Re: Time for a firefox-56 port?
On Nov 25, 2017 8:15 PM, "Greg 'groggy' Lehey"wrote: It doesn't address the addon issue. I expect that gradually the addons will get updated to the new interfaces, so this is just a temporary thing. Oh, no, these addons are permanently dead, and your best hope is to find alternatives, such as those made for Chrome. The addons have been given 2 years to switch, and if that haven't happen, that's unlikely to happen starting from today. As you may know, some most famous ones have announced death by their authors. Given my information from Mozilla employees, Mozilla has no motivation to make WebExtensions any more powerful to support any addon that requires extra functionalities to port from XUL. So give it up, try Pale Moon. -- Zhihao ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Time for a firefox-56 port?
On Nov 25, 2017 6:31 PM, "Greg 'groggy' Lehey"wrote: I'm sure I'm not the only person who relies on old addons. How about a firefox-56 port until the current problems die down? Here is a port for the Palemoon browser: https://www.freshports.org/www/palemoon/ -- Zhihao ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: The Original VI ?
On Sep 4, 2013 3:55 PM, Chad Perrin c...@apotheon.net wrote: Is there some specific reason the nvi in base is stalled so far behind nvi-devel in terms of usability (by the way)? The nvi in CURRENT already supports UTF-8; if you want varies encodings, you need WITH_ICONV=1. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: CFT: texlive ports
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote: for D in /usr/local/share/texmf /usr/local/share/texmf-dist /usr/local/share/texmf-local /usr/local/share/texmf-var; do if [ -r $D/ls-R ]; then /usr/local/bin/mktexlsr $D; fi; done Only the first dir presents on a clean installed system. So... -- Zhihao Yuan, ID lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Need help to port www/py-falcon
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Zhihao Yuan lich...@gmail.com wrote: If I set USE_PYDISTUTILS=easy_install then I got === Generating temporary packing list running easy_install Creating /tmp/falcon/lib/python2.7/site-packages/site.py error: Not a URL, existing file, or requirement spec: '/home/lichray/devel/ports/www/py-falcon/work/falcon-0.1.1/dist/falcon-0.1.1-py2.7.egg' while my egg should be named falcon-0.1.1-py2.7-freebsd-8.3-STABLE-amd64.egg Solved. PYEASYINSTALL_ARCHDEP= yes -- Zhihao Yuan, ID lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Need help to port www/py-falcon
Hi, hackers: I'm porting falcon http://falconframework.org/ , but I found a problem with installation. If I set USE_PYDISTUTILS=easy_install then I got === Generating temporary packing list running easy_install Creating /tmp/falcon/lib/python2.7/site-packages/site.py error: Not a URL, existing file, or requirement spec: '/home/lichray/devel/ports/www/py-falcon/work/falcon-0.1.1/dist/falcon-0.1.1-py2.7.egg' while my egg should be named falcon-0.1.1-py2.7-freebsd-8.3-STABLE-amd64.egg And if I set USE_PYDISTUTILS=easy_install I got === Generating temporary packing list running install Checking .pth file support in /tmp/falcon/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ error: can't create or remove files in install directory The following error occurred while trying to add or remove files in the installation directory: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/tmp/falcon/lib/python2.7/site-packages/test-easy-install-26039.pth' I don't get it, since I have no problem to install it through `pip` or manually run `python setup.py install` under the source tree. I need some help. -- Zhihao Yuan, ID lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Need help to port www/py-falcon
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Gary J. Hayers g...@hayers.org wrote: Would need to see the rest of the Makefile to help really. The Makefile is attached. The PYDISTUTILS_NOEGGINFO= yes line has no use, currently. -- Zhihao Yuan, ID lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ Makefile Description: Binary data ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Need help to port www/py-falcon
On Feb 22, 2013 2:09 PM, Gary J. Hayers g...@hayers.org wrote: Using /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/six-1.2.0-py2.7.egg I'remove this dependence. But my execution with genplist did not get me there. Finished processing dependencies for falcon==0.1.1 === Registering installation for py27-falcon-0.1.1 pkg: lstat(/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/falcon-0.1.1-py2.7.egg-info): No such file or directory Installing py27-falcon-0.1.1... done You are running make install as root right? Yes, with genplist. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Help my maintainer timeout PRs
Hi, All of these are maintainer timeout. ports/168645: [UPDATE] x11/luit to 1.1.1 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/168645 ports/172735: [UPDATE] devel/glog to 0.3.2 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/172735 This one is not under ports/, but still trivial: bin/168415: [PATCH] stdbuf(1) does not allow cmd with no parameters http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/168415 Thanks. -- Zhihao Yuan, ID lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: PR missing
Hi, I meet the same problem: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=173590 Category: ports Responsible:freebsd-ports-bugs Synopsis: New ports: fcitx-m17n and fcitx-unikey Arrival-Date: Tue Nov 13 00:20:00 UTC 2012 The PR lost. On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Muhammad Moinur Rahman 5u623...@gmail.com wrote: Check Confidential flag. Sorry, I don't quite understand. Isn't that always no? -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: mplayer2 for FreeBSD
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote: I was wondering if anyone had actually attempted to compile mplayer2 http://www.mplayer2.org/ on FreeBSD or if there was someone working on porting it? I'm using it, and it seems to be a nice replace to mplayer. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/163438 -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __ We live in a world where losing your phone is more dramatic to a sixteen year old girl than losing her virginity. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Xfce 4.10 on FreeBSD 9 release powerpc
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Takashi Fujita rina.invers...@gmail.com wrote: When the module which is not downloadable was copied to the folder which referred to google and was specified, building started. The screen of Xfce was displayed when it started instantly, since building was successful. About two problems have occurred. -There are two or more parts (it is x) where the icon of an application menu is not displayed. Yes. Because your icon theme hicolor do not have those. It's OK. -The reboot and shutdown by a general user cannot be performed. Check /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4-session/pkg-message BTW, this file should be .in; %%LOCALBASE%% is not replaced. If the correspondence method is carried out now [ familiar / direction ] about these two points, please let me know. (2012/05/15 23:01), Zhihao Yuan wrote: On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Takashi Fujita rina.invers...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you for the correspondence. May the following methods be used although it is the order of the real way of a script? 1.execute xfcemerge 2.cd /usr/ports/x11/xfce4 3.make clean 4.make install clean You may want to try: sudo xfcemerge - followed by - sudo portmaster -a portmaster will handle the upgrade order according to the dependencies. If there is a file deleted beforehand, please let me know. (12/05/15 22:37), Zhihao Yuan wrote: On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Takashi Fujita rina.invers...@gmail.com wrote: After deleting a file, when make install clean was performed again, the following errors came out and compile was interrupted. ==Patching for xfce4-session-4.10.0 ==Applying FreeBSD patches for xfce4-session-4.10.0 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to xfce4-session/xfsm-shutdown-helper.c.rej =Patch patch-xfce4-session_xfsm-shutdown-helper.c failed to apply cleanly. (2012/05/15 21:26), Zhihao Yuan wrote: On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Takashi Fujita rina.invers...@gmail.com wrote: M9686J/A Mac mini G4 FreeBSD 9-Release is installed in 1.25 GHz. The following contribution tends to be seen and it is going to install Xfce4.10 in this environment. Hi folks, I've updated the xfce-4.10 tarball [1] (it contains only the latest versions of Xfce4 core). Changes : - Delete thunarvfs in bsd.xfce.mk, because this library now, is obsolete, even if it always used by archiver/squeeze (no update since 4 years). - Drop support of GTK3 in x11-themes/gtk-xfce-engine I've also add shell script 'xfcemerge' [2] (based on marcusmerge and kdemerge) to easily update ports tree. It works with tarball and with my repository. In my repository we can found the latest versions of : - x11/xfce4-screenshooter-plugin, http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=167537 - www/midori, http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=167536 - sysutils/xfce4-battery-plugin (1.0.2) - sysutils/xfce4-systemload-plugin (1.1.0) - x11-clocks/xfce4-timer-out-plugin (1.0.1) - graphics/ristretto (0.6.0) Enjoy [1] http://xfce-ports.googlecode.com/files/xfce-4.10.tar.xz [2] http://xfce-ports.googlecode.com/files/xfcemerge shell script'xfcemerge' was performed and port tree was updated. When [cd /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4] [make config-recursive] [make install clean] and a command are executed after that, the following error comes out and compile goes wrong. === Installing for xfce-4.10 === xfce-4.10 depends on executable: xfwm4 - not found === Verifying install for xfwm4 in /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4-wm === Patching for xfce4-wm-4.10.0 === Applying FreeBSD patches for xfce4-wm-4.10.0 File to patch: No file found--skip this patch? [n]y 2 out of 2 hunks ignored--saving rehects to doc/manual/images/Makefile.in.rej Can't create doc/manual/images/Makefile.in.rej, output is in /tmp/patchrvHLsNE: No such file or directory = Patch patch-doc_manual_images_Makefile.in failed to apply cleanly. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4-wm. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4-wm. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4. -- Takashi Fujita rina.invers...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org As I said, the xfcemerge script does not remove old files. So please remove any file under xfce4-wm/files except extrapatch-src__events.c. -- Takashi Fujita rina.invers...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org I see. I'll fix this. Try the new xfcemerge script attached
Re: Xfce 4.10 on FreeBSD 9 release powerpc
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 6:13 AM, Takashi Fujita rina.invers...@gmail.com wrote: (2012/05/16 19:44), Zhihao Yuan wrote: On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Takashi Fujita rina.invers...@gmail.com wrote: When the module which is not downloadable was copied to the folder which referred to google and was specified, building started. The screen of Xfce was displayed when it started instantly, since building was successful. About two problems have occurred. -There are two or more parts (it is x) where the icon of an application menu is not displayed. Yes. Because your icon theme hicolor do not have those. It's OK. What should be done for improving this state? -The reboot and shutdown by a general user cannot be performed. Check /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4-session/pkg-message Do I hear that this application is installed? Unfortunately, Olivier used an uncommon method which makes you can only see this message after pkg_add, not after make install. BTW, this file should be .in; %%LOCALBASE%% is not replaced. Would you teach a little in more detail? Olivier used ${SED} here. A better approach is to set SUB_FILES= pkg-message and to add @${CAT} ${PKGMESSAGE} in post-install. To enable shutdown/restart, just replace 'PUTYOURGROUPHERE' with your own user group, and create a .pkla file under /usr/local/etc/polkit-1/localauthority/50-local.d (use mkdir -p to create this). -- Takashi Fujita rina.invers...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Xfce 4.10 on FreeBSD 9 release powerpc
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Takashi Fujita rina.invers...@gmail.com wrote: M9686J/A Mac mini G4 FreeBSD 9-Release is installed in 1.25 GHz. The following contribution tends to be seen and it is going to install Xfce4.10 in this environment. Hi folks, I've updated the xfce-4.10 tarball [1] (it contains only the latest versions of Xfce4 core). Changes : - Delete thunarvfs in bsd.xfce.mk, because this library now, is obsolete, even if it always used by archiver/squeeze (no update since 4 years). - Drop support of GTK3 in x11-themes/gtk-xfce-engine I've also add shell script 'xfcemerge' [2] (based on marcusmerge and kdemerge) to easily update ports tree. It works with tarball and with my repository. In my repository we can found the latest versions of : - x11/xfce4-screenshooter-plugin, http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=167537 - www/midori, http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=167536 - sysutils/xfce4-battery-plugin (1.0.2) - sysutils/xfce4-systemload-plugin (1.1.0) - x11-clocks/xfce4-timer-out-plugin (1.0.1) - graphics/ristretto (0.6.0) Enjoy [1] http://xfce-ports.googlecode.com/files/xfce-4.10.tar.xz [2] http://xfce-ports.googlecode.com/files/xfcemerge shell script'xfcemerge' was performed and port tree was updated. When [cd /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4] [make config-recursive] [make install clean] and a command are executed after that, the following error comes out and compile goes wrong. === Installing for xfce-4.10 === xfce-4.10 depends on executable: xfwm4 - not found === Verifying install for xfwm4 in /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4-wm === Patching for xfce4-wm-4.10.0 === Applying FreeBSD patches for xfce4-wm-4.10.0 File to patch: No file found--skip this patch? [n]y 2 out of 2 hunks ignored--saving rehects to doc/manual/images/Makefile.in.rej Can't create doc/manual/images/Makefile.in.rej, output is in /tmp/patchrvHLsNE: No such file or directory = Patch patch-doc_manual_images_Makefile.in failed to apply cleanly. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4-wm. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4-wm. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4. -- Takashi Fujita rina.invers...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org As I said, the xfcemerge script does not remove old files. So please remove any file under xfce4-wm/files except extrapatch-src__events.c. -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Xfce 4.10 on FreeBSD 9 release powerpc
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Takashi Fujita rina.invers...@gmail.com wrote: After deleting a file, when make install clean was performed again, the following errors came out and compile was interrupted. ==Patching for xfce4-session-4.10.0 ==Applying FreeBSD patches for xfce4-session-4.10.0 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to xfce4-session/xfsm-shutdown-helper.c.rej =Patch patch-xfce4-session_xfsm-shutdown-helper.c failed to apply cleanly. (2012/05/15 21:26), Zhihao Yuan wrote: On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Takashi Fujita rina.invers...@gmail.com wrote: M9686J/A Mac mini G4 FreeBSD 9-Release is installed in 1.25 GHz. The following contribution tends to be seen and it is going to install Xfce4.10 in this environment. Hi folks, I've updated the xfce-4.10 tarball [1] (it contains only the latest versions of Xfce4 core). Changes : - Delete thunarvfs in bsd.xfce.mk, because this library now, is obsolete, even if it always used by archiver/squeeze (no update since 4 years). - Drop support of GTK3 in x11-themes/gtk-xfce-engine I've also add shell script 'xfcemerge' [2] (based on marcusmerge and kdemerge) to easily update ports tree. It works with tarball and with my repository. In my repository we can found the latest versions of : - x11/xfce4-screenshooter-plugin, http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=167537 - www/midori, http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=167536 - sysutils/xfce4-battery-plugin (1.0.2) - sysutils/xfce4-systemload-plugin (1.1.0) - x11-clocks/xfce4-timer-out-plugin (1.0.1) - graphics/ristretto (0.6.0) Enjoy [1] http://xfce-ports.googlecode.com/files/xfce-4.10.tar.xz [2] http://xfce-ports.googlecode.com/files/xfcemerge shell script'xfcemerge' was performed and port tree was updated. When [cd /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4] [make config-recursive] [make install clean] and a command are executed after that, the following error comes out and compile goes wrong. === Installing for xfce-4.10 === xfce-4.10 depends on executable: xfwm4 - not found === Verifying install for xfwm4 in /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4-wm === Patching for xfce4-wm-4.10.0 === Applying FreeBSD patches for xfce4-wm-4.10.0 File to patch: No file found--skip this patch? [n]y 2 out of 2 hunks ignored--saving rehects to doc/manual/images/Makefile.in.rej Can't create doc/manual/images/Makefile.in.rej, output is in /tmp/patchrvHLsNE: No such file or directory = Patch patch-doc_manual_images_Makefile.in failed to apply cleanly. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4-wm. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4-wm. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4. -- Takashi Fujita rina.invers...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org As I said, the xfcemerge script does not remove old files. So please remove any file under xfce4-wm/files except extrapatch-src__events.c. -- Takashi Fujita rina.invers...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org I see. I'll fix this. Try the new xfcemerge script attached. -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ xfcemerge Description: Binary data ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Xfce 4.10 on FreeBSD 9 release powerpc
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Takashi Fujita rina.invers...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you for the correspondence. May the following methods be used although it is the order of the real way of a script? 1.execute xfcemerge 2.cd /usr/ports/x11/xfce4 3.make clean 4.make install clean You may want to try: sudo xfcemerge - followed by - sudo portmaster -a portmaster will handle the upgrade order according to the dependencies. If there is a file deleted beforehand, please let me know. (12/05/15 22:37), Zhihao Yuan wrote: On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Takashi Fujita rina.invers...@gmail.com wrote: After deleting a file, when make install clean was performed again, the following errors came out and compile was interrupted. ==Patching for xfce4-session-4.10.0 ==Applying FreeBSD patches for xfce4-session-4.10.0 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to xfce4-session/xfsm-shutdown-helper.c.rej =Patch patch-xfce4-session_xfsm-shutdown-helper.c failed to apply cleanly. (2012/05/15 21:26), Zhihao Yuan wrote: On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Takashi Fujita rina.invers...@gmail.com wrote: M9686J/A Mac mini G4 FreeBSD 9-Release is installed in 1.25 GHz. The following contribution tends to be seen and it is going to install Xfce4.10 in this environment. Hi folks, I've updated the xfce-4.10 tarball [1] (it contains only the latest versions of Xfce4 core). Changes : - Delete thunarvfs in bsd.xfce.mk, because this library now, is obsolete, even if it always used by archiver/squeeze (no update since 4 years). - Drop support of GTK3 in x11-themes/gtk-xfce-engine I've also add shell script 'xfcemerge' [2] (based on marcusmerge and kdemerge) to easily update ports tree. It works with tarball and with my repository. In my repository we can found the latest versions of : - x11/xfce4-screenshooter-plugin, http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=167537 - www/midori, http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=167536 - sysutils/xfce4-battery-plugin (1.0.2) - sysutils/xfce4-systemload-plugin (1.1.0) - x11-clocks/xfce4-timer-out-plugin (1.0.1) - graphics/ristretto (0.6.0) Enjoy [1] http://xfce-ports.googlecode.com/files/xfce-4.10.tar.xz [2] http://xfce-ports.googlecode.com/files/xfcemerge shell script'xfcemerge' was performed and port tree was updated. When [cd /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4] [make config-recursive] [make install clean] and a command are executed after that, the following error comes out and compile goes wrong. === Installing for xfce-4.10 === xfce-4.10 depends on executable: xfwm4 - not found === Verifying install for xfwm4 in /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4-wm === Patching for xfce4-wm-4.10.0 === Applying FreeBSD patches for xfce4-wm-4.10.0 File to patch: No file found--skip this patch? [n]y 2 out of 2 hunks ignored--saving rehects to doc/manual/images/Makefile.in.rej Can't create doc/manual/images/Makefile.in.rej, output is in /tmp/patchrvHLsNE: No such file or directory = Patch patch-doc_manual_images_Makefile.in failed to apply cleanly. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4-wm. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4-wm. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4. -- Takashi Fujita rina.invers...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org As I said, the xfcemerge script does not remove old files. So please remove any file under xfce4-wm/files except extrapatch-src__events.c. -- Takashi Fujita rina.invers...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org I see. I'll fix this. Try the new xfcemerge script attached. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFT] Xfce 4.10
Tested using xfcemerge; Thunar untested. Great one-man-show! 2 tiny problems: 1. In bsd.xfce.mk, -L is a LDFLAGS, not CPPFLAGS. I saw too many clang 'unused option' warnings during the compilation; 2. The xfcemerge does not delete files. the files/ dir under xfce4-systemload is removed, right? On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen tin...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Olivier Duchateau duchateau.oliv...@gmail.com wrote: Hi folks, I've updated the xfce-4.10 tarball [1] (it contains only the latest versions of Xfce4 core). Changes : - Delete thunarvfs in bsd.xfce.mk, because this library now, is obsolete, even if it always used by archiver/squeeze (no update since 4 years). How are we supposed to get squeeze to install now? It fails: === xfce-4.10 depends on executable: squeeze - not found === Verifying install for squeeze in /usr/ports/archivers/squeeze === squeeze-0.2.3_2 cannot install: Unknown component thunarvfs. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/archivers/squeeze. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4. -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: New X.Org
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 6:49 AM, Andrea Venturoli m...@netfence.it wrote: Hello. I see in UPDATING The default mesa has been updated to 7.6.1 and the default xorg-server to 1.7.7. A switch is available for people that want to use mesa 7.11.x and xorg-server 1.10.6. This requires an nvidia card or Intel+KMS support. I have a Radeon card, so, does this mean I will get xorg-server? Any way to get 1.10? Any advantage into this? Also, I have WITHOUT_NOUVEAU in /etc/make.conf. Should I remove it? This flag only applies to Mesa, and it's no longer used. The new WITH_NEW_XORG applies to both xorg-server and Mesa. Thought I just asked, before risking to blow everything up :) bye Thanks av. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: New X.Org
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 9:28 AM, matt sendtom...@gmail.com wrote: On 04/23/12 05:59, Warren Block wrote: On Mon, 23 Apr 2012, Andrea Venturoli wrote: I have a Radeon card, so, does this mean I will get xorg-server? Any way to get 1.10? Any advantage into this? A Radeon 4650 is working fine here with xorg-server 1.10.6 and mesa 7.11. So far there are no Firefox title bar artifacts like there were occasionally with the earlier version. Also, I have WITHOUT_NOUVEAU in /etc/make.conf. Should I remove it? Yes, replace it with WITH_NEW_XORG=yes. Then rebuild graphics/libdrm, xorg-server, xf86-input-*, xf86-video-*, and... a few other things I should have taken notes on. ___ freebsd-...@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-x11-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Interesting. Another Radeon 4650 (rv730) is not working here, giving Bus Errors at the same address whenever certain applications are launched. Failing examples: Firefox, gedit, qt4-designer Successful: xfce4-terminal, ioquake3, compiz I just completed recompiling all ports dependent on libGL with no luck. I had WITHOUT_NOUVEAU in make.conf at the same time as WITH_NEW_XORG, is that the problem? WITHOUT_NOUVEAU has no effect; only WITH_NEW_XORG has. Any crash log? Xorg.0.log? Does this sound like an Xorg problem or a ports/ld problem? Matt ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Re: recent portrevision bump for libvpx
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Mikhail T. mi+t...@aldan.algebra.com wrote: On -10.01.-28163 14:59, Jakub Lach wrote: Speaking of recent libvpx update, some ports explicitly look for libvpx.so.0, and fail to update trying to install again libvpx which is already installed. e.g. multimedia/gstreamer-plugins-vp8 Yet again I'd like to point out, that -- contrary to the wide-spread practice -- ports should not, by default, list a particular shlib major number in LIB_DEPENDS. Only in cases, when a wrong version of some libfoo is known to cause problems, should the correct version be explicitly given in LIB_DEPENDS. I regard this as a wrong practice. Here is why: 1. The way you specify the version in LIB_DEPENDS has NO relation with how the port link to the lib. The port can link to the major version (pkg-config), or the .so, etc. 2. One responsibility of the ports system is to protect the user from suffering from running a software which links to a ABI incompatible, hence, wrong shared library. A software runs incorrectly is a disaster, and the shared library version is to prevent this, and the ports system is to protect the versioned shared libraries. Thus -- A port fails to find its depends better than it does not link, a software does not link is better than it does not run correctly. And your practice is trying to remove such protection. 3. Known to cause problem? Can I infer you can predict the future from that? So, to link to a version explicitly should be the default. Only a library behaviors good in its development history can be considered to use it's libname only in LIB_DEPENDS. -mi ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: recent portrevision bump for libvpx
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Mikhail T. mi+t...@aldan.algebra.com wrote: On 17.02.2012 14:24, Zhihao Yuan wrote: I regard this as a wrong practice. Here is why: 1. The way you specify the version in LIB_DEPENDS has NO relation with how the port link to the lib. The port can link to the major version (pkg-config), or the .so, etc. I'm sorry, I can not parse the above part. Perhaps, a live example is in order. LIB_DEPENDS= png.6: or =png: does not affect how the lib got linked. It always links to the latest libpng the time you compile the port. 2. One responsibility of the ports system is to protect the user from suffering from running a software which links to a ABI incompatible, hence, wrong shared library. This is a made-up non-reason, sorry. The only way to get into an ABI incompatibility is to have -- at the time of the port building -- header-files declarations from one version of a library and implementation(s) from another. Avoiding such situations is out of the scope of the ports-system and this discussion. Again, try to come up with a real-life example of how my proposal would break ABI for an actual user... You can not. This only happens when a minor version of a library is not compatible with another one. OK, that's out of the scope. 3. Known to cause problem? Can I infer you can predict the future from that? Yes, you can. Well-knowing the past 15 or so years of the ports-system, I can predict some aspects of the future. For example: committers will continue to forget to update some of the umpteen instances of LIB_DEPENDS=foo.X in various ports, when bumping up major version of foo. committers will continue to mindlessly bump-up these umpteen instances -- without actually verifying, that the new version of foo is still acceptable to all of those dependants. My opinion is that, fails to build is not a big trouble, at least we notified the through portsnap/pkg_version; The user surprisingly finds that his software fails to run is a bigger trouble. port-building will remain unduly difficult because of the wide-spread mindless (mis)use of the major shlib-number in LIB_DEPENDS. Consider the following scenario (substitute any of png, jpeg, xml, etc. for foo): The updates to major libs always bind to a larger updates in the ports tree. You have to upgrade all of the ports depend on them no matter how you use LIB_DEPENDS. You build a shiny new machine -- with the desktop of your choice (KDE, Gnome, Xfce - whatever) from ports. Hours of build-time interrupted by occasional `config' screens... A week later you update your ports tree -- which sees version-bump of libfoo. You try to add a foo-using program bar to your computer -- and fail, because the bar-port now insists on the very latest version of libfoo. Not because the maintainer of bar determined, that the earlier versions are bad -- simply because the maintainer of foo went through all dependents and updated the LIB_DEPENDS lines in all of them, as is the current sad practice. You now have to either portupgrade libfoo -- which means, your desktop will be using libfoo.N and the newly-built bar will be using libfoo.N+1 (inefficient and sometimes a source of problems in its own), or go through rebuilding all of the foo-using ports again... I regards what you said above as the regular routine, and I can't see how your practice can improve such a routine. So, to link to a version explicitly should be the default. Only a library behaviors good in its development history can be considered to use it's libname only in LIB_DEPENDS. I'm not sure, what you mean by link to a version. Once again, I beg you to offer a live example. Yours, I mean LIB_DEPENDS= png.6 -mi -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: recent portrevision bump for libvpx
On Feb 17, 2012 5:17 PM, Mikhail T. mi+t...@aldan.algebra.com wrote: On 17.02.2012 17:05, Zhihao Yuan wrote: On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Mikhail T. mi+t...@aldan.algebra.com wrote: On 17.02.2012 14:24, Zhihao Yuan wrote: I regard this as a wrong practice. Here is why: 1. The way you specify the version in LIB_DEPENDS has NO relation with how the port link to the lib. The port can link to the major version (pkg-config), or the .so, etc. I'm sorry, I can not parse the above part. Perhaps, a live example is in order. LIB_DEPENDS= png.6: or =png: does not affect how the lib got linked. It always links to the latest libpng the time you compile the port. Yes, this is correct. But irrelevant, really -- this will remain true, whether or not LIB_DEPENDS lines contain explicit library numbers. 2. One responsibility of the ports system is to protect the user from suffering from running a software which links to a ABI incompatible, hence, wrong shared library. This is a made-up non-reason, sorry. The only way to get into an ABI incompatibility is to have -- at the time of the port building -- header-files declarations from one version of a library and implementation(s) from another. Avoiding such situations is out of the scope of the ports-system and this discussion. Again, try to come up with a real-life example of how my proposal would break ABI for an actual user... You can not. This only happens when a minor version of a library is not compatible with another one. OK, that's out of the scope. We have not used minor library versions since switch-over to ELF... I do not understand, what you are talking about. 3. Known to cause problem? Can I infer you can predict the future from that? Yes, you can. Well-knowing the past 15 or so years of the ports-system, I can predict some aspects of the future. For example: committers will continue to forget to update some of the umpteen instances of LIB_DEPENDS=foo.X in various ports, when bumping up major version of foo. committers will continue to mindlessly bump-up these umpteen instances -- without actually verifying, that the new version of foo is still acceptable to all of those dependants. My opinion is that, fails to build is not a big trouble, at least we notified the through portsnap/pkg_version; The user surprisingly finds that his software fails to run is a bigger trouble. The existing practice does not protect against this bigger trouble either -- whenever port installing libfoo.so is updated, all of the ports LIB_DEPENDing on foo.X are matter-of-factly updated to LIB_DEPEND on foo.(X+1). At best, these updates are verified to continue to build -- but they are never verified to continue to work -- although they usually do work, of course. `cvs log' shows thousands of commit messages matching the pattern chas.*bump (libvpx included, of course) -- I'd be surprised to learn, the usability test was conducted in 1% of these cases... port-building will remain unduly difficult because of the wide-spread mindless (mis)use of the major shlib-number in LIB_DEPENDS. Consider the following scenario (substitute any of png, jpeg, xml, etc. for foo): The updates to major libs always bind to a larger updates in the ports tree. You have to upgrade all of the ports depend on them no matter how you use LIB_DEPENDS. No, I should not have to. I might prefer to, but I should not be forced to do it. And what's a major lib anyway? Does x264 qualify? If I want to add vlc, for example, do you want to force me to rebuild mplayer as well -- because x264 went from 137 to 171 since I last built it? You build a shiny new machine -- with the desktop of your choice (KDE, Gnome, Xfce - whatever) from ports. Hours of build-time interrupted by occasional `config' screens... A week later you update your ports tree -- which sees version-bump of libfoo. You try to add a foo-using program bar to your computer -- and fail, because the bar-port now insists on the very latest version of libfoo. Not because the maintainer of bar determined, that the earlier versions are bad -- simply because the maintainer of foo went through all dependents and updated the LIB_DEPENDS lines in all of them, as is the current sad practice. You now have to either portupgrade libfoo -- which means, your desktop will be using libfoo.N and the newly-built bar will be using libfoo.N+1 (inefficient and sometimes a source of problems in its own), or go through rebuilding all of the foo-using ports again... I regards what you said above as the regular routine, and I can't see how your practice can improve such a routine. If the port bar is willing to compile against any version of libfoo (and the vast majority of ports are), then the problem I described will not strike anyone -- bar will built against whatever libfoo is already installed on the building computer, and that's it. The user still has an option to upgrade everything
Re: Library numbers in LIB_DEPENDS considered harmful (Re: recent portrevision bump for libvpx)
On Feb 17, 2012 5:41 PM, Mikhail T. mi+t...@aldan.algebra.com wrote: On 17.02.2012 17:05, Zhihao Yuan wrote: LIB_DEPENDS= png.6: or =png: does not affect how the lib got linked. Allow me to rephrase my argument from a different perspective... The language used in our ports' Makefiles is, largely, declarative -- various things are declared and then bsd.port.mk (and friends) interpret them to do the right thing. Each declaration is meant to say something, so let's examine, what a LIB_DEPENDS entry declares: LIB_DEPENDS=foo.V:${PORTSDIR}/cat/libfoo The above line says, that this port needs a shared library libfoo.so.V to be installed. It also says, how to install it, if it is not already present at build-time. If, in fact, the current port does not care, which version of libfoo is uses -- and most software does not -- then declaring an explicit V is wrong: it gratuitously tightens the build-time requirements. Unless a particular version is, indeed, required, the above line should read simply: LIB_DEPENDS=foo:${PORTSDIR}/cat/libfoo Let's say, you sent someone to buy a bottle of dry red wine in a store. Wouldn't you be (unpleasantly) surprised, if he returned empty-handed, because the store did not have any Californian Pinot Noir of the 2003 vintage? Huh? You did not ask for Pinot Noir. You did not specify the origin nor the year either -- why did not he get something else that matched your much wider and easier-to-satisfy requirement: dry red wine? So what, I come to your bar and say 10 year red wine in1998, you give me a 1988 one. And I went your place again in 2008, and say same wine, and you give me a 1998 one? A similar thing happens here: if the, say, vlc software needs libx264 to be available at build time, the FreeBSD port of vlc should not add a requirement of a particular version to that. -mi ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: FreeBSD Port: x11-wm/compiz
Try to put a %%GNOME%% in front of each file that appears conditionally in pkg-plist, and PLIST_SUB it. Good luck. -- Zhihao Yuan On Feb 16, 2012 9:39 AM, Ashley Diamond a...@diamondbsd.com wrote: I am using Compiz as a standalone window manager and am trying to build without gnome support to reduce dependencies. If I compile with RSVG, GTK, DBUS and Gnome it builds successfully. If I try to compile with just RSVG, GTK and DBUS it fails with: === Running ldconfig /sbin/ldconfig -m /usr/local/lib === Registering installation for compiz-0.8.4_7 === Creating a package for new version compiz-0.8.4_7 tar: share/applications/compiz.desktop: Cannot stat: No such file or directory tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors. pkg_create: make_dist: tar command failed with code 256 === Package creation of compiz-0.8.4_7 failed === Aborting update Terminated === You can restart from the point of failure with this command line: portmaster flags x11-wm/compiz I assume either you *have* to install with Gnome (if so why is it an option) or reference to the compiz.desktop needs to be removed when not using Gnome? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: cannot build x11-wm/xfce4-wm after upgrade x11/xcb-util
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Heino Tiedemann rotkaps_spam_t...@gmx.de wrote: Michael Johnson a...@ahze.net wrote: Out of curiosity, what does 'grep xcb-aux /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/*' show? Nothing. No Output. Heino ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org I solved this problem by rebuilding libxfce4menu (to update the libtool profile). -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: CFT: mplayer and mencoder updates
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Jan Beich jbe...@tormail.net wrote: Zhihao Yuan lich...@gmail.com writes: Zhihao Yuan lich...@gmail.com writes: On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Thomas Zander thomas.e.zan...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, thank you all for your comments on the first iteration of the ports. A heavily revised version can be found on http://www.rrr.de/~riggs/mplayer/m20111230.tar.bz2 Changes: [...] - use newer gcc and binutils thus enabling significant speed-ups (and also, since most mplayer and ffmpeg development is done on newer gcc and binutils than we have in the base system, it's slowly getting tedious to ensure compatibility with older toolchain) So, with the new toolchain --disable-ssse3 is dropped but why BROKEN_RELOCATIONS is still there? GJ. Tested with clang, no problem either. Even though the port now explicitly uses gcc, ignoring CC from make.conf or Makefile.local ? And on clang with -integrated-as being default gnu as is not used, e.g. try to remove /usr/bin/as, it'd still build fine. It's not ignoring CC. It sets USE_GCC=, which can be overwrite by make CC=clang. Have you actually tried ? It's a known blind spot for clang -exp runs. $ echo CC=clang Makefile.local $ make -V CC gcc46 To specify a var in command has different effect. You can try it, make CC=clang in mplayer dir. -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: CFT: mplayer and mencoder updates
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Jan Beich jbe...@tormail.net wrote: Zhihao Yuan lich...@gmail.com writes: On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Thomas Zander thomas.e.zan...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, thank you all for your comments on the first iteration of the ports. A heavily revised version can be found on http://www.rrr.de/~riggs/mplayer/m20111230.tar.bz2 Changes: [...] - use newer gcc and binutils thus enabling significant speed-ups (and also, since most mplayer and ffmpeg development is done on newer gcc and binutils than we have in the base system, it's slowly getting tedious to ensure compatibility with older toolchain) So, with the new toolchain --disable-ssse3 is dropped but why BROKEN_RELOCATIONS is still there? GJ. Tested with clang, no problem either. Even though the port now explicitly uses gcc, ignoring CC from make.conf or Makefile.local ? And on clang with -integrated-as being default gnu as is not used, e.g. try to remove /usr/bin/as, it'd still build fine. It's not ignoring CC. It sets USE_GCC=, which can be overwrite by make CC=clang. -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: CFT: mplayer and mencoder updates
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Thomas Zander thomas.e.zan...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 00:43, Zhihao Yuan lich...@gmail.com wrote: stable/8: gcc: ffmpeg/libavformat/libavformat.a(udp.o): In function `udp_open': udp.c:(.text+0xf8e): undefined reference to `pthread_create' ffmpeg/libavcodec/libavcodec.a(pthread.o): In function `ff_thread_init': pthread.c:(.text+0x178c): undefined reference to `pthread_create' pthread.c:(.text+0x1894): undefined reference to `pthread_create' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status How did you trigger this build problem? What OPTIONS did you use? OCFLAGS, X11, X11XV, VDPAU, MAD, LIBCDIO. The following is the options recorded by config.mak: CONFIGURATION = --cc=clang --host-cc=clang --disable-bitmap-font --disab le-liba52 --disable-ssse3 --disable-directfb --disable-faac --disable-faad --dis able-libdca --disable-twolame --disable-x264 --disable-xvid --disable-libdirac-l avc --disable-mencoder --disable-mpg123 --disable-alsa --disable-musepack --disa ble-inet6 --disable-gif --disable-libopenjpeg --disable-libdv --disable-theora - -disable-libvpx-lavc --disable-libschroedinger-lavc --disable-speex --disable-li ve --disable-jack --disable-nas --disable-openal --disable-pulse --disable-blura y --disable-smb --disable-fribidi --disable-cdparanoia --disable-ladspa --disabl e-liblzo --disable-win32dll --disable-qtx --disable-real --disable-libopencore_a mrnb --disable-libopencore_amrwb --disable-libgsm --disable-tv-v4l1 --disable-tv -v4l2 --disable-librtmp --disable-mng --enable-ass --enable-ass-internal --disab le-enca --disable-dga1 --disable-dga2 --disable-gl --disable-xinerama --disable- vm --disable-rtc --disable-arts --disable-caca --disable-lirc --disable-sdl --di sable-svga --disable-aa --disable-esd --disable-joystick --x-libraries=/usr/loca l/lib --x-includes=/usr/local/include --prefix=/usr/local --mandir=/usr/local/ma n --build=amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2 And, there is no -pthread in this file. I'll look into your patch set as soon as I can! Until then, thanks for testing and patching! Best regards Riggs -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: CFT: mplayer and mencoder updates
Hi: Could you take a look at this (support FreeBSD OSS 24-bit output)? http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/156747 I unified the some patches here: https://gist.github.com/1362097 1. Disable ALSA explicitly; 2. Allow internal libass if ASS is tuned off; 3. OSS 24-bit output; 4. FreeBSD's log2 log2f in libc. Let me test the port... stable/8: gcc: ffmpeg/libavformat/libavformat.a(udp.o): In function `udp_open': udp.c:(.text+0xf8e): undefined reference to `pthread_create' ffmpeg/libavcodec/libavcodec.a(pthread.o): In function `ff_thread_init': pthread.c:(.text+0x178c): undefined reference to `pthread_create' pthread.c:(.text+0x1894): undefined reference to `pthread_create' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status clang: clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-rpath=/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib' ffmpeg/libavformat/libavformat.a(udp.o): In function `udp_open': libavformat/udp.c:(.text+0x907): undefined reference to `pthread_create' ffmpeg/libavcodec/libavcodec.a(pthread.o): In function `ff_thread_init': libavcodec/pthread.c:(.text+0xded): undefined reference to `pthread_create' libavcodec/pthread.c:(.text+0x104e): undefined reference to `pthread_create' clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) The original config.mak has no -pthread, so the replacement in port-configure fails to work. The program works fine. Thanks. On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Thomas Zander thomas.e.zan...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi list, on http://www.rrr.de/~riggs/mplayer/m20111219.tar.bz2 you can find the draft of updates to the mplayer and mencoder ports. Please have a look, play with it and let me know what you think. I tested it on 8.2 STABLE i386 and amd64 only so far, so I hope it works for 9 and 10 as well. As always, comments, suggestions and especially patches are more than welcome. Best regards Riggs ___ freebsd-multime...@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-multimedia To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-multimedia-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Linux compatibility with more than one Linux installed?
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:53 AM, Thomas Mueller mueller6...@bellsouth.net wrote: The X server has a unix socket somewhere in /tmp. Normally this is used instead of a TCP connection to the localhost. You need to change the DISPLAY env-variable to use a TCP connection, or you need o make the unix socket available to the chrooted linux-env. The linuxulator in FreeBSD is nearly linux 2.6.16 compatible. We lack inotify and epoll support which the 2.6.16 kernel normally supports. If your system does not depend upon inotify, epoll and anything newer than 2.6.16, it should work. If you give it a try, please report success or failure to emulat...@freebsd.org. Bye, Alexander. Now I might have something to try, but it is very unlikely that I would build a Linux kernel = 2.6.16, especially with new hardware that might need the latest drivers. I will primarily want to run Linux natively rather than under FreeBSD. I think emulators/linux_dist-gentoo-stage3 and emulators/linux_base-gentoo-stage3 must use kernel far beyond 2.6.16. But I think, when chrooting into Linux from FreeBSD, FreeBSD kernel is the one in effect. Not really. The actual thing is, linuxulator is a Linux kernel running as a FreeBSD kernel module. The only thing FreeBSD kernel do is to identify the Linux program and to pass it to the Linux kernel. To the Linux programs inside a GNU chroot enviroment, they think they are running inside a Linux box and actually they are running inside a Linux box. To the Linux programs running under a FreeBSD base, they may identify that the base is not GNU by invoking some external programs like `uname`. However, we can replace their sh with /compat/linux/bin/sh, so that they are blind again. Tom ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Linux compatibility with more than one Linux installed?
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:21 AM, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 04:54:18 -0600 Zhihao Yuan wrote: Not really. The actual thing is, linuxulator is a Linux kernel running as a FreeBSD kernel module. The only thing FreeBSD kernel do is to identify the Linux program and to pass it to the Linux kernel. To the Linux programs inside a GNU chroot enviroment, they think they are running inside a Linux box and actually they are running inside a Linux box. Are you sure about that? I was under the impression that it was a fairly thin emulation layer on top of the FreeBSD kernel. Has something changed? To Linux program, there is no emulation layer. This technology should be called extended ELF lookup table, and has nothing to do with emulation. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Linux compatibility with more than one Linux installed?
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 7:45 AM, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 06:29:03 -0600 Zhihao Yuan wrote: On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:21 AM, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 04:54:18 -0600 Zhihao Yuan wrote: Not really. The actual thing is, linuxulator is a Linux kernel running as a FreeBSD kernel module. The only thing FreeBSD kernel do is to identify the Linux program and to pass it to the Linux kernel. To the Linux programs inside a GNU chroot enviroment, they think they are running inside a Linux box and actually they are running inside a Linux box. Are you sure about that? I was under the impression that it was a fairly thin emulation layer on top of the FreeBSD kernel. Has something changed? To Linux program, there is no emulation layer. This technology should be called extended ELF lookup table, and has nothing to do with emulation. It's not emulation in the narrow sense that vmware is emulation and wine isn't, but it certainly is emulation within the normal sense or the word. My dictionary defines emulate as imitate zealously. But what I was getting at was the statement linuxulator is a Linux kernel running as a FreeBSD kernel module which I'm guessing now you didn't mean literally. FreeBSD handbook: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/linuxemu-advanced.html In effect, there is a Linux kernel in the FreeBSD kernel; the various underlying functions that implement all of the services provided by the kernel are identical to both the FreeBSD system call table entries, and the Linux system call table entries: file system operations, virtual memory operations, signal delivery, System V IPC, etc... So, if you define a Linux kernel as every thing written by Linus and his followers, then I'm wrong; but if you agree that Android is not GNU but it does run a Linux kernel, then I'm probably right. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Linux compatibility with more than one Linux installed?
Well, I'm wrong. I read in effect as in fact... -- Zhihao Yuan On Dec 6, 2011 9:33 AM, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 08:04:59 -0600 Zhihao Yuan wrote: On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 7:45 AM, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote: But what I was getting at was the statement linuxulator is a Linux kernel running as a FreeBSD kernel module which I'm guessing now you didn't mean literally. FreeBSD handbook: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/linuxemu-advanced.html In effect, there is a Linux kernel in the FreeBSD kernel; ... Clearly the author of that article doesn't agree with you or he wouldn't have written In effect. If your statement had been: linuxulator is effectively a Linux kernel running as a FreeBSD kernel, then it wouldn't have been plain wrong. So, if you define a Linux kernel as every thing written by Linus and his followers, then I'm wrong; but if you agree that Android is not GNU but it does run a Linux kernel, then I'm probably right. Android is based on fork of Linux, it contains real Linux code. All you could argue from that is that the linuxulator could be called Linux if it were based on Linux code. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Plan to add a bsd.pure.mk
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com wrote: I would like to hold off on any more disruptive changes to the tree until we can get this release out the door. If that means devel/clang needs to stay at its current value (and only clang-devel updated), then that's fine. devel/clang always points to the release version, and its maintainer is contacting other maintainers who has ports depends on clang/llvm to fix the broken stuff. mcl -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Plan to add a bsd.pure.mk
No, we don't need it that to upgrade llvm, but I need to decide soon. -- Zhihao Yuan On Dec 5, 2011 10:16 AM, Brooks Davis bro...@freebsd.org wrote: On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 01:28:33AM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: I would like to hold off on any more disruptive changes to the tree until we can get this release out the door. If that means devel/clang needs to stay at its current value (and only clang-devel updated), then that's fine. We don't actually need to add a bsd.pure.mk to upgrade llvm. We would need to complete the repocopy in ports/163030 and change the build and run depends in lang/pure which would change the depends of the 12ish ports involved. Similar changes are needed in a couple other ports. I'll leave it up to portmgr to decide if that's too disruptive. IMO if any change of this scope (an upgrade triggering less than dozen rebuilds, mostly of ports that aren't widely used) should be approved, it should be this one given our general toolchain focus. -- Brooks ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Plan to add a bsd.pure.mk
portmgr@: Clang 3.0 is released and about to replace the clang-2.9 in ports. Pure 0.47 in ports does not build with 3.0, so I must make sure ports/161799 can be committed soon. From now on, 18 hours. If I do not get a response from portmgr@ with in 18 hours, I'll assume my request, to add the bsd.pure.mk script into /usr/ports/Mk, is rejected. Thanks. On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Zhihao Yuan lich...@gmail.com wrote: Currently, 12. Plus 3 committed, 1 unsubmitted, 3~4 planning to port. The total existing addons are listed here: http://code.google.com/p/pure-lang/wiki/Addons I probably not going to port all of them, but this list is growing. On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu ite...@freebsd.org wrote: On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:02:38 -0600 Zhihao Yuan lich...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The PR which updates all pure-* ports was passed to portmgr for a long time, since it seem that to put a .if defined(USE_PURE) .include ${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.pure.mk .endif In bsd.port.mk may a be better choice. Though Pure is not as popular as some languages like PHP or Python, but it does and it will have more ports than like Go. To include bsd.pure.mk under Mk/ can lower 2 lines in ~20 ports (or I have to leave it under lang/pure's private directory). How many pure ports are there ATM? -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD user Intellectual Property is nowhere near as valuable as Intellect FreeBSD committer - ite...@freebsd.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Plan to add a bsd.pure.mk
Currently, 12. Plus 3 committed, 1 unsubmitted, 3~4 planning to port. The total existing addons are listed here: http://code.google.com/p/pure-lang/wiki/Addons I probably not going to port all of them, but this list is growing. On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu ite...@freebsd.org wrote: On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:02:38 -0600 Zhihao Yuan lich...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The PR which updates all pure-* ports was passed to portmgr for a long time, since it seem that to put a .if defined(USE_PURE) .include ${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.pure.mk .endif In bsd.port.mk may a be better choice. Though Pure is not as popular as some languages like PHP or Python, but it does and it will have more ports than like Go. To include bsd.pure.mk under Mk/ can lower 2 lines in ~20 ports (or I have to leave it under lang/pure's private directory). How many pure ports are there ATM? -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD user Intellectual Property is nowhere near as valuable as Intellect FreeBSD committer - ite...@freebsd.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Plan to add a bsd.pure.mk
Hi, The PR which updates all pure-* ports was passed to portmgr for a long time, since it seem that to put a .if defined(USE_PURE) .include ${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.pure.mk .endif In bsd.port.mk may a be better choice. Though Pure is not as popular as some languages like PHP or Python, but it does and it will have more ports than like Go. To include bsd.pure.mk under Mk/ can lower 2 lines in ~20 ports (or I have to leave it under lang/pure's private directory). I included both the .mk file, and the missing, new, pure-readline port here. In bsd.pure.mk, we support user to specify the pure-* dependencies through USE_PURE= readline ffi And readline is the one we have't inluded yet. Btw, they are two more pure ports pending here http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/161800 Please commit they according to the way you accept bsd.pure.mk. Thanks. -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ bsd.pure.mk Description: Binary data ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: CFT Chromium 15.0.874.92
Tested, no problem, with all acceleration + flash enabled. Thanks! On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 9:41 AM, George Liaskos geo.lias...@gmail.comwrote: On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 5:34 PM, George Liaskos geo.lias...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, http://cybertron.gr/chromium-20111016.tar.xz http://cybertron.gr/chromium-15.0.874.92.tbz Meh, sorry about that. I pushed send by mistake. What i meant to write was : please test Chromium 15.0.874.92 :) There are many people that report problems with the current version of Chromium in ports. I believe that this revision of the port should resolve most of the issues but it would be really nice if we have more feadback. The package is for 9 amd64 compiled with gcc45. Regards, George ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ImageMagick fails to build when upgrading.
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Paul Macdonald p...@ifdnrg.com wrote: On 11/10/2011 11:58, Leslie Jensen wrote: /usr/ports/graphics/**ImageMagick/work/ImageMagick-** 6.7.2-10/test-suite.log Segmentation fault (core dumped) in case you hadn't spotted 6.7.3.0 is in ports tree and builds ok for me. Paul. -- - Paul Macdonald IFDNRG Ltd Web and video hosting - t: 0131 5548070 m: 07534206249 e: p...@ifdnrg.com w: http://www.ifdnrg.com - IFDNRG 40 Maritime Street Edinburgh EH6 6SA - __**_ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-portshttp://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@**freebsd.orgfreebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org I checked out the latest version in ports, but this test still fails for gcc46. I'll try clang latter. -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Vim does not build with ruby19 (since ruby19 does not install the ruby command)
Hi, I specified RUBY_DEFAULT_VER=1.9 in /etc/make.conf, and rebuild everything relates to ruby, and I found the successfully built Vim lacks of the ruby support. By default, vim requires the 'ruby' command when building WITH_RUBY=1, but ruby19 does not install the command. One solution is that to install the command as a symbol link, and mark ruby-1.8 and ruby-1.9 as conflicts. Another one only works for vim, to set the '--with-ruby-command=ruby19' as a configure args. Any comments? -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Vim does not build with ruby19 (since ruby19 does not install the ruby command)
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov cvs-...@yandex.ruwrote: Zhihao Yuan wrote on 11.10.2011 17:56: Hi, I specified RUBY_DEFAULT_VER=1.9 in /etc/make.conf, and rebuild everything relates to ruby, and I found the successfully built Vim lacks of the ruby support. By default, vim requires the 'ruby' command when building WITH_RUBY=1, but ruby19 does not install the command. One solution is that to install the command as a symbol link, and mark ruby-1.8 and ruby-1.9 as conflicts. Another one only works for vim, to set the '--with-ruby-command=ruby19' as a configure args. Any comments? I'd check if we already have ${PREFIX}/bin/ruby, and if not - install symlink. If ${PREFIX}/bin/ruby is already there - install just ruby1X. This can be added to both ruby ports. -- Regards, Ruslan Tinderboxing kills... the drives. I suggest that to make the 'ruby' command obey the RUBY_DEFAULT_VER setting, like what python ports do. -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: TeXLive
Similar question. I tried to install the texlive-xetex. The installation is successful, but there is no .fmt files installed. On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith step...@missouri.edu wrote: Hey guys, I did make -C /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/**portshaker-config install # Ensure TEXLIVE is checked portshaker -v Now I have a whole bunch of texlive ports installed under /usr/ports/print. Am I just supposed to build the ports I need, or is there some grand texlive-build-all port that is in this long list somewhere? __**_ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-portshttp://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@**freebsd.orgfreebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: chromium 14.0.835.202 build error
Fixed, but not committed yet. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/161323 On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Marco Beishuizen mb...@xs4all.nl wrote: Hi, Yesterday I portupgraded my ports. Chromium doesn't build with: ... CXX(target) out/Release/obj.target/**browser/chrome/browser/ui/** webui/print_preview_ui.o chrome/browser/ui/webui/print_**preview_handler.cc: In member function 'void PrintSystemTaskProxy::**GetPrinterCapabilities(const std::string)': chrome/browser/ui/webui/print_**preview_handler.cc:291: error: 'ppd_file_t' was not declared in this scope chrome/browser/ui/webui/print_**preview_handler.cc:291: error: 'ppd' was not declared in this scope chrome/browser/ui/webui/print_**preview_handler.cc:291: error: 'ppdOpenFile' was not declared in this scope chrome/browser/ui/webui/print_**preview_handler.cc:293: error: 'ppd_attr_t' was not declared in this scope chrome/browser/ui/webui/print_**preview_handler.cc:293: error: 'attr' was not declared in this scope chrome/browser/ui/webui/print_**preview_handler.cc:293: error: 'ppdFindAttr' was not declared in this scope chrome/browser/ui/webui/print_**preview_handler.cc:297: error: 'ppd_choice_t' was not declared in this scope chrome/browser/ui/webui/print_**preview_handler.cc:297: error: 'ch' was not declared in this scope chrome/browser/ui/webui/print_**preview_handler.cc:297: error: 'ppdFindMarkedChoice' was not declared in this scope chrome/browser/ui/webui/print_**preview_handler.cc:299: error: 'ppd_option_t' was not declared in this scope chrome/browser/ui/webui/print_**preview_handler.cc:299: error: 'option' was not declared in this scope chrome/browser/ui/webui/print_**preview_handler.cc:299: error: 'ppdFindOption' was not declared in this scope chrome/browser/ui/webui/print_**preview_handler.cc:301: error: 'ppdFindChoice' was not declared in this scope chrome/browser/ui/webui/print_**preview_handler.cc:307: error: 'ppdClose' was not declared in this scope gmake: *** [out/Release/obj.target/**browser/chrome/browser/ui/**webui/print_preview_handler.o] Error 1 gmake: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs *** Error code 1 ... I've never seen this one before. Has anyone an idea? Running FreeBSD 8.2-stable and portstree is up-to-date. Marco -- The distinction between true and false appears to become increasingly blurred by... the pollution of the language. -- Arne Tiselius __**_ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-portshttp://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@**freebsd.orgfreebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: FreeBSD Ports: sylpheed, gnash, seamonkey
It's updating to 3.1.1 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/158798 I guess this will be committed soon. Or you can just patch and try it earlier. On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen tin...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Marco Alberoni m.alber...@cineca.it wrote: Hello everybody, I usually use the applications Sylpheed, Gnash and Seamonkey, and for all of them there the FreeBSD port is not synchronized with the latest available version: are there any problems for their upgrade? Sylpheed 3.1.1 was released on May 6th, 2011. And on July 1st, 2011 Sylpheed 3.2beta1 was released. What are the current plans for upgrading the Sylpheed port (if any)? Have a nice day. -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Why so many versions of the port science/hdf?
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith step...@missouri.edu wrote: Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: Why are there three versions of science/hdf in the ports? This is causing problems for me when I try to build the port octave-forge. As dependencies, it calls in the octave port (which currently defaults to hdf5), the cgnslib port (which uses hdf5-18), and the opendx port (which uses hdf). All of these ports function perfectly well with hdf5.18, because all the different versions of hdf conflict with each other. If we could settle on using hdf5-18 throughout, that would be great. (I currently maintain opendx, so that would be something I can fix.) Are there ports that need hdf but don't build with hdf5-18? Thanks, Stephen Well I feel pretty dumb. Actually it is my port, opendx, that needs the original hdf port. I forgot to enable WITH_HDF before testing it! Stephen Stephen ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org math/PDL only builds with hdf4. It detects hdf.h and libdf.a. -- Zhihao Yuan The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Ask maintainership of lang/p5-F77 and math/PDL
Hi, perl@ is not a maintainer, but I still waited a month for my last contribution to these two ports (they are related). Now I want to maintain these two ports. PDL 2.4.9 is released, and I'm going to spend some time on it. Btw, if someone want to let me to do so, please apply the patch included to p5-F77 at the same time. The patch fixes a tiny problem (${FC} defaults to f77 on 7.0R, which is not trustful). -- Zhihao Yuan The best way to predict the future is to invent it. p5-ExtUtils-F77-1.17_1.patch Description: Binary data ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Ask for maintainership of lang/p5-F77 and math/PDL
Hi, perl@ is not a maintainer, but I still waited a month for my last contribution to these two ports (they are related). Now I want to maintain these two ports. PDL 2.4.9 is released, and I'm going to spend some time on it. Btw, if someone want to let me to do so, please apply the patch included to p5-F77 at the same time. The patch fixes a tiny problem (${FC} defaults to f77 on 7.0R, which is not trustful). -- Zhihao Yuan The best way to predict the future is to invent it. p5-ExtUtils-F77-1.17_1.patch Description: Binary data ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
ports/156747: multimedia/mplayer: fix 24-bits OSS + some improvements
Hi, My final patches applies to mplayer and mencoder. After some discussion, I think they are stable enough. I hope someone can take this PR soon (before next upstream update, at least). Thanks so much. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/156747 -- Zhihao Yuan The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
ports/156747: multimedia/mplayer: fix 24-bits OSS + some improvements
Hi, My final patches applies to mplayer and mencoder. After some discussion, I think they are stable enough. I hope someone can take this PR soon (before next upstream update, at least). Thanks so much. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/156747 -- Zhihao Yuan The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Charlie Kester corky1...@comcast.net wrote: Well, due to some serious philosophical differences re these deprecation campaigns and what seems to be resistance to any further discussion, I don't think I can continue working with the committers. So I'm stepping down. If no one else wants to maintain them, please reset the maintainer of the following ports to po...@freebsd.org: audio/mcplay deskutils/osmo deskutils/teapot devel/argtable devel/egypt devel/gengetopt devel/libXGP devel/libYGP finance/xinvest finance/xquote graphics/box graphics/boxer graphics/fly graphics/sng math/ised misc/vifm misc/xsw multimedia/gpodder multimedia/openshot multimedia/photofilmstrip security/beecrypt security/ccrypt security/nettle security/ranpwd sysutils/dircomp sysutils/gaffitter sysutils/iextract sysutils/lookat sysutils/moreutils sysutils/moreutils-parallel sysutils/ncdu sysutils/rdup textproc/tdhkit x11/fbpanel O-o-ok... philosophical differences. audio/mcplay and the 3 multimedia-related ports, + fbpanel, have many users, AFAIK, and require much works. We need to someone to take them soon. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Zhihao Yuan The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: graphics/simpleviewer doesn't build on head(?)
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Sergey V. Dyatko sergey.dya...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm trying to build graphics/simpleviewerer and got following error: http://tiger.ipfw.ru/files/simpleviewer.txt tiger# uname -a FreeBSD tiger.minsk.domain 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #36 r220184: Thu Mar 31 16:17:14 EEST 2011 root@tiger.minsk.domain:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/tiger-desktop i386 I tested it on 8-STABLE, and it does not build either (with gcc45). The port maintainer add a strange section to post-patch: @${REINPLACE_CMD} -e 's,const struct dirent,struct dirent,' \ ${WRKSRC}/src/fileslist.* Remove it, and it will works. -- wbr, tiger ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Zhihao Yuan The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: graphics/simpleviewer doesn't build on head(?)
2011/4/8 Sergey V. Dyatko sergey.dya...@gmail.com: On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 01:36:46 -0500 Zhihao Yuan lich...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Sergey V. Dyatko sergey.dya...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm trying to build graphics/simpleviewerer and got following error: http://tiger.ipfw.ru/files/simpleviewer.txt tiger# uname -a FreeBSD tiger.minsk.domain 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #36 r220184: Thu Mar 31 16:17:14 EEST 2011 root@tiger.minsk.domain:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/tiger-desktop i386 I tested it on 8-STABLE, and it does not build either (with gcc45). The port maintainer add a strange section to post-patch: @${REINPLACE_CMD} -e 's,const struct dirent,struct dirent,' \ ${WRKSRC}/src/fileslist.* Remove it, and it will works. Thanks for reply. I'm confused, maintainer commit fix for 'esc' key (PORTREVISION= 1). So I think port build fine for him :) Whatever... I don't like this image viewer. Let others send PR or something. -- wbr, tiger -- wbr, tiger -- Zhihao Yuan The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: graphics/simpleviewer doesn't build on head(?)
2011/4/8 Alexey Dokuchaev da...@freebsd.org: On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 01:50:27AM -0500, Zhihao Yuan wrote: Whatever... I don't like this image viewer. While this viewer is far from perfect, I find that it at least works (contrary to gliv which dumps core on me both now and many years ago when I first discovered it) and performs scaling correctly (unlike pho, which is currently my viewer of choice). I'd happily switch to anything at least as good as default viewer in windoze xp, but have not seen anything decent so far. Maybe you can recommend something which is not part of Gnome or KDE? The reason I don't like it is, my ATI driver does not support OpenGL very well -- when I scale the window size, the content disappears. I use xli for years. When I need to see an image which is not supported by xli (like GIF), I use display command (ImageMagick). When I need to see a lot of images (like a manga), I use comix -- it has some special display modes designed for manga or book. ./danfe -- Zhihao Yuan The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: graphics/simpleviewer doesn't build on head(?)
2011/4/8 Alexey Dokuchaev da...@freebsd.org: On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 02:22:17AM -0500, Zhihao Yuan wrote: 2011/4/8 Alexey Dokuchaev da...@freebsd.org: On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 01:50:27AM -0500, Zhihao Yuan wrote: Whatever... I don't like this image viewer. I'd happily switch to anything at least as good as default viewer in windoze xp, but have not seen anything decent so far. Maybe you can recommend something which is not part of Gnome or KDE? The reason I don't like it is, my ATI driver does not support OpenGL very well -- when I scale the window size, the content disappears. Same bug here with Intel 915GM. :-( I use xli for years. When I need to see an image which is not supported by xli (like GIF), I use display command (ImageMagick). When I need to see a lot of images (like a manga), I use comix -- it has some special display modes designed for manga or book. Unfortunately, graphics/xli seems to be deprecated and scheduled for termination after 2011-05-01. Perhaps you'd like to become new maintainer? Yes. So far, I only maintain new ports. How do I take managership of other ports? ./danfe -- Zhihao Yuan The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: graphics/simpleviewer doesn't build on head(?)
2011/4/8 Alexey Dokuchaev da...@freebsd.org: On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 02:39:50AM -0500, Zhihao Yuan wrote: 2011/4/8 Alexey Dokuchaev da...@freebsd.org: Unfortunately, graphics/xli seems to be deprecated and scheduled for termination after 2011-05-01. Perhaps you'd like to become new maintainer? Yes. So far, I only maintain new ports. How do I take managership of other ports? I will clean up graphics/xli and set you as maintainer. Generally, you can post an email on this list@ or file a PR. Maybe since just asking for maintainership is trivial change, spamming PR database is not needed. ./danfe Thanks. The original distfile source can be removed. Others looks fine. -- Zhihao Yuan The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: graphics/simpleviewer doesn't build on head(?)
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Zhihao Yuan lich...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/4/8 Alexey Dokuchaev da...@freebsd.org: On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 02:39:50AM -0500, Zhihao Yuan wrote: 2011/4/8 Alexey Dokuchaev da...@freebsd.org: Unfortunately, graphics/xli seems to be deprecated and scheduled for termination after 2011-05-01. Perhaps you'd like to become new maintainer? Yes. So far, I only maintain new ports. How do I take managership of other ports? I will clean up graphics/xli and set you as maintainer. Generally, you can post an email on this list@ or file a PR. Maybe since just asking for maintainership is trivial change, spamming PR database is not needed. ./danfe Thanks. The original distfile source can be removed. Others looks fine. Oh. Btw. If you need to commit this port, please add a patch. It eliminate many warnings when building xli. -- Zhihao Yuan The best way to predict the future is to invent it. -- Zhihao Yuan The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: graphics/simpleviewer doesn't build on head(?)
2011/4/8 Alexey Dokuchaev da...@freebsd.org: On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 03:03:20AM -0500, Zhihao Yuan wrote: On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Zhihao Yuan lich...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/4/8 Alexey Dokuchaev da...@freebsd.org: I will clean up graphics/xli and set you as maintainer. Thanks. The original distfile source can be removed. Others looks fine. Oh. Btw. If you need to commit this port, please add a patch. It eliminate many warnings when building xli. Done. You might be interested to know that Debian has this package of version 1.17.0-20061110, which is newer than ours. I didn't take liberty to update the port which I don't use however. This snapshot fixed a problem relates to PBM. I sent a PR to move to MASTER_SITE_DEBIAN: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=156272 So that the distfile of this snapshot is available. BTW... Debian's 2000~line own xli patch set is really shocking. How much time these guys spent on this... ./danfe -- Zhihao Yuan The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: graphics/simpleviewer doesn't build on head(?)
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Alexey Shuvaev shuv...@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de wrote: On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 07:07:02AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 01:50:27AM -0500, Zhihao Yuan wrote: Whatever... I don't like this image viewer. While this viewer is far from perfect, I find that it at least works (contrary to gliv which dumps core on me both now and many years ago when I first discovered it) and performs scaling correctly (unlike pho, which is currently my viewer of choice). I'd happily switch to anything at least as good as default viewer in windoze xp, but have not seen anything decent so far. Maybe you can recommend something which is not part of Gnome or KDE? graphics/geeqie, it uses gtk but not gnome Check this out: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Lightweight_Applications 0.02$, Alexey. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Zhihao Yuan The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Removing Cruft from the ports tree
to standardize our WITH_*/WITHOUT_* flags instead of giving a commonly use flags instruction. --- While I understand there might some minor part of the community that has a sentimental attachment to the blue-on-gray-on-blue configuration, and still others want to prematurely optimize, a simple workaround could be implemented. We can allow users to add their own ./configure arguments to the makefile. This serves the needs of the community while allowing us to deal with a simpler and more reliable ports system. Feel free to express your thoughts here. I would like to get this hashed out now so the process could occur on a later date(1). -- Eitan Adler Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Zhihao Yuan The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Firefox does not build with gcc45
Hi, It seems that shlibsign keep crashes: /home/lichray/temp/firefox/work/mozilla-2.0/obj-amd64-unknown-freebsd8.2/nss/shlibsign -v -i /home/lichray/temp/firefox/work/mozilla-2.0/obj-amd64-unknown-freebsd8.2/security/manager/../../dist/lib/libfreebl3.so moduleSpec configdir='' certPrefix='' keyPrefix='' secmod='' flags=noCertDB, noModDB Generate a DSA key pair ... Library File: /home/lichray/temp/firefox/work/mozilla-2.0/obj-amd64-unknown-freebsd8.2/nss/freebl/FreeBSD_SINGLE_SHLIB/libfreebl3.so 376337 bytes Check File: /home/lichray/temp/firefox/work/mozilla-2.0/obj-amd64-unknown-freebsd8.2/nss/freebl/FreeBSD_SINGLE_SHLIB/libfreebl3.chk Link: libfreebl3.chk hash: 20 bytes 78 d7 55 ce 21 79 d2 ff 3e f2 e8 06 a7 20 5e 96 2b d3 4b db signature: 40 bytes 5a 7b a1 8a 63 79 bd aa ba b7 17 29 26 3f b2 a7 de 1c e8 c9 40 4e 36 5e 48 e5 60 32 15 d5 d7 39 96 5f 96 2c 52 a2 61 d9 Segmentation fault (core dumped) gmake[6]: *** [/home/lichray/temp/firefox/work/mozilla-2.0/obj-amd64-unknown-freebsd8.2/security/manager/../../dist/lib/libfreebl3.chk gmake[6]: Leaving directory `/home/lichray/temp/firefox/work/mozilla-2.0/security/nss/cmd/shlibsign' ... The error is the same when I build it under /usr/ports/www. When I issue the last command by hand, it seems that there is no crash. But the core file does belong to shlibsign: ./obj-amd64-unknown-freebsd8.2/dist/lib/shlibsign.core -- Zhihao Yuan The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Building for libofa-0.9.3_6 fails
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Heino Tiedemann rotkaps_spam_t...@gmx.de wrote: Alex Dupre a...@freebsd.org wrote: Leslie Jensen ha scritto: I got this problem with building libofa-0.9.3_6 What can I do to solve it? Set: CPPFLAGS+= -I${LOCALBASE}/include in the port's Makefile. shouldn't it be put into that file by maintainer? It should. Heino ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Zhihao Yuan The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [HEADS UP] Ports Infrastructure Changes
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Henk van Oers h...@signature.nl wrote: From: Pav Lucistnik p...@freebsd.org Matthias Andree pí¹e v so 19. 03. 2011 v 09:52 +0100: [...] Where do you see the dividing line between web apps on one hand and on the other hand http servers ... everything related to apache? IOW, how do I decide if I put a new port into www-webapps or into www-servers for its primary category? Basically, everything that serves network is server and everything that generates pages on these servers is webapp. So: why is p5-Mojolicious in webapp, it serves network (main deployment). And it's a client too... Not just p5-Mojolicious. Many webapps can be web servers, like Flask. Even some unrelated packages can be www servers, like python, with SimpleHTTPServer. And some www-clients can also be www-servers. For example, opera. It's a client, server, email client, HTML-editor. You can't just *separate* things into clients, servers, apps, and misc. And also, during the development of the HTML5, there will be more and more www-client ports can be used as servers, by using web socket. The border of clients and servers will become fuzzy. We should not used a C/S model to sort these ports. That's why I suggest that to create a www-devel branch - you can determined what a software is mainly designed for, but you can not always determined what a software can be used as. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Zhihao Yuan The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [HEADS UP] Ports Infrastructure Changes
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Henk van Oers h...@signature.nl wrote: From: Pav Lucistnik p...@freebsd.org Matthias Andree pí¹e v so 19. 03. 2011 v 09:52 +0100: [...] Where do you see the dividing line between web apps on one hand and on the other hand http servers ... everything related to apache? IOW, how do I decide if I put a new port into www-webapps or into www-servers for its primary category? Basically, everything that serves network is server and everything that generates pages on these servers is webapp. So: why is p5-Mojolicious in webapp, it serves network (main deployment). And it's a client too... My suggestion: separate www into www and www-devel. C/S model can not clarify the developing web technology these years. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Zhihao Yuan The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [HEADS UP] Ports Infrastructure Changes
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Michal Varga varga.mic...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, 2011-03-19 at 09:49 +0800, Martin Wilke wrote: Attached is a proposed list of ports being moved from the www category. Please review, discuss and report ommissions and mistakes. The general key to the new categories is as follows: [...] www-webapps - web apps, frameworks, libraries Just a quick thought to the 'discuss' part: Is this (above) really the best name possible? I mean world wide web-webapps sounds kind of redundant. m. www-devel may be preferred, since www-webapps contains the web frameworks, libs. or may be devel-www :) -- Michal Varga, Stonehenge (Gmail account) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Zhihao Yuan The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Firefox 4 - Beta
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Heino Tiedemann rotkaps_spam_t...@gmx.de wrote: Sergey Nikolenko s...@swa.org.ru wrote: On 06.03.2011 19:17, Heino Tiedemann wrote: is there someone who likes to go for the Firefox 4 in ports? maybe into www/firefox-devel? Firefox 4 is in the State beta 12 - what means it is the release candidate. Firefox 4 is available for FreeBSD for a long time in our development repository. Please have a look at this page for more information about the freebsd-gecko repository: https://trillian.chruetertee.ch/freebsd-gecko/ Firefox 4 lives at: https://trillian.chruetertee.ch/svn/freebsd-gecko/branches/experimental/www/firefox-devel/ We are not going to commit a Firefox 4 Beta or RC to the ports tree. If you like to test Firefox 4 use the one from the development repository at your own risk. Cool. Any manpage or howto how I can gat this on my computer? Do I need SVN for that 1. cd /usr/ports/devel/subversion; make install clean 2. cd /usr/ports/www 3. svn co https://trillian.chruetertee.ch/svn/freebsd-gecko/branches/experimental/www/firefox-devel 4. cd firefox-devel 5. make install clean The performance of Firefox 4 is impressive, sometimes it's even working faster than Chromium. Yes, it is Fast! I belive it is even faster on startup... One Question: Do I HAVE TO put it into my ports tree? Or can I put it somewhere into my home directory tree? e.g. 1 cd ~/myports/www 2 svn co https://trillian.chruetertee.ch/svn/freebsd-gecko/branches/experimental/www/firefox-devel 3 cd firefox-devel 4 make install clean Does that work? Where doesthe distfile go to then? distfiles goes to /usr/ports/distfiles. You don't have to mv it into your ports tree. After you have done sudo make fetch, you can build the port as a normal user. Heino ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Zhihao Yuan The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org