Re: opera 12.11
On 27.11.2012 12:34, ajtiM wrote: Hi! Update to Opera 12.11 and Opera-Linuxplugins 12.11 from 12.10 on my FreeBSD 9.1 RC-3 doen't works anymore: opera libpng error: incorrect data check libpng error: incorrect data check libpng error: incorrect data check Segmentation fault (core dumped) It is quite a while since, but did you update your graphics/png properly? Please check /usr/ports/UPDATING 20120531 . Greetings Peter Thanks in advance. P.S. I used Clang to build Opera. Mitja http://www.redbubble.com/people/lumiwa ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Binary packages for releases and portupgrade
Am Mittwoch, den 06.01.2010, 16:24 -0500 schrieb Martin Cracauer: Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote on Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 09:43:21PM +0100: On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Martin Cracauer wrote: If there is a serious question WRT it does run in the Linux emulator that would be easy enough to test, I can just NFS-mount one of my diskless Debians. Today I started an experiment: I created a jail as a clean build enviroment for OOo. Yet it has installed 145 dependencies and not even started building OOo. And that worked (building in a jail I mean). - Just for the records. Uli. I expected nothing less. The Java requirement is particularly annoying on FreeBSD. And all that do get a Powerpoint clone with drunker mouse pointer syndrome written in tcl... Martin ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Binary packages for releases and portupgrade
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Martin Cracauer wrote: So the verdict is to hunt down OpenOffice packages manually and install them so that portupgrade ignores them, then go from there. ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-stable/ seems to have what `portupgrade -P` should expect, right? So I wouldn't have to move from stable to release+sec. I wonder if people who succeed in building OOo (happens about twice a year to me) could put their packages on some kind of ftp server. From their mailing list I get the impression OOo-porting team could need all kind of help. Greetings Uli. Martin -- %%% Martin Cracauer craca...@cons.org http://www.cons.org/cracauer/ FreeBSD - where you want to go, today. http://www.freebsd.org/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | Wuppertal | Germany ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Binary packages for releases and portupgrade
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Martin Cracauer wrote: Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote on Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 08:46:38PM +0100: On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Martin Cracauer wrote: So the verdict is to hunt down OpenOffice packages manually and install them so that portupgrade ignores them, then go from there. ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-stable/ seems to have what `portupgrade -P` should expect, right? So I wouldn't have to move from stable to release+sec. I wonder if people who succeed in building OOo (happens about twice a year to me) could put their packages on some kind of ftp server. From their mailing list I get the impression OOo-porting team could need all kind of help. Might be easier to just slam a Debian into a chroot. How do chroot and Linuxulator play together, anyway? Can I have a random-Linux in /compat/linux and then have a different one in /compat/linux/var/chroot/debian ? Alternatively I could just leave this poor notebook alone WRT building and run the same FreeBSD on one of my beefier machines to build binary packages and share the successes. Would probably involve two complete installations, one with a ports tree that only ever builds OO (and pulls in it's dependencies but nothing else). If you manage to install OOo in Linuxolator, please publish some kind of HOWTO... Today I started an experiment: I created a jail as a clean build enviroment for OOo. Yet it has installed 145 dependencies and not even started building OOo. Greetings Uli. Martin -- %%% Martin Cracauer craca...@cons.org http://www.cons.org/cracauer/ FreeBSD - where you want to go, today. http://www.freebsd.org/ | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | Wuppertal | Germany ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Binary packages for releases and portupgrade
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, Martin Cracauer wrote: Doug Barton wrote on Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 01:58:57PM -0800: Martin Cracauer wrote: It's time to bite the bullet. My 1.3 GHz Pentium-M Notebook just can't keep up with the port building. I need OpenOffice and stuff and the party is really over at that point. I need something with binary packages. Do I understand that correctly if I run 8.0 release I get to have prebuilt binaries as recognized by portupgrade? Well, 8-release or 8-stable should both be fine for this purpose, for most packages, with portupgrade or portmaster. My understanding is that we've given up trying to produce packages for openoffice on all branches. Are you saying there are binary packages for 8-stable? I thought I can only have them for -RELEASE? What happens to the minor security updates? Can I follow TRELENG_8_0 and port portsupgrade recognize this as something that uses 8-release binary packages? RELENG_8_0 is _exactly_ 8.0-RELEASE, and will never change. If you want 8-stable, RELENG_8 is the way to go. Otherwise you will need to update the tag each time a new security branch is created. RELENG_8 will lift be out of binary ports, at least as far as portupgrade is concerned. RELENG_8_0 will have emergency fixes AFAIK and I was hoping that I could run that and make portupgrade to the right thing (recognize the binary packages a insert them appropriately). If we have binary packages for 8-stable and/or if I can coerce portupgrade to use 8-release packages on 8-stable that would be fine, too. Martin Have a look at porting.openoffice.org/freebsd . You will find something that works for you. Greetings Uli. -- %%% Martin Cracauer craca...@cons.org http://www.cons.org/cracauer/ FreeBSD - where you want to go, today. http://www.freebsd.org/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | Wuppertal | Germany ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Binary packages for releases and portupgrade
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, John Hay wrote: On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 11:37:00PM +0100, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote: On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, Martin Cracauer wrote: Doug Barton wrote on Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 01:58:57PM -0800: Martin Cracauer wrote: It's time to bite the bullet. My 1.3 GHz Pentium-M Notebook just can't keep up with the port building. I need OpenOffice and stuff and the party is really over at that point. I need something with binary packages. Do I understand that correctly if I run 8.0 release I get to have prebuilt binaries as recognized by portupgrade? Well, 8-release or 8-stable should both be fine for this purpose, for most packages, with portupgrade or portmaster. My understanding is that we've given up trying to produce packages for openoffice on all branches. Are you saying there are binary packages for 8-stable? I thought I can only have them for -RELEASE? What happens to the minor security updates? Can I follow TRELENG_8_0 and port portsupgrade recognize this as something that uses 8-release binary packages? RELENG_8_0 is _exactly_ 8.0-RELEASE, and will never change. If you want 8-stable, RELENG_8 is the way to go. Otherwise you will need to update the tag each time a new security branch is created. RELENG_8 will lift be out of binary ports, at least as far as portupgrade is concerned. RELENG_8_0 will have emergency fixes AFAIK and I was hoping that I could run that and make portupgrade to the right thing (recognize the binary packages a insert them appropriately). If we have binary packages for 8-stable and/or if I can coerce portupgrade to use 8-release packages on 8-stable that would be fine, too. Martin Have a look at porting.openoffice.org/freebsd . You will find something that works for you. It depends on what you have. Say you have 8.0 i386 or even 7.2 i386. No binaries for you there then. I have to admit, I have got an amd64. But you might be able to run the 7.1 -STABLE version with misc/compat7 installed. Did you try? Greetings Uli John -- John Hay -- j...@meraka.csir.co.za / j...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | Wuppertal | Germany ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Why so many ports still depend on firefox-2.X.X.X ?
Am Sonntag, den 26.04.2009, 20:43 +0200 schrieb army.of.root: Renato Botelho wrote: On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote: I see that ImageMagick, gimp, gimp-apps, inkscape, gnucash, etc depend on firefox-2. Why they aren't switched to firefox-3? You can change gecko engine with WITH_GECKO, if you want to use libxul, the one firefox3 uses, just use: WITH_GECKO=libxul Hi, could I just add WITH_GECKO=libxul to my make.conf and all the ports would still work? You will have to rebuild the ports depending on firefox2. I just installed gnome2-lite on my notebook and it demands firefox2! - gnome2, gnome2-lite, gnome2-office can live with libxul instead of firefox2. I believe in gnome2-fifth-toe there is still some dependency on firefox left (galeon p.ex.) Greetings Uli. I removed epiphany and yelp from the parent Makefile (normal gnome) and it went away. best regards :) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: HEADS UP: GNOME 2.26 available for FreeBSD
Hi, Am Freitag, den 10.04.2009, 02:12 -0400 schrieb Joe Marcus Clarke: GNOME 2.26 has been merged into the ports tree. See http://library.gnome.org/misc/release-notes/2.26/ for a list of what's new. On the FreeBSD front, we introduced a port of libxul 1.9 as an alternative for Firefox 2.0 as a Gecko provider. Almost all of the Gecko consumers can make use of this provider by setting: WITH_GECKO=libxul I see galeon-2.0.7 (via gnome2-fifth-toe) offers option xulrunner not libxul. With your setting WITH_GECKO=libxul it will use firefox instead. Greeetings, Uli. Joe ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: is anyone working on a openjdk port
matt donovan schrieb: I been thinking about making it but if someone already started I won't I just not had the time at the moment to start it since it'll be good to have in the port tree even if it needs a java installed to bootstrap it There already is a java/openjdk6 port in the tree and there was some email traffic about openjdk7 . Greetings Uli. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
question/request regarding lang/python30 and x11-toolkits/py-tkinter
Hi! Is there any special reason why py-tkinter doesn't support python30? Mind: This is no vital problem, I only would like to use idle with python30 . Greetings and thanks Uli. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Xorg disaster
Lars Eighner schrieb: Xorg upgrade (gory details follow) went south. I must have a working graphics browser by Monday. This is pretty much *vital*, as in a matter of survival. What is the fastest and/or surest way to get a platform that will run firefox or opera? a. try to get my nvidia hardware to work with a generic (vesa or vga) driver? b. try to downgrade Xorg to something that worked. Deinstall the nvidia driver and try a. first. Chances are high you will have something usable. If that doesn't work: do b. . Good Luck! Uli. Hints on either course would be appreciated. What happened: upgraded system from 7.1 prerelease to 7.1 release p2. cvsupped the ports tree. Upgraded Xorg and nvidia-driver (after upgrading perl and everything portupgrade -fr perl5.8 will upgrade (as the script failed miserably). This was after 20090124 when the mouse problem was supposed to be fixed. What happens: first there is something undefined in nvidia's libwfb so I changed the symbolic link to point to Xorg's version of the lib. That message went away, but there are tons of Generic Event Extension missing messages and no mouse --- what is more the accessibility keypad mouse thing doesn't work at all. I can't pay my bills and I can't get to another computer to use someone else's browser to do it. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: java/linux-sun-jdk16 distfile isn't available anymore
matt donovan schrieb: On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Peter Ulrich Kruppa ulr...@pukruppa.netwrote: Hi, I just tried to install java/linux-sun-jdk16 . The required file jdk-6u10-linux-i586.bin isn't available anymore. Latest version would be jdk-6u12-linux-i586.bin . Greetings Uli. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org It's hre https://cds.sun.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/WFS/CDS-CDS_Developer-Site/en_US/-/USD/viewproductdetail-start?productref=jdk-6u10-oth-...@cds-cds_developer Thanks, Uli. freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
java/linux-sun-jdk16 distfile isn't available anymore
Hi, I just tried to install java/linux-sun-jdk16 . The required file jdk-6u10-linux-i586.bin isn't available anymore. Latest version would be jdk-6u12-linux-i586.bin . Greetings Uli. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: gnome-power-manager fails to build
Eduardo Cerejo schrieb: Trying to build this port on FreeBSD 7.1 release but it fails either using just make or portupgrade, I cvsuped my ports twice in the last two days to no avail. file=`echo tr | sed 's,.*/,,'`.gmo \ rm -f $file /usr/local/bin/msgfmt -o $file tr.po file=`echo uk | sed 's,.*/,,'`.gmo \ rm -f $file /usr/local/bin/msgfmt -o $file uk.po file=`echo vi | sed 's,.*/,,'`.gmo \ rm -f $file /usr/local/bin/msgfmt -o $file vi.po file=`echo zh_CN | sed 's,.*/,,'`.gmo \ rm -f $file /usr/local/bin/msgfmt -o $file zh_CN.po file=`echo zh_HK | sed 's,.*/,,'`.gmo \ rm -f $file /usr/local/bin/msgfmt -o $file zh_HK.po file=`echo zh_TW | sed 's,.*/,,'`.gmo \ rm -f $file /usr/local/bin/msgfmt -o $file zh_TW.po gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/sysutils/gnome-power-manager/wo rk/gnome-power-manager-2.24.3/po' Making all in docs gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/sysutils/gnome-power-manager/w ork/gnome-power-manager-2.24.3/docs' gmake[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/sysutils/gnome-power-manager/wo rk/gnome-power-manager-2.24.3/docs' Making all in man gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/sysutils/gnome-power-manager/w ork/gnome-power-manager-2.24.3/man' docbook2man gnome-power-manager.sgml gnome-power-manager.1 gmake[2]: *** [gnome-power-manager.1] Error 8 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/sysutils/gnome-power-manager/wo rk/gnome-power-manager-2.24.3/man' ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade.1 8830.0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=gnome-power-manager-2. 22.1_2 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=2.22.1_2 make ** Fix the problem and try again. ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) ! sysutils/gnome-power-manager (gnome-power-manager-2.22.1_2)(u nknown build error) This problem is dicussed at gn...@freebsd.org mailing list now. I am afraid we will have to wait what gnome porting team finds out. Greetings, Uli. Any idea what might be causing this? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
