Re: CFT: New hal patchset
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 12:29:07 -0500, Jeremy Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 06 Apr 2008 23:50:43 -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm looking for people to test this small patchset for hal to look for adverse effects. Ideally, these patches should be a big no-op for the majority of users, but I want to make sure there are no regressions. If you are going to test, first save the output of lshal to have a control with which to compare. Then, apply the following diff to sysutils/hal: # cd /usr/ports/sysutils/hal It should be: # cd /usr/ports/sysutils # patch -p /path/to/hal.diff # portupgrade -fOW hal If you do notice a problem, please provide a clear problem description and the before and after lshal outputs. Some users may notice an improvement in the following areas: * Discs formatted with non-ISO, non-UDF file systems are properly detected * Certain unsliced file systems (e.g. FAT, NTFS, etc.) are properly detected (and mounted) I'm not interested in general hal problems (though those _should_ be reported). I just want confirmation that this patchset does not introduce _new_ problems. Thanks. http://www.marcuscom.com/downloads/hal.diff I can test it this week when I am done w/ update my system. My system is pretty out of date right now. I haven't update ports tree and installed ports since GNOME 2.22 went in. I have tested it with CD-R blank, CD-R data, DVD movie and USB flash drive. I don't see any difference, so it works fine. Cheers, Mezz Cheers, Mezz Joe -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CFT: New hal patchset
On Sun, 06 Apr 2008 23:50:43 -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm looking for people to test this small patchset for hal to look for adverse effects. Ideally, these patches should be a big no-op for the majority of users, but I want to make sure there are no regressions. If you are going to test, first save the output of lshal to have a control with which to compare. Then, apply the following diff to sysutils/hal: # cd /usr/ports/sysutils/hal It should be: # cd /usr/ports/sysutils # patch -p /path/to/hal.diff # portupgrade -fOW hal If you do notice a problem, please provide a clear problem description and the before and after lshal outputs. Some users may notice an improvement in the following areas: * Discs formatted with non-ISO, non-UDF file systems are properly detected * Certain unsliced file systems (e.g. FAT, NTFS, etc.) are properly detected (and mounted) I'm not interested in general hal problems (though those _should_ be reported). I just want confirmation that this patchset does not introduce _new_ problems. Thanks. http://www.marcuscom.com/downloads/hal.diff I can test it this week when I am done w/ update my system. My system is pretty out of date right now. I haven't update ports tree and installed ports since GNOME 2.22 went in. Cheers, Mezz Joe -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CFT: New hal patchset
I'm looking for people to test this small patchset for hal to look for adverse effects. Ideally, these patches should be a big no-op for the majority of users, but I want to make sure there are no regressions. If you are going to test, first save the output of lshal to have a control with which to compare. Then, apply the following diff to sysutils/hal: # cd /usr/ports/sysutils/hal # patch -p /path/to/hal.diff # portupgrade -fOW hal If you do notice a problem, please provide a clear problem description and the before and after lshal outputs. Some users may notice an improvement in the following areas: * Discs formatted with non-ISO, non-UDF file systems are properly detected * Certain unsliced file systems (e.g. FAT, NTFS, etc.) are properly detected (and mounted) I'm not interested in general hal problems (though those _should_ be reported). I just want confirmation that this patchset does not introduce _new_ problems. Thanks. http://www.marcuscom.com/downloads/hal.diff Joe -- Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
