Re: After mutt-1.10.0_1 -> mutt-1.10.1 upgrade, gnupg fails

2018-07-20 Thread Adam Weinberger
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 6:53 AM David Wolfskill  wrote:
>
> This is running:
>
> FreeBSD g1-215.catwhisker.org 11.2-STABLE FreeBSD 11.2-STABLE #685  
> r336523M/336541:1102501: Fri Jul 20 03:40:05 PDT 2018 
> r...@g1-215.catwhisker.org:/common/S1/obj/usr/src/sys/CANARY  amd64
>
> and after updating all installed ports to reflect the ports "head"
> branch at r475002.
>
> A symptom is that an attempt to send a signed, unencrypted message
> yields a failure, with the messages:
>
> | gpg: skipped "0x6757003D": Unusable secret key
> | gpg: signing failed: Unusable secret key
>
> This works on another machine (the one I'm using to send this
> message), with the same gnupg/mutt setup, but running mutt-1.10.0_1.
>
> I have not configured mutt to use gpgme, though I'm willing to try
> it.  I recall that I needed to tweak ~/.muttrc a bit after the
> gnupg-2.0 -> gnupg-2.1 update -- though that change was merely
> commenting out the 'pgp_verify_command' line.
>
> I note that a result of the mutt upgrade is that
> /usr/local/share/examples/mutt/gpg.rc has changed, but that change
> was merely to remove the pgp_decryption_okay setting (which I don't
> have) and add 'set pgp_check_gpg_decrypt_status_fd'; I tried adding
> that, to no avail.
>
> Any hints or suggestions?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Peace,
> david

Hi, David!

FWIW, I'd highly suggest using gpgme.
  set crypt_use_gpgme=yes
has replaced my entire gnupg command file.

gnupg was just updated to 2.2.9 a few days ago, so that might be the
cause (and not mutt). Are you able to successfully use that key from
the command-line?

# Adam


-- 
Adam Weinberger
ad...@adamw.org
https://www.adamw.org
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


After mutt-1.10.0_1 -> mutt-1.10.1 upgrade, gnupg fails

2018-07-20 Thread David Wolfskill
This is running:

FreeBSD g1-215.catwhisker.org 11.2-STABLE FreeBSD 11.2-STABLE #685  
r336523M/336541:1102501: Fri Jul 20 03:40:05 PDT 2018 
r...@g1-215.catwhisker.org:/common/S1/obj/usr/src/sys/CANARY  amd64

and after updating all installed ports to reflect the ports "head"
branch at r475002.

A symptom is that an attempt to send a signed, unencrypted message
yields a failure, with the messages:

| gpg: skipped "0x6757003D": Unusable secret key
| gpg: signing failed: Unusable secret key

This works on another machine (the one I'm using to send this
message), with the same gnupg/mutt setup, but running mutt-1.10.0_1.

I have not configured mutt to use gpgme, though I'm willing to try
it.  I recall that I needed to tweak ~/.muttrc a bit after the
gnupg-2.0 -> gnupg-2.1 update -- though that change was merely
commenting out the 'pgp_verify_command' line.

I note that a result of the mutt upgrade is that
/usr/local/share/examples/mutt/gpg.rc has changed, but that change
was merely to remove the pgp_decryption_okay setting (which I don't
have) and add 'set pgp_check_gpg_decrypt_status_fd'; I tried adding
that, to no avail.

Any hints or suggestions?

Thanks!

Peace,
david
-- 
David H. Wolfskill  da...@catwhisker.org
Trump is providing aid and comfort to a regime that is hostile to US interests.

See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2018-07-20 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer,

The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can
safely ignore the entry.

You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations
below.

Full details can be found at the following URL:
http://portscout.freebsd.org/po...@freebsd.org.html


Port| Current version | New version
+-+
www/gobuffalo   | 0.10.3  | v0.12.4
+-+
x11-fm/filerunner   | 17.04.01.19 | 18.07.19.16
+-+


If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page
for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of
distfiles on a per-port basis:

http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt

Thanks.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Package Quarterly 104 amd64/i386 cannot build math/saga

2018-07-20 Thread Rainer Hurling
The package builders for 104amd64-quarterly and 104i386-quarterly 
complain about a build problem with math/saga[1][2].


This happens, because 104 uses the outdated math/saga version 6.3.0. In 
HEAD, there is already a working version 6.4.0 for some time now.


Is it possible to also update the quarterly packages to version 6.4.0?

Thanks for any clarification.

Regards,
Rainer Hurling


[1] 
http://beefy2.nyi.freebsd.org/data/104amd64-quarterly/474918/logs/errors/saga-6.3.0.log
[2] 
http://beefy4.nyi.freebsd.org/data/104i386-quarterly/474918/logs/saga-6.3.0.log

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"