Re: [freebsd-ports] astro/boinc-einsteinathome outdated
[added CC: to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as maintaner of setiathome] Peter Jeremy writes: I notice that [EMAIL PROTECTED] have stopped generating S5R3 workunits and a new client is needed to handle the new S5R4 workunits. Do you have any plans to upgrade the port? I am also no longer receiving work units for setiathome sine ~48 hours after the upgrade. The log records: Sun Aug 17 10:29:21 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. Requesting 30240 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks Sun Aug 17 10:29:26 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks Sun Aug 17 10:29:26 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message from server: platform 'i386-portbld-freebsd' not found Sun Aug 17 10:29:26 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Generated new host CPID: 74bc297439f0b96b87b1dd2cbb3b3d41 Even though you hijacked the thread, can you mention WHAT you upgraded? boinc-setiathome? boinc-setiathome-enhanced? boinc-setiathome-naparst? Did you switch from 1 to another? What is the contents of your /var/db/boinc/projects/setiathome.berkeley.edu/app_info.xml file? Tuc ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SETI/BOINC problems
Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET writes: Even though you hijacked the thread, can you mention WHAT you upgraded? Which was not the intention. pav is the listed aintainer for boinc-client, which was upgraded within the last seven days. I do not believe boinc-setiathome-enhanced (my only boinc client) has been upgraded for about 10 weeks. boinc-setiathome? boinc-setiathome-enhanced? boinc-setiathome-naparst? Did you switch from 1 to another? What is the contents of your /var/db/boinc/projects/setiathome.berkeley.edu/app_info.xml file? huff@ more /var/db/boinc/projects/setiathome.berkeley.edu/app_info.xml /var/db/boinc/projects/setiathome.berkeley.edu/app_info.xml: No such file or directory So whats under /var/db/boinc/projects? It should have something to the tune of setiathome.berkeley.edu . Usually I've seen that error when there wasn't an app_info.xml to tell the server not to identify me as freebsd, but an anonymous platform. Then again, I'm still running on boinc-client-5.10.32_2 (X11 enabled, ALT disabled). It looks like the system may have also given your computer a new identifier. If you go onto the SETI website, do you see anything about the same computer with different information? BTW: My help isn't to supplant Rene or Pav, just trying to help out on things I am not totally cluefully impaired about. (And the fact *I've* bugged them both enough about things so trying to help out where I can. ;) ) Tuc ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freebsd-ports] FreeBSD Port: DarwinStreamingServer-5.5.5
DSS 6.0 has been released: http://dss.macosforge.org Please update the port for the new version. This has been a widely anticipated update with many new features and fixes. When you contacted nork, what'd he say about it? Has he worked on the porting, tested, and been able to create diffs since it was released? Maybe he's a bit confused by the fact that http://developer.apple.com/opensource/server/streaming/index.html still claims the official release to be 5.5.5, and isn't sure if he wants to make a devel port, wait until it becomes official, etc. Have you attempted to just compile from source and share with him your findings? Tuc ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
portupgrade changed operation?
Hi, Using portupgrade 2.4.1 (2008/01/29). I have 509 packages, and a 1/2 dozen in HOLD_PKG. I went to run it today, and oddly it started doing things like : [Gathering depends for textproc/php5-xml done] [Gathering depends for archivers/php5-zlib .. done] [Gathering depends for ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel . done] [Gathering depends for net-mgmt/rancid . done] ruby-1.8.6,1 is in HOLD_PKG. Ignored. [Gathering depends for x11/xdm done] [Gathering depends for x11/xterm ... done] [Gathering depends for shells/zsh .. done] It didn't do it for all 509 packages though... The next thing it did was : --- Skipping 'www/apache13' because a requisite port 'lang/perl5.8' failed (specify -k to force) But I *DO* want apache upgraded, even if I have perl5.8 in HOLD_PKG. It is behaving properly? Thanks, Tuc ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
autoconf install not playing well?
Hi, I'm going through upgrading 1/2 a zillion ports on a machine, and while I was doing it all of a sudden I got notification the server was not responding. It seems /usr/local/bin/perl no longer existed. I went and checked my /usr/local/bin and only found : asgard# ls autoconf-2.53 autom4te-2.53 autoscan-2.53 ifnames-2.53 autoheader-2.53 autoreconf-2.53 autoupdate-2.53 The other thing I noticed is that there were 3 other directories that seemed ONLY to have autoconf stuff: info, man, share It seems it took my soft links that I used for all those directories, deleted them, created new directories, and installed the software. Can anyone verify this? If so, WHY? Why would it care? I'll spend the time re-copying all the files over where they belong and continue on my upgrade... Thanks, Tuc ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freebsd-ports] autoconf install not playing well? (more info)
Hi, I'm going through upgrading 1/2 a zillion ports on a machine, and while I was doing it all of a sudden I got notification the server was not responding. It seems /usr/local/bin/perl no longer existed. I went and checked my /usr/local/bin and only found : asgard# ls autoconf-2.53 autom4te-2.53 autoscan-2.53 ifnames-2.53 autoheader-2.53 autoreconf-2.53 autoupdate-2.53 The other thing I noticed is that there were 3 other directories that seemed ONLY to have autoconf stuff: info, man, share It seems it took my soft links that I used for all those directories, deleted them, created new directories, and installed the software. Can anyone verify this? If so, WHY? Why would it care? I'll spend the time re-copying all the files over where they belong and continue on my upgrade... Thanks, Tuc I cleaned things up, re-ran portupgrade, and saw exactly what it did It asks if I want to upgrade 2.53 to 2.61, so I say YES. Goes about its business then : --- Uninstallation of autoconf-2.53_4 ended at: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 17:22:31 -0500 (consumed 00:00:03) --- Installation of devel/autoconf261 started at: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 17:22:31 -0500 --- Installing the new version via the port === Installing for autoconf-2.61_2 === autoconf-2.61_2 depends on executable: gm4 - found === autoconf-2.61_2 depends on executable: autoconf-wrapper - found === autoconf-2.61_2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.8 - found === Generating temporary packing list === Checking if devel/autoconf261 already installed === autoconf-2.61_2 is already installed You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. If you really wish to overwrite the old port of devel/autoconf261 without deleting it first, set the variable FORCE_PKG_REGISTER in your environment or the make install command line. *** Error code 1 (deleted) --- Modifying /var/db/pkg/zsh-4.3.4_1/+CONTENTS --- Restoring the old version --- Removing old package' ** Fix the installation problem and try again. --- Installation of devel/autoconf261 ended at: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 17:22:42 -0500 (consumed 00:00:10) --- Upgrade of devel/autoconf261 ended at: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 17:22:42 -0500 (consumed 00:01:16) So it doesn't look like autoconf maybe itself, but the Restoring the old version phase. Where to go from here? I see in UPDATING : 20070930: AFFECTS: everyone AUTHOR: Mark Linimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] The ports tree has been migrated to the latest version of autoconf, 2.61. Versions 2.53 and 2.59 were declared obsolete and removed. is it that the ports system doesn't know how to handle this change? How do I tell the system to consider that I don't have 2.53 anymore, just delete /var/db/pkg/autoconf-2.53_4 ? (I also have autoconf-2.59_3, how to do the same for that?) Thanks, Tuc ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: autoconf install not playing well? (more info)
[...] How do I tell the system to consider that I don't have 2.53 anymore, just delete /var/db/pkg/autoconf-2.53_4 ? (I also have autoconf-2.59_3, how to do the same for that?) Thanks, Tuc pkg_delete(1) would be a far more elegant solution to that question. -Garrett Ooopsie. I did a pkgdb -Fu .. Its unregistered... But I must not have answered a question right and it saved the files and put the +CONTENTS into autoconf-2.61_2. So now how to fix THIS screwup? Thanks, Tuc ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: for Thomas E. Zander, mplayer maintainer.
Distributed, worldwide projects like FreeBSD rely on communication between their members. When one project member in a position of responsibility denies the ability for others to contact him -- whether it was his direct choice or just because he chooses to use a mail server with inappropriate filtering -- then it harms the project. Kris, FWIW, I think when someone posts a request for help onto a list, gets back a dozen Did you RTFM either on list or offlist, replies back that they did (And shows they did), and then gets dead air.. THAT harms the project. Tuc ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: for Thomas E. Zander, mplayer maintainer.
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:58:04AM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: Distributed, worldwide projects like FreeBSD rely on communication between their members. When one project member in a position of responsibility denies the ability for others to contact him -- whether it was his direct choice or just because he chooses to use a mail server with inappropriate filtering -- then it harms the project. Kris, FWIW, I think when someone posts a request for help onto a list, gets back a dozen Did you RTFM either on list or offlist, replies back that they did (And shows they did), and then gets dead air.. THAT harms the project. Uh, you seem to be axe grinding, but I told you to follow up with the maintainer once I evaluated your report and didn't spot any obvious problems. Why wasn't that good enough for you? If you mean axe grinding in the sense that over the years I've posted to freebsd-* for help with things pertaining to either a single piece of software, procedure I read somewhere, problem during an upgrade, etc... and either been blown off, told to re-read the docs that I've missed a crucial step (Which I stated that I did perform in my original email), or told to fix something ELSE that had nothing to do with it first... Then yea, I guess you can call it axe grinding. If your talking about the most recent interaction you/I had about portupgrade and +CONTENTS, thats a dead issue to me once others said they saw it too. (Yea, its annoying as all hell especially on a filesystem where every read/write is precious, but I'll get over it, and if I can't, I will follow the sage advice to CTFPM). And hey, yea, it was f'n good enough for me, so thanks! (But again, you seem to be quite defensive that I'm supposedly axe grinding over it) Tuc ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: for Thomas E. Zander, mplayer maintainer.
In response to Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:58:04AM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: Distributed, worldwide projects like FreeBSD rely on communication between their members. When one project member in a position of responsibility denies the ability for others to contact him -- whether it was his direct choice or just because he chooses to use a mail server with inappropriate filtering -- then it harms the project. Kris, FWIW, I think when someone posts a request for help onto a list, gets back a dozen Did you RTFM either on list or offlist, replies back that they did (And shows they did), and then gets dead air.. THAT harms the project. Uh, you seem to be axe grinding, but I told you to follow up with the maintainer once I evaluated your report and didn't spot any obvious problems. Why wasn't that good enough for you? If you mean axe grinding in the sense that over the years I've posted to freebsd-* for help with things pertaining to either a single piece of software, procedure I read somewhere, problem during an upgrade, etc... and either been blown off, told to re-read the docs that I've missed a crucial step (Which I stated that I did perform in my original email), or told to fix something ELSE that had nothing to do with it first... Then yea, I guess you can call it axe grinding. Perhaps FreeBSD is not the correct community for you? I don't mean that negatively, or that I _want_ you to go away. It's just that open source projects have personalities. The communities that support them (Linux, FreeBSD, etc) have ideals and traditions and so forth. While I don't ever want to chase anyone away from FreeBSD, the point (in my mind) of open source projects is that you can choose what works for you with no strings, and even fork off a project and do it your own way if you so desire. If you're having so much trouble with the FreeBSD community, I would suggest one of two strategies: *) re-evaluate they way you interact with the FreeBSD community *) try to find a community that you can interact with more successfully So much trouble??? I'm not sure where I said I had So much trouble. I started my PC *nix life with Linux 0.9 . I've used NetBSD. I've been using FreeBSD since BSD/OS sold out to Wind River Systems sometime in 2001 or so. I was on mailing lists for all those, and yea, at times my questions there went unanswered too. I'm not saying that its unique to FreeBSD. To paraphrase (AND KIDDING) I've been ignored on better forums than this. Mysql, PHP, Cisco (If I have an axe to grind at anyone, right now its the Cisco NSP and Cisco Usenet groups), OpenVPN, ISP-Wireless, etc. Probably ATLEAST once on every list I'm on. FreeBSD became the main operating system for a Managed Server Hosting company I owned at the time. (Some Solaris). I personally have 3 laptops with it loaded on, my day-to-day one RARELY ever dual booting into W2K, my personal server has it on it, and all the servers (Except 1) at my new Managed Server Hosting Company are running it. I've asked my fair share of questions on the lists, and I've gotten my fair share of answers. I've posted the best I can, most of the time opting for offlist trying not to clutter the list (And telling them if my answer DOES help, to post a SOLVED to the list). Yes, there are times I seemed to be totally blown off as if I didn't exist. I would wait a week (If I could make it that long, depending on severity), and try to ask again adding anything new I learned in that timeframe. And yea, sometimes I got blown off again and sometimes I got some help. But the ratio of being blown off compared to getting questions answered has been extremely low. The main point of my reply, was not to grind an axe, just to say in defense of someone trying to contact a developer privately (Which I personally try not to do until it becomes a last resort) that being blown off when the user contacts a list for help (Which should be the first resource) harms us more. As had been said, communications is important, especially so in my opinion in the public forums. I'm not asking that everyone cowtow and plead to fix my problems immediately for me, not by any means. I'm certainly not adverse to any work, and try to contribute back to projects whenever possible (My name is in a few pieces of software credits, I've run Listservs to support software, etc). But when anyone communicates a problem on a list, and doesn't hear back, thats harmful. I never intended that comment to elicit the responses it has. It was made with a FWIW (Maybe it should have been IMHO), but it was just supposed to be a comment to be taken as is and not to become the focus of the back/forth it has seemed to generate. I really hate to do it to you guys, but I'm probably going to be here
Re: x11/xterm-227 does not like FreeBSD
Hi, I didn't seem to notice any problems in 227, but did upgrade to 228. Having a cut/paste issue though, but not sure if its X, window manager, or xterm (Since I did the Xorg upgrade). What part of the whole system actually does cut/pastes? Thanks, Tuc I noticed this too but it was followed by an upgrade to 228 which seems to fix it On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 02:11:18PM -0700, Chris Timmons wrote: Greetings, When I upgraded to x11/xterm-227, I noticed that rows and columns as reported to the terminal device by xterm were set to 0: system:/home/cwt/xterm-227 stty all speed 38400 baud; 0 rows; 0 columns; Terminal applications would not properly recognize the window size until I re-sized the window manuall. After doing some research I found this in the xterm-228 release notes: # amend changes to handshake in patch #226 to accommodate Solaris, which relies on the extra setting of the terminal size after I/O initialization. Do this by adding new resource ptySttySize, which is false for Linux and MacOS X, i.e., true for for Solaris and other SVR4 platforms, as well as FreeBSD (reports by David Wood, Renato Botelho). You may want to hold off on that 'portupgrade -a' that you know wasn't a good idea to begin with until the port is upgraded :) -Chris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Xorg upgrade issues, pulling wrong lib
Hi, And yes, I did do according to the instructions : Script started on Mon Jul 23 00:05:00 2007 himinbjorg# setenv XORG_UPGRADE yes himinbjorg# portupgrade -Rfi libXft --- Session started at: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 00:05:34 -0400 --- Reinstallation of x11/xproto started at: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 00:05:38 -0400 --- Reinstalling 'xproto-7.0.10' (x11/xproto) OK? [yes] --- Build of x11/xproto started at: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 00:05:42 -0400 So not sure why I'm running into this and the rest of the world didn't. If the path to the old one is before the new one, no one should have gotten it to work... Or did I do something wrong or have a special situation? Thanks, Tuc Hi, I've asked this on questions, but thought maybe porters would have a better idea... I'm following the directions to upgrade Xorg (REALLY I AM, PROMISE!) and I'm seeing this fly by my screen : /usr/local/bin/bdftopcf -t lubR12-ISO8859-13.bdf | gzip lubR12-ISO8859-13.pcf.gz /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXfont.so.1: Undefined symbol serverClient /usr/local/bin/ucs2any lubR14.bdf /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/util/map-ISO8859-13 ISO8859-13 Writing 192 characters into file 'lubR14-ISO8859-13.bdf'. (AND SO ON) I won't go any further as I'm sure this is indicating a problem. But where/how? -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 5308 Jul 23 13:18 /usr/local/bin/bdftopcf /usr/local/bin/bdftopcf: libXfont.so.1 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXfont.so.1 (0x2807f000) libc.so.5 = /lib/libc.so.5 (0x280e5000) Looks like its picking up libXfont.so.1 from the /usr/X11R6 : -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 424992 Oct 26 2006 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXfont.so.1 and not from the local : -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 432705 Jul 23 13:18 /usr/local/lib/libXfont.so.1 What could cause it? How do I fix it mid build? Is there anything else I should be looking at? So I went to x11-fonts/bdftopcf. I set my XORG_UPGRADE variable (Just incase) and did : === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found === Extracting for bdftopcf-1.0.1 = MD5 Checksum OK for xorg/app/bdftopcf-1.0.1.tar.bz2. = SHA256 Checksum OK for xorg/app/bdftopcf-1.0.1.tar.bz2. === Patching for bdftopcf-1.0.1 === bdftopcf-1.0.1 depends on file: /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/xfont.pc - found === bdftopcf-1.0.1 depends on executable in : pkg-config - found === Configuring for bdftopcf-1.0.1 configure: WARNING: you should use --build, --host, --target checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for gawk... no checking for mawk... no checking for nawk... nawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no checking if xorg-macros used to generate configure is at least 1.1... yes, 1.1.5 checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.5-gcc... cc checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of executables... checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether cc accepts -g... yes checking for cc option to accept ISO C89... none needed checking for style of include used by make... GNU checking dependency style of cc... gcc3 checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.5-pkg-config... no checking for pkg-config... /usr/local/bin/pkg-config checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking for BDFTOPCF... yes checking build system type... i386-portbld-freebsd5.5 checking host system type... i386-portbld-freebsd5.5 configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile config.status: creating config.h config.status: executing depfiles commands === Building for bdftopcf-1.0.1 make all-am if cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.-I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/freetype2 -O -pipe -MT bdftopcf-bdftopcf.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/bdftopcf-bdftopcf.Tpo -c -o bdftopcf-bdftopcf.o `test -f 'bdftopcf.c' || echo './'`bdftopcf.c; then mv -f .deps/bdftopcf-bdftopcf.Tpo .deps/bdftopcf-bdftopcf.Po; else rm -f .deps/bdftopcf-bdftopcf.Tpo; exit 1; fi cc -O -pipe -o bdftopcf bdftopcf-bdftopcf.o -L/usr/local/lib -lXfont sed -e 's|__vendorversion__|bdftopcf 1.0.1 X Version 11|' -e 's|__xorgversion__|bdftopcf 1.0.1 X Version 11|' -e 's|__xservername__|Xorg|g' -e 's|__xconfigfile__|xorg.conf|g' -e 's|__projectroot__|/usr/local|g' -e 's|__apploaddir__||' -e 's|__appmansuffix__|1|g' -e 's|__libmansuffix__|3|g' -e 's|__adminmansuffix__|8|g' -e 's|__miscmansuffix__|7|g' -e 's|__filemansuffix__|5|g' bdftopcf.man bdftopcf.1 himinbjorg# ldd work/bdftopcf-1.0.1/bdftopcf work/bdftopcf-1.0.1/bdftopcf:
Re: make index on 4.10-STABLE
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 08:10:58PM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: vjofn# mv /etc/make.conf /etc/make.conf.hold vjofn# make index Generating INDEX - please wait..=== arabic/ae_fonts_mono failed *** Error code 1 === accessibility/at-poke failed *** Error code 1 2 errors You're probably not going to get very far with this. Many ports have had the 4.x compatibility code ripped out now. If you install devel/make (you'll need the 4.x EOL branch) over the make in base you might have a chance of building an INDEX. The above error is actually likely to be due to the recent Xorg checks... try 'make describe' from arabic/ae_fonts_mono. Hi, Thanks for the reply! I went back to the EOL branch, got the devel/make, installed it. Went back to the current state, and still had the issue. Tried to run it as MAKE=/usr/local/bin/make /usr/local/bin/make index and still no go. I was trying to see if I didn't have to make it the base permanently. So I mv /usr/bin/make /usr/bin/make.old;ln -s /usr/local/bin/make /usr/bin/make. I did much better, and thought I was gonna make it... When I got to devel/monotone it died that it wasn't able to find devel/boost-gcc3. The Makefile has a check for the OSVERSION 50 and if so to depend on boost-gcc3, if not then just boost. And, of course, looking at MOVED it was changed 3/7/2007 . I'll probably just end up running into this more as I go down the line. I guess I need to create a bunch of boot CDs, take my server down for a while, and see if it'll run later versions of FreeBSD. I know on a few other computers I have I can't go past 5.3 without it breaking. Thanks, Tuc ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xorg upgrade issues, pulling wrong lib
Hi, I've asked this on questions, but thought maybe porters would have a better idea... I'm following the directions to upgrade Xorg (REALLY I AM, PROMISE!) and I'm seeing this fly by my screen : /usr/local/bin/bdftopcf -t lubR12-ISO8859-13.bdf | gzip lubR12-ISO8859-13.pcf.gz /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXfont.so.1: Undefined symbol serverClient /usr/local/bin/ucs2any lubR14.bdf /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/util/map-ISO8859-13 ISO8859-13 Writing 192 characters into file 'lubR14-ISO8859-13.bdf'. (AND SO ON) I won't go any further as I'm sure this is indicating a problem. But where/how? -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 5308 Jul 23 13:18 /usr/local/bin/bdftopcf /usr/local/bin/bdftopcf: libXfont.so.1 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXfont.so.1 (0x2807f000) libc.so.5 = /lib/libc.so.5 (0x280e5000) Looks like its picking up libXfont.so.1 from the /usr/X11R6 : -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 424992 Oct 26 2006 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXfont.so.1 and not from the local : -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 432705 Jul 23 13:18 /usr/local/lib/libXfont.so.1 What could cause it? How do I fix it mid build? Is there anything else I should be looking at? So I went to x11-fonts/bdftopcf. I set my XORG_UPGRADE variable (Just incase) and did : === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found === Extracting for bdftopcf-1.0.1 = MD5 Checksum OK for xorg/app/bdftopcf-1.0.1.tar.bz2. = SHA256 Checksum OK for xorg/app/bdftopcf-1.0.1.tar.bz2. === Patching for bdftopcf-1.0.1 === bdftopcf-1.0.1 depends on file: /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/xfont.pc - found === bdftopcf-1.0.1 depends on executable in : pkg-config - found === Configuring for bdftopcf-1.0.1 configure: WARNING: you should use --build, --host, --target checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for gawk... no checking for mawk... no checking for nawk... nawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no checking if xorg-macros used to generate configure is at least 1.1... yes, 1.1.5 checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.5-gcc... cc checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of executables... checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether cc accepts -g... yes checking for cc option to accept ISO C89... none needed checking for style of include used by make... GNU checking dependency style of cc... gcc3 checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.5-pkg-config... no checking for pkg-config... /usr/local/bin/pkg-config checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking for BDFTOPCF... yes checking build system type... i386-portbld-freebsd5.5 checking host system type... i386-portbld-freebsd5.5 configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile config.status: creating config.h config.status: executing depfiles commands === Building for bdftopcf-1.0.1 make all-am if cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.-I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/freetype2 -O -pipe -MT bdftopcf-bdftopcf.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/bdftopcf-bdftopcf.Tpo -c -o bdftopcf-bdftopcf.o `test -f 'bdftopcf.c' || echo './'`bdftopcf.c; then mv -f .deps/bdftopcf-bdftopcf.Tpo .deps/bdftopcf-bdftopcf.Po; else rm -f .deps/bdftopcf-bdftopcf.Tpo; exit 1; fi cc -O -pipe -o bdftopcf bdftopcf-bdftopcf.o -L/usr/local/lib -lXfont sed -e 's|__vendorversion__|bdftopcf 1.0.1 X Version 11|' -e 's|__xorgversion__|bdftopcf 1.0.1 X Version 11|' -e 's|__xservername__|Xorg|g' -e 's|__xconfigfile__|xorg.conf|g' -e 's|__projectroot__|/usr/local|g' -e 's|__apploaddir__||' -e 's|__appmansuffix__|1|g' -e 's|__libmansuffix__|3|g' -e 's|__adminmansuffix__|8|g' -e 's|__miscmansuffix__|7|g' -e 's|__filemansuffix__|5|g' bdftopcf.man bdftopcf.1 himinbjorg# ldd work/bdftopcf-1.0.1/bdftopcf work/bdftopcf-1.0.1/bdftopcf: libXfont.so.1 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXfont.so.1 (0x2808) libc.so.5 = /lib/libc.so.5 (0x280e6000) WHY when the cc step is stating -L/usr/local/lib is it bring the Xfont from /usr/X11R6/lib? It looks the library was installed at the request of bdftopcf, but there still is another version out there from the previous install of xorg-libraries-6.9.0 . Where do I go? Thanks, Tuc ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
make index on 4.10-STABLE
Hi,
(Yea, yea, I know... Its my personal machine and I've got so
much rigged up that I don't know it would upgrade well to 5, let along
past that)
I cvsup the ports-all as of 2 minutes before attempting. Running
4.10-STABLE, x86, standard env.
When I run it with my full make.conf, I get :
Generating INDEX - please wait../usr/ports/audio/gstreamer-plugins-esound/../..
/multimedia/gstreamer-plugins/Makefile.common, line 391: Malformed conditional
(${gst_${GST_PLUGIN}_GCONF_SCHEMAS}!=)
/usr/ports/audio/gstreamer-plugins-esound/../../multimedia/gstreamer-plugins/Ma
kefile.common, line 395: Malformed conditional (${gst_${GST_PLUGIN}_USE_SDL}!=
)
/usr/ports/audio/gstreamer-plugins-esound/../../multimedia/gstreamer-plugins/Ma
kefile.common, line 397: if-less endif
/usr/ports/audio/gstreamer-plugins-esound/../../multimedia/gstreamer-plugins/Ma
kefile.common, line 397: Need an operator
/usr/ports/audio/gstreamer-plugins-esound/../../multimedia/gstreamer-plugins/Ma
kefile.common, line 418: if-less endif
/usr/ports/audio/gstreamer-plugins-esound/../../multimedia/gstreamer-plugins/Ma
kefile.common, line 418: Need an operator
make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
=== audio/gstreamer-plugins-esound failed
*** Error code 1
1 error
When I move it out of the way :
vjofn# mv /etc/make.conf /etc/make.conf.hold
vjofn# make index
Generating INDEX - please wait..=== arabic/ae_fonts_mono failed
*** Error code 1
=== accessibility/at-poke failed
*** Error code 1
2 errors
Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: make index on 4.10-STABLE
RELENG_4 isn't supported, period. You should probably start researching what it will take to do a fresh install of 7-stable when it comes out soonish. That way you'll be future-proofed for the next couple years anyway. hth, Doug Part of my concern is the hardware platform. I know a few machines I have couldn't go past 5.3 without locking during boot. Tried posting to the list and got silence, so I have to keep those machines at 5.3 . So will have to schedule time to see if I can boot some recent install CD's on the 4.10-STABLE server and see if it works... My post was worth a try to get other than the isn't supported reply. Tuc ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
astro/gpsd maintainer contact issues
Hi, I'm trying to contact the author of the astro/gpsd port. I get : ... while talking to mx.toxahost.ru.: DATA 503 5.7.4 Error: authentication disabled 554 5.0.0 Service unavailable 554 5.5.1 Error: no valid recipients for Anton Karpov [EMAIL PROTECTED]. I'd like to try to submit the changes that the OpenBSD person worked on if thats allowable, someone just needs to point me to where in the procedure to start. Thanks, Tuc ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fetchyahoo 2.10.2 - 2.10.6
Hi, I was wondering if 2.10.6 of fetchyahoo would be checked in soon. I'm not sure what list this shows up on, so if you can CC me back it would be appreciated. Thanks, Tuc ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
