Re: Dropbox on FreeBSD
For a small fee one can create an account at dropdav.com. Dropdav puts a WebDav interface in front of Dropbox. My client of choice is www/cadaver. YMMV -- Regards, Doug On Mar 5, 2013, at 13:41, Doug Hardie wrote: > > On 5 March 2013, at 11:20, Wojciech Puchar > wrote: > place. One was to eliminate multiple votes from the same IP I believe. >>> >>>Hrm. That sounds silly. The Dropbox voting actually encourages it's >> >> can anyone explain me what is so great in that software. >> >> got into webpage, and it looks like detailless advert just like plenty of >> others. >> >> Found that it "simplify sharing", get quite bored after trying to find out >> WHAT and HOW it actually provides. > > Yep its quite boring. However, it can provide a useful service. I use it to > transfer large audio files from a few people who are not strong computer > users and its very simple interface is easy for them to use. They will > actually remember how to use it and do it and there are clients available for > windows machines (which they all use). > > > > ___ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Question about the devel/subversion port
On Thu, May 28, 2009 09:20, Glen Barber wrote: > Hi, Doug > > On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Doug Poland > wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have a question about this port. If one wants a client only >> install, and one wants to use https as the communication protocol, >> does one choose the "static" config option? >> >> and was surprised to get a full installation of the apache >> webserver. I understand that libapr and libapr-util are required >> but is a full install of apache the only way to get those >> libraries? >> >> > > Subversion is one of those "you either have it or you don't" > situations, meaning that it doesn't differentiate between "server" > and "client." The 'svnserve' binary will be installed either way. > > As far as apr, there is a devel/apr-db42 port available (which, IIRC > negates the need to install a full apache instance). > > Either way, if you plan on using https, you will need apache20 at a > minimum (with openssl support). > Thanks for the explanation. What is the purpose of building a static binary? Are all the bits (neon, apr, svn) rolled into one binary? -- Regards, Doug ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Question about the devel/subversion port
Hello, I have a question about this port. If one wants a client only install, and one wants to use https as the communication protocol, does one choose the "static" config option? In my case I choose: WITHOUT_MOD_DAV_SVN=true WITH_APACHE2_APR=true WITHOUT_MOD_DONTDOTHAT=true WITH_NEON=true WITHOUT_SERF=true WITHOUT_SASL=true WITHOUT_BDB=true WITHOUT_ASVN=true WITHOUT_MAINTAINER_DEBUG=true WITHOUT_SVNSERVE_WRAPPER=true WITHOUT_STATIC=true WITHOUT_BOOK=true and was surprised to get a full installation of the apache webserver. I understand that libapr and libapr-util are required but is a full install of apache the only way to get those libraries? -- Regards, Doug ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: [Call For Testing] VirtualBox for FreeBSD! take2
On Sun, May 17, 2009 19:25, Greg Byshenk wrote: > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 08:09:20PM +0200, Martin Wilke wrote: >> >> We rolled a new tarball with the patch from Juergen Lock [1] >> with a posible fix for AMD64 users, tested on 3 machines >> which now works without problems. Many Thanks to him for >> his nice work! >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~miwi/vbox/virtualbox_2.tgz > Working for me with a fresh cvsup of 7.2-STABLE (17 May 09). Installing a 7.2-RELEASE amd64 guest as I write this. -- Regards, Doug ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Transferring ports
Ivan Voras wrote: On 20/03/2008, Doug Poland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 12:02:42AM +0300, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: >> * Ivan Voras ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >>> Is there a utility that would do that, and if not, does anyone have the >>> time to write one? >> Would this not be an appropriate use for packages? If one creates a package for every installed port on the "host" system, then one simply installs the package on the target system. Yes, that's exactly what I need (the same functionality as "pkg_create -b" + install on the other system), only without the actual package file being created. Pipes would also be acceptable (piping the output of pkg_create from one machine to the other, etc). > Too bad you cannot accept the package file. If pkg_create would accept a - instead of specifying the output tarball, then one could do some foo with nc, i.e., target# nc -l 1234 | tar -xf - source# pkg_create -b mypackage - | nc target 1234 -- Regards, Doug ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Transferring ports
Peter Pentchev wrote: On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 12:02:42AM +0300, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: * Ivan Voras ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Is there a utility that would do that, and if not, does anyone have the time to write one? >> Would this not be an appropriate use for packages? If one creates a package for every installed port on the "host" system, then one simply installs the package on the target system. I have used this technique with some success when "transferring" ports from one system to another. In my situation, I'm using the same architecture (i386) and OS version (6.3 --> 6.3 or 7.0 --> 7.0). -- Regards, Doug ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: apache 2.2.8 authdbm woes
On Sun, February 17, 2008 08:19, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 07:23:17AM -0600, Doug Poland wrote: >> Hello, > > You're likely suffering from this: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=119711 > > There were some recent changes to www/apache22 which specifically > addressed the above: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/www/apache22/Makefile > Thanks for the quick response. I've read the pr description (119711) but am still a little confused. I used the new Makefile options: make -DWITH_BDB -DWITH_BDB_BASE as mentioned in my OP. The really weird thing is apache-2.2.8 worked with AuthDBM for many tests, but then suddenly stopped working. Perhaps my base install of Berkeley DB is having issues reading .dat files generated from an earlier version? How would one diagnose this? Again, thanks for the help. -- Regards, Doug ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
apache 2.2.8 authdbm woes
Hello, For the past few days, I've been migrating a bunch of apache-1.3.41 vhosts to apache-2.2.8 (on the same machine, 6.3-RELEASE i386). Many of directories are protected with AuthType directives and I want to reuse the existing .dat files. After working successfully for more than a day with the original .dat files, apache-2.2.8 suddenly decides that format is not supported. Here's what the error log says: This function has not been implemented on this platform: could not open dbm (type DB) auth file: /usr/local/etc/apache22/auth/admin-passwords.dat I'm fairly certain that the beginning of the error messages coincided with the first modifications I made to the .dat files after copying them from /usr/local/etc/apache to /usr/local/etc/apache22. The syntax I used to modify the files were: dbmmanage admin-groups.dat add newAdminUser newAdminGroup dbmmanage admin-passwords.dat adduser newAdminUser I compiled apache-2.2.8 with the following options: make -DWITH_BDB -DWITH_BDB_BASE And have the following directives in the conf file: AuthType Basic AuthName "Authorized Users" AuthBasicProvider dbm AuthDBMType DB AuthDBMUserFile etc/apache22/auth/admin-passwords.dat AuthDBMGroupFile etc/apache22/auth/admin-groups.dat require group newAdminGroup In the apache-1.3.41 httpd.conf file, I used: AuthName "Authorized Users" AuthType Basic AuthDBUserFile /usr/local/etc/apache/admin-passwords.dat AuthDBGroupFile /usr/local/etc/apache/admin-groups.dat require group newAdminGroup This change in apache's behavior is very strange indeed. I tried copying the original .dat files and restarting apache, but to no avail. I also must admit that I'm a little confused between AuthDBM/AuthDB and and all the DBM/BDB options in FreeBSD's Make infrastructure Many thanks for your consideration and assistance. -- Regards, Doug ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Firefox 2.0.0.9 issues on 7.0-BETA3 (SOLVED)
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 10:21:19PM -0600, Doug Poland wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 09:33:17PM -0600, Doug Poland wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 07:11:44PM -0800, Mike Bowie wrote: > > > Doug Poland wrote: > > > >On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:29:38PM -0600, Doug Poland wrote: > > > > > > > >>Hello, > > > >> > > > >>I have a freshly installed 7.0-BETA3 i386 system and am having > > > >>issues with firefox 2.0.0.9. > > > >> > > > >>Upon launching /usr/local/bin/firefox from a command line I am > > > >>immediately returned a cursor with an error code of 1. > > > >> > > > >>% /usr/local/bin/firefox > > > >>% echo $? > > > >>1 > > > >> > > > >>I debugged both /usr/local/bin/firefox and > > > >>/usr/local/lib/firefox/run-mozilla.sh until I found the debugger > > > >>option, which I tried: > > > >> > > > >>/usr/local/lib/firefox/run-mozilla.sh -g > > > >>/usr/local/lib/firefox/firefox-bin -d gdb > > > >> > > > >># /usr/local/lib/firefox/run-mozilla.sh -g \ > > > >> /usr/local/lib/firefox/firefox-bin -d gdb > > > >> > > > >>MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=/usr/local/lib/firefox > > > >> > > > >> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox:/usr/local/lib/firefox/plugins:/usr/local/lib/browser_plugins:/usr/local/lib/browser_linux_plugins:/usr/local/lib/firefox > > > >>DISPLAY=:0.0 > > > >>DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox:/usr/local/lib/firefox > > > >> > > > >> LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox:/usr/local/lib/firefox/components:/usr/local/lib/firefox > > > >> SHLIB_PATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox:/usr/local/lib/firefox > > > >> LIBPATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox:/usr/local/lib/firefox > > > >> ADDON_PATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox > > > >> MOZ_PROGRAM=/usr/local/lib/firefox/firefox-bin > > > >> MOZ_TOOLKIT= > > > >>moz_debug=1 > > > >> moz_debugger= > > > >>/usr/bin/gdb /usr/local/lib/firefox/firefox-bin -x /tmp/mozargs.VoVJBX > > > >>GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] > > > >>Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > > >>GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and > > > >>you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under > > > >>certain conditions. > > > >>Type "show copying" to see the conditions. > > > >>There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for > > > >>details. > > > >>This GDB was configured as "i386-marcel-freebsd"...(no debugging > > > >>symbols found)... > > > >>(gdb) run > > > >>Starting program: /usr/local/lib/firefox/firefox-bin -d gdb > > > >>(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...[New LWP > > > >>100191] > > > >>(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no
Re: Firefox 2.0.0.9 issues on 7.0-BETA3
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 09:33:17PM -0600, Doug Poland wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 07:11:44PM -0800, Mike Bowie wrote: > > Doug Poland wrote: > > >On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:29:38PM -0600, Doug Poland wrote: > > > > > >>Hello, > > >> > > >>I have a freshly installed 7.0-BETA3 i386 system and am having issues > > >>with firefox 2.0.0.9. > > >> > > >>Upon launching /usr/local/bin/firefox from a command line I am > > >>immediately returned a cursor with an error code of 1. > > >> > > >>% /usr/local/bin/firefox > > >>% echo $? > > >>1 > > >> > > >>I debugged both /usr/local/bin/firefox and > > >>/usr/local/lib/firefox/run-mozilla.sh until I found the debugger > > >>option, which I tried: > > >> > > >>/usr/local/lib/firefox/run-mozilla.sh -g > > >>/usr/local/lib/firefox/firefox-bin -d gdb > > >> > > >># /usr/local/lib/firefox/run-mozilla.sh -g \ > > >> /usr/local/lib/firefox/firefox-bin -d gdb > > >> > > >>MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=/usr/local/lib/firefox > > >> > > >> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox:/usr/local/lib/firefox/plugins:/usr/local/lib/browser_plugins:/usr/local/lib/browser_linux_plugins:/usr/local/lib/firefox > > >>DISPLAY=:0.0 > > >>DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox:/usr/local/lib/firefox > > >> > > >> LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox:/usr/local/lib/firefox/components:/usr/local/lib/firefox > > >> SHLIB_PATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox:/usr/local/lib/firefox > > >> LIBPATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox:/usr/local/lib/firefox > > >> ADDON_PATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox > > >> MOZ_PROGRAM=/usr/local/lib/firefox/firefox-bin > > >> MOZ_TOOLKIT= > > >>moz_debug=1 > > >> moz_debugger= > > >>/usr/bin/gdb /usr/local/lib/firefox/firefox-bin -x /tmp/mozargs.VoVJBX > > >>GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] > > >>Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > >>GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and > > >>you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under > > >>certain conditions. > > >>Type "show copying" to see the conditions. > > >>There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for > > >>details. > > >>This GDB was configured as "i386-marcel-freebsd"...(no debugging > > >>symbols found)... > > >>(gdb) run > > >>Starting program: /usr/local/lib/firefox/firefox-bin -d gdb > > >>(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...[New LWP > > >>100191] > > >>(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...[New Thread > > >>0x29a01100 (LWP 100191)] > > >>(no debugging s
Re: Firefox 2.0.0.9 issues on 7.0-BETA3
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 07:11:44PM -0800, Mike Bowie wrote: > Doug Poland wrote: > >On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:29:38PM -0600, Doug Poland wrote: > > > >>Hello, > >> > >>I have a freshly installed 7.0-BETA3 i386 system and am having issues > >>with firefox 2.0.0.9. > >> > >>Upon launching /usr/local/bin/firefox from a command line I am > >>immediately returned a cursor with an error code of 1. > >> > >>% /usr/local/bin/firefox > >>% echo $? > >>1 > >> > >>I debugged both /usr/local/bin/firefox and > >>/usr/local/lib/firefox/run-mozilla.sh until I found the debugger > >>option, which I tried: > >> > >>/usr/local/lib/firefox/run-mozilla.sh -g > >>/usr/local/lib/firefox/firefox-bin -d gdb > >> > >># /usr/local/lib/firefox/run-mozilla.sh -g \ > >> /usr/local/lib/firefox/firefox-bin -d gdb > >> > >>MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=/usr/local/lib/firefox > >> > >> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox:/usr/local/lib/firefox/plugins:/usr/local/lib/browser_plugins:/usr/local/lib/browser_linux_plugins:/usr/local/lib/firefox > >>DISPLAY=:0.0 > >>DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox:/usr/local/lib/firefox > >> > >> LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox:/usr/local/lib/firefox/components:/usr/local/lib/firefox > >> SHLIB_PATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox:/usr/local/lib/firefox > >> LIBPATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox:/usr/local/lib/firefox > >> ADDON_PATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox > >> MOZ_PROGRAM=/usr/local/lib/firefox/firefox-bin > >> MOZ_TOOLKIT= > >>moz_debug=1 > >> moz_debugger= > >>/usr/bin/gdb /usr/local/lib/firefox/firefox-bin -x /tmp/mozargs.VoVJBX > >>GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] > >>Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > >>GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and > >>you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under > >>certain conditions. > >>Type "show copying" to see the conditions. > >>There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for > >>details. > >>This GDB was configured as "i386-marcel-freebsd"...(no debugging > >>symbols found)... > >>(gdb) run > >>Starting program: /usr/local/lib/firefox/firefox-bin -d gdb > >>(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...[New LWP > >>100191] > >>(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...[New Thread > >>0x29a01100 (LWP 100191)] > >>(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > >>debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > >>debugging symbols found)...[New LWP 100191] > >> > >>Program received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap. > >>[Switching to LWP 100191] > >>Cannot remove breakpoints because program is no longer writable. > >>It might be running in another process. > >>Further ex
Re: Firefox 2.0.0.9 issues on 7.0-BETA3
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:29:38PM -0600, Doug Poland wrote: > Hello, > > I have a freshly installed 7.0-BETA3 i386 system and am having issues > with firefox 2.0.0.9. > > Upon launching /usr/local/bin/firefox from a command line I am > immediately returned a cursor with an error code of 1. > > % /usr/local/bin/firefox > % echo $? > 1 > > I debugged both /usr/local/bin/firefox and > /usr/local/lib/firefox/run-mozilla.sh until I found the debugger > option, which I tried: > > /usr/local/lib/firefox/run-mozilla.sh -g > /usr/local/lib/firefox/firefox-bin -d gdb > > # /usr/local/lib/firefox/run-mozilla.sh -g \ > /usr/local/lib/firefox/firefox-bin -d gdb > > MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=/usr/local/lib/firefox > > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox:/usr/local/lib/firefox/plugins:/usr/local/lib/browser_plugins:/usr/local/lib/browser_linux_plugins:/usr/local/lib/firefox > DISPLAY=:0.0 > DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox:/usr/local/lib/firefox > > LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox:/usr/local/lib/firefox/components:/usr/local/lib/firefox >SHLIB_PATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox:/usr/local/lib/firefox > LIBPATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox:/usr/local/lib/firefox >ADDON_PATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox > MOZ_PROGRAM=/usr/local/lib/firefox/firefox-bin > MOZ_TOOLKIT= > moz_debug=1 > moz_debugger= > /usr/bin/gdb /usr/local/lib/firefox/firefox-bin -x /tmp/mozargs.VoVJBX > GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] > Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and > you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under > certain conditions. > Type "show copying" to see the conditions. > There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for > details. > This GDB was configured as "i386-marcel-freebsd"...(no debugging > symbols found)... > (gdb) run > Starting program: /usr/local/lib/firefox/firefox-bin -d gdb > (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...[New LWP > 100191] > (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...[New Thread > 0x29a01100 (LWP 100191)] > (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no > debugging symbols found)...[New LWP 100191] > > Program received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap. > [Switching to LWP 100191] > Cannot remove breakpoints because program is no longer writable. > It might be running in another process. > Further execution is probably impossible. > 0x2805c3e0 in ?? () from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 > > I did some googling but nothing interesting turned up. I find it > curious that the latest build of Thunderbird works, but linux-firefox > fails like it's native sibling. > > All help is appreciated... > Thought I'd try installing firefox 2.0.0.10,1 on the whim that it may fix my problem. No joy. BTW, how do I get debugging symbols for firefox so that I may further debug this? -- Regards, Doug ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: OpenOffice.org 2.2.1 package compile options
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 10:53:20PM +0200, Nikola Lecic wrote: > On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:48:52 -0500 (CDT) > "Doug Poland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > How can I tell if the package that is openoffice.org-2.2.1 has CUPS > > support compiled in? > > > > Traditionally, I've built OO.org from source to ensure I have CUPS > > enabled, but it'll save me a bunch of time if the package is already > > there. > > > As you see on > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=openoffice.org-2.2.1 > > CUPS (cups-base) is not listed as a dependency. > > Packages are always built with default options you can find in files > inside the ports tree, without alterations from /var/db/ports/*/options, > configuration files like /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf (for portupgrade), > etc. This means that OpenOffice package is (at this moment) built without > CUPS support because, according to what is stated in > /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2/, CUPS support has to be > explicitly requested, in which case it will be added as a dependency. > > Nikola Le??i?? > Thank you very much for that thorough explanation. -- Regards, Doug ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
OpenOffice.org 2.2.1 package compile options
Hello, How can I tell if the package that is openoffice.org-2.2.1 has CUPS support compiled in? Traditionally, I've built OO.org from source to ensure I have CUPS enabled, but it'll save me a bunch of time if the package is already there. -- Regards, Doug ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Time to kill FreeBSD as a Desktop
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 11:46:34PM +0200, Rico Secada wrote: > Hi All. > > I have been using FreeBSD as a desktop system, on serveral computers > for about one and a half year now. I truly love FreeBSD! But keeping > third party ports/packages updated is just to timeconsuming IMHO. > > Building everything from ports is ok, on a quick machine, but even on > a quick machine building KDE takes a LOT of time. Waiting until the > stable packages are ready takes about 2 - 3 weeks, and until then, a > lot of other stuff needs to be updated. > perhaps you'd like PC-BSD? -- Regards, Doug ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: GNUCash 2.0 port
On Thu, November 16, 2006 12:30, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On Thu, 2006-Nov-16 10:58:17 -0500, Frank J. Laszlo wrote: >>Please read the entire PR, including all comments. Most notably the >>last few on ports/93216. > > Hmmm. I was unaware of that port - I will have to see how it differs > to what I did. Thanks for the pointer. For Doug's benefit, my port > can be found at > http://members.optusnet.com.au/peterjeremy/gnucash2.tgz > Thanks Peter -- Regards, Doug ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: GNUCash 2.0 port
On Thu, November 16, 2006 09:58, Frank J. Laszlo wrote: > Doug Poland wrote: >>> >>> See ports/93216 and ports/94826. >>> >> Thank you. Those PR's relate to issues in the 1.9.x version of >> GnuCash. The post I'm referring to... >> > Please read the entire PR, including all comments. Most notably the > last few on ports/93216. > Thanks -- Regards, Doug ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: GNUCash 2.0 port
On Mon, November 13, 2006 19:20, Frank J. Laszlo wrote: > Doug Poland wrote: >> >> I was searching the list archives and came across a post by Peter >> Jeremy. He stated that he has a GNUCash 2.0 port. Does anyone know >> the status of the port? I couldn't find it querying the PR >> database. >> > See ports/93216 and ports/94826. > Thank you. Those PR's relate to issues in the 1.9.x version of GnuCash. The post I'm referring to (http://groups.google.com/group/mailing.freebsd.ports/browse_frm/thread/28080f3927305adc ) is where Peter Jeremy states he has port for rev 2.0.2 -- Regards, Doug ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
GNUCash 2.0 port
Hello, I was searching the list archives and came across a post by Peter Jeremy. He stated that he has a GNUCash 2.0 port. Does anyone know the status of the port? I couldn't find it querying the PR database. -- Regards, Doug ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
