Re: Looking for commiter: security update for databases/percona56-server

2019-07-09 Thread Sergey Akhmatov

On 05/04/2019 10:13, Kubilay Kocak wrote:

On 4/04/2019 3:47 am, Sergey Akhmatov wrote:

Hello,

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235930

More than month without maintainer feedback on security update:
https://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/freebsd/d3d02d3a-2242-11e9-b95c-b499baebfeaf.html 



Can it be commited?


See also:

databases/percona57-{server,client} update to 5.7.25-28 (fixes several 
vulnerabilities)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236570
maintainer: feld (CC'd)

There is no bug report or patches for databases/percona55-{server,client}
maintainer: flo (CC'd)


I'd like to rise the issue again: the bug with fixes for security 
vulnerabilities documented in vuxml remains unattended since February - 
nearly half a year. Unfortunately it seems like @flo does not maintain 
it anymore.


First of all I want to ask again to commit the patch due to maintainer 
timeout.


And the second question I'd like to solve is the fate of the ports 
maintainership: Is it possible to reach @flo to be sure if he is willing 
to maintain his ports? Maybe the current maintainer of databases/mysql* 
could adopt them, which seems reasonable because they have common 
ancestry. Otherwise I'd like to adopt the port myself.


___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Looking for commiter: security update for databases/percona56-server

2019-04-03 Thread Sergey Akhmatov

Hello,

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235930

More than month without maintainer feedback on security update:
https://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/freebsd/d3d02d3a-2242-11e9-b95c-b499baebfeaf.html

Can it be commited?

Thank you.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Problems with make fetchindex on FreeBSD-10

2018-07-17 Thread Sergey Akhmatov

On 16.07.2018 21:38, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote:


I get this error message if I do "make fetchindex" on FreeBSD-10.

Certificate verification failed for /C=US/O=Let's Encrypt/CN=Let's
Encrypt Authority X3
675258712:error:14090086:SSL
routines:SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE:certificate verify
failed:/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../crypto/openssl/ssl/s3_clnt.c:1191:
fetch: https://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/INDEX-10.bz2: Authentication error

Is this an error at my end or yours?  I have been successfully doing
"make fetchindex" for many years from this same computer.

Site for INDEX downloads moved from HTTP to HTTPS here: 
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision=460340
Try installing security/ca_root_nss either from ports, or by pkg install 
ca_root_nss, it should fix you problem automatically.


This package contains collection of trusted root certificates used to 
verify server certificates.

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Maintainership revocation due to unavaliable email

2018-07-10 Thread Sergey Akhmatov

Hello,

I've had problems with my e-mail - it was unavailable for some time, and 
found out that it caused maintainership revocation for my ports in r473941.


I'm willing to take it back. Should I issue PR on this?

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Help with porting carbon-c-relay.

2018-03-26 Thread Sergey Akhmatov

Try adding:

CPPFLAGS+=  -I${LOCALBASE}/include
LDFLAGS+=   -L${LOCALBASE}/lib

CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--with-lz4=yes


On 26/03/2018 13:17, Andreas Andersson wrote:

First of, with this Makefile the port is functional. It's just that it
lacks the ability to compress data sent between two carbon-c-relay's.

According to config.log it does set both prefix and includedir, yet it is
unable to find lz4.h.

I'm kind of new to porting stuff using autoconf and such , therefor any
hints or advice would be appreciated.

I am including the Makefile I have at this point.


/Andreas


___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Can't makepatch to a port (graphics/py-gdal)

2018-01-19 Thread Sergey Akhmatov



On 19/01/2018 09:01, L.Bartoletti wrote:

Hi,

A dummy question, but, I haven't be able to make a simple patch to a 
port (graphics/py-gdal).


My patch (using diff -u) is:

   --- swig/include/gdal_array.i.orig  2018-01-19
   06:46:50.571482000 +0100
   +++ swig/include/gdal_array.i   2018-01-19 06:46:50.571393000 +0100
   @@ -1065,6 +1065,7 @@

     %pythoncode %{
     import numpy
   +from . import _gdal_array

     import gdalconst
     import gdal

> make makepatch

produces nothing

running the "make patch", I got

===>  Patching for py27-gdal-2.2.3
===>  Applying FreeBSD patches for py27-gdal-2.2.3
File to patch:

and unable to apply the patch.

Any hint?


Hello/

The port has
WRKSRC_SUBDIR=  swig/python

Everything, including 'make patch' is running inside this dir. 
swig/include is not there.

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: pkg search dependency tree

2018-01-14 Thread Sergey Akhmatov



I got off-list reply on how to achieve this with locally installed
packages, by using `pkg prime-origins', which is apparently an alias to
the command you suggested.

It will solve my problem, as I have no more than 20 servers using this
repo, I just need to run the command on all of them and uniq the output.

But it would be nice if I could do this for all the packages in repo,
and not just for packages installed locally on each server.
You could use  "pkg rquery", which handles requests agains remote repo 
database.
It features less request types than "pkg query" against local packages 
database,

but I hope it could give some help for you problem. E.g. you could use:
% pkg rquery '%o - %?r'
to get list of packages with a number of reverse dependencies and 
consider the ones with zero

reverse dependencies as 'top level'.
'man pkg-rquery' may give some other hints.


___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Keeping your Poudriere dry!

2017-12-12 Thread Sergey Akhmatov



On 12.12.2017 18:29, blubee blubeeme wrote:

Apologize for the ignorance but I just ran a testport and things seemingly
went well until I tried to update my ports tree, then I get this error:
  sudo poudriere ports -u -p HEAD
[00:00:00] Error: Ports tree "HEAD" is currently mounted and being used.

mount command shows this
-
zroot/poudriere on /zroot/poudriere (zfs, local, noatime, nfsv4acls)
zroot/poudriere/data on /usr/local/poudriere/data (zfs, local, noatime,
nfsv4acls)

...


so there's a lot of poudriere stuff still mounted. I can't figure out how
to umount that stuff.
How can manually umount the PORTS tree mounted by a poudriere job?

It happend to me if poudriere job was aborted unexpectedly before doing 
cleanup.

Try checking if some poudriere jails are running:
$ jls

Then try stopping them:
# poudriere jail -j  -k
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


What is the preferred MASTER_SITES for python port?

2017-12-11 Thread Sergey Akhmatov

Hello.

Suppose I want to port some python package that exists in the Python 
Package Index (PyPI) and has it's source code available on some official 
website or github.


Is there any policy or recommended practice for choosing MASTER_SITES? 
Should I use "USE_GITHUB=yes" or "MASTER_SITES= CHEESESHOP" for such 
package?


I've looked for the answer in Porters Handbook and at 
https://wiki.freebsd.org/Python/PortsPolicy but haven't found it.


Thank you.

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"