is ports/head/base/binutils that is being reported on, freebsd-powe...@freebsd.org assignee is wrong
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 08:19:20AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: > But I can not fix the assignee: it should not be freebsd-powe...@freebsd.org > > Can you put back the correct assignee for a port problem? May I ask what exactly makes you think that freebsd-ports-b...@freebsd.org is correct assignee in this case? Perhaps it's not entirely accurate, but it's IMHO better than umbrella freebsd-ports-b...@freebsd.org. If you can think of more appropriate party, I'd be happy to reassign. ./danfe P.S. There's no need to rereply; it's already logged in the Bugzilla. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
buzilla 214400: is is ports/head/base/binutils that is being reported on, freebsd-powe...@freebsd.org assignee is wrong
You (danfe at FreeBSD.org) updated bugzilla 214400 but. . . The notation base/binutils in the summary and possibly elsewhere seems to have confused things: This is about the port, not the base system files. So I've added ports/head/ before base/binutils in the Summary. I've also put back the port version number in the summary. But I can not fix the assignee: it should not be freebsd-powe...@freebsd.org Can you put back the correct assignee for a port problem? === Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: manpath change for ports ?
On 03/06/2017 17:56, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Hi all, I would like to propose a change in the localbase hier for ports [...] Which will also remove tons of hacks from the ports tree. What do you think? This sounds good to me. I seem to recall that most(?) Linux distros used /usr/man many years ago, but they switched to /usr/share/man, I think in the early 2000s. If that's correct, then I consider our /usr/local/man path a historical curiosity that should finally be changed to /usr/local/share/man. Eric ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: manpath change for ports ?
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 06:29:19AM +, Jan Beich wrote: > Baptiste Daroussin writes: > > > Hi all, > > > > I would like to propose a change in the localbase hier for ports > > > > I think we should add /usr/local/share/man in the manpath along with at > > first > > and maybe instead of in long term. > > > > The reason is: > > - /usr/local/share/man seems more consistent to me with base which have: > > /usr/share/man > > - It will remove lots of patches from the ports tree where were we need to > > patch > > upstream build system to install in a non usual path. > > Can you also move /usr/local/info to /usr/local/share/info? texinfo is > gone since 11.0-RELEASE (or r276551) but hier(7) and BSD.usr.dist still > try to encroach on GNU defaults. A big yes from me for both of these proposals. -- - d...@freebsd.org d...@db.net http://www.db.net/~db ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: archivers/libarchive fails to build
Walter Schwarzenfeld writes: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217244 > > (But if it will removend, half of the repo on the servers had to be > recompiled. Cause if lzmalib is installed other ports grap it, if the > needed or not). Poudriere builds each port in a clean environment which contains only those packages that the port explicitly requires, so that is not an issue. I am unable to reproduce the qt5-webkit issue that you mention in the PR on 10.3 or 11.0. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/po...@freebsd.org.html Port| Current version | New version +-+ archivers/dpkg | 1.18.22 | 1.18.23 +-+ graphics/icoutils | 0.31.1 | 0.31.2 +-+ graphics/opencollada| 1.6.37 | v1.6.40 +-+ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
