Re: mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin looking for a new maintainer
On Sunday 17 March 2013 04:08:08 Michael Scheidell wrote: Maintainer has been reset to ports@. If anyone wants to adopt this port, open a pr (if you are not a committer), or grab it if you are. I grabbed it, thanks. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - Committer / Developer - be...@freebsd.org /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.1R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Would someone please commit ports/176156?
On Monday 25 February 2013 11:44:20 Darren Pilgrim wrote: It was approved by the maintainer a week ago, but hasn't been committed yet. If someone would pick this one up soon it would be appreciated, thanks. I got it and committed the patch. Beech ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: flashplugin 11.2r202.238
On 10/1/2012 11:56 PM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: 01.10.2012 21:33, Jerry wrote: I just finished installing linux-f10-flashplugin-11.2r202.238. For some inexplicable reason, it is no longer working. I followed the directions in UPDATING but without success. I even cleared out the entries in the ~/.mozilla/plugins directory and reran the command without results. In fact, now nothing is listed in the directory and flash still doesn't work. Every time I reach a page that requires flash, I am greeted with a message telling me I need to download and install it. Could you please rerun nspluginwrapper -v -a -i? Is there anything in the system log? I ran into the same problem. Tried for two days to get flash working on a client's FreeBSD box. No go. I finally just copied npwrapper.libflashplayer.so into .mozilla/plugins, firefox found it and now all works fine. seems nspluginwrapper -v -a -i is not populating .mozilla/plugins. Beech ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ports/169054: Can#39;t install irc/eggdrop
On 6/14/2012 10:30 AM, James Wade (Phurix) wrote: The following reply was made to PR ports/169054; it has been noted by GNATS. From: James Wade (Phurix) james.w...@phurix.co.uk To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/169054: Can#39;t install irc/eggdrop Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 19:05:34 +0100 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --070204040909070603050005 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The bigger issue here is the SSL patch, it's unofficial. The advise from the vendor is that using SSL patches are a bad idea. http://www.eggheads.org/news/2011/05/25/39 Instead the port should switch to eggdrop1.8-snapshot (development but, supports SSL) or eggdrop1.6.20 (latest but, no SSL support). I tried to contact be...@freebsd.org mailto:be...@freebsd.org, but received no reply, has this port become unmaintained? --070204040909070603050005 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit html head meta http-equiv=content-type content=text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 /head body bgcolor=#FF text=#00 The bigger issue here is the SSL patch, it's unofficial. divbr /div divThe advise from the vendor is that using SSL patches are a bad idea./div divbr /div diva href=http://www.eggheads.org/news/2011/05/25/39;http://www.eggheads.org/news/2011/05/25/39/a /div divbr /div divInstead the port should switch to eggdrop1.8-snapshot (development but, supports SSL) ornbsp;eggdrop1.6.20 (latest but,nbsp;no SSL support)./div divbr /div divI tried to contact a href=mailto:be...@freebsd.org;be...@freebsd.org/a, but received no reply, has this port become unmaintained?/div /body /html --070204040909070603050005-- I have ported 1.8 to irc/eggdrop-devel. I will update the other to 1.6.21 and drop the rooty patch. Upstream has discontinued all support for the patch as it's very buggy. If you need ssl support try the -devel version. Comments are welcome. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - be...@freebsd.org /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/9.0R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: New Port for ACE-6.0.4
On Monday 03 October 2011 09:29:30 Ladislav Jerabek wrote: Hello. This is my first port submission, so I hope that I will do it right. I modified patches from ACE-5.5.2, create port for ACE-6.0.4 and attached the SHAR file. Let me please know, if I should fix anything. Thank you. Best Regards, Ladislav Jerabek For updates we don't accept shar files, please read: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/port- upgrading.html#CVS-DIFF And to properly submit your patches so they will be picked up by a committer: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/problem-reports/pr- writing.html This list isn't the right place to send updates or new ports. Cheers, Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - be...@freebsd.org /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://people.freebsd.org/~beech X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Skype: akbeech / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/8.2R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Instafix for FreeBSD ports brokenness on 10.0?
On Friday 30 September 2011 13:10:20 Jim Trigg wrote: On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Erwin Lansing er...@freebsd.org wrote: That said, this patch is the wrong place to fix a problem to autotools. It needs to be fixed in autotools, not bsd.port.mk. No matter if it's bsd.ports.mk or autotools, such a fix needs proper testing, for which we do not currently have the resources as we are concentrating on releasing 9.0. I would suggest you do the same and make 9.0 the best release possible during the next few weeks, after that we'll start looking into 10.0. I have to admit that my reaction is not so much Why won't you fix ports for 10.0 as Why was 9.0 dropped out of CURRENT and 10.0 introduced before 9.0 went STABLE? Jim At this point 9.0 and 10.0 are virtually identical. I really doubt that there will be much development in -CURRENT till after 9.0 is released anyway. A couple of the temporary fixes worked for me, so I can still update if I need to. All in all this is minor compared to a few years ago when all development was done directly on the head branch. You never knew from day to day and sometimes by the hour if -CURRENT would even build let alone run. This is just a bump in the road by comparison. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - be...@freebsd.org /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://people.freebsd.org/~beech X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Skype: akbeech / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/8.2R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT
On Wednesday 28 September 2011 12:18:47 Doug Barton wrote: On 09/28/2011 12:39, Hartmann, O. wrote: The mess started to happen when I tried to repair a non CLANG compiling port math/gotoblas with portmaster -vf amth/gotoblas. Since this build binutils and even gettext and libiconv, I guess they got broken. Last I saw was a successful installation report from portmaster. But the libiconv.so.3 wasn't there anymore when I checked! This is a catastrophy ... I'm on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r225844 It's been widely reported on the ports list that you can't do fresh ports compiles on 10-current, and won't be able to until well after 9.0-RELEASE. The primary reason is that auto* stuff doesn't understand the 2-digit release version. Solutions are to set UNAME_r=9.0-CURRENT in your environment, and/or twiddle the version in newvers.sh and rebuild/reinstall your kernel. hth, Doug So if I change /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh to something like vers 9.9 I'm not going to shoot myself in the foot if I try and update? I would really like to avoid downgrading this box.I've altready been bitten once today and had to build packages on my tindy and force install. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - be...@freebsd.org /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://people.freebsd.org/~beech X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Skype: akbeech / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/8.2R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT
On Wednesday 28 September 2011 12:47:50 Doug Barton wrote: On 09/28/2011 13:45, Beech Rintoul wrote: On Wednesday 28 September 2011 12:18:47 Doug Barton wrote: On 09/28/2011 12:39, Hartmann, O. wrote: The mess started to happen when I tried to repair a non CLANG compiling port math/gotoblas with portmaster -vf amth/gotoblas. Since this build binutils and even gettext and libiconv, I guess they got broken. Last I saw was a successful installation report from portmaster. But the libiconv.so.3 wasn't there anymore when I checked! This is a catastrophy ... I'm on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r225844 It's been widely reported on the ports list that you can't do fresh ports compiles on 10-current, and won't be able to until well after 9.0-RELEASE. The primary reason is that auto* stuff doesn't understand the 2-digit release version. Solutions are to set UNAME_r=9.0-CURRENT in your environment, and/or twiddle the version in newvers.sh and rebuild/reinstall your kernel. hth, Doug So if I change /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh to something like vers 9.9 I'm not going to shoot myself in the foot if I try and update? I would really like to avoid downgrading this box.I've altready been bitten once today and had to build packages on my tindy and force install. That should be the case, yes. I haven't tested it yet myself. If you do, and it works, let us know and I'll write the UPDATING entry if no one else does. No problem, I'm building now. Any suggestions as to what port I should try after the reboot? Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - be...@freebsd.org /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://people.freebsd.org/~beech X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Skype: akbeech / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/8.2R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT
On Wednesday 28 September 2011 12:53:23 Beech Rintoul wrote: On Wednesday 28 September 2011 12:47:50 Doug Barton wrote: On 09/28/2011 13:45, Beech Rintoul wrote: On Wednesday 28 September 2011 12:18:47 Doug Barton wrote: On 09/28/2011 12:39, Hartmann, O. wrote: The mess started to happen when I tried to repair a non CLANG compiling port math/gotoblas with portmaster -vf amth/gotoblas. Since this build binutils and even gettext and libiconv, I guess they got broken. Last I saw was a successful installation report from portmaster. But the libiconv.so.3 wasn't there anymore when I checked! This is a catastrophy ... I'm on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r225844 It's been widely reported on the ports list that you can't do fresh ports compiles on 10-current, and won't be able to until well after 9.0-RELEASE. The primary reason is that auto* stuff doesn't understand the 2-digit release version. Solutions are to set UNAME_r=9.0-CURRENT in your environment, and/or twiddle the version in newvers.sh and rebuild/reinstall your kernel. hth, Doug So if I change /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh to something like vers 9.9 I'm not going to shoot myself in the foot if I try and update? I would really like to avoid downgrading this box.I've altready been bitten once today and had to build packages on my tindy and force install. That should be the case, yes. I haven't tested it yet myself. If you do, and it works, let us know and I'll write the UPDATING entry if no one else does. No problem, I'm building now. Any suggestions as to what port I should try after the reboot? I'm now at 9.9 and gawk built without problems. So this seems to work at least for the time being. Thanks for the fix, even if it is temporary. :-) If anyone else has a problem port let me know, I'd be happy to run a few. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - be...@freebsd.org /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://people.freebsd.org/~beech X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Skype: akbeech / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/8.2R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/procmail Makefile
On Tuesday 30 August 2011 11:01:18 Ted Hatfield wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Matthias Andree wrote: Am 30.08.2011 19:57, schrieb Mark Linimon: On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 07:44:12PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: It only warns, it does not prevent fresh installs on systems that don't have the same port/package already installed. code, not policy ... ? Well... is _is_ policy and meant as such. We make decisions for ports users all the time, and this is no exception. If procmail has no ongoing security issues and it compiles and installs with no problems what's the reasoning behind removing it from the ports tree? As far as I can see the reasoning advocated at this time is that procmail hasn't been in active development since 2001. Shouldn't that be seen as a sign of stability. I'm not a software developer so maybe I'm missing something obvious about this situation. Feel free to educate/convice me that I should make the effort to switch from procmail to maildrop. I've been using procmail now for 16 years and I'm very happy with it's performance. Moving to maildrop would be a significant amount of effort for both me and my users. Ted Hatfield I second that, I also have it installed in several places and haven't had any problems. I don't want to have to move to another app just because someone feels like deprecating a mature port. I think the old addage if it ain't broke applies here. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - be...@freebsd.org /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://people.freebsd.org/~beech X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Skype: akbeech / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/8.2R/announce.html --- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated?
On Sunday 24 July 2011 18:30:04 Steve Wills wrote: On 07/24/11 22:20, Eitan Adler wrote: At this point noone is maintaining portupgrade any more and a large number of PRs have been filed against it (see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?text=portupgrade). No one has stepped up to do the work to fix these bugs so it is time to officially drop it. Personally, I agree it's time to drop it if no one is going to do the work to maintain it, which at this point it seems clear is not going to happen. I'd be happy to be proven wrong about that. So the question becomes, how do we go about doing it? First step would be changing the handbook. Most UPDATING entries seem to include both portupgrade and portmaster instructions these days, so that should be covered. The next issue would be warning portupgrade users, perhaps by marking the port DEPRECATED? I'd think a date a little longer than the usual month would be needed before expiring. Why pick portupgrade when a lot of people (including myself) use it? There are probably 100's of ports more worthy of deprecation. Maybe there should be a policy to deprecate all unmaintained ports if nobody steps up. You can always drag it out of the attic if enough people squak and probably find someone to maintain it in the process. Just my .02 Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - be...@freebsd.org /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://people.freebsd.org/~beech X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Skype: akbeech / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/8.2R/announce.html --- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: INDEX build failed for 7.x
On Friday 08 July 2011 05:13:56 Erwin Lansing wrote: INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done. make_index: horde-webmail-4.0.1: no entry for /usr/ports/deskutils/horde4-mnemo make_index: horde-webmail-4.0.1: no entry for /usr/ports/deskutils/horde4-nag make_index: horde-webmail-4.0.1: no entry for /usr/ports/mail/horde4-imp make_index: horde-webmail-4.0.1: no entry for /usr/ports/mail/horde4-ingo make_index: horde-webmail-4.0.1: no entry for /usr/ports/mail/horde4-turba make_index: horde-groupware-4.0.1: no entry for /usr/ports/deskutils/horde4-mnemo make_index: horde-groupware-4.0.1: no entry for /usr/ports/deskutils/horde4-nag make_index: horde-groupware-4.0.1: no entry for /usr/ports/mail/horde4-turba Committers on the hook: arved beech danfe dougb glewis kevlo linimon lwhsu mm nivit sbz Most recent CVS update was: U MOVED U devel/py-coverage/Makefile U devel/py-coverage/distinfo U devel/py-coverage/pkg-plist U x11-wm/Makefile U x11-wm/blackbox/Makefile U x11-wm/blackbox/pkg-descr U x11-wm/blackbox/files/patch-src_Screen.cc U x11-wm/blackbox/files/patch-src_Slit.cc ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org If mm@ doesn't get this. I'll jump in and fix it myself. Beech ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: INDEX build failed for 7.x
On Friday 08 July 2011 07:36:59 Beech Rintoul wrote: On Friday 08 July 2011 05:13:56 Erwin Lansing wrote: INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done. make_index: horde-webmail-4.0.1: no entry for /usr/ports/deskutils/horde4-mnemo make_index: horde-webmail-4.0.1: no entry for /usr/ports/deskutils/horde4-nag make_index: horde-webmail-4.0.1: no entry for /usr/ports/mail/horde4-imp make_index: horde-webmail-4.0.1: no entry for /usr/ports/mail/horde4-ingo make_index: horde-webmail-4.0.1: no entry for /usr/ports/mail/horde4-turba make_index: horde-groupware-4.0.1: no entry for /usr/ports/deskutils/horde4-mnemo make_index: horde-groupware-4.0.1: no entry for /usr/ports/deskutils/horde4-nag make_index: horde-groupware-4.0.1: no entry for /usr/ports/mail/horde4-turba Committers on the hook: arved beech danfe dougb glewis kevlo linimon lwhsu mm nivit sbz Most recent CVS update was: U MOVED U devel/py-coverage/Makefile U devel/py-coverage/distinfo U devel/py-coverage/pkg-plist U x11-wm/Makefile U x11-wm/blackbox/Makefile U x11-wm/blackbox/pkg-descr U x11-wm/blackbox/files/patch-src_Screen.cc U x11-wm/blackbox/files/patch-src_Slit.cc If mm@ doesn't get this. I'll jump in and fix it myself. Beech I unhooked both from the build till mm or I have a chance to fix them. -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - be...@freebsd.org /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://people.freebsd.org/~beech X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Skype: akbeech / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/8.2R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: State of affairs with Horde4
On Thursday 26 May 2011 23:36:30 Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Beech Rintoul akbe...@gmail.com (from Thu, 26 May 2011
08:04:28 -0800):
On Thursday 26 May 2011 00:58:15 you wrote:
Hi,
I've seen your commits to horde4. I would like to know that current
status of this. Are there still some things to do, or is your
update-work finished in ports?
If there are no open issues anymore, did you replace a horde3 (imp,
kronolith, nag, turba, ...) install with horde4? If yes, was it an
update and how did it went, or was it a complete new setup?
There is still much to do with horde4. This series completely replaces
any previous versions and isn't backwards compatible with any other
horde framework. Horde decided to go with pear install and split
everything into approx 70 separate installs. That's a work in progress
to translate all those libs and extensions into FreeBSD's port system.
If you want to try it in the meantime, you can do a pear install -a -B
of any of the apps and it will install everything into ${PEARDIR}/horde.
Both that path and
${PREFIX}/www/horde are in the search path, so you can have both until I
get everything ported.
I would prefer to install via ports instead via pear. Do you have any
idea about your available time for this (= when do you plan to finish
this.. I mostly care about IMP/kronolith/nag/turba and maybe mnemo, I
do not care much about hermes and whups (I have them installed but I
do not really use them))?
I'm going to be working on this mostly full time till it's done. My boss wants
all this for our company, so excluding an emergency I have the green light to
concentrate on this project. It's still too early to give an estimate on
finishing but unless I run into something show stopping I should have this
done in a few more days.
Hermes and whups aren't ported to H4 yet, so I'm not sure they'll work.
Everything else you mentioned is available. I'm still working on the base
dependencies and hope to have everything (meaning framework imp) in by the
end of the weekend ${REALJOB} permitting.
I haven't seen any major problems with this release apart from the normal
config issues. Horde has never been much fun to configure given all the
choices, but watching the lists I'm only seeing minor problems and they
seem very good about addressing same. My experience is with a new
install, but migration is possible and supported. I would definitely
back up your db before
even attempting an upgrade. The db schema updates are now all
contained inside
the main configure screen, but the docs on updating are still sketchy.
I already read the availabe docs regarding the migration before I
contacted you. Taking a ZFS snapshot before the upgrade is the first I
plan to do when I try to migrate.
H3 is still fully supported and I plan on keeping it updated. This
new release
is such a huge departure from previous versions that there really aren't
any choices besides a fresh install (keeping the old data and
importing).
I would much appreciate any feedback you have if you do update to this
version.
Ok, give me (and/or ports) a heads-up when you have the ports in a
state you feel good about, and I try to get some time to upgrade and
tell about my experience.
I hit a snag with both migration and locale which pear install to
${PEARDIR}/data/horde. Hopefully I can just install those files into
www/horde/data and have the correct path without too much hacking.
I would really like to avoid having these ports all spread out on the system.
I plan to keep everyone posted and will put an entry in UPDATING when I get
everything playing nicely. Everything I've committed so far works, but may not
be complete.
Beech
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: State of affairs with Horde4
On Thursday 26 May 2011 00:58:15 you wrote:
Hi,
I've seen your commits to horde4. I would like to know that current
status of this. Are there still some things to do, or is your
update-work finished in ports?
If there are no open issues anymore, did you replace a horde3 (imp,
kronolith, nag, turba, ...) install with horde4? If yes, was it an
update and how did it went, or was it a complete new setup?
There is still much to do with horde4. This series completely replaces any
previous versions and isn't backwards compatible with any other horde
framework. Horde decided to go with pear install and split everything into
approx 70 separate installs. That's a work in progress to translate all those
libs and extensions into FreeBSD's port system. If you want to try it in the
meantime, you can do a pear install -a -B of any of the apps and it will
install everything into ${PEARDIR}/horde. Both that path and
${PREFIX}/www/horde are in the search path, so you can have both until I get
everything ported.
I haven't seen any major problems with this release apart from the normal
config issues. Horde has never been much fun to configure given all the
choices, but watching the lists I'm only seeing minor problems and they seem
very good about addressing same. My experience is with a new install, but
migration is possible and supported. I would definitely back up your db before
even attempting an upgrade. The db schema updates are now all contained inside
the main configure screen, but the docs on updating are still sketchy.
H3 is still fully supported and I plan on keeping it updated. This new release
is such a huge departure from previous versions that there really aren't any
choices besides a fresh install (keeping the old data and importing).
I would much appreciate any feedback you have if you do update to this
version.
I'm going to cc this to ports@, so others know what the status is.
Beech
--
---
Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - be...@freebsd.org
/\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://people.freebsd.org/~beech
X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Skype: akbeech
/ \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/8.2R/announce.html
---
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: PR's not being picked up (Was Re: becoming a port committor)
On Sunday 21 November 2010 20:26:49 Charlie Kester wrote: On Sun 21 Nov 2010 at 20:09:23 PST Beech Rintoul wrote: That is correct, although it is possible to use a unified diff with the -N flag against a non existent source. The problem is too many contributors send in update pr's in shar format which are a real PITA to deal with from our end. You may notice that many pr's aren't picked up by committers for just that reason. In such cases, does the submitter receive any communication explaining the reasons his PR isn't getting worked on? E.g., why not send an email requesting resubmission in the proper format? Many of the of oldest unassigned but still-open PR's show no evidence that they've even been looked at by a committer. There are no entries beyond the original one. How can we know which PR's were rejected/not picked up for some reason and which ones were genuinely overlooked? You can't, but if a significant amount of time passes and no committer assigns themselves to a pr it usually means there are problems, either with the format or the upgrade itself. It's rare that a pr get's completely overlooked. We try and look at the list daily (as time permits). From: Contributing to the FreeBSD Ports Collection-5.2.1 Keep your ports up to date: 5. At some stage a committer will deal with your PR. It may take minutes, or it may take weeks - so please be patient. The reality is if a committer reviews a pr for an update and it's in shar format he/she will usually pass them by. If you think it's taking too long an email or question on #bsdports will usually get a response. We do get emails from portmgr detailing outstanding pr's, but there is no requirement to grab one. We also have a bugbusting team that reviews outstanding pr's and broken ports. With the wealth of info in The porter's guide and in contributing a submission which is coded well and in the proper format will usually get a quick response. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - be...@freebsd.org /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://people.freebsd.org/~beech X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Skype: akbeech / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/8.0R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: PR's not being picked up (Was Re: becoming a port committor)
On Monday 22 November 2010 13:15:18 RW wrote: On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 19:58:56 +0100 Torfinn Ingolfsen tin...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 2:19 PM, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote: If someone that's never submitted a document patch before, submits one that involves moving a chapter in the porter's handbook, what are the chances of its being committed? As long as what's proposed is accurate, well written and follows the general tone of the handbook (formatting style), the chances are very good. The docs team is always looking for contributors. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - be...@freebsd.org /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://people.freebsd.org/~beech X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Skype: akbeech / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/8.0R/announce.html --- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: becoming a port committor
On Sunday 21 November 2010 15:12:08 Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: Hi, On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Jonathan jonat...@kc8onw.net wrote: On 11/20/2010 11:57 PM, Beech Rintoul wrote: Contribute approx. 50 pr's with patches that are consistently coded and prove to work (and in the right format) no shar files please. Does the Porter's Handbook need to be updated then? It explicitly says to use shar files to send ports in section 3.6, or where you referring specifically to patches and not full ports? That is my understanding at least: shar for new ports diffs for patches and updates to existing ports. HTH That is correct, although it is possible to use a unified diff with the -N flag against a non existent source. The problem is too many contributors send in update pr's in shar format which are a real PITA to deal with from our end. You may notice that many pr's aren't picked up by committers for just that reason. In the above I was referring to updates, not new ports. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - be...@freebsd.org /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://people.freebsd.org/~beech X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Skype: akbeech / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/8.0R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: becoming a port committor
On Saturday 20 November 2010 06:41:01 Fbsd8 wrote: I have a lot of free time now that I am retired. I see a large number of ports in open status that have been waiting to be committed longer than 30 days. A lot of these ports or the associated patches have problems or are in the wrong format. As for new ports, not all get committed for various reasons. Feel free to correct any problems and resubmit. Read the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook and Contributing to the FreeBSD Ports Collection. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/ http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributing- ports/index.html What is the procedure to become a ports committor? There is no hard and fast procedure. You must be invited, approved by portmgr@ and undergo a period of mentorship. If approved, your mentor will decide when you're ready to commit on your own. Here are some guidelines: Contribute approx. 50 pr's with patches that are consistently coded and prove to work (and in the right format) no shar files please. Make your presence known on #bsdports and answer questions correctly. Have the ability to take (and act on) constructive criticism from senior maintainers, committors and portmgr. Understand and follow FreeBSD guidelines and procedures. Above all, be an asset and get along well with others in the project. If you do all of this you will be noticed and a mentor will likely contact you. Good Luck, Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - be...@freebsd.org /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://people.freebsd.org/~beech X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Skype: akbeech / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/8.0R/announce.html --- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Dead projects in ports tree
On Monday 02 March 2009 13:36:38 David E. Thiel wrote: On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 04:05:56PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: multimedia/openquicktime - no movement in CVS / SVN for 1+ years; no releases in the past 3 years I'll continue posting more items to this thread as I find them... Thanks, -Garrett xmms looks completely dead now. Can someone confirm or deny this fact? While I'm in favor of removing useless ports, there are several projects which are simply done, and lack of development doesn't mean they're obsolete or useless. The logic above would seem to suggest we should remove qmail too. I would like to hear what people feel the best method for getting rid of unused and irrelevant ports, though -- bump portrevision and mark BROKEN for a few months? This opens up a huge can of worms. One user's favorite port is another user's crap. The general rule of thumb is if the port is unmaintained and abandonware (website gone, not fetchable etc) then it should be marked DEPRECATED with a date a month or so out. Most of these ports are also mirrored by FreeBSD if they aren't restricted. Any port that has been broken for 6 months are usually removed. Portmgr usually handles this area and it's generally a good idea to contact them regarding any of these ports. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - be...@freebsd.org /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://people.freebsd.org/~beech X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Skype: akbeech / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/7.1R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Dead projects in ports tree
On Saturday 28 February 2009 17:33:17 Robert Huff wrote: per...@pluto.rain.com writes: multimedia/openquicktime - no movement in CVS / SVN for 1+ years; no releases in the past 3 years This strikes me as slim evidence on which to seek a death sentence :) While I can't testify to the usefulness of this particular port, the fact that something has not changed in a long time could just as well mean that it does its job well -- and thus does not need to be updated -- as that it is no longer useful. Are there criteria - or even guidelines - for when a port should be reaped? Sure, if the port has been broken for more than 6 months, it's abandoned (website is gone and port isn't fetchable from outside mirrors) or it's been replaced. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - be...@freebsd.org /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://people.freebsd.org/~beech X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Skype: akbeech / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/7.1R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Dead projects in ports tree
On Saturday 28 February 2009 15:05:56 Garrett Cooper wrote: On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com wrote: Just trying to amass cruft in the ports tree that could be marked deprecated and removed. Some assistance in amassing the list would be helpful... multimedia/openquicktime - no movement in CVS / SVN for 1+ years; no releases in the past 3 years I'll continue posting more items to this thread as I find them... Thanks, -Garrett xmms looks completely dead now. Can someone confirm or deny this fact? That port is maintained by me. There haven't been any updates for awhile, but the port is stable. Two reasons to leave it alone. 1: It is stable and works on all versions and 2: The port has several ports that depend on it. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - be...@freebsd.org /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://people.freebsd.org/~beech X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Skype: akbeech / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/7.1R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Strange error
I'm updating www/htmleditor an I'm getting the following error: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.8 -Iblib/arch -Iblib/lib ._Makefile.PL ._Makefile Unrecognized character \x05 at ._Makefile.PL line 1. *** Error code 255 I can't find any strange characters in the distfiles. Does someone know what this means? Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - be...@freebsd.org /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://people.freebsd.org/~beech X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Skype: akbeech / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Strange error
On Friday 02 January 2009 17:55:43 Garrett Cooper wrote: On Jan 2, 2009, at 4:19 PM, Beech Rintoul wrote: I'm updating www/htmleditor an I'm getting the following error: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.8 -Iblib/arch -Iblib/ lib ._Makefile.PL ._Makefile Unrecognized character \x05 at ._Makefile.PL line 1. *** Error code 255 I can't find any strange characters in the distfiles. Does someone know what this means? Beech Probably a corrupt distfile that should be deleted and refetched. I have no idea what the ENQ character does, and neither does Perl no doubt... -Garrett It turned out to be a Mac encoded file that isn't needed. Thanks for the responses :-) Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - be...@freebsd.org /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://people.freebsd.org/~beech X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Skype: akbeech / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Problem with net/x11vnc update.
I'm trying to update the x11vnc port to the latest and I'm getting the following configure error: checking jpeglib.h usability... yes checking jpeglib.h presence... yes checking for jpeglib.h... yes checking for jpeg_CreateCompress in -ljpeg... no Note configure: WARNING: == *** The libjpeg compression library was not found. *** This may lead to reduced performance, especially over slow links. If libjpeg is in a non-standard location use --with-jpeg=DIR to indicate the header file is in DIR/include/jpeglib.h and the library in DIR/lib/libjpeg.a. A copy of libjpeg may be obtained from: ftp://ftp.uu.net/graphics/jpeg/ == I'm running -CURRENT as of Sunday and I tried adding the path in configure, but it makes no difference. I also tried googling but the only references I found were either Mac or FreeBSD 4.x. The previous version didn't have this check, so I don't know if this is a new or ongoing problem. Anyone have any thoughts on this? Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - be...@freebsd.org /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://people.freebsd.org/~beech X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Skype: akbeech / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Problem with net/x11vnc update.
On Monday 15 December 2008 15:25:34 Chuck Swiger wrote: On Dec 15, 2008, at 4:15 PM, Beech Rintoul wrote: I'm trying to update the x11vnc port to the latest and I'm getting the following configure error: checking jpeglib.h usability... yes checking jpeglib.h presence... yes checking for jpeglib.h... yes checking for jpeg_CreateCompress in -ljpeg... no Note I see that symbol here: % nm /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.a | grep jpeg_CreateCompress T jpeg_CreateCompress % pkg_info | grep jpeg jpeg-6b_7 IJG's jpeg compression utilities Are you sure you have the latest version of the port, and that you have these files: /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.a /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.la /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.so /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.so.9 ...? :-) Regards, Yes, I have the latest and all libs. My box shows: stargate# nm /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.a | grep jpeg_CreateCompress 0340 T jpeg_CreateCompress So this appears to be a problem in configure. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - be...@freebsd.org /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://people.freebsd.org/~beech X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Skype: akbeech / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Problem with net/x11vnc update.
On Monday 15 December 2008 15:35:22 Garrett Cooper wrote: On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Beech Rintoul be...@alaskaparadise.com wrote: On Monday 15 December 2008 15:25:34 Chuck Swiger wrote: On Dec 15, 2008, at 4:15 PM, Beech Rintoul wrote: I'm trying to update the x11vnc port to the latest and I'm getting the following configure error: checking jpeglib.h usability... yes checking jpeglib.h presence... yes checking for jpeglib.h... yes checking for jpeg_CreateCompress in -ljpeg... no Note I see that symbol here: % nm /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.a | grep jpeg_CreateCompress T jpeg_CreateCompress % pkg_info | grep jpeg jpeg-6b_7 IJG's jpeg compression utilities Are you sure you have the latest version of the port, and that you have these files: /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.a /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.la /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.so /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.so.9 ...? :-) Regards, Yes, I have the latest and all libs. My box shows: stargate# nm /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.a | grep jpeg_CreateCompress 0340 T jpeg_CreateCompress So this appears to be a problem in configure. Beech Bug filing time with the x11vnc folks :). -Garrett Yep, just did. I thought I'd ask the list first in case someone has seen this before. Thanks guys, Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - be...@freebsd.org /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://people.freebsd.org/~beech X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Skype: akbeech / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: COPYTREE_AUTO
On Wednesday 03 September 2008, Akinori MUSHA said:
Hi,
What about adding COPYTREE_AUTO defined as below?
You often need some scripts in an example directory to have
executable bits so that the examples actually work, and it is waste
of time to sort files out into COPYTREE_BIN and COPYTREE_SHARE when
they already have proper bits out of the tarball.
Index: Mk/bsd.port.mk
===
RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk,v
retrieving revision 1.603
diff -u -r1.603 bsd.port.mk
--- Mk/bsd.port.mk25 Aug 2008 01:29:01 - 1.603
+++ Mk/bsd.port.mk3 Sep 2008 08:42:37 -
@@ -2262,6 +2262,13 @@
${CHOWN} -R ${SHAREOWN}:${SHAREGRP} $$1
\
${FIND} $$1/ -type d -exec chmod 755 {}
\; \
${FIND} $$1/ -type f -exec chmod
${SHAREMODE} {} \;' --
+COPYTREE_AUTO= ${SH} -c '(${FIND} -d $$0 $$2 | ${CPIO} -dumpl $$1
/dev/null \ +21) \
+ ${CHOWN} -R ${SHAREOWN}:${SHAREGRP} $$1
\
+ ${FIND} $$1 -type d -exec chmod 755 {}
\; \
+ ${FIND} $$1 -type f \! -perm +100 -exec
chmod ${SHAREMODE} {}
\; \ + ${FIND} $$1 -type f -perm +100
-exec ${CHOWN}
${BINOWN}:${BINGRP} {} \; \ + ${FIND}
$$1 -type f -perm +100
-exec chmod ${BINMODE} {} \;' -- .else
COPYTREE_BIN=${SH} -c '(${FIND} -d $$0 $$2 | ${CPIO} -dumpl $$1
/dev/null \ 21) \
@@ -2271,6 +2278,11 @@
21) \
${FIND} $$1/ -type d -exec chmod 755 {}
\; \
${FIND} $$1/ -type f -exec chmod
${SHAREMODE} {} \;' --
+COPYTREE_AUTO= ${SH} -c '(${FIND} -d $$0 $$2 | ${CPIO} -dumpl $$1
/dev/null \ +21) \
+ ${FIND} $$1 -type d -exec chmod 755 {}
\; \
+ ${FIND} $$1 -type f \! -perm +100 -exec
chmod ${SHAREMODE} {}
\; \ + ${FIND} $$1 -type f -perm +100
-exec chmod ${BINMODE}
{} \;' -- .endif
# The user can override the NO_PACKAGE by specifying this from
Regards,
--
Akinori MUSHA / http://akinori.org/
I'm working on this with portmgr. The first step is to fix copytree.
If you try and use copytree_bin you will end up hosing
your /usr/local/bin dir. I have already submitted some fixed code and
was planning on adding copytree_www, so adding copytree_auto won't be
a big problem. This is all strictly portmgr territory, so it's up to
whatever they decide.
Beech
--
---
Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://people.freebsd.org/~beech
X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Skype: akbeech
/ \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html
---
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cvs commit: ports/deskutils/everygui Makefile ports/deskutils/superswitcher MakeRe: file ports/devel/cdk Makefile ports/devel/p5-Cdk Makefile ports/multimedia/gcfilms Makefile ports/security/openv
I'll work on Cdk, this one's easy. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://people.freebsd.org/~beech X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Skype: akbeech / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Heads Up irc/tirc is about to be deorbited.
Tirc has not been developed for some time now. It's now considered insecure and has already been removed from most of the other distros. It has been flagged deprecated in our tree for awhile, so unless someone wants to take over development and maintenance of this port it will be deorbited Thursday. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://people.freebsd.org/~beech X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Skype: akbeech / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: graphics/xmagv - failes: install_error
On Sunday 24 August 2008, Kris Kennaway said: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on 7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags=-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly and ccache support, with the official up-to-date Ports Tree, with the following vars set: NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes, NOPORTDATA=yes, FORCE_PACKAGE=yes. Excerpt from http://T64.TecNik93.com/logs/7-STABLE-FTP/xmagv-1.11_1.log : building xmagv-1.11_1 in directory /var/tinderbox/7-STABLE-FTP maintained by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] These ports are unmaintained are the mails just spam the list. Kris I think the general idea is that someone will take notice and step up and fix it. -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://people.freebsd.org/~beech X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Skype: akbeech / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cherokee-0.8.1 Released
Cherokee-0.8.1 is now in the tree as www/cherokee-devel. This is a major release, now with full docs and an admin interface. If there are no major problems it will move to the main version soon. = Cherokee 0.8.1 released = Cherokee is a very fast, flexible and easy to configure Web Server. It supports the widespread technologies nowadays: FastCGI, SCGI, PHP, CGI, TLS and SSL encrypted connections, Virtual hosts, Authentication, on the fly encoding, Apache compatible log files, load balancing, and much more. Cherokee also provides an easy to use configuration interface that allows to configure the server from top to bottom without having to edit a text configuration file. Please visit the Cherokee Web Server site for more information: http://www.cherokee-project.com/ Enjoy, Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://people.freebsd.org/~beech X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Skype: akbeech / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MOVED has extra blank line, breaks portupdate-scan
On Monday 14 July 2008, Doug Barton said: Alex Stangl wrote: /usr/ports/MOVED picked up an extra blank line on the end, apparently in v1.1647. This breaks portupdate-scan, and maybe other things that process this file. Is there any definitive document describing this file format? Not that I'm aware of. If blank lines should be treated as equivalent to comments, then I will issue a fix to portupdate-scan. As a general principle you should try to make any application robust in the fact of unexpected input. hth, Doug I fixed it. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD Port: www/cherokee-devel build and run
On Monday 14 July 2008, regisr said: On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:06:46 +1000 Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit: This implies that /usr/local/bin is not in your $PATH. But it is in the path! I run echo $PATH and I checked .login .profile .cshrc ... If it was not in the PATH I can't run a lot of commands ;-) I don't understand... There is another file to check? In the same terminal that I launch cherokee-admin: # env python Python 2.5.2 (r252:60911, May 4 2008, 09:22:23) [GCC 3.4.6 [FreeBSD] 20060305] on freebsd6 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information. /usr/bin/env python works too. I patched the paths, this should stop any problems. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help request to undestand the portmon report
On Friday 11 July 2008, Rodrigo OSORIO (ros) said: Hello everyone, I just take a quick look at the portmon report about my first port submit, omegaT[1], a translation memory editor. As I can see, portmon reports a 'failed to build' state for the amd64-8-latest environment, but if I took a close look, the log file looks ok (the port and the pakage was build without errors). My question is why portmon think an error occurs during the build (maybe something wrong is hide in the log). And how can I fix this situation to avoid unnecesary problems reported for the port tree. Thanks for your answers. Rodrigo OSORIO === Checking filesystem state list of filesystem changes from before and after port installation and deinstallation usr/local/share/java/apache-ant/bin/antRun changed permissions expected 0555 found 0444 Your port seems to be changing file permissions of another port. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tgz in tgz...!
On Thursday 10 July 2008, Anders Troback said:
Hi,
I need some tips about a port that I'm working on!
The problem that I have are that the source of the code are in a
tgz that are in a sub folder in an other tgz! So first I need the
port to download and extract the first tgz and then extract,
configure and make the second tgz!
How do I cope with that?
Thanks!
You can probably extract the second time in post-extract, but you're
going to have to get creative defining the right ${WRKSRC}. After
that it should patch and build normally.
Beech
--
---
Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org
X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release:
/ \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html
---
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [x11-toolkits/gtkdatabox[2]]: Kind request to commit an update
On Wednesday 09 July 2008, Alexey Shuvaev said:
Hello dear commiters :-
There is a
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/123937
laying around for about 1.5 month. It is just a little bit
non-trivial update to the port (see the notes in the PR).
As for the maintainership claim one can see the beginning of the
history at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/116120
I belive one should not wait another maintainer timeout?
It would be nice if someone can commit this somewhere around
weekend so I can finish the trilogy
x11-toolkits/{slgtk,gtkdatabox,slgtkdatabox}. Here, the latest
version of slgtkdatabox (not in the tree) is built upon the latest
version of gtkdatabox (not updated yet).
Thanks in advance,
Alexey.
First of all you need to request a repocopy from gtkdatabox --
gtkdatabox2. You cant just rename a port. I'll grab it.
Beech
--
---
Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org
X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release:
/ \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html
---
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: INDEX build failed for 6.x
On Friday 04 July 2008, Erwin Lansing said: INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-6 - please wait../a/erwin/tindex/ports/chinese/links/../../www/links/Makefile , line 75: warning: duplicate script for target pre-configure ignored p5-Games-Bingo-Print-0.04: /a/erwin/tindex/ports/textproc/p5-Test-Pod-Coverage non-existent -- dependency list incomplete === games/p5-Games-Bingo-Print failed *** Error code 1 *** Error code 1 Stop in /a/erwin/tindex/ports. *** Error code 1 Stop in /a/erwin/tindex/ports. 1 error Committers on the hook: beech edwin leeym maho Most recent CVS update was: U MOVED U devel/horde-chora/Makefile U devel/p5-Cache-Cache/Makefile U editors/openoffice.org-3-RC/Makefile U editors/openoffice.org-3-RC/distinfo U editors/openoffice.org-3-RC/files/openoffice.org-wrapper U editors/openoffice.org-3-RC/files/patch-i80129 U editors/openoffice.org-3-RC/files/patch-i85127 U editors/openoffice.org-3-RC/files/patch-i85972 U editors/openoffice.org-3-RC/files/patch-i87583 U editors/openoffice.org-3-RC/files/patch-i91318 U editors/openoffice.org-3-RC/files/pkg-message.in U games/p5-Games-Bingo-Print/Makefile U games/p5-Games-Bingo-Print/distinfo U games/p5-Games-Bingo-Print/pkg-plist U games/tome/Makefile U games/tome/pkg-plist U games/tome/files/pkg-deinstall.in U japanese/mh/Makefile U japanese/mh/files/patch-uip_msh.c U japanese/mh/files/patch-uip_prompter.c U japanese/mh/files/patch-uip_trmsbr.c U misc/tmux/Makefile U misc/tmux/distinfo U misc/tmux/files/patch-tty.c U polish/Makefile U polish/qnapi/Makefile U polish/qnapi/distinfo U polish/qnapi/pkg-descr U polish/qnapi/pkg-plist U polish/qnapi/files/patch-doc-qnapi.desktop U polish/qnapi/files/patch-doc-qnapi_download.desktop U polish/qnapi/files/patch-doc-qnapi_download.schemas U polish/qnapi/files/patch-qnapi.pro U textproc/Makefile U textproc/doc-mode.el/Makefile U textproc/doc-mode.el/distinfo U textproc/doc-mode.el/pkg-descr U textproc/doc-mode.el/pkg-plist U www/Makefile U www/atutor/Makefile U www/atutor/distinfo U www/atutor/files/pkg-message.in U www/ruby-amazon/Makefile p5-Test-Pod-Coverage is in /devel not /textproc Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: .desktop file and icon
On Tuesday 24 June 2008, Danny Pansters said: I have an app (kbtv2) that I want to get committed to ports soon. Where do I put the .desktop file and icon (or I'll just refer to the latter through absolute path) so that it gets picked up by the various desktop environments (prefix/share/applications/foo.desktop does not seem to work here in kde3)? Thanks, Dan Try prefix/share/applications/kde/foo.desktop or enable it manually through the kde settings. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Port Submission Etiquette
On Tuesday 06 May 2008, Sahil Tandon said: I would like to submit a new port which RUN_DEPENDS another port; the latter did not exist in the tree, so I submitted it (ports/123382) on May 4. I fully appreciate the committers' various responsibilities and time constraints, so this is not a 'hey, what's taking you so long' query. Since this was my first submission, I am just trying to get a sense of proper etiquette. Is it bad form to email the committer who took responsibility of the PR asking whether I've made a glaring mistake which would be fixable via a follow-up? Or should I simply wait for a feedback request if that were the case? Thanks. Since I'm the committer in question, I'll go ahead and answer. First of all you just submitted this port two days ago and I haven't had time to look at it yet. While it's always ok to email the committer responsible with questions or concerns, the general rule is to give them time to work on it. Most committers are fairly prompt in their handling of pr's, but since we are all volunteers sometimes real life issues supersede. I think giving the committer a couple of weeks before following up is probably a good idea. Also, in general, new ports don't carry the same priority as fixes or updates, but that doesn't maen they should languish indefinately either. As for glaring mistakes if I find a serious problem with a port I will always email the submitter with either a fix or asking for further input. While there is no set policy on this, most committers will let you know if something isn't right or the port doesn't build. So please be patient and I will get to it as soon as I can. Hope that answers your question :-) Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ifhp port marked as broken
On Thursday 03 April 2008, Fredrik Bengtsson said: Dear port maintainer, I noticed that the ifhp port is marked broken. However, I failed to find any further information on the subject. Does anyone know when the port will be available for building again? best regards, /Fredrik Bengtsson The port was marked broken because the vendor distfiles changed and now there is a checksum mismatch. This will require someone to verify and fix the port. Also, this port is currently unmaintained and is unlikely to be fixed unless someone steps up to maintain it. Perhaps you'd like to adopt it? Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: error installing linux emulator- linux_base-fc6-6_5 linuxulator is not (kld)loaded.
On Friday 28 March 2008, Siju George said: On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 4:43 AM, Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, How do i fix this error? freebsdsrv# pwd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc6 freebsdsrv# make install clean === linux_base-fc6-6_5 linuxulator is not (kld)loaded. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc6. freebsdsrv# = Thanks --Siju I did #kldload linux and now get this error freebsdsrv# pwd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc6 freebsdsrv# make install clean === linux_base-fc6-6_5 compat.linux.osrelease: 2.4.2 is not supported. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc6. freebsdsrv# == How do I fix this? If you had read UPDATING you would see to do: sysctl compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.16 Add: compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.16 to /etc/sysctl.conf Beech thanks Siju -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: net/skype - a few port related issues...
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Norberto Meijome said:
Hi Beech et al,
First of all, thanks so much for getting the latest linux version
working on FBSD :)
Some issues:
- the url to get the OSS file isn't correct - the correct one it is
now
http://www.skype.com/go/getskype-linux-oss
That's just a link on their website to the address I have in the
Makefile. I verified that address correct this morning. That being
said, I have seen connectivity issues the past few days with their
download site and Skype is aware of it.
If for some reason it doesn't work, i am happy to provide hosting
for the file (if allowed by Skype's license of course).
Unfortunately, Skype's license doesn't allow us to mirror the
distfiles. I'm working on this, but for now we need to use the
official repo.
I downloaded the file to /tmp, moved the old
skype_static-1.4.0.118-oss.tar.bz2 out of the way, moved the new
one to /usr/ports/distfiles,and it installed just fine.
- After following the upgrade to linux-base-fc-6 , a portinstall -p
net/skype would try to reinstall fc-4. This didn't happen when I
did the manual process ( download of bz2 as per above, make clean;
make ; make package ). No idea why is this... I even restarted to
make sure I had a clean linux environment.
Try adding OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=fc6 to /etc/make.conf
The new version with updated linux environment seems to be working
quite well - on an initial test I can confirm that on exit it
doesn't leave behind any process stuck ... thanks!!
Beto
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
On another note, Skype is about to release 2.0 in oss. I have the beta
and it works great (without video) and should be available shortly as
skype-devel. Stay tuned! If anyone here has experience with webcams
on FreeBSD and wants to contribute, please contact miwi@ or myself
off-list.
Cheers,
Beech
--
---
Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org
X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release:
/ \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html
---
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Heads Up! linux_dri on amd64
Install of graphics/linux_dri is about to be implemented for amd64. It's been tested with at least a couple of ports (skype for one) and they work correctly with it installed. I've posted a list of the ports which could be affected by this here: http://freebsd.alaskaparadise.com/wiki/tiki-index.php?page=LinuxDriAmd64 These ports are already marked ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= i386, so this change shouldn't have any affect on them. However, please bear in mind that linux_dri is not yet fully functional on the amd64 platform and applications using it will fall back to software rendering. While this is acceptable for ports like skype, it could cause serious performance issues with games and apps like google-earth (which is known to be completely broken with this). If you maintain one of these ports, or plan to port one to the tree, please thoroughly test for acceptable performance on amd64 before blindly enabling it. I will be tracking and dealing with any fallout this causes, and contacting maintainers directly. If you have any issues, please contact me. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: skype 2
On Saturday 15 March 2008, Ion-Mihai Tetcu said: On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:15:48 +0100 Markus Klaschka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, Skype 2 with Video is out for Linux. Will this also come or FreeBSD, or is it still evil software? Don't hold your breath. Actually, I'm testing our oss version of this and I just have to wait for the ok from skype to put it in the tree. The video part is going to take a bit of work, but looks doable. Stay tuned :-) Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: interactive ports - the plague
On Monday 03 March 2008, Mark Linimon said: On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 09:12:37AM -0800, pjd wrote: With me the JDK ports stop and demand I manually download the files, which is even more irritating Given Sun's licensing requirements, what is your suggestion? -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: interactive ports - the plague
On Monday 03 March 2008, Beech Rintoul said: On Monday 03 March 2008, Mark Linimon said: On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 09:12:37AM -0800, pjd wrote: With me the JDK ports stop and demand I manually download the files, which is even more irritating Given Sun's licensing requirements, what is your suggestion? Sorry, having that port just fail seems to be the right thing to do. FWIW, it doesn't hang up portupgrade. -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xmms fails to play on 7.0
On Thursday 28 February 2008, Kevin Oberman said: I have two FreeBSD systems running 7.0 and xmms fails to play MP3s on both systems. It starts up, but when I play, the time zips through the MP3 at around 100 times the correct speed. (About 3.25 seconds for a 4 minute MP3). The spectrum display seems to show the song playing, but there is no sound. I do get the error: Gtk-WARNING **: Failed to load module libgnomebreakpad.so: Shared object libgnomebreakpad.so not found, required by xmms I get this with a lot of working Gnome apps, so I suspect it is a read herring. I can confirm that I have /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so, but I am not sure if that directory is in the shared library load path. Other players including totem and mpg123 play it fine, so it is specific to xmms. Any ideas? Shall I fine a PR? Check that your output plugin is set to OSS and not the Disk Writer plugin in your preferences. What your describing sounds exactly like the behavior when you're converting something to burn. If that's not it, file a pr with as much config and system info as you can. Also, you didn't say if you were running xmms or xmms2. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/6.3R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Weird portlint errors
On Thursday 21 February 2008, Brooks Davis said: On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 02:19:14PM -0800, comperr wrote: http://groups.google.com/group/ml-freebsd-ports/files tmp is portlint tmp 21 Makefile is the makefile I'm having errors with. The file contains bogus carrage returns, probably due to being exiting on a windows box. Please run dos2unix on it or recreate it in an appropriate editor. Then it will work. Also, please don't top-post when posting to freebsd-lists. -- Brooks I agree and additionally you can't use spaces after variable names, use tabs. The Makefile is full of spaces. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/6.3R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux app port, version `GLIBC_2.4' not found
On Monday 04 February 2008, Dmitry Marakasov said: * Beech Rintoul ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I'm trying to port a linux app, and it says: % ./app ./app: /lib/obsolete/linuxthreads/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.4' not found (required by ./app) Seems like linux_base-fc4 is too old for this application, as it requires glibc 2.4. Is there a way to indicate in a port that newer linux_base is needed? From bsd.port.mk: # USE_LINUX - Set to yes to say the port needs the default linux base port. # Set to value X, if the port needs emulators/linux_base-X. # If set to 7, a dependency is registered to emulators/linux_base. # Implies appropriate settings for STRIP and STRIP_CMD. Yes, but this info seems a bit outdated for me. First, there's no linux_base-7. Besides fc4 there's fc6 and f7, what should I use? fc6, f7 Also, what'll happen if user has linux_base-fc4 installed already? Seems to me that it would be better to check for linux glibc =2.4 and ask user to reinstall newer linux_base if it's not found. The problem is there are no examples for this, everyone just use LINUX_BASE=yes. You can do that as well, however I suggest reading through the linux options in bsd.port.mk. -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/6.3R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux app port, version `GLIBC_2.4' not found
On Sunday 03 February 2008, Dmitry Marakasov said: Hi! I'm trying to port a linux app, and it says: % ./app ./app: /lib/obsolete/linuxthreads/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.4' not found (required by ./app) Seems like linux_base-fc4 is too old for this application, as it requires glibc 2.4. Is there a way to indicate in a port that newer linux_base is needed? From bsd.port.mk: # USE_LINUX - Set to yes to say the port needs the default linux base port. # Set to value X, if the port needs emulators/linux_base-X. # If set to 7, a dependency is registered to emulators/linux_base. # Implies appropriate settings for STRIP and STRIP_CMD. Cheers, Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/6.3R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [PATCH] graphics/cinepaint -- typo in Makefile
On Saturday 02 February 2008, Philipp Ost said:
Hello David, hi list,
graphics/cinepaint refuses to build because bsd.port.pre.mk is
included twice in the Makefile. The following patch solves this
issues for me:
--- Makefile.orig 2008-02-02 21:13:02.0 +0100
+++ Makefile2008-02-02 21:14:24.0 +0100
@@ -46,7 +46,6 @@
PLIST_SUB+=OPENEXR:=@comment
.endif
-.include bsd.port.pre.mk
post-patch:
@${REINPLACE_CMD} -e \
Regards,
Philipp
This has been fixed.
--
---
Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org
X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release:
/ \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/6.3R/announce.html
---
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: www/horde-base
On Wednesday 19 December 2007, Nicki de Wet said:
The latest patch broke my horde, I get the following error when
opening horde in the browser:
Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_STRING in
/usr/local/www/horde/lib/Horde/NLS.php on line 122
This is the file that was patched.
Here is the patch file's contents:
--- lib/Horde/NLS.php.orig 2007-09-29 07:22:46.0 -0800
+++ lib/Horde/NLS.php 2007-12-18 11:16:03.0 -0900
@@ -119,6 +119,10 @@
setlocale(LC_ALL, $lang_charset);
}
}
+ A0 A0 A0 A0/* avoid FreeBSD issapce(3) bug */
+ A0 A0 A0 A0if(NLS::getCharset() == UTF-8){
+ A0 A0 A0 A0 A0 A0setlocale(LC_CTYPE,C);
+ A0 A0 A0 A0}
@putenv('LANG=' . $lang_charset);
@putenv('LANGUAGE=' . $lang_charset);
}
Here is what the file looks like now, obviously there were some
funny characters: setlocale(LC_ALL, $lang_charset);
}
}
\xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0/* avoid FreeBSD issapce(3) bug */
\xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0if(NLS::getCharset() == UTF-8){
\xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0setlocale(LC_CTYPE,C);
\xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0}
@putenv('LANG=' . $lang_charset);
@putenv('LANGUAGE=' . $lang_charset);
}
This is what the patch should look like;
--- usr/local/www/horde/lib/Horde/NLS.php Sat Sep 29 17:22:46
2007 +++ /usr/local/www/horde/lib/Horde/NLS.php Thu Dec 20
10:38:46 2007 @@ -119,6 +119,10 @@
setlocale(LC_ALL, $lang_charset);
}
}
+/* avoid FreeBSD issapce(3) bug */
+if(NLS::getCharset() == UTF-8){
+ setlocale(LC_CTYPE,C);
+}
@putenv('LANG=' . $lang_charset);
@putenv('LANGUAGE=' . $lang_charset);
}
Regards,
Nicki
The problem has been fixed, update your ports tree and rebuild.
Beech
--
---
Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org
X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release:
/ \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html
---
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD Port: horde-base-3.1.5_1
On Wednesday 19 December 2007, Jeremy Chadwick said:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 02:29:40PM -, Barry Byrne wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Chadwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 December 2007 11:34
To: Barry Byrne
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Checked the patched file (NLS.php) and I had something like
this;
\xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0/* avoid FreeBSD issapce(3) bug */
\xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0if(NLS::getCharset() == UTF-8){
\xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0setlocale(LC_CTYPE,C);
\xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0}
When I replaced the \xa0 with tabs, all was fine again.
The parse error is probably because PHP does not have Unicode
or multibyte character support enabled. The patch file in
question contains actual Unicode characters. You might try
rebuilding PHP with Zend support for multibyte characters (it's
an option in make config)
and see if that improves things.
Jeremy,
Thanks for the quick response.
You're correct in assuming I don't have Multibyte enabled.
However, I just rebuilt php on another machine and enabled
multibyte, then built horde-base on that, but still had the same
characters in the NLS.php file on that, so not sure what the
problem is.
Okay, so it's probably a Unicode vs. UTF-8 parser thing.
My comment about the code needing to remain in ASCII stands, though
(this isn't your fault, of course). The patch should really be
fixed to use literal whitespace (ASCII 0x20) or tabs (ASCII 0x09).
I have commit access to fix this, but I want to clear it + discuss
with those involved with the PR first.
I have re-rolled the patch, please let me know if you still have
problems. It may take a while to get into the tree.
Beech
--
---
Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org
X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release:
/ \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html
---
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ion3 removal (Re: Ion3 license violation)
On Wednesday 12 December 2007, Mikhail Teterin said: The simple fact is that Tuomo has some strange desire to blame packagers for all his problems with software and users. Yes, license-crafting lawyers are usually more polite and don't engage in direct communications with forums such as ours. Their licenses suck much more, however -- think Java, cdrtools, or Skype, and all the other closed-source packages. Put Tuomo's demands in perspective, for crying out loud... Lets not pick on Skype. While they may be closed source, they are very accommodating and interested in FreeBSD and FreeBSD users. They certainly don't put unreasonable demands on me as maintainer or the FreeBSD Project itself. I have direct access to their developers and they in fact rolled the new OSS version mostly for our benefit. There are no 28 day or rename it something else provisions anywhere in their license. That to me is a completely unreasonable demand. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: (Very) bogus package dependencies
On Monday 10 December 2007, Paul Schmehl said: --On Monday, December 10, 2007 16:33:20 +0200 Andriy Gapon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From a small research it seems that the only thing needed from cdrtools is isoinfo utility which gets called in FreeBSD-specific code (hald/freebsd/probing/probe-volume.c) like follows: isoinfo -p -i %s And it seems that its only usage is to detect presence of directories named 'VIDEO_TS|VCD|SVCD', so that properties like volume.disc.is_videodvd could be set. Maybe there is a way to write code for this functionality that could be included into hal source code or as a port patch, so that hal doesn't have to depend on cdrtools. While I have no objections to this particular suggestion, my question would be - where do you stop? You could easily do this for hundreds (if not thousands of ports) that depend upon some other port because of one piece of code. In general. port maintainers follow the guidelines of the software developer. If the developer states that the software depends upon cdrtools, then the maintainer is going to include that dependency in the port. Many of us don't have sufficient skill to audit code and determine where a dependency could be replaced by some additional code. So, while this might make sense in isolated cases, I don't think it scales well. Furthermore, modern machines generally have enough disc space that the addition of a few unused ports to include necessary code is a small price to pay to distribute the load of providing ports over a larger population of volunteers. (And yes, I know not everyone has a modern machine or large discs to work with.) I agree. The ports tree is a moving target. Any time you add custom code to a port it puts you (as maintainer) in the position of being both developer and maintainer. Frequently building a port will pull in dependencies all of which are maintained by different people. We already run into the problem where updating port foo requires port bar be updated first. Fortunately, there is a lot of cooperation by those on the project and it's rarely an issue. However, adding dependent code into the port itself would make this situation an absolute nightmare. Instead of maintaining one port, now you're maintaining two or more (not to mention license issues). We already have ports in the tree which download and extract other ports, but only use a specific piece. These tend to all be from the same master port or family. If disk space is a premium common tools like autotools can be removed after the port is built, but doing that will quickly paint you into a corner where you no longer have the space to build. We have options in ports that frequently determine if a dependency will be built or not depending on choice. It's up to the individual maintainer to include options. Many ports have additional options which can be set (or unset) from the command line. We tend to include the most common options, but that doesn't mean others aren't available. Anyone with interest at this level is strongly encouraged to read the port's Makefile before building and installing. -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Call for testers k3d
On Friday 09 November 2007, V.Chukharev said: On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 00:22:39 +0200, Jeff Royle wrote: Beech Rintoul wrote: It has been reported to me that this leaves files behind if built andinstalled on a box with gnome desktop. Would someone who runs gnomeplease build, install and deinstall this and tell me what (if any)files get left behind. http://people.freebsd.org/~beech/source/k3d.tgz Thanks,Beech Looks good Beech. Using gnome-desktop-2.18.3 make config - Build for Gnome turned on make - Built fine make install - Installed without issue make deinstall - Deinstalled fine Following directories checked for k3d files: /usr/local/share/k3d /usr/local/man/man1 /usr/local/lib /usr/local/lib/k3d /usr/local/include/k3d /usr/local/bin No files found. Let me know if you need any other tests done on the port. Cheers, Jeff I tried it with gnome2-2.20.1, using portupgrade, pkg_delete, and portupgrade -P again. No problem. Thanks! The only drawback for me is a conflict with math/atlas. (Well, I did not recheck if the conflict remains with the new version of k3d, now atlas under building, but that is a long build...) Thanks for the effort. :-) I'm not sure if it still does conflict I was planning on testing that before I commit it. If you find it does play nicely with atlas please let me know. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Packaging issue
On Thursday 08 November 2007, javier prats said:
Good day everyone,
I'm having an odd problem getting a port to package properly. When
running `port test` on the program it goes through the installation
process as expected ending with registering installation. When
`port` attempts to create a package i recieve many lines of
errors. Below is a snippet of the errors. The port is
successfully installed though, and i can even run it from the
/usr/ports/sysutils/metamorphose/work/ directory. I thought maybe
`port` was not seeing it in the work directory so I added
${WRKSRC}/metamorphose_1.1.0/ to all the files in pkg-plist and
still had no luck. Does anyone have a suggestion? Can `port` be
told to install the program elsewhere and can it be told where to
look for something to package?
tar: metamorphose_1.1.0/py2exe_setup.py: Cannot stat: No such file
or directory tar: metamorphose_1.1.0/readme_en.html: Cannot stat:
No such file or directory tar: metamorphose_1.1.0/readme_es.html:
Cannot stat: No such file or directory tar:
metamorphose_1.1.0/readme_fr.html: Cannot stat: No such file or
directory tar: metamorphose_1.1.0/readme_pl.html: Cannot stat: No
such file or directory tar: metamorphose_1.1.0/roman.py: Cannot
stat: No such file or directory tar:
metamorphose_1.1.0/smallHelp.py: Cannot stat: No such file or
directory tar: ${PREFIX}/metamorphose_1.1.0/translations.html:
Cannot stat: No such file or directory pkg_create: make_dist: tar
command failed with code 256
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/metamorphose.
=== Error running make package
=== Files currently installed in PREFIX
=== Cleaning up
Javier Prats
Don't prefix the plist with ${WRKSRC}. What that is telling you is
those files are listed in the pkg-plist but are not installed in the
path listed. If you're using port test add -i -C flags and do a ^c
after install. You then need to check in the tmp directory of that
port and see if those files are found in the path listed in the
pkg-plist. If those files are not installed, you either need to fix
your install or remove them from the plist.
Beech
--
---
Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org
X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release:
/ \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html
---
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Call for testers k3d
It has been reported to me that this leaves files behind if built and installed on a box with gnome desktop. Would someone who runs gnome please build, install and deinstall this and tell me what (if any) files get left behind. http://people.freebsd.org/~beech/source/k3d.tgz Thanks, Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fix build w/ gcc 4.2 - any priority?
On Sunday 04 November 2007, Pietro Cerutti said: Mark Linimon wrote: On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 03:08:45PM +0100, Pietro Cerutti wrote: Is there anything like bsdstats that I can use to see that? FreshPorts has http://www.freshports.org/graphs.php?id=7, but it's only the top 20, so not really. yep... and none of them has problems ;-) thanks mcl I have grepped the tree for ports broken with gcc-4.2 the list can be found here: http://freebsd.alaskaparadise.com/wiki/tiki-index.php?page=BrokenPortsGCC42 Happy bugswatting :-) Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: aqbanking update?
On Tuesday 09 October 2007, Mattias Lindgren said: I tried to install gnucash2 tonight and it complained about aqbanking being quite out of date. Are there any plans in the works for updating to a newer version? Are there build problems with the newer versions? The current version is 1.0.11, and gnucash is wanting at least 1.6. Thanks, The port isn't maintained, I'll take a look at it and see if I can update it. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Hi!... How to maintain a ports
On Thursday 27 September 2007, Stephano Zanzin said: Hello! Im new in this list, and I want to know how I can maintain a ports. I want very much to contribute with the Ports project. Please folks, help me! Start by reading the Porters Handbook. On your machine: /usr/share/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/index.html On the web: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/index.html Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Xorg 7.3 and keyboard leds
On Monday 17 September 2007, Alex Dupre said: Am I the only one who have freezed keyboard leds in X after updating to Xorg 7.3? I doubt, since both my desktops with different keyboards exhibit this problem. They work fine on console. -- Alex Dupre It's a known problem, both xorg and flz@ are aware of it. -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Updating X.org FreeBSD ports to 7.3
I did run into one problem. The new xf86-input-keyboard driver isn't working properly. The keyboard works, but all the led's go out. Dropping back to console, they're back. There are no error messages that I could find. FreeBSD stargate.alaskaparadise.com 7.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #8: Fri Aug 24 06:41:53 AKDT 2007 Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mail/horde
On Wednesday 01 August 2007, Andrew Pantyukhin said: On 7/20/07, Jonathan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 20 July 2007 08:36:38 Jonathan Horne wrote: i am trying to setup mail/horde on a test box, but so far i am not having much success. can anyone direct me to a place where i might find tips or documentation for setting up the *current* port version of horde? sorry, i meant to say www/horde-meta. Why don't you try to contact its maintainer (cc'ed)? Good luck! Horde is a base framework and a series of modules that perform various functions. You can install one or all of them. horde-meta is the FreeBSD version of horde's bundles like webmail edition except you can choose what to install. The base and individual modules docs are installed in /usr/local/share/docs/horde. There is extensive documentation on setup and the individual modules at http://www.horde.org and you will also find a wiki and mailing lists. Horde was designed to be versatile and able to run on any webserver that will support php either directly or with fastcgi, that said it seems a bit daunting to set up. I can assure you it really isn't that bad, but does require some user configuration to work. This is well documented, both in the docs and on their site. Good luck with your install and feel free to ask any specific questions you may have. Beech - Horde Maintainer -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mail/horde
On Wednesday 01 August 2007, Eric said: Beech Rintoul wrote: On Wednesday 01 August 2007, Andrew Pantyukhin said: Good luck with your install and feel free to ask any specific questions you may have. Beech - Horde Maintainer on a somewhat related note, any idea when we will see DIMP get put into the ports tree? it looks nice Eric Probably with the next release. Dimp only works with the development version and it would be too big a change. I would have to create devel versions of everything just to get that working. It is on my list of Horde todo's. There are other mods I'm looking at also. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD Port: dovecot-1.0.1
On Tuesday 17 July 2007, Athan D. said: Attn: Dovecot port maintainer Dovecot has been updated to v1.0.2. Could you please update port? Regards, Athan Dovecot has been updated to 1.0.2, you need to update your ports tree. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can't build new PHP
On Tuesday 22 May 2007, Paul Hoffman said: ROOT-opus:/usr/ports/lang/php5# make reinstall === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found === Found saved configuration for php5-5.2.1_3 = php-5.2.2-mail-header.patch doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. = Attempting to fetch from http://choon.net/opensource/php/. fetch: http://choon.net/opensource/php/php-5.2.2-mail-header.patch: Operation timed out = Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. fetch: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/php-5.2.2-mail-he ader.patch: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) = Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this = port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/ and try again. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php5. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php5. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php5. # I got around this by turning off the MAILHEAD option, but this seems kinda bad for people making the new PHP5. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- --- Beech Rintoul - Port Maintainer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Firefox errors
I just completed the xorg upgrade and have -CURRENT from yesterday. Firefox was rebuilt as part of the upgrade. It now just returns a blank page with the following error: stargate# firefox GConf Error: Failed to contact configuration server; some possible causes are that you need to enable TCP/IP networking for ORBit, or you have stale NFS locks due to a system crash. See http://www.gnome.org/projects/gconf/ for information. (Details - 1: IOR file '/var/tmp/gconfd-root/lock/ior' not opened successfully, no gconfd located: No such file or directory 2: IOR file '/var/tmp/gconfd-root/lock/ior' not opened successfully, no gconfd located: No such file or directory) ** (Gecko:93032): WARNING **: Wrong permissions for /var/tmp/orbit-root Anyone have a suggestion? Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - Port Maintainer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Local ports up-to-date version doesn't match website
Walter Ian Kaye wrote: At 11:10 a -0800 05/11/2007, Beech Rintoul didst inscribe upon an electronic papyrus: Walter Ian Kaye wrote: Hi, Locally I see this: /usr/ports/www/lynx-ssl pkg_version -v [...] lynx-ssl-2.8.5_2= up-to-date with port But freebsd.org website shows 2.8.6_4,1 How do I get my ports to know what's actually available? thanks, -Walter running os version 4.10 Freebsd 4.x is no longer supported in any way. Newer ports will not build on 4.x. You should consider upgrading to 6.2. Then why does the website info for lynx port list versions from 6.x down to 4.10? When I saw that, I figured it was supported Technically, it is. But, the newer versions aren't supported on 4.x anymore. They need to update their website. I know 4.10 is EOL'd; it's just that it's a production Internet server and I don't know how long it'd be down for. I've never upgraded a FreeBSD system before and have no idea how to go about it (it's a remote dedicated server, unmanaged from my hosting provider). Will I have to reinstall every port afterwards, or can I upgrade the OS and the existing ports will just work? You will need to rebuild your ports if you upgrade. The compat4 port is marked forbidden due to security issues, so most of your 4.x ports probably will not run. As for upgrading, the handbook has a lot of good information. Also search the lists for tips on upgrading a remote machine. Really, the best way is to do a clean install of 6.2 on another machine and move your files over. There were significant file system improvements since 4.x that you would not have the benefit of doing an upgrade. You should talk to your provider and see if they will provide you a 6.x server so you can migrate your files and test before going online. I personally wouldn't stay with any provider who refuses to upgrade from a deprecated os version. That said, if you decide to stay with 4.x, you can use the tag RELEASE_4_EOL when you cvsup src or ports. That is the last known good 4.x configuration. Anything past that will not build, as all of the 4.x build tools were removed from the tree. One other thing to consider is there will be no more security updates for 4.x, so running it on a production server will become increasingly risky. Beech thanks, -Walter still glad he talked his host (iStrata) into providing FreeBSD while their official offerings were only Linux. :-) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- --- Beech Rintoul - Port Maintainer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: psybnc port version
On Wednesday 25 April 2007, Hans Fleischmann said: Hello, Some time ago I tried to install PyBNC from ports but that version had some problems. When I checked their website I noticed that this is a very old version, 2.3.1-1, somewhere from early 2002, and that there is a newer version 2.3.2-7 from april '05. This last version does work perfectly for me, except that it's not from ports. Maybe someone can update the port to this version? I don't know how supported that port still is, but the website is still up. I'll grab it and update it. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - Port Maintainer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OPTIONS changes
Am I correct in assuming that with the new changes default OPTIONS no longer need to be written as: .if !defined(WITHOUT_FOO) Will pointyhat deal correctly with: .if defined(WITH_FOO) if it defaults to on? Thanks, Beech --- Beech Rintoul - Port Maintainer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PHP error
I have a port which calls php -m as a test from the makefile. Problem is if I do php -m I get the following: stargate# php -m /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/php/20060613/imap.so: Undefined symbol ssl_onceonlyinit I tried rebuilding php the module involved, but no joy. Does anyone have a suggestion? I'm running the following: FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #113: Sun Apr 8 08:27:49 AKDT 2007 Apache-2.0.59 php5-5.2.1_3 php5-imap-5.2.1_3 This worked about a month ago. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - Port Maintainer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: php4 port - undefined ref to getopt_long
On Wednesday 14 March 2007 10:56, timmartin said: First let me say I'm not a programmer, just a humble designer who happens to know enough to make himself dangerous. Anyway, three things started happening with my ports tree that make me unhappy. They may be unrelated, but since I don't know i'll list all three. this is all on freebsd 4.11 1) a while back i stopped being able to make my own ports index because of a bunch of gstreamer-plugins that wouldn't let me make index so i started having to make fetchindex instead. 2) when i look at portversion outputs it seems as though it doesn't really know what versions are in the ports tree -- many ports have been updated and it doesn't seem to think so. When i ran portupgrade on said ports it worked just fine -- just portversion didn't know what was going on. 3) today i stopped being able to build php4 -- i get the following error that stops the upgrade: ext/standard/basic_functions.lo(.text+0x1507): undefined reference to `getopt_long' Anybody have an idea on how i can fix the situation? The only one that really sucks is the last problem -- the other two i can live with although it'd be nice to fix them too. .tim On January 31st, FreeBSD 4.11 and earlier releases will have reached its End of Life dates and will no longer be supported by the FreeBSD Ports Team. Users are encouraged to upgrade to FreeBSD 6.2. Compatibility with 4.x has been removed from most of the ports. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - Port Maintainer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Audacity needs a loving family
If the port is up for grabs, I'll take maintainership. I do use it from time to time. Cheers, Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - Port Maintainer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --- pgpr8ypMZg8Yy.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: proftpd port missing dependency on autoconf
On Saturday 17 February 2007 11:56, Steven Hartland said: The current version download via cvsup as of this evening is broken due to a missing dependency on autoconf producing the following error on a clean machine: [log] cd . autoconf autoconf: not found gmake: *** [configure] Error 127 *** Error code 2 [/log] Installing autoconf-2.61 followed by make clean; make fixed the error. The makefile however does state so maybe something more seriously wrong with the current port base? USE=AUTOTOOLS= autoconf:259 Steve There is a commit pending that addresses this issue. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - Port Maintainer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --- pgpqwAbJxOpWZ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Impending update to devel/gettext
On Tuesday 30 January 2007 15:52, Ade Lovett wrote: Hi folks, I'm looking for some early adopters to try out an upgrade of devel/ gettext to 0.16.1 -- I've already built a few relatively large consumers of gettext which seem to be fine; the issues are much more likely to be run-time rather than compile-time, so a pointyhat -exp build is unlikely to be amazingly useful in terms of feedback. The patch can be found at http://people.FreeBSD.org/~ade/gettext.diff -- all the usual disclaimers apply in terms of blowing up your computer, setting fire to your house, eating your first-born and so on. Ideally I'd like to commit this in about two weeks or so. Please send any comments directly to me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, -aDe I can't get the patches to apply cleanly. can you provide a .tgz or a shar of the port, and I'll be happy to test it. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - Port Maintainer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Impending update to devel/gettext
On Tuesday 30 January 2007 20:55, Beech Rintoul wrote: On Tuesday 30 January 2007 15:52, Ade Lovett wrote: Hi folks, I'm looking for some early adopters to try out an upgrade of devel/ gettext to 0.16.1 -- I've already built a few relatively large consumers of gettext which seem to be fine; the issues are much more likely to be run-time rather than compile-time, so a pointyhat -exp build is unlikely to be amazingly useful in terms of feedback. The patch can be found at http://people.FreeBSD.org/~ade/gettext.diff -- all the usual disclaimers apply in terms of blowing up your computer, setting fire to your house, eating your first-born and so on. Ideally I'd like to commit this in about two weeks or so. Please send any comments directly to me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, -aDe I can't get the patches to apply cleanly. can you provide a .tgz or a shar of the port, and I'll be happy to test it. Beech Never mind, my downloaad was corrupted. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gcc42 Build Error
I'm getting the following updating gcc42: gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc42/work/build/i386-portbld-freebsd7.0/libjava/classpath' Making all in lib gmake[4]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc42/work/build/i386-portbld-freebsd7.0/libjava/classpath/lib' true top_builddir=.. top_srcdir=../../../.././..//gcc-4.2-20070124/libjava/classpath /bin/sh ./gen-classlist.sh standard Adding java source files from srcdir '../../../.././..//gcc-4.2-20070124/libjava/classpath'. Adding java source files from VM directory /usr/ports/lang/gcc42/work/gcc-4.2-20070124/libjava Adding java source files from VM directory /usr/ports/lang/gcc42/work/build/i386-portbld-freebsd7.0/libjava Adding generated files in builddir '..'. gmake -f ../../../.././..//gcc-4.2-20070124/libjava/classpath/lib/Makefile.gcj \ GCJ='/usr/ports/lang/gcc42/work/build/gcc/gcj -B/usr/ports/lang/gcc42/work/build/i386-portbld-freebsd7.0/libjava/ -B/usr/ports/lang/gcc42/work/build/gcc/' \ compile_classpath='..:/usr/ports/lang/gcc42/work/gcc-4.2-20070124/libjava:/usr/ports/lang/gcc42/work/build/i386-portbld-freebsd7.0/libjava:../../../.././..//gcc-4.2-20070124/libjava/classpath:../../../.././..//gcc-4.2-20070124/libjava/classpath/external/w3c_dom:../../../.././..//gcc-4.2-20070124/libjava/classpath/external/sax:../../../.././..//gcc-4.2-20070124/libjava/classpath/external/relaxngDatatype:.::' \ top_srcdir=../../../.././..//gcc-4.2-20070124/libjava/classpath gmake[4]: *** [compile-classes] Killed: 9 gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc42/work/build/i386-portbld-freebsd7.0/libjava/classpath/lib' gmake[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc42/work/build/i386-portbld-freebsd7.0/libjava/classpath' gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc42/work/build/i386-portbld-freebsd7.0/libjava' gmake[1]: *** [all-target-libjava] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc42/work/build' gmake: *** [bootstrap-lean] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - Port Maintainer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --- pgpNQUGIXHPwe.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Looking for a maintainer for the Horde ports
On Thursday 25 January 2007 08:01, Shaun Amott wrote: Hi, I took over maintainership of the Horde family of ports some time ago, but I no longer have the time or inclination to look after them well. I'm looking for a new maintainer who is willing to keep them updated. They are relatively easy to maintain, other than the occasional VuXML entry which needs creating. The ports are: deskutils/kronolith deskutils/mnemo deskutils/nag devel/chora ftp/gollem mail/imp mail/ingo mail/turba www/horde www/horde-passwd If anyone is interested, let me know. Are these still up for grabs? Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - Port Maintainer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --- pgpNnEcLynBxR.pgp Description: PGP signature
autoconf problem
While building /ftp/proftpd, pointyhat running 5.5-STABLE reported the following: configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile config.status: creating mod_wrap2.h /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's:/usr/local/share/examples/proftpd:/usr/local:' /work/a/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc2/config.h /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's: -lnsl::' /work/a/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc2/Make.rules /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin:' -e 's:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:' /work/a/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc2/src/proftpd.8 /work/a/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc2/utils/ftpshut.8 /work/a/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc2/utils/ftpcount.1 === Building for proftpd-1.3.1.r2_1 cd . autoconf autoconf: not found gmake: *** [configure] Error 127 *** Error code 2 I'm not quite sure how to deal with this. Should I add it as a BUILD_DEPENDS, or USE_AUTOTOOLS? This problem doesn't show up on any local boxes I've tested on. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - Port Maintainer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --- pgpYUqzyYZDrh.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: autoconf problem
On Monday 22 January 2007 12:17, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 11:54:01AM -0900, Beech Rintoul wrote: While building /ftp/proftpd, pointyhat running 5.5-STABLE reported the following: configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile config.status: creating mod_wrap2.h /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's:/usr/local/share/examples/proftpd:/usr/local:' /work/a/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc2/config.h /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's: -lnsl::' /work/a/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc2/Make.rules /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin:' ?-e 's:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:' ? /work/a/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc2/src/proftpd.8 /work/a/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc2/utils/ftpshut.8 ? /work/a/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc2/utils/ftpcount.1 === ?Building for proftpd-1.3.1.r2_1 cd . autoconf autoconf: not found gmake: *** [configure] Error 127 *** Error code 2 I'm not quite sure how to deal with this. Should I add it as a BUILD_DEPENDS, or USE_AUTOTOOLS? This problem doesn't show up on any local boxes I've tested on. Typically means that you touched one of the autoconf input files, and the makefile noticed the output files were out of date and tried to regenerate them. Kris OK, so should I run autoconf before build? and should I list autoconf as a build depend? Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - Port Maintainer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --- pgpcuhJhdn0Ht.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: autoconf problem
On Monday 22 January 2007 17:49, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 04:39:57AM +0200, Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu wrote: On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:17:18 -0500 Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 11:54:01AM -0900, Beech Rintoul wrote: While building /ftp/proftpd, pointyhat running 5.5-STABLE reported the following: configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile config.status: creating mod_wrap2.h /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's:/usr/local/share/examples/proftpd:/usr/local:' /work/a/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc2/config.h /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's: -lnsl::' /work/a/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc2/Make.rules /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin:' ?-e 's:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:' ? /work/a/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc2/src/proftpd.8 /work/a/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc2/utils/ftpshut.8 ? /work/a/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc2/utils/ftpcount.1 === ?Building for proftpd-1.3.1.r2_1 cd . autoconf autoconf: not found gmake: *** [configure] Error 127 *** Error code 2 I'm not quite sure how to deal with this. Should I add it as a BUILD_DEPENDS, or USE_AUTOTOOLS? This problem doesn't show up on any local boxes I've tested on. Typically means that you touched one of the autoconf input files, and the makefile noticed the output files were out of date and tried to regenerate them. But why does it happen only on pointy ? I tested this on my box plus my i386 and amd64 tindys and I don't see this error. Dunno, might be a timing issue. e.g. if the files are created in the same second maybe gmake doesn't see they're OOD. PH builds with more I/O latency so they have different timestamps. Kris The only build difference that I see is the following line from pointy: cd . autoconf I don't see that on any of the test builds I did. Anyway, I'll add autoconf to the makefile to keep everybody happy :-) Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - Port Maintainer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --- pgpTERHBOq8Jd.pgp Description: PGP signature
portlint gettext warnings
I'm in the process of updating an orphaned port. Portlint reports about 25 of the following: WARN: /usr/ports/audio/beast/pkg-plist: [259]: installing gettext translation files, please define USE_GETTEXT as appropriate I added USE_GETTEXT= yes to the makefile, but it didn't help. What do I need to do to fix this warning? TIA, Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com --- pgpyeCUgbg2ZT.pgp Description: PGP signature
Strange linker error
I'm in the process of updating proftpd and I'm running into the following error: test -z || (cd locale/ gmake locale) /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=link cc -L./lib -L/usr/local/lib/mysql -L/usr/local/lib -o proftpd src/main.o src/timers.o src/sets.o src/pool.o src/table.o src/regexp.o src/dirtree.o src/support.o src/netaddr.o src/inet.o src/child.o src/parser.o src/log.o src/lastlog.o src/xferlog.o src/bindings.o src/netacl.o src/class.o src/scoreboard.o src/help.o src/feat.o src/netio.o src/response.o src/ident.o src/data.o src/modules.o src/display.o src/auth.o src/fsio.o src/mkhome.o src/ctrls.o src/event.o src/var.o src/trace.o src/utf8.o src/proctitle.o src/pidfile.o src/env.o modules/mod_core.o modules/mod_xfer.o modules/mod_auth_unix.o modules/mod_auth_file.o modules/mod_auth.o modules/mod_ls.o modules/mod_log.o modules/mod_site.o modules/mod_delay.o modules/mod_auth_pam.o modules/mod_ifsession.o modules/mod_sql_mysql.o modules/mod_sql.o modules/mod_wrap2.o modules/mod_rewrite.o modules/mod_readme.o modules/mod_ratio.o modules/module_glue.o -lm -lmysqlclient -lz -lpam @WRAP2_LIBS@ -lsupp -lcrypt -lutil cc -o proftpd src/main.o src/timers.o src/sets.o src/pool.o src/table.o src/regexp.o src/dirtree.o src/support.o src/netaddr.o src/inet.o src/child.o src/parser.o src/log.o src/lastlog.o src/xferlog.o src/bindings.o src/netacl.o src/class.o src/scoreboard.o src/help.o src/feat.o src/netio.o src/response.o src/ident.o src/data.o src/modules.o src/display.o src/auth.o src/fsio.o src/mkhome.o src/ctrls.o src/event.o src/var.o src/trace.o src/utf8.o src/proctitle.o src/pidfile.o src/env.o modules/mod_core.o modules/mod_xfer.o modules/mod_auth_unix.o modules/mod_auth_file.o modules/mod_auth.o modules/mod_ls.o modules/mod_log.o modules/mod_site.o modules/mod_delay.o modules/mod_auth_pam.o modules/mod_ifsession.o modules/mod_sql_mysql.o modules/mod_sql.o modules/mod_wrap2.o modules/mod_rewrite.o modules/mod_readme.o modules/mod_ratio.o modules/module_glue.o @WRAP2_LIBS@ -L/usr/ports/ftp/proftpd.new/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc2/lib -L/usr/local/lib/mysql -L/usr/local/lib /usr/local/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.so -lm -lz -lpam -lsupp -lcrypt -lutil -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib/mysql -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib/mysql cc: @WRAP2_LIBS@: No such file or directory gmake: *** [proftpd] Error 1 *** Error code 2 I can't find any reference to @WRAP2_LIBS@ anywhere. Anyone have a suggestion? The port and work directory can be found here: http://www.alaskaparadise.com/freebsd/proftpd.new.tgz Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PLIST_FILES question
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 23:09, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
Beech Rintoul schrieb:
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 13:43, you wrote:
Beech Rintoul schrieb:
Thanks to everyone who responded. I somehow missed that handbook
section, but I have it figured out now. What I needed to do is the
following:
.if defined(WITH_MYSQL)
USE_MYSQL=yes
MODULES:=${MODULES}:mod_sql:mod_sql_mysql
INCLUDEDIRS:=${INCLUDEDIRS}:${LOCALBASE}/include
LIBDIRS:=${LIBDIRS}:${LOCALBASE}/lib/mysql
PLIST_FILES= include/proftpd/mod_sql.h
.endif
The extra header file is not copied to include unless that option is
checked and hard coding it in pkg-plist broke the pkg build. It didn't
show up on pointyhat because that option is off by default.
Oh, do you want to mix PLIST_FILES and pkg-plist, did I catch it right?
That should not be done. You can list that file in pkg-plist as
%%MYSQL%%include/proftpd/mod_sql.h and do the following in Makefile:
if defined(WITH_MYSQL)
PLIST_SUB+= MYSQL=
[...another things here...]
.else
PLIST_SUB+= MYSQL=@comment
.endif
Look at e.g. security/amavisd-new, I do something similar there.
Regards,
Gabor
Thanks, It doesn't say anything in the handbook about not doing that and
it works. In the interest of being correct I'll try what you suggest.
Yep. PH doesn't say it, but portlint does. Maybe this should be noted in
PH as well.
That would be a good idea. I did change the Makefile and pkg-plist as you
suggested, but before doing so I ran portlint again and it did NOT complain
about using both pkg-plist and PLIST_FILES. The PH in the advanced section
would lead one to believe that it's acceptable to use both. I'm glad I
posted what I was trying to do, this release was rushed to address a security
issue and was a real pain to get all the options building correctly. I
definitely don't want to add problems on top of it. Anyway, thanks again for
your input.
Beech
--
---
Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310
X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501
/ \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com
---
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PLIST_FILES question
Can someone give me the proper syntax for PLIST_FILES in a port Makefile? The handbook isn't really clear on how to use it. TIA, Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PLIST_FILES question
Thanks to everyone who responded. I somehow missed that handbook section, but
I have it figured out now. What I needed to do is the following:
.if defined(WITH_MYSQL)
USE_MYSQL= yes
MODULES:=${MODULES}:mod_sql:mod_sql_mysql
INCLUDEDIRS:=${INCLUDEDIRS}:${LOCALBASE}/include
LIBDIRS:=${LIBDIRS}:${LOCALBASE}/lib/mysql
PLIST_FILES=include/proftpd/mod_sql.h
.endif
The extra header file is not copied to include unless that option is checked
and hard coding it in pkg-plist broke the pkg build. It didn't show up on
pointyhat because that option is off by default.
Beech
--
---
Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310
X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501
/ \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com
---
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: can't upgrade proftpd in FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE
On Monday 01 January 2007 02:28, Chris wrote: On 31/12/06, Beech Rintoul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 31 December 2006 06:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On all of my installations that have proftpd-1.3.0_5 I get the following error when attempting to upgrade to proftpd-1.3.1rc1. cc -o proftpd src/main.o src/timers.o src/sets.o src/pool.o src/table.o src/regexp.o src/dirtree.o src/support.o src/netaddr.o src/inet.o src/child.o src/parser.o src/log.o src/lastlog.o src/xferlog.o src/bindings.o src/netacl.o src/class.o src/scoreboard.o src/help.o src/feat.o src/netio.o src/response.o src/ident.o src/data.o src/modules.o src/display.o src/auth.o src/fsio.o src/mkhome.o src/ctrls.o src/event.o src/var.o src/trace.o src/utf8.o modules/mod_core.o modules/mod_xfer.o modules/mod_auth_unix.o modules/mod_auth_file.o modules/mod_auth.o modules/mod_ls.o modules/mod_log.o modules/mod_site.o modules/mod_delay.o modules/mod_auth_pam.o modules/mod_ifsession.o modules/mod_ldap.o modules/mod_wrap2.o modules/mod_rewrite.o modules/mod_readme.o modules/mod_ratio.o modules/module_glue.o -L/usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/lib -L/usr/local/lib -lsupp -lcrypt -lutil /usr/local/lib/libldap.so -lssl -lcrypto /usr/local/lib/liblber.so -lpam -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.t ext+ 0x5c5): In function `_getopt_internal': : undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.t ext+ 0x687): In function `_getopt_internal': : undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.t ext+ 0x8b1): In function `_getopt_internal': : undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.t ext+ 0xa3a): In function `_getopt_internal': : undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.t ext+ 0xa99): In function `_getopt_internal': : undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.t ext+ 0xb04): more undefined references to `libintl_gettext' follow gmake: *** [proftpd] Error 1 *** Error code 2 The reference to libintl_gettext has me comfused. Could I be missing a dependency? I have tryed compiling in ftp/proftpd, using portmaster and portupgrade and none seem to detect anything missing and all end as above. A couple of the boxes are running un to date current the rest are RELENG_6 and up to date with daily cvsup and build. My configuration includes: Use LDAP Include mod_ifsession Include mod_readme Include mod_ratio mod_rewrite mod_wrap2 All suggestions appreciated. That linker error was fixed and committed yesterday. Make sure you're building 1.3.1rc1_1. Beech (Maintainer) 1.3.1rc1_1 overwrites /usr/local/etc/proftpd.conf instead of making a dist file. Chris That problem has also been fixed and is waiting commit. Beech (Maintainer) -- --- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com --- pgpVSgZepanRr.pgp Description: PGP signature
Port deletes .conf file on update
ftp/proftpd deletes /usr/local/etc/proftpd.conf when updating. I thought I had
it fixed, but it continues to delete the config. Here's the section in the
makefile:
post-install:
[ -f ${PREFIX}/etc/proftpd.conf ] || \
${CP} ${EXAMPLESDIR}/etc/proftpd.conf
${PREFIX}/etc/proftpd.conf.sample
.if !defined(NOPORTDOCS)
@${MKDIR} ${PREFIX}/share/doc/proftpd
.for f in ${PORTDOCSdoc}
@${INSTALL_DATA} ${WRKSRC}/doc/${f} ${PREFIX}/share/doc/proftpd
.endfor
.for f in ${PORTDOCScontrib}
@${INSTALL_DATA} ${WRKSRC}/doc/contrib/${f} ${PREFIX}/share/doc/proftpd
.endfor
.endif
.if !defined(WITHOUT_PAM)
@${CAT} ${PKGMESSAGE}
.endif
.if defined(WITH_CTRLS)
@${INSTALL_PROGRAM} ${WRKSRC}/ftpdctl ${PREFIX}/sbin/ftpdctl
@${INSTALL_MAN} ${WRKSRC}/src/ftpdctl.8 ${PREFIX}/man/man8/ftpdctl.8
.endif
It creates proftpd.conf.sample properly, but then deletes proftpd.conf. BTW
proftpd.conf is not in the pkg-plist.
How do I fix this?
Beech (Maintainer)
--
---
Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310
X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501
/ \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com
---
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: can't upgrade proftpd in FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE
On Sunday 31 December 2006 06:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On all of my installations that have proftpd-1.3.0_5 I get the following error when attempting to upgrade to proftpd-1.3.1rc1. cc -o proftpd src/main.o src/timers.o src/sets.o src/pool.o src/table.o src/regexp.o src/dirtree.o src/support.o src/netaddr.o src/inet.o src/child.o src/parser.o src/log.o src/lastlog.o src/xferlog.o src/bindings.o src/netacl.o src/class.o src/scoreboard.o src/help.o src/feat.o src/netio.o src/response.o src/ident.o src/data.o src/modules.o src/display.o src/auth.o src/fsio.o src/mkhome.o src/ctrls.o src/event.o src/var.o src/trace.o src/utf8.o modules/mod_core.o modules/mod_xfer.o modules/mod_auth_unix.o modules/mod_auth_file.o modules/mod_auth.o modules/mod_ls.o modules/mod_log.o modules/mod_site.o modules/mod_delay.o modules/mod_auth_pam.o modules/mod_ifsession.o modules/mod_ldap.o modules/mod_wrap2.o modules/mod_rewrite.o modules/mod_readme.o modules/mod_ratio.o modules/module_glue.o -L/usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/lib -L/usr/local/lib -lsupp -lcrypt -lutil /usr/local/lib/libldap.so -lssl -lcrypto /usr/local/lib/liblber.so -lpam -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.text+ 0x5c5): In function `_getopt_internal': : undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.text+ 0x687): In function `_getopt_internal': : undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.text+ 0x8b1): In function `_getopt_internal': : undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.text+ 0xa3a): In function `_getopt_internal': : undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.text+ 0xa99): In function `_getopt_internal': : undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.text+ 0xb04): more undefined references to `libintl_gettext' follow gmake: *** [proftpd] Error 1 *** Error code 2 The reference to libintl_gettext has me comfused. Could I be missing a dependency? I have tryed compiling in ftp/proftpd, using portmaster and portupgrade and none seem to detect anything missing and all end as above. A couple of the boxes are running un to date current the rest are RELENG_6 and up to date with daily cvsup and build. My configuration includes: Use LDAP Include mod_ifsession Include mod_readme Include mod_ratio mod_rewrite mod_wrap2 All suggestions appreciated. That linker error was fixed and committed yesterday. Make sure you're building 1.3.1rc1_1. Beech (Maintainer) -- --- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ports/107221: [Maintainer Update] ftp/proftpd fixed linker errors
All errors that I could find have been fixed. The port is waiting for commit. If you don't want to wait the new port can be found here: http://www.alaskaparadise.com/freebsd/proftpd.tgz I would like to personally thank all those that helped me with this port. It's greatly appreciated. Beech (Maintainer) -- --- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com --- pgp2VzY4Ct5Ew.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Proftpd-user] proftpd build error
On Thursday 28 December 2006 11:15, Beech Rintoul wrote: I'm attempting to update the FreeBSD port of proftpd. While building the new mod_wrap2 I get the following error: gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/contrib/mod_wrap2' cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD7_0 -DFREEBSD7 -I. -I../.. -I../../include -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wall -c mod_wrap2.c In file included from mod_wrap2.h:35, from mod_wrap2.c:25: ../../include/conf.h:57:21: libintl.h: No such file or directory gmake[2]: *** [mod_wrap2.o] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/contrib/mod_wrap2' cp: ../contrib/mod_wrap2/mod_wrap2.o: No such file or directory gmake[1]: *** [static] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/modules' gmake: *** [modules] Error 2 *** Error code 2 I tried adding #include libintl.h to config.h, but it didn't help. That header is in the the path, what do I need to do to get mod_wrap2 to see it? I fixed the build with the following patches: --- contrib/mod_wrap2/Makefile.in.orig Wed Sep 6 15:11:47 2006 +++ contrib/mod_wrap2/Makefile.in Thu Dec 28 11:41:24 2006 @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ MODULE_NAME=mod_wrap2 # Necessary redefinitions -INCLUDES=-I. -I../.. -I../../include +INCLUDES=-I. -I../.. -I../../include -I/usr/local/include CPPFLAGS= -DHAVE_CONFIG_H $(DEFAULT_PATHS) $(PLATFORM) $(INCLUDES) LDFLAGS=-L../../lib --- lib/getopt.c.orig Thu Feb 28 10:30:01 2002 +++ lib/getopt.cTue Dec 26 13:39:53 2006 @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ # endif #endif -#ifndef _ +#if defined(PR_USE_NLS) !defined(_) /* This is for other GNU distributions with internationalized messages. When compiling libc, the _ macro is predefined. */ # ifdef HAVE_LIBINTL_H @@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ # else # define _(msgid) (msgid) # endif +#else +# define _(msgid) (msgid) #endif /* This version of `getopt' appears to the caller like standard Unix `getopt' That fixed earlier problems, but now I'm getting: cc -L./lib -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib -o ftptop utils/ftptop.o utils/scoreboard.o -lncurses -lsupp ./lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.text+0x5c5): In function `_getopt_internal': : undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' ./lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.text+0x687): In function `_getopt_internal': : undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' ./lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.text+0x8b1): In function `_getopt_internal': : undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' ./lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.text+0xa3a): In function `_getopt_internal': : undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' ./lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.text+0xa99): In function `_getopt_internal': : undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' ./lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.text+0xb04): more undefined references to `libintl_gettext' follow gmake: *** [ftptop] Error 1 *** Error code 2 I could use some help here. TIA, Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com --- pgpr2N7EtH7o5.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: FreeBSD Port: proftpd-1.3.1.r1 - Variable INCLUDEDIRS is recursive
On Monday 25 December 2006 18:44, Alexandr Smirnov wrote: Hi Beech! Have big problem! # $FreeBSD: ports/ftp/proftpd/Makefile,v 1.94 2006/12/21 22:13:40 miwi Exp $ # PORTNAME= proftpd DISTVERSION=1.3.1rc1 make Variable INCLUDEDIRS is recursive. Please show the output of make showconfig. Also I need to know what version you're building on. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com --- pgp7dZiSKAV4K.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: QT4
On Sunday 24 December 2006 03:53, Alex Samorukov wrote: I have a question about QT4. I use some programs, which are depends on QT4 toolkit. E.g. one of the best bittorrent clients - qbittorrent-0.8.0. I want to submit them to freebsd ports tree but i see no QT4 support. What i need to do to push this ports into the tree? You should contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (qt maintainers) and see if they're willing to commit a devel/qt4 port, otherwise you need to port it yourself. You would then submit your port as a pr. See the porter's handbook: /usr/share/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook for complete info on how to submit your port. -- --- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com --- pgpZEriYWW5sj.pgp Description: PGP signature
Config info
Can someone tell me where the config options for a port are actually stored? TIA Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com --- pgpAHCLOQr1rn.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Config info
On Saturday 23 December 2006 08:23, Bill Moran wrote: Beech Rintoul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can someone tell me where the config options for a port are actually stored? /var/db/ports/portname But the canonical way to adjust these is with make config in the port directory. -Bill Thanks, I'm not planning on an edit I just needed to check the file. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com --- pgpxGzxysKVWW.pgp Description: PGP signature
Sourcefile named differently than portname.
I'm working on a port upgrade where the sourcefile has a different name from the port. For example the port is called myport-6.2 but the distfile is called myportsrc. I used DISTNAME= myportsrc. in the makefile and the same in distinfo. It fetches correctly but when it tries to cd to the workfile it uses the port name instead of the DISTNAME and fails. How do I override this? Beech pgp2YlbEUdtCr.pgp Description: PGP signature
Sourcefile named differently than portname.
I'm working on a port upgrade where the sourcefile has a different name from the port. For example the port is called myport-6.2 but the distfile is called myportsrc. I used DISTNAME= myportsrc. in the makefile and the same in distinfo. It fetches correctly but when it tries to cd to the workfile it uses the port name instead of the DISTNAME and fails. How do I override this? Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com --- pgpUvwH1wnyx7.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Sourcefile named differently than portname.
On Monday 18 December 2006 11:05, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 10:35:09AM -0900, Beech Rintoul wrote:
I'm working on a port upgrade where the sourcefile has a different name
from the port. For example the port is called myport-6.2 but the distfile
is called myportsrc. I used DISTNAME= myportsrc. in the makefile and the
same in distinfo. It fetches correctly but when it tries to cd to the
workfile it uses the port name instead of the DISTNAME and fails. How do
I override this?
Set WRKSRC to ${WRKDIR}/${DISTNAME} or what ever is appropriate.
Thanks, That went right by me :-)
Beech
--
---
Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310
X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501
/ \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com
---
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
