Re: [CFT] add a config.site cache for the ports
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 08:56:52PM -0400, Steve Wills wrote: I'm sure your list probably includes this, but just in case, databases/db42 broke with this for me. Steve Here is a new version that fix the issue for db42 and others: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/config_site.diff Thanks all for testing. regards, Bapt pgpRxfyWGfnhS.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [CFT] add a config.site cache for the ports
I'm sure your list probably includes this, but just in case, databases/db42 broke with this for me. Steve just a fyi this exp-run broke quiet a lot. On Mar 23, 2013, at 11:18 PM, Bryan Drewery bdrew...@freebsd.org wrote: On 3/18/2013 12:41 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Hi, The autotools allows us to have a config.site cache where we define our defaults values for a couple of things, and prevent the slow and possibly wrong autodetection. Here is a patch that makes use of it: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/autotools_config_site.diff As the libiconv/gettext update has shown the configure scripts can fall back on gnu version of commands first if it find it, and in case gettext is removed you can get trouble. In this config.site, I hardcoded a couple of FreeBSD binaries in order to always use them, but I let the toolchain being autodetected. I also added a couple of headers to avoid useless checks and more can be added in the futur. Any thought? regards, Bapt This will be great. I've added it to my jails for testing too. Bryan +-oOO--(_)--OOo-+ With best Regards, Martin Wilke (miwi_(at)_FreeBSD.org) Mess with the Best, Die like the Rest ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFT] add a config.site cache for the ports
On 3/18/2013 12:41 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Hi, The autotools allows us to have a config.site cache where we define our defaults values for a couple of things, and prevent the slow and possibly wrong autodetection. Here is a patch that makes use of it: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/autotools_config_site.diff As the libiconv/gettext update has shown the configure scripts can fall back on gnu version of commands first if it find it, and in case gettext is removed you can get trouble. In this config.site, I hardcoded a couple of FreeBSD binaries in order to always use them, but I let the toolchain being autodetected. I also added a couple of headers to avoid useless checks and more can be added in the futur. Any thought? regards, Bapt This will be great. I've added it to my jails for testing too. Bryan signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [CFT] add a config.site cache for the ports
just a fyi this exp-run broke quiet a lot. On Mar 23, 2013, at 11:18 PM, Bryan Drewery bdrew...@freebsd.org wrote: On 3/18/2013 12:41 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Hi, The autotools allows us to have a config.site cache where we define our defaults values for a couple of things, and prevent the slow and possibly wrong autodetection. Here is a patch that makes use of it: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/autotools_config_site.diff As the libiconv/gettext update has shown the configure scripts can fall back on gnu version of commands first if it find it, and in case gettext is removed you can get trouble. In this config.site, I hardcoded a couple of FreeBSD binaries in order to always use them, but I let the toolchain being autodetected. I also added a couple of headers to avoid useless checks and more can be added in the futur. Any thought? regards, Bapt This will be great. I've added it to my jails for testing too. Bryan +-oOO--(_)--OOo-+ With best Regards, Martin Wilke (miwi_(at)_FreeBSD.org) Mess with the Best, Die like the Rest ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFT] add a config.site cache for the ports
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Hi, The autotools allows us to have a config.site cache where we define our defaults values for a couple of things, and prevent the slow and possibly wrong autodetection. Here is a patch that makes use of it: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/autotools_config_site.diff As the libiconv/gettext update has shown the configure scripts can fall back on gnu version of commands first if it find it, and in case gettext is removed you can get trouble. In this config.site, I hardcoded a couple of FreeBSD binaries in order to always use them, but I let the toolchain being autodetected. I also added a couple of headers to avoid useless checks and more can be added in the futur. Any thought? Avoiding the repeated detection of the exact same things could seriously reduce build times for big ports. Thank you! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFT] add a config.site cache for the ports
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.orgwrote: Hi, The autotools allows us to have a config.site cache where we define our defaults values for a couple of things, and prevent the slow and possibly wrong autodetection. Here is a patch that makes use of it: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/autotools_config_site.diff As the libiconv/gettext update has shown the configure scripts can fall back on gnu version of commands first if it find it, and in case gettext is removed you can get trouble. In this config.site, I hardcoded a couple of FreeBSD binaries in order to always use them, but I let the toolchain being autodetected. I also added a couple of headers to avoid useless checks and more can be added in the futur. Any thought? If this can be made to work reliably with provisions for exceptions, this would be absolutely wonderful! -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFT] add a config.site cache for the ports
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Kevin Oberman rkober...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.orgwrote: Hi, The autotools allows us to have a config.site cache where we define our defaults values for a couple of things, and prevent the slow and possibly wrong autodetection. Here is a patch that makes use of it: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/autotools_config_site.diff As the libiconv/gettext update has shown the configure scripts can fall back on gnu version of commands first if it find it, and in case gettext is removed you can get trouble. In this config.site, I hardcoded a couple of FreeBSD binaries in order to always use them, but I let the toolchain being autodetected. I also added a couple of headers to avoid useless checks and more can be added in the futur. Any thought? If this can be made to work reliably with provisions for exceptions, this would be absolutely wonderful! -- Yes please. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFT] add a config.site cache for the ports
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:22:03AM +0200, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Kevin Oberman rkober...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.orgwrote: Hi, The autotools allows us to have a config.site cache where we define our defaults values for a couple of things, and prevent the slow and possibly wrong autodetection. Here is a patch that makes use of it: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/autotools_config_site.diff As the libiconv/gettext update has shown the configure scripts can fall back on gnu version of commands first if it find it, and in case gettext is removed you can get trouble. In this config.site, I hardcoded a couple of FreeBSD binaries in order to always use them, but I let the toolchain being autodetected. I also added a couple of headers to avoid useless checks and more can be added in the futur. Any thought? If this can be made to work reliably with provisions for exceptions, this would be absolutely wonderful! -- Yes please. Patch has been updated to remove everything connected to the toolchain, and adding some more commands. Exp-run is on being run right now by miwi. If everything is ok and noone object this will be committed, on next tuesday. regards, Bapt pgp6zyFRwm1P0.pgp Description: PGP signature
[CFT] add a config.site cache for the ports
Hi, The autotools allows us to have a config.site cache where we define our defaults values for a couple of things, and prevent the slow and possibly wrong autodetection. Here is a patch that makes use of it: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/autotools_config_site.diff As the libiconv/gettext update has shown the configure scripts can fall back on gnu version of commands first if it find it, and in case gettext is removed you can get trouble. In this config.site, I hardcoded a couple of FreeBSD binaries in order to always use them, but I let the toolchain being autodetected. I also added a couple of headers to avoid useless checks and more can be added in the futur. Any thought? regards, Bapt pgpiZKQhcgerV.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [CFT] add a config.site cache for the ports
On Mar 18, 2013 12:42 PM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi, The autotools allows us to have a config.site cache where we define our defaults values for a couple of things, and prevent the slow and possibly wrong autodetection. Here is a patch that makes use of it: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/autotools_config_site.diff As the libiconv/gettext update has shown the configure scripts can fall back on gnu version of commands first if it find it, and in case gettext is removed you can get trouble. In this config.site, I hardcoded a couple of FreeBSD binaries in order to always use them, but I let the toolchain being autodetected. I also added a couple of headers to avoid useless checks and more can be added in the futur. Any thought? There are some ports that need to use gnu tar, gnu sed, gnu grep and other gnu stuff. How will this cache affect on those ports? regards, Bapt ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFT] add a config.site cache for the ports
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 02:15:51PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote: On Mar 18, 2013 12:42 PM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi, The autotools allows us to have a config.site cache where we define our defaults values for a couple of things, and prevent the slow and possibly wrong autodetection. Here is a patch that makes use of it: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/autotools_config_site.diff As the libiconv/gettext update has shown the configure scripts can fall back on gnu version of commands first if it find it, and in case gettext is removed you can get trouble. In this config.site, I hardcoded a couple of FreeBSD binaries in order to always use them, but I let the toolchain being autodetected. I also added a couple of headers to avoid useless checks and more can be added in the futur. Any thought? There are some ports that need to use gnu tar, gnu sed, gnu grep and other gnu stuff. How will this cache affect on those ports? regards, Bapt We can always overwrite those in CONFIGURE_ENV if needed, and I'll run an exp-run to make sure no ports requiring gsed, gtar etc fails. regards, Bapt pgp_QXLTx0CFK.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [CFT] add a config.site cache for the ports
On Mar 18, 2013 2:24 PM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote: On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 02:15:51PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote: On Mar 18, 2013 12:42 PM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi, The autotools allows us to have a config.site cache where we define our defaults values for a couple of things, and prevent the slow and possibly wrong autodetection. Here is a patch that makes use of it: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/autotools_config_site.diff As the libiconv/gettext update has shown the configure scripts can fall back on gnu version of commands first if it find it, and in case gettext is removed you can get trouble. In this config.site, I hardcoded a couple of FreeBSD binaries in order to always use them, but I let the toolchain being autodetected. I also added a couple of headers to avoid useless checks and more can be added in the futur. Any thought? There are some ports that need to use gnu tar, gnu sed, gnu grep and other gnu stuff. How will this cache affect on those ports? regards, Bapt We can always overwrite those in CONFIGURE_ENV if needed, and I'll run an exp-run to make sure no ports requiring gsed, gtar etc fails. If it works very well then I think it sounds good. regards, Bapt ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFT] add a config.site cache for the ports
On 18 Mar 2013 17:42, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi, The autotools allows us to have a config.site cache where we define our defaults values for a couple of things, and prevent the slow and possibly wrong autodetection. Here is a patch that makes use of it: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/autotools_config_site.diff As the libiconv/gettext update has shown the configure scripts can fall back on gnu version of commands first if it find it, and in case gettext is removed you can get trouble. In this config.site, I hardcoded a couple of FreeBSD binaries in order to always use them, but I let the toolchain being autodetected. I also added a couple of headers to avoid useless checks and more can be added in the futur. Any thought? This could save literally hours on package builds... Very exciting, thanks for this work! Chris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFT] add a config.site cache for the ports
On 18 Mar 2013 17:42, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi, The autotools allows us to have a config.site cache where we define our defaults values for a couple of things, and prevent the slow and possibly wrong autodetection. Here is a patch that makes use of it: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/autotools_config_site.diff As the libiconv/gettext update has shown the configure scripts can fall back on gnu version of commands first if it find it, and in case gettext is removed you can get trouble. In this config.site, I hardcoded a couple of FreeBSD binaries in order to always use them, but I let the toolchain being autodetected. I also added a couple of headers to avoid useless checks and more can be added in the futur. Any thought? This could save literally hours on package builds... Very exciting, thanks for this work! Agreed, I like this a lot and will be testing it. Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
