Re: pkg checksum mismatch for a variety of ports
Sorry for missing this earlier. This has now been resolved by commit r504347: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=504347 Thanks for the tip Tijl. Regards, Ben -- From: Benjamin Woods woods...@gmail.com On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 at 23:34, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:55:00 + tech-lists > wrote: > > Hello ports@, > > > > What's the significance of this and what can I do about it? Deinstalling > > and reinstalling doesn't help. These were installed with ports r436245 > > on 11.0-stable r314138: > > > > # pkg check -s > > > > Checking all packages: 3% > > bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for > > /usr/local/share/applications/mimeinfo.cache > > bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for > /usr/local/share/mime/XMLnamespaces > > bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/aliases > > bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for > /usr/local/share/mime/generic-icons > > bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/globs > > bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/globs2 > > bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/icons > > bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/magic > > bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/mime.cache > > bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/subclasses > > bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/treemagic > > bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/types > > Checking all packages: 4% > > calibre-2.81.0: checksum mismatch for > > /usr/local/share/mime/application/epub+zip.xml > > calibre-2.81.0: checksum mismatch for > > /usr/local/share/mime/application/x-mobipocket-ebook.xml > > > > thanks > > It's a problem with the packaging. "--disable-update-databases" should > be added to CONFIGURE_ARGS in www/bluefish/Makefile. > ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
checksum mismatch for py27 ports
Hello Need help to fix some checksum mismatch for following ports. I've tried reinstalling the affected ports, and my system and portsthree are all up to date. all the best /Hasse hasse@ymer:~ % sudo pkg check -s -a Checking all packages: 71% py27-certifi-2018.1.18: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/certifi/__init__.pyc py27-certifi-2018.1.18: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/certifi/core.pyc Checking all packages: 72% py27-cffi-1.11.2: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/cffi/__init__.pyc py27-cffi-1.11.2: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/cffi/api.pyc py27-cffi-1.11.2: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/cffi/cffi_opcode.pyc py27-cffi-1.11.2: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/cffi/commontypes.pyc py27-cffi-1.11.2: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/cffi/cparser.pyc py27-cffi-1.11.2: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/cffi/error.pyc py27-cffi-1.11.2: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/cffi/ffiplatform.pyc py27-cffi-1.11.2: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/cffi/lock.pyc py27-cffi-1.11.2: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/cffi/model.pyc py27-cffi-1.11.2: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/cffi/recompiler.pyc py27-cffi-1.11.2: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/cffi/setuptools_ext.pyc Checking all packages: 77% py27-josepy-1.0.1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/josepy/__init__.pyc py27-josepy-1.0.1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/josepy/b64.pyc py27-josepy-1.0.1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/josepy/errors.pyc py27-josepy-1.0.1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/josepy/interfaces.pyc py27-josepy-1.0.1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/josepy/json_util.pyc py27-josepy-1.0.1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/josepy/jwa.pyc py27-josepy-1.0.1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/josepy/jwk.pyc py27-josepy-1.0.1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/josepy/jws.pyc py27-josepy-1.0.1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/josepy/util.pyc Checking all packages: 78% py27-pycparser-2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycparser/__init__.pyc py27-pycparser-2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycparser/ast_transforms.pyc py27-pycparser-2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycparser/c_ast.pyc py27-pycparser-2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycparser/c_lexer.pyc py27-pycparser-2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycparser/c_parser.pyc py27-pycparser-2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycparser/lextab.pyc py27-pycparser-2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycparser/ply/__init__.pyc py27-pycparser-2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycparser/ply/lex.pyc py27-pycparser-2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycparser/ply/yacc.pyc py27-pycparser-2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycparser/plyparser.pyc py27-pycparser-2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycparser/yacctab.pyc Checking all packages: 100% signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: pkg checksum mismatch for a variety of ports
On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:55:00 + tech-lists wrote: > Hello ports@, > > What's the significance of this and what can I do about it? Deinstalling > and reinstalling doesn't help. These were installed with ports r436245 > on 11.0-stable r314138: > > # pkg check -s > > Checking all packages: 3% > bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for > /usr/local/share/applications/mimeinfo.cache > bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/XMLnamespaces > bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/aliases > bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/generic-icons > bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/globs > bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/globs2 > bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/icons > bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/magic > bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/mime.cache > bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/subclasses > bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/treemagic > bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/types > Checking all packages: 4% > calibre-2.81.0: checksum mismatch for > /usr/local/share/mime/application/epub+zip.xml > calibre-2.81.0: checksum mismatch for > /usr/local/share/mime/application/x-mobipocket-ebook.xml > > thanks It's a problem with the packaging. "--disable-update-databases" should be added to CONFIGURE_ARGS in www/bluefish/Makefile. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
pkg checksum mismatch for a variety of ports
Hello ports@, What's the significance of this and what can I do about it? Deinstalling and reinstalling doesn't help. These were installed with ports r436245 on 11.0-stable r314138: # pkg check -s Checking all packages: 3% bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/applications/mimeinfo.cache bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/XMLnamespaces bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/aliases bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/generic-icons bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/globs bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/globs2 bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/icons bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/magic bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/mime.cache bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/subclasses bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/treemagic bluefish-2.2.10: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/types Checking all packages: 4% calibre-2.81.0: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/application/epub+zip.xml calibre-2.81.0: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/application/x-mobipocket-ebook.xml thanks -- J. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: checksum mismatch devel/pear
Am 26.07.2013 um 09:31 schrieb Sergey V. Dyatko : > On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 05:47:55 +0800 > Martin Wilke wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Remove /usr/ports/distfiles/ and the problem will go away. > > rm /distfiles/pear-1.9.4.tar.bz2 Thanks! Also to miwi for solving this :) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: checksum mismatch devel/pear
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 05:47:55 +0800 Martin Wilke wrote: > Hi, > > Remove /usr/ports/distfiles/ and the problem will go away. rm /distfiles/pear-1.9.4.tar.bz2 > > On Jul 19, 2013, at 3:58 PM, Peter Klett wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > since yesterday devel/pear will not fetch: > > > > ===> Fetching all distfiles required by pear-1.9.4_2 for building > > => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for pear-1.9.4.tar.bz2. > > ===> Refetch for 1 more times files: pear-1.9.4.tar.bz2 > > => pear-1.9.4.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /distfiles/. > > => Attempting to fetch > > http://miwibox.org/distfiles/pear-1.9.4.tar.bz2 fetch: > > http://miwibox.org/distfiles/pear-1.9.4.tar.bz2: Requested Range > > Not Satisfiable => Attempting to fetch > > ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/pear-1.9.4.tar.bz2 > > fetch: > > ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/pear-1.9.4.tar.bz2: > > size mismatch: expected 322695, actual 328672 => Couldn't fetch it > > - please try to retrieve this => port manually into /distfiles/ and > > try again. *** [do-fetch] Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/pear. > > *** [checksum] Error code 1 > > > > > > > > seems distfiles got changed yesterday: > > > > http://www.freshports.org/commit.php?category=devel&port=pear&files=yes&message_id=201307181633.r6igx2fp088...@svn.freebsd.org > > > > greetings > > Peter > > ___ > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > > > > +-oOO--(_)--OOo-+ > With best Regards, >Martin Wilke (miwi_(at)_FreeBSD.org) > > Mess with the Best, Die like the Rest > > ___ -- wbr, tiger ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: checksum mismatch devel/pear
Hi, Remove /usr/ports/distfiles/ and the problem will go away. On Jul 19, 2013, at 3:58 PM, Peter Klett wrote: > Hi, > > > since yesterday devel/pear will not fetch: > > ===> Fetching all distfiles required by pear-1.9.4_2 for building > => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for pear-1.9.4.tar.bz2. > ===> Refetch for 1 more times files: pear-1.9.4.tar.bz2 > => pear-1.9.4.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /distfiles/. > => Attempting to fetch http://miwibox.org/distfiles/pear-1.9.4.tar.bz2 > fetch: http://miwibox.org/distfiles/pear-1.9.4.tar.bz2: Requested Range Not > Satisfiable > => Attempting to fetch > ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/pear-1.9.4.tar.bz2 > fetch: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/pear-1.9.4.tar.bz2: > size mismatch: expected 322695, actual 328672 > => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this > => port manually into /distfiles/ and try again. > *** [do-fetch] Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/pear. > *** [checksum] Error code 1 > > > > seems distfiles got changed yesterday: > > http://www.freshports.org/commit.php?category=devel&port=pear&files=yes&message_id=201307181633.r6igx2fp088...@svn.freebsd.org > > greetings > Peter > ___ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > +-oOO--(_)--OOo-+ With best Regards, Martin Wilke (miwi_(at)_FreeBSD.org) Mess with the Best, Die like the Rest ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
checksum mismatch devel/pear
Hi, since yesterday devel/pear will not fetch: ===> Fetching all distfiles required by pear-1.9.4_2 for building => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for pear-1.9.4.tar.bz2. ===> Refetch for 1 more times files: pear-1.9.4.tar.bz2 => pear-1.9.4.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch http://miwibox.org/distfiles/pear-1.9.4.tar.bz2 fetch: http://miwibox.org/distfiles/pear-1.9.4.tar.bz2: Requested Range Not Satisfiable => Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/pear-1.9.4.tar.bz2 fetch: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/pear-1.9.4.tar.bz2: size mismatch: expected 322695, actual 328672 => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this => port manually into /distfiles/ and try again. *** [do-fetch] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/pear. *** [checksum] Error code 1 seems distfiles got changed yesterday: http://www.freshports.org/commit.php?category=devel&port=pear&files=yes&message_id=201307181633.r6igx2fp088...@svn.freebsd.org greetings Peter ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: devel/opencl: Checksum mismatch
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 10:23:16 +0300 "Sergey V. Dyatko" wrote: > On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 09:17:56 +0200 > "O. Hartmann" wrote: > > > On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 09:41:15 +0300 > > "Sergey V. Dyatko" wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > laptop# make checksum > > > ===> opencl-1.2_2 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > > > => opencl.h doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/opencl. > > > => Attempting to fetch > > > http://www.khronos.org/registry/cl/api/1.2/opencl.h > > > opencl.h 100% of 1754 B 2078 > > > kBps 00m00s => cl_platform.h doesn't seem to exist > > > in /usr/ports/distfiles/opencl. => Attempting to fetch > > > http://www.khronos.org/registry/cl/api/1.2/cl_platform.h > > > cl_platform.h 100% of 40 kB 7995 > > > kBps 00m00s => cl.h doesn't seem to exist > > > in /usr/ports/distfiles/opencl. => Attempting to fetch > > > http://www.khronos.org/registry/cl/api/1.2/cl.h > > > cl.h 100% of 60 kB 11 > > > MBps 00m00s => cl_ext.h doesn't seem to exist > > > in /usr/ports/distfiles/opencl. => Attempting to fetch > > > http://www.khronos.org/registry/cl/api/1.2/cl_ext.h fetch: > > > http://www.khronos.org/registry/cl/api/1.2/cl_ext.h: size > > > mismatch: expected 11540, actual 13646 => Attempting to fetch > > > ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/opencl/cl_ext.h > > > fetch: > > > ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/opencl/cl_ext.h: > > > size mismatch: expected 11540, actual 9951 => Couldn't fetch it - > > > please try to retrieve this => port manually > > > into /usr/ports/distfiles/opencl and try again. *** Error code 1 > > > > > > Stop. > > > make: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/opencl > > > > > > > Hello. > > > > I'm aware of the problem, Khoronos made some changes. I have already > > proposed for a change, see > > > > ports/180338 . > > > > I'm already saw that pr. But it is doesn't touch distinfo (tnx jgh@ > for pointing) ;-) I'll check this, thanks for the info. > > > If you like to fix this swiftly for your own, first make a "make > > distclean" and then "make makesum" to obtain the new distinfo > > hashes. > > Yes, I know that. My goal was to inform about a broken port. No offense. Thanks. > > > Hopefully then it should work for you until the port changes has > > been reviewed and committed. > > > > > Regards, > > > > Oliver > > > Oliver signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: devel/opencl: Checksum mismatch
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 09:17:56 +0200 "O. Hartmann" wrote: > On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 09:41:15 +0300 > "Sergey V. Dyatko" wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > laptop# make checksum > > ===> opencl-1.2_2 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > > => opencl.h doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/opencl. > > => Attempting to fetch > > http://www.khronos.org/registry/cl/api/1.2/opencl.h > > opencl.h 100% of 1754 B 2078 > > kBps 00m00s => cl_platform.h doesn't seem to exist > > in /usr/ports/distfiles/opencl. => Attempting to fetch > > http://www.khronos.org/registry/cl/api/1.2/cl_platform.h > > cl_platform.h 100% of 40 kB 7995 > > kBps 00m00s => cl.h doesn't seem to exist > > in /usr/ports/distfiles/opencl. => Attempting to fetch > > http://www.khronos.org/registry/cl/api/1.2/cl.h > > cl.h 100% of 60 kB 11 > > MBps 00m00s => cl_ext.h doesn't seem to exist > > in /usr/ports/distfiles/opencl. => Attempting to fetch > > http://www.khronos.org/registry/cl/api/1.2/cl_ext.h fetch: > > http://www.khronos.org/registry/cl/api/1.2/cl_ext.h: size mismatch: > > expected 11540, actual 13646 => Attempting to fetch > > ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/opencl/cl_ext.h > > fetch: > > ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/opencl/cl_ext.h: > > size mismatch: expected 11540, actual 9951 => Couldn't fetch it - > > please try to retrieve this => port manually > > into /usr/ports/distfiles/opencl and try again. *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop. > > make: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/opencl > > > > Hello. > > I'm aware of the problem, Khoronos made some changes. I have already > proposed for a change, see > > ports/180338 . > I'm already saw that pr. But it is doesn't touch distinfo (tnx jgh@ for pointing) ;-) > If you like to fix this swiftly for your own, first make a "make > distclean" and then "make makesum" to obtain the new distinfo hashes. Yes, I know that. My goal was to inform about a broken port. > Hopefully then it should work for you until the port changes has been > reviewed and committed. > > Regards, > > Oliver -- wbr, tiger ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: devel/opencl: Checksum mismatch
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 09:41:15 +0300 "Sergey V. Dyatko" wrote: > Hi, > > laptop# make checksum > ===> opencl-1.2_2 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > => opencl.h doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/opencl. > => Attempting to fetch > http://www.khronos.org/registry/cl/api/1.2/opencl.h > opencl.h 100% of 1754 B 2078 > kBps 00m00s => cl_platform.h doesn't seem to exist > in /usr/ports/distfiles/opencl. => Attempting to fetch > http://www.khronos.org/registry/cl/api/1.2/cl_platform.h > cl_platform.h 100% of 40 kB 7995 > kBps 00m00s => cl.h doesn't seem to exist > in /usr/ports/distfiles/opencl. => Attempting to fetch > http://www.khronos.org/registry/cl/api/1.2/cl.h > cl.h 100% of 60 kB 11 > MBps 00m00s => cl_ext.h doesn't seem to exist > in /usr/ports/distfiles/opencl. => Attempting to fetch > http://www.khronos.org/registry/cl/api/1.2/cl_ext.h fetch: > http://www.khronos.org/registry/cl/api/1.2/cl_ext.h: size mismatch: > expected 11540, actual 13646 => Attempting to fetch > ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/opencl/cl_ext.h > fetch: > ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/opencl/cl_ext.h: > size mismatch: expected 11540, actual 9951 => Couldn't fetch it - > please try to retrieve this => port manually > into /usr/ports/distfiles/opencl and try again. *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/opencl > Hello. I'm aware of the problem, Khoronos made some changes. I have already proposed for a change, see ports/180338 . If you like to fix this swiftly for your own, first make a "make distclean" and then "make makesum" to obtain the new distinfo hashes. Hopefully then it should work for you until the port changes has been reviewed and committed. Regards, Oliver signature.asc Description: PGP signature
devel/opencl: Checksum mismatch
Hi, laptop# make checksum ===> opencl-1.2_2 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found => opencl.h doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/opencl. => Attempting to fetch http://www.khronos.org/registry/cl/api/1.2/opencl.h opencl.h 100% of 1754 B 2078 kBps 00m00s => cl_platform.h doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/opencl. => Attempting to fetch http://www.khronos.org/registry/cl/api/1.2/cl_platform.h cl_platform.h 100% of 40 kB 7995 kBps 00m00s => cl.h doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/opencl. => Attempting to fetch http://www.khronos.org/registry/cl/api/1.2/cl.h cl.h 100% of 60 kB 11 MBps 00m00s => cl_ext.h doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/opencl. => Attempting to fetch http://www.khronos.org/registry/cl/api/1.2/cl_ext.h fetch: http://www.khronos.org/registry/cl/api/1.2/cl_ext.h: size mismatch: expected 11540, actual 13646 => Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/opencl/cl_ext.h fetch: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/opencl/cl_ext.h: size mismatch: expected 11540, actual 9951 => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this => port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/opencl and try again. *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/opencl -- wbr, tiger ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
texlive: tex-formats, tex-xetex - pkg check checksum mismatch
# pkg check -srda tex-formats-20120701_1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/texmf-var/web2c/p dftex/cont-en.fmt tex-formats-20120701_1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/texmf-var/web2c/p dftex/cont-en.log # Which goes away after rebuilding tex-formats, but new mismatch appears: # pkg check -srda tex-xetex-0.: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/texmf-var/web2c/xetex/c ont-en.fmt tex-xetex-0.: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/texmf-var/web2c/xetex/c ont-en.log # After rebuilding tex-xetex, I'm back to the first mismatch case: # pkg check -srda tex-formats-20120701_1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/texmf-var/web2c/p dftex/cont-en.fmt tex-formats-20120701_1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/texmf-var/web2c/p dftex/cont-en.log # Perhaps something is wrong with PLIST for tex-formats or tex-xetex? Or maybe with pkg check? Thanks Anton ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: security/libgcrypt checksum mismatch
On 12/05/2013 08:11, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 11/05/2013 22:15, RW wrote:
>> FWIW I fetch files like this:
>>
>>
>> for porg in `pkg version -Iol'<' |awk '{ print $1 }'` ; do
>> echo "Checking - ${porg}"
>> cd /usr/ports/${porg}
>> make checksum || (
>> export RANDOMIZE_MASTER_SITES=yes
>> make distclean
>> make checksum
>> )
>> done
>>
>> I do it that way because it avoids a lot of problems with rerolled
>> files, but it would help with this problem too.
>
> I'm sorry, but this is a really bad idea and an irresponsible thing to
> advise anyone else to do. You're throwing away all the security
> benefits of using checksums, which are essentially that you can tell if
> anyone has tampered with the distfiles you intend to compile.
>
> If you don't understand why that matters, then try reading this:
>
> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=37188&cid=3991288
> http://www.mavetju.org/unix/openssh-trojan.php
Damn. I'm sorry. I misread your code. It's perfectly fine.
I apologise unreservedly for my earlier message.
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: security/libgcrypt checksum mismatch
On 11/05/2013 22:15, RW wrote:
> FWIW I fetch files like this:
>
>
> for porg in `pkg version -Iol'<' |awk '{ print $1 }'` ; do
> echo "Checking - ${porg}"
> cd /usr/ports/${porg}
> make checksum || (
> export RANDOMIZE_MASTER_SITES=yes
> make distclean
> make checksum
> )
> done
>
> I do it that way because it avoids a lot of problems with rerolled
> files, but it would help with this problem too.
I'm sorry, but this is a really bad idea and an irresponsible thing to
advise anyone else to do. You're throwing away all the security
benefits of using checksums, which are essentially that you can tell if
anyone has tampered with the distfiles you intend to compile.
If you don't understand why that matters, then try reading this:
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=37188&cid=3991288
http://www.mavetju.org/unix/openssh-trojan.php
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: security/libgcrypt checksum mismatch
On Sat, 11 May 2013 17:39:52 +0200
Michael Gmelin wrote:
> Besides the fact that ISPs really shouldn't interfere with your HTTP
> traffic in that way (terrible!), preferring FTP sounds like a bad
> idea, since it's a lot more complicated protocol and therefore more
> likely to fail in limited network setups. There are a couple of
> possible solutions, some more useful than others.
I doubt it makes much difference, fetch can request ftp urls through
an http proxy which eliminates a lot of the potential problems, and
even in the worst case FreeBSD will fall through to an HTTP link.
> 1. Avoid ISPs that break your traffic.
>Caveat: Sometimes you have no choice.
> 2. Use HTTPS whenever possible, so that certificate checking can take
>place and stop you from downloading broken files in the first
> place. (there's a patch to fetch I'm working on with des that will
>hopefully make it to base soon).
>Caveat: Not every project provides an SSL enabled source, lots of
>ports need to be adapted, never near 100%.
On the whole caching is a good thing. HTTPS sounds more trouble than
it's worth to me.
> 3. Modify the ports framework, so you can set an environment/config
>variable like PREFER_HTTP or PREFER_FTP.
>Caveat: It's work and not *that* useful.
You can already do this with:
MASTER_SORT_REGEX?= ^ftp:
I used to do it the other way around because my ISP preferred cached
HTTP in their traffic shaping.
> 4. Modify the ports framework, so it tries the next download location
>in case there is a file size or checksum mismatch.
>Caveat: Requires effort.
>
> IMHO implementing 4 would make a lot sense to compensate for broken
> mirrors.
FWIW I fetch files like this:
for porg in `pkg version -Iol'<' |awk '{ print $1 }'` ; do
echo "Checking - ${porg}"
cd /usr/ports/${porg}
make checksum || (
export RANDOMIZE_MASTER_SITES=yes
make distclean
make checksum
)
done
I do it that way because it avoids a lot of problems with rerolled
files, but it would help with this problem too.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: security/libgcrypt checksum mismatch
From n...@njm.me.uk Sat May 11 13:41:11 2013 In message <201305111044.r4baimuh059...@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>, Anton Shterenlikht (me...@bris.ac.uk) wrote: > This is on amd64/clang r249781, with ports at 317861: > > # pkg version -vX libgcry > libgcrypt-1.5.0_1 < needs updating (port has 1.5.2) > > ===> License GPLv2 LGPL21 accepted by the user > ===> libgcrypt-1.5.2 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > => libgcrypt-1.5.2.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles//. > => Attempting to fetch http://gnupg.org.favoritelinks.net/libgcrypt/libgcrypt-1.5.2.tar.bz2 > fetch: http://gnupg.org.favoritelinks.net/libgcrypt/libgcrypt-1.5.2.tar.bz2: size unknown > fetch: http://gnupg.org.favoritelinks.net/libgcrypt/libgcrypt-1.5.2.tar.bz2: size of remote file is not known > libgcrypt-1.5.2.tar.bz2 1082 B 2277 kBps 00m00s > ===> Fetching all distfiles required by libgcrypt-1.5.2 for building > ===> License GPLv2 LGPL21 accepted by the user > ===> libgcrypt-1.5.2 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > ===> Fetching all distfiles required by libgcrypt-1.5.2 for building > => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for libgcrypt-1.5.2.tar.bz2. > ===> Giving up on fetching files: libgcrypt-1.5.2.tar.bz2 > Make sure the Makefile and distinfo file (/usr/ports/security/libgcrypt/distinfo) > are up to date. If you are absolutely sure you want to override this > check, type "make NO_CHECKSUM=yes [other args]". > *** [checksum] Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/security/libgcrypt. > *** [checksum] Error code 1 I had something similar to this yesterday. Can you do the following and post the results here please? # file /usr/ports/distfiles/libgcrypt-1.5.2* In my case HTML files had been fetched! # file /usr/ports/distfiles/libgcrypt-1.5.2* /usr/ports/distfiles/libgcrypt-1.5.2.tar.bz2: HTML document, ASCII text, with very long lines, with no line terminators # yes, silly.. But did you manage to get the right file afterwards? Thanks Anton ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: security/libgcrypt checksum mismatch
On Sat, 11 May 2013 14:59:46 +0100 "N.J. Mann" wrote: > In message <2013055228.gc94...@titania.njm.me.uk>, > N.J. Mann (n...@njm.me.uk) wrote: > > In message <518e2913.5040...@hayers.org>, > > Gary J. Hayers (g...@hayers.org) wrote: > > > I've been getting this with varying ports for some time now, > > > sometimes I've had to manually fetch the distfiles. > > > > I am sorry to hear this, but glad I am not the only one. :-) > > > > The files I have had to manually fetch are: > > > > libgcrypt-1.5.2.tar.bz2 > > libassuan-2.0.3.tar.bz2 > > libassuan-2.0.3.tar.bz2.sig > > libksba-1.3.0.tar.bz2 > > libksba-1.3.0.tar.bz2.sig > > gnupg-2.0.19.tar.bz2 > > gnupg-2.0.19.tar.bz2.sig > > gnupg-2.0.20.tar.bz2 > > gnupg-2.0.20.tar.bz2.sig > > I now know why I get HTML files when trying to fetch these distfiles. > The common factor is that they all use HTTP rather FTP for fetching. > For HTTP fetches my ISP (British Telecom, aka BT) will display a > "helpful" 'sorry no one at home' web page when the fetch fails, and > that is what I end up with in the distfile. Thankfully, this 'nice' > feature can be disabled. Once disabled 'make fetch' does its job of > trying the next site after the failure and the proper file(s) are > downloaded. > > I do not know whether other ISPs do something similar, does anyone? I > wonder whether FTP sites should be listed before HTTP ones? > > > Cheers, >Nick. Hi Nick, Besides the fact that ISPs really shouldn't interfere with your HTTP traffic in that way (terrible!), preferring FTP sounds like a bad idea, since it's a lot more complicated protocol and therefore more likely to fail in limited network setups. There are a couple of possible solutions, some more useful than others. 1. Avoid ISPs that break your traffic. Caveat: Sometimes you have no choice. 2. Use HTTPS whenever possible, so that certificate checking can take place and stop you from downloading broken files in the first place. (there's a patch to fetch I'm working on with des that will hopefully make it to base soon). Caveat: Not every project provides an SSL enabled source, lots of ports need to be adapted, never near 100%. 3. Modify the ports framework, so you can set an environment/config variable like PREFER_HTTP or PREFER_FTP. Caveat: It's work and not *that* useful. 4. Modify the ports framework, so it tries the next download location in case there is a file size or checksum mismatch. Caveat: Requires effort. IMHO implementing 4 would make a lot sense to compensate for broken mirrors. In the meantime, as a workaround, you could set HTTP_PROXY=127.0.0.1:12000 (or any other unused port on your system) That way fetch fails on all HTTP sites and therefore effectively uses FTP instead. Cheers, Michael -- Michael Gmelin ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: security/libgcrypt checksum mismatch
I'm on a brit ISP too, Virgin Media, not sure if they do something simular, I wonder if it is fetch(1) that is doing it, when manually downloading distfiles I use wget which shows no symptoms for downloading mismatch files... On 11/05/2013 14:59, N.J. Mann wrote: In message <2013055228.gc94...@titania.njm.me.uk>, I now know why I get HTML files when trying to fetch these distfiles. The common factor is that they all use HTTP rather FTP for fetching. For HTTP fetches my ISP (British Telecom, aka BT) will display a "helpful" 'sorry no one at home' web page when the fetch fails, and that is what I end up with in the distfile. Thankfully, this 'nice' feature can be disabled. Once disabled 'make fetch' does its job of trying the next site after the failure and the proper file(s) are downloaded. I do not know whether other ISPs do something similar, does anyone? I wonder whether FTP sites should be listed before HTTP ones? Cheers, Nick. -- Regards, Gary J. Hayers g...@hayers.org PGP Signature http://www.hayers.org/pgp ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: security/libgcrypt checksum mismatch
In message <2013055228.gc94...@titania.njm.me.uk>, N.J. Mann (n...@njm.me.uk) wrote: > In message <518e2913.5040...@hayers.org>, > Gary J. Hayers (g...@hayers.org) wrote: > > I've been getting this with varying ports for some time now, sometimes > > I've had to manually fetch the distfiles. > > I am sorry to hear this, but glad I am not the only one. :-) > > The files I have had to manually fetch are: > > libgcrypt-1.5.2.tar.bz2 > libassuan-2.0.3.tar.bz2 > libassuan-2.0.3.tar.bz2.sig > libksba-1.3.0.tar.bz2 > libksba-1.3.0.tar.bz2.sig > gnupg-2.0.19.tar.bz2 > gnupg-2.0.19.tar.bz2.sig > gnupg-2.0.20.tar.bz2 > gnupg-2.0.20.tar.bz2.sig I now know why I get HTML files when trying to fetch these distfiles. The common factor is that they all use HTTP rather FTP for fetching. For HTTP fetches my ISP (British Telecom, aka BT) will display a "helpful" 'sorry no one at home' web page when the fetch fails, and that is what I end up with in the distfile. Thankfully, this 'nice' feature can be disabled. Once disabled 'make fetch' does its job of trying the next site after the failure and the proper file(s) are downloaded. I do not know whether other ISPs do something similar, does anyone? I wonder whether FTP sites should be listed before HTTP ones? Cheers, Nick. -- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: security/libgcrypt checksum mismatch
Seems very sporadic, gnupg-2.0.20.tar.bz2 and the .sig I had to manually fetch this morning. I have around 1000 ports installed and probably had to fetch around 50. libgcrypt-1.5.2.tar.bz2 is another so seems to be a pattern there. On 11/05/2013 12:52, N.J. Mann wrote: In message <518e2913.5040...@hayers.org>, Gary J. Hayers (g...@hayers.org) wrote: I've been getting this with varying ports for some time now, sometimes I've had to manually fetch the distfiles. I am sorry to hear this, but glad I am not the only one. :-) The files I have had to manually fetch are: libgcrypt-1.5.2.tar.bz2 libassuan-2.0.3.tar.bz2 libassuan-2.0.3.tar.bz2.sig libksba-1.3.0.tar.bz2 libksba-1.3.0.tar.bz2.sig gnupg-2.0.19.tar.bz2 gnupg-2.0.19.tar.bz2.sig gnupg-2.0.20.tar.bz2 gnupg-2.0.20.tar.bz2.sig Do you have a list of affected files/ports? Cheers, Nick. -- Regards, Gary J. Hayers g...@hayers.org PGP Signature http://www.hayers.org/pgp ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: security/libgcrypt checksum mismatch
In message <518e2913.5040...@hayers.org>, Gary J. Hayers (g...@hayers.org) wrote: > I've been getting this with varying ports for some time now, sometimes > I've had to manually fetch the distfiles. I am sorry to hear this, but glad I am not the only one. :-) The files I have had to manually fetch are: libgcrypt-1.5.2.tar.bz2 libassuan-2.0.3.tar.bz2 libassuan-2.0.3.tar.bz2.sig libksba-1.3.0.tar.bz2 libksba-1.3.0.tar.bz2.sig gnupg-2.0.19.tar.bz2 gnupg-2.0.19.tar.bz2.sig gnupg-2.0.20.tar.bz2 gnupg-2.0.20.tar.bz2.sig Do you have a list of affected files/ports? Cheers, Nick. -- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: security/libgcrypt checksum mismatch
I've been getting this with varying ports for some time now, sometimes I've had to manually fetch the distfiles. On 11/05/2013 12:01, N.J. Mann wrote: Hi, In message <201305111044.r4baimuh059...@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>, Anton Shterenlikht (me...@bris.ac.uk) wrote: This is on amd64/clang r249781, with ports at 317861: # pkg version -vX libgcry libgcrypt-1.5.0_1 < needs updating (port has 1.5.2) ===> License GPLv2 LGPL21 accepted by the user ===> libgcrypt-1.5.2 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found => libgcrypt-1.5.2.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles//. => Attempting to fetch http://gnupg.org.favoritelinks.net/libgcrypt/libgcrypt-1.5.2.tar.bz2 fetch: http://gnupg.org.favoritelinks.net/libgcrypt/libgcrypt-1.5.2.tar.bz2: size unknown fetch: http://gnupg.org.favoritelinks.net/libgcrypt/libgcrypt-1.5.2.tar.bz2: size of remote file is not known libgcrypt-1.5.2.tar.bz2 1082 B 2277 kBps 00m00s ===> Fetching all distfiles required by libgcrypt-1.5.2 for building ===> License GPLv2 LGPL21 accepted by the user ===> libgcrypt-1.5.2 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by libgcrypt-1.5.2 for building => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for libgcrypt-1.5.2.tar.bz2. ===> Giving up on fetching files: libgcrypt-1.5.2.tar.bz2 Make sure the Makefile and distinfo file (/usr/ports/security/libgcrypt/distinfo) are up to date. If you are absolutely sure you want to override this check, type "make NO_CHECKSUM=yes [other args]". *** [checksum] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/libgcrypt. *** [checksum] Error code 1 I had something similar to this yesterday. Can you do the following and post the results here please? # file /usr/ports/distfiles/libgcrypt-1.5.2* In my case HTML files had been fetched! Cheers, Nick. -- Regards, Gary J. Hayers g...@hayers.org PGP Signature http://www.hayers.org/pgp ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: security/libgcrypt checksum mismatch
Hi, In message <201305111044.r4baimuh059...@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>, Anton Shterenlikht (me...@bris.ac.uk) wrote: > This is on amd64/clang r249781, with ports at 317861: > > # pkg version -vX libgcry > libgcrypt-1.5.0_1 < needs updating (port has 1.5.2) > > ===> License GPLv2 LGPL21 accepted by the user > ===> libgcrypt-1.5.2 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > => libgcrypt-1.5.2.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles//. > => Attempting to fetch > http://gnupg.org.favoritelinks.net/libgcrypt/libgcrypt-1.5.2.tar.bz2 > fetch: http://gnupg.org.favoritelinks.net/libgcrypt/libgcrypt-1.5.2.tar.bz2: > size unknown > fetch: http://gnupg.org.favoritelinks.net/libgcrypt/libgcrypt-1.5.2.tar.bz2: > size of remote file is not known > libgcrypt-1.5.2.tar.bz2 1082 B 2277 kBps 00m00s > ===> Fetching all distfiles required by libgcrypt-1.5.2 for building > ===> License GPLv2 LGPL21 accepted by the user > ===> libgcrypt-1.5.2 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > ===> Fetching all distfiles required by libgcrypt-1.5.2 for building > => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for libgcrypt-1.5.2.tar.bz2. > ===> Giving up on fetching files: libgcrypt-1.5.2.tar.bz2 > Make sure the Makefile and distinfo file > (/usr/ports/security/libgcrypt/distinfo) > are up to date. If you are absolutely sure you want to override this > check, type "make NO_CHECKSUM=yes [other args]". > *** [checksum] Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/security/libgcrypt. > *** [checksum] Error code 1 I had something similar to this yesterday. Can you do the following and post the results here please? # file /usr/ports/distfiles/libgcrypt-1.5.2* In my case HTML files had been fetched! Cheers, Nick. -- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
security/libgcrypt checksum mismatch
This is on amd64/clang r249781, with ports at 317861: # pkg version -vX libgcry libgcrypt-1.5.0_1 < needs updating (port has 1.5.2) ===> License GPLv2 LGPL21 accepted by the user ===> libgcrypt-1.5.2 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found => libgcrypt-1.5.2.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles//. => Attempting to fetch http://gnupg.org.favoritelinks.net/libgcrypt/libgcrypt-1.5.2.tar.bz2 fetch: http://gnupg.org.favoritelinks.net/libgcrypt/libgcrypt-1.5.2.tar.bz2: size unknown fetch: http://gnupg.org.favoritelinks.net/libgcrypt/libgcrypt-1.5.2.tar.bz2: size of remote file is not known libgcrypt-1.5.2.tar.bz2 1082 B 2277 kBps 00m00s ===> Fetching all distfiles required by libgcrypt-1.5.2 for building ===> License GPLv2 LGPL21 accepted by the user ===> libgcrypt-1.5.2 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by libgcrypt-1.5.2 for building => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for libgcrypt-1.5.2.tar.bz2. ===> Giving up on fetching files: libgcrypt-1.5.2.tar.bz2 Make sure the Makefile and distinfo file (/usr/ports/security/libgcrypt/distinfo) are up to date. If you are absolutely sure you want to override this check, type "make NO_CHECKSUM=yes [other args]". *** [checksum] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/libgcrypt. *** [checksum] Error code 1 Anton ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
games/supertux SHA256 Checksum mismatch for supertux-0.1.3.tar.bz2.
This is amd64 r246552 root@zzz:/usr/ports/games/supertux # svn up Updating '.': At revision 311993. root@zzz:/usr/ports/games/supertux # => Attempting to fetch http://download2.berlios.de/supertux/supertux-0.1.3.tar.b z2 fetch: http://download2.berlios.de/supertux/supertux-0.1.3.tar.bz2: size unknown fetch: http://download2.berlios.de/supertux/supertux-0.1.3.tar.bz2: size of remo te file is not known supertux-0.1.3.tar.bz21064 B 6418 kBps 00m00s ===> supertux-0.1.3_9 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for supertux-0.1.3.tar.bz2. ===> Giving up on fetching files: supertux-0.1.3.tar.bz2 Make sure the Makefile and distinfo file (/usr/ports/games/supertux/distinfo) are up to date. If you are absolutely sure you want to override this check, type "make NO_CHECKSUM=yes [other args]". *** [checksum] Error code 1 Thanks Anton ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: multimedia/libvdpau: checksum mismatch
On 18 September 2012 18:45, Barbara wrote: > # make checksum -C /usr/ports/multimedia/libvdpau Thanks for the report. This should be fixed now. The upstream mirror returned different files per request. :( -- Eitan Adler Source & Ports committer X11, Bugbusting teams ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
multimedia/libvdpau: checksum mismatch
# make checksum -C /usr/ports/multimedia/libvdpau ===> License MIT accepted by the user => libvdpau-0.5.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~aplattner/libvdpau/snapshot/libvdpau-0.5.tar.gz fetch: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~aplattner/libvdpau/snapshot/libvdpau-0.5.tar.gz: size unknown fetch: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~aplattner/libvdpau/snapshot/libvdpau-0.5.tar.gz: size of remote file is not known libvdpau-0.5.tar.gz 139 kB 99 kBps => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for libvdpau-0.5.tar.gz. ===> Refetch for 1 more times files: libvdpau-0.5.tar.gz ===> License MIT accepted by the user => libvdpau-0.5.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~aplattner/libvdpau/snapshot/libvdpau-0.5.tar.gz fetch: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~aplattner/libvdpau/snapshot/libvdpau-0.5.tar.gz: size unknown fetch: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~aplattner/libvdpau/snapshot/libvdpau-0.5.tar.gz: size of remote file is not known libvdpau-0.5.tar.gz 139 kB 100 kBps ===> License MIT accepted by the user => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for libvdpau-0.5.tar.gz. ===> Giving up on fetching files: libvdpau-0.5.tar.gz Make sure the Makefile and distinfo file (/usr/ports/multimedia/libvdpau/distinfo) are up to date. If you are absolutely sure you want to override this check, type "make NO_CHECKSUM=yes [other args]". *** [checksum] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/multimedia/libvdpau. *** [checksum] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/multimedia/libvdpau. # ls -la /usr/ports/distfiles/libvdpau-0.5.tar.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 142708 Sep 19 00:36 /usr/ports/distfiles/libvdpau-0.5.tar.gz # sha256 /usr/ports/distfiles/libvdpau-0.5.tar.gz SHA256 (/usr/ports/distfiles/libvdpau-0.5.tar.gz) = 4024f37fe801f01cee46a71536e7812f921d9d277e27ea5e9d42b74357a91302 Regards Barbara ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: checksum mismatch in print/texinfo
> > > On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Henry Miller wrote: > > > > > subject says it all, I'm trying to update texinfo, and getting a checksum > > mismatch. I deleted the distfiles in questions, so I'm not sure what else > > to > > try. > > > > shairia# uname -a > > FreeBSD shairia.millerfarm.com 8.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #0: Thu > > Feb 17 > > 02:41:51 UTC 2011 root at mason.cse.buffalo.edu: > > /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > > amd64 > > shairia# rm ../../distfiles/tex* > > shairia# make > > ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE > > => texinfo-4.13.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. > > => Attempting to fetch http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo-4.13.tar.gz > > texinfo-4.13.tar.gz 100% of 2686 kB 785 kBps > > => texinfo.tex doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. > > => Attempting to fetch http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex > > fetch: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex: size mismatch: expected > > 321229, actual 321252 > > => Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex > > fetch: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex: size mismatch: expected > > 321229, actual 321252 > > => Attempting to fetch > > http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex > > fetch: http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex: > > size > > unknown > > fetch: http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex: > > size of > > remote file is not known > > texinfo.tex340 B 2460 kBps > > => texi2dvi doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. > > => Attempting to fetch http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi > > fetch: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi: size mismatch: expected > > 57940, > > actual 58102 > > => Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi > > fetch: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi: size mismatch: expected > > 57940, > > actual 58102 > > => Attempting to fetch > > http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi > > fetch: http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi: size > > unknown > > fetch: http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi: size > > of > > remote file is not known > > texi2dvi 337 B 2438 kBps > > ===> Extracting for texinfo-4.13.20120406 > > => SHA256 Checksum OK for texinfo-4.13.tar.gz. > > => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for texinfo.tex. > > => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for texi2dvi. > > ===> Refetch for 1 more times files: texinfo.tex texi2dvi > > ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE > > => texinfo.tex doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. > > => Attempting to fetch http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex > > fetch: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex: size mismatch: expected > > 321229, actual 321252 > > => Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex > > fetch: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex: size mismatch: expected > > 321229, actual 321252 > > => Attempting to fetch > > http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex > > fetch: http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex: > > size > > unknown > > fetch: http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex: > > size of > > remote file is not known > > texinfo.tex340 B 2443 kBps > > => texi2dvi doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. > > => Attempting to fetch http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi > > fetch: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi: size mismatch: expected > > 57940, > > actual 58102 > > => Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi > > fetch: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi: size mismatch: expected > > 57940, > > actual 58102 > > => Attempting to fetch > > http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi > > fetch: http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi: size > > unknown > > fetch: http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi: size > > of > > remote file is not known > > texi2dvi 337 B 2570 kBps > > ===> License check disabled, p
Re: checksum mismatch in print/texinfo
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Henry Miller wrote: > > subject says it all, I'm trying to update texinfo, and getting a checksum > mismatch. I deleted the distfiles in questions, so I'm not sure what else > to > try. > > shairia# uname -a > FreeBSD shairia.millerfarm.com 8.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #0: Thu > Feb 17 > 02:41:51 UTC 2011 r...@mason.cse.buffalo.edu: > /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > amd64 > shairia# rm ../../distfiles/tex* > shairia# make > ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE > => texinfo-4.13.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. > => Attempting to fetch http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo-4.13.tar.gz > texinfo-4.13.tar.gz 100% of 2686 kB 785 kBps > => texinfo.tex doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. > => Attempting to fetch http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex > fetch: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex: size mismatch: expected > 321229, actual 321252 > => Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex > fetch: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex: size mismatch: expected > 321229, actual 321252 > => Attempting to fetch > http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex > fetch: http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex: > size > unknown > fetch: http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex: > size of > remote file is not known > texinfo.tex340 B 2460 kBps > => texi2dvi doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. > => Attempting to fetch http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi > fetch: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi: size mismatch: expected > 57940, > actual 58102 > => Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi > fetch: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi: size mismatch: expected > 57940, > actual 58102 > => Attempting to fetch > http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi > fetch: http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi: size > unknown > fetch: http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi: size > of > remote file is not known > texi2dvi 337 B 2438 kBps > ===> Extracting for texinfo-4.13.20120406 > => SHA256 Checksum OK for texinfo-4.13.tar.gz. > => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for texinfo.tex. > => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for texi2dvi. > ===> Refetch for 1 more times files: texinfo.tex texi2dvi > ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE > => texinfo.tex doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. > => Attempting to fetch http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex > fetch: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex: size mismatch: expected > 321229, actual 321252 > => Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex > fetch: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex: size mismatch: expected > 321229, actual 321252 > => Attempting to fetch > http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex > fetch: http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex: > size > unknown > fetch: http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex: > size of > remote file is not known > texinfo.tex340 B 2443 kBps > => texi2dvi doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. > => Attempting to fetch http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi > fetch: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi: size mismatch: expected > 57940, > actual 58102 > => Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi > fetch: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi: size mismatch: expected > 57940, > actual 58102 > => Attempting to fetch > http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi > fetch: http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi: size > unknown > fetch: http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi: size > of > remote file is not known > texi2dvi 337 B 2570 kBps > ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE > => SHA256 Checksum OK for texinfo-4.13.tar.gz. > => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for texinfo.tex. > => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for texi2dvi. > ===> Giving up on fetching files: texinfo.tex texi2dvi > Make sure the Makefile and distinfo file > (/usr/ports/print/texinfo/distinfo) > are up to date. If you are absolutely sure you want to override this > check, type "make NO_CHECKSUM=yes [other args]". > *** Error code 1 > > Stop
checksum mismatch in print/texinfo
subject says it all, I'm trying to update texinfo, and getting a checksum mismatch. I deleted the distfiles in questions, so I'm not sure what else to try. shairia# uname -a FreeBSD shairia.millerfarm.com 8.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #0: Thu Feb 17 02:41:51 UTC 2011 r...@mason.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 shairia# rm ../../distfiles/tex* shairia# make ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE => texinfo-4.13.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo-4.13.tar.gz texinfo-4.13.tar.gz 100% of 2686 kB 785 kBps => texinfo.tex doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex fetch: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex: size mismatch: expected 321229, actual 321252 => Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex fetch: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex: size mismatch: expected 321229, actual 321252 => Attempting to fetch http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex fetch: http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex: size unknown fetch: http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex: size of remote file is not known texinfo.tex340 B 2460 kBps => texi2dvi doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi fetch: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi: size mismatch: expected 57940, actual 58102 => Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi fetch: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi: size mismatch: expected 57940, actual 58102 => Attempting to fetch http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi fetch: http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi: size unknown fetch: http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi: size of remote file is not known texi2dvi 337 B 2438 kBps ===> Extracting for texinfo-4.13.20120406 => SHA256 Checksum OK for texinfo-4.13.tar.gz. => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for texinfo.tex. => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for texi2dvi. ===> Refetch for 1 more times files: texinfo.tex texi2dvi ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE => texinfo.tex doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex fetch: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex: size mismatch: expected 321229, actual 321252 => Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex fetch: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex: size mismatch: expected 321229, actual 321252 => Attempting to fetch http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex fetch: http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex: size unknown fetch: http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texinfo.tex: size of remote file is not known texinfo.tex340 B 2443 kBps => texi2dvi doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi fetch: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi: size mismatch: expected 57940, actual 58102 => Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi fetch: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi: size mismatch: expected 57940, actual 58102 => Attempting to fetch http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi fetch: http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi: size unknown fetch: http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi: size of remote file is not known texi2dvi 337 B 2570 kBps ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE => SHA256 Checksum OK for texinfo-4.13.tar.gz. => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for texinfo.tex. => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for texi2dvi. ===> Giving up on fetching files: texinfo.tex texi2dvi Make sure the Makefile and distinfo file (/usr/ports/print/texinfo/distinfo) are up to date. If you are absolutely sure you want to override this check, type "make NO_CHECKSUM=yes [other args]". *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/print/texinfo. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/print/texinfo. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: math/py-numpy (py26-numpy-1.5.1_1,1) (checksum mismatch) error
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:48 AM, David Southwell wrote: > > Hi > > > > As you are listed as maintainer in current Makefile I thought you might > > appreciate a copy > > > > David > > -- Forwarded Message -- > > > > Subject: math/py-numpy (py26-numpy-1.5.1_1,1) (checksum mismatch) error > > Date: Tuesday 13 December 2011, 06:42:33 > > From: David Southwell > > To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org > > > > Hi > > > > As subject line - checksum mismatch error from latest upgrade. > > > > David > > > > - On Tuesday 13 December 2011 08:44:17 Li-Lun "Leland" Wang wrote: > Please update your ports to 1.6.1. The documentation files of the > same names have been updated. If you get the newer 1.6.1 > documentation files from a mirror and try to checksum against the > older 1.5.1_1 distinfo, you'll get a mismatch. If you get a checksum > mismatch after you updated your ports to 1.6.1, it is possible that > the mirror site that you use has not fetched the newer files, in which > case you can fetch from the MASTER_SITE directly by undefining > MASTER_SITE_OVERRIDE. > > -- llwang > Hi llwang Thanks for the info. I had the latest upgrade and am still getting the problem. The latest error report is shown below from a fully uptodate ports tree. I have not used the MASTER_SITE_OVERRIDE option and cannot find any documentation. Would you mind giving some more detailed info? Thanks in advance David [root@dns1 /usr/ports/deskutils]# portupgrade -a ---> Upgrading 'py26-numpy-1.5.1_1,1' to 'py26-numpy-1.6.1,1' (math/py-numpy) ---> Building '/usr/ports/math/py-numpy' ===> Cleaning for py26-numpy-1.6.1,1 ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE ===> Found saved configuration for py26-numpy-1.5.1_1,1 ===> Extracting for py26-numpy-1.6.1,1 => SHA256 Checksum OK for numpy-1.6.1.tar.gz. => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for numpy-ref.pdf. => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for numpy-user.pdf. ===> Refetch for 1 more times files: numpy-ref.pdf numpy-user.pdf ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE ===> Found saved configuration for py26-numpy-1.5.1_1,1 => numpy-ref.pdf doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy-1.6.0/numpy-ref.pdf fetch: http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy-1.6.0/numpy-ref.pdf: Requested Range Not Satisfiable => Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/numpy-ref.pdf => numpy-user.pdf doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy-1.6.0/numpy-user.pdf fetch: http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy-1.6.0/numpy-user.pdf: Requested Range Not Satisfiable => Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/numpy-user.pdf ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE ===> Found saved configuration for py26-numpy-1.5.1_1,1 => SHA256 Checksum OK for numpy-1.6.1.tar.gz. => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for numpy-ref.pdf. => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for numpy-user.pdf. ===> Giving up on fetching files: numpy-ref.pdf numpy-user.pdf Make sure the Makefile and distinfo file (/usr/ports/math/py-numpy/distinfo) are up to date. If you are absolutely sure you want to override this check, type "make NO_CHECKSUM=yes [other args]". *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/math/py-numpy. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/math/py-numpy. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/math/py-numpy. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade20111214-46619-xoytj-0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=py26-numpy-1.5.1_1,1 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=1.5.1_1,1 make ** Fix the problem and try again. ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) ! math/py-numpy (py26-numpy-1.5.1_1,1) (checksum mismatch) [root@dns1 /usr/ports/deskutils]# d /usr/ports/math/py-numpy ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: math/py-numpy (py26-numpy-1.5.1_1, 1) (checksum mismatch) error
On 13.12.2011 15:42 (UTC+1), David Southwell wrote: Hi As subject line - checksum mismatch error from latest upgrade. The port wants to fetch numpy-1.6.1.tar.gz, numpy-ref.pdf and numpy-user.pdf. Only the first one has a version number, the next two have not. So removing numpy-ref.pdf and numpy-user.pdf before updating should help. Rainer David ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: math/py-numpy (py26-numpy-1.5.1_1,1) (checksum mismatch) error
Please update your ports to 1.6.1. The documentation files of the same names have been updated. If you get the newer 1.6.1 documentation files from a mirror and try to checksum against the older 1.5.1_1 distinfo, you'll get a mismatch. If you get a checksum mismatch after you updated your ports to 1.6.1, it is possible that the mirror site that you use has not fetched the newer files, in which case you can fetch from the MASTER_SITE directly by undefining MASTER_SITE_OVERRIDE. -- llwang On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:48 AM, David Southwell wrote: > Hi > > As you are listed as maintainer in current Makefile I thought you might > appreciate a copy > > David > -- Forwarded Message -- > > Subject: math/py-numpy (py26-numpy-1.5.1_1,1) (checksum mismatch) error > Date: Tuesday 13 December 2011, 06:42:33 > From: David Southwell > To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org > > Hi > > As subject line - checksum mismatch error from latest upgrade. > > David > > - ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
math/py-numpy (py26-numpy-1.5.1_1,1) (checksum mismatch) error
Hi As subject line - checksum mismatch error from latest upgrade. David ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ioncube checksum mismatch
Hi, experienced over the past few days, (with updated portstree) fetch: http://downloads2.ioncube.com/loader_downloads/ioncube_loaders_fre_8_x86-64.tar.gz: size mismatch: expected 3157148, actual 3157150 => Attempting to fetch http://ls.fvds.ru/ioncube/4.0.8/ioncube_loaders_fre_8_x86-64.tar.gz ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for ioncube_loaders_fre_8_x86-64.tar.gz. ===> Giving up on fetching files: ioncube_loaders_fre_8_x86-64.tar.gz Make sure the Makefile and distinfo file (/usr/ports/devel/ioncube/distinfo) are up to date. If you are absolutely sure you want to override this check, type "make NO_CHECKSUM=yes [other args]". *** Error code 1 best regards Paul. -- - Paul Macdonald IFDNRG Ltd Web and video hosting - t: 0131 5548070 m: 07534206249 e: p...@ifdnrg.com w: http://www.ifdnrg.com - IFDNRG 40 Maritime Street Edinburgh EH6 6SA - ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Checksum mismatch for ports/finance/homebank-4.2
On 3/2/2010 4:44 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Pursuing diffs on re-rolled sources might be nice, but Doug, after > you also refused to allow ports to flag installs of binaries not > built from fetched sources ? ... Balance seems missing ! I didn't "refuse" anything, I have no actual authority. :) I'm just a lowly committer. What I _did_ say was that I agreed with the policy that ports should be built from a stable set of sources, and I voiced my opposition to the idea of changing that policy. My concern about the changes to the sources of this port is along the same lines. Doug -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover!http://SupersetSolutions.com/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Checksum mismatch for ports/finance/homebank-4.2
Doug Barton wrote: > That's fine, but our process mandates that any committer who makes the > update needs to verify the diff between the two tarballs. > On 02/24/10 09:31, Wesley Shields wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:25:39PM +0300, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > >> On 24.02.2010 02:45, Wesley Shields wrote: > I asked for someone to send me a copy of the original tarball, the one > that matches the current distinfo file. So far no one has. > >>> > >>> I don't have one but QAT may. Hopefully itectu@ can confirm or deny > >>> that. > >>> > >>> -- WXS > >> > >> 4.2.1 was released. > >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=144258 > > > > I've grabbed this PR and will be committing it once I review it. > > I'm not going to suggest a course of action for you, but I would like to > say that for me I would still like to get a copy of the tarball that > matches what's in ports now to compare against the current version. But > I'm just paranoid like that. :) Pursuing diffs on re-rolled sources might be nice, but Doug, after you also refused to allow ports to flag installs of binaries not built from fetched sources ? ... Balance seems missing ! http://berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/FreeBSD/ports/binary_installs.html Cheers, Julian - -- Julian Stacey: BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Mail plain text not quoted-printable, HTML or Base64 http://www.asciiribbon.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Checksum mismatch for ports/finance/homebank-4.2
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:29:05 -0600, Doug Barton wrote: On Fri, 26 Feb 2010, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: I've removed all the conversations from homebank author after patch from this PR was commited ). But he is released the new version (4.2.1) after i ask him if distfile was rerolled. Latter he is addmitted that reroll was the bad idea. There is only 4.2.1 and 4.0.2 and past versions: http://homebank.free.fr/public/ Original 4.2 distfile was removed. Since you're in contact with the author, perhaps he could provide a copy of the distfile that matches what's currently in ports? You need to relax... :-) He is author. Therefore, it makes no difference if he released new version or rerolled the tarball. If he said that he rerolled to fix the bug(s) then it's good enough. Same idea with new release version. Cheers, Mezz Doug -- me...@cox.net - m...@freebsd.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gn...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Checksum mismatch for ports/finance/homebank-4.2
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: I've removed all the conversations from homebank author after patch from this PR was commited ). But he is released the new version (4.2.1) after i ask him if distfile was rerolled. Latter he is addmitted that reroll was the bad idea. There is only 4.2.1 and 4.0.2 and past versions: http://homebank.free.fr/public/ Original 4.2 distfile was removed. Since you're in contact with the author, perhaps he could provide a copy of the distfile that matches what's currently in ports? Doug -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover!http://SupersetSolutions.com/ Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. -- Pablo Picasso ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Checksum mismatch for ports/finance/homebank-4.2
On 26.02.2010 00:37, Doug Barton wrote: On 02/24/10 09:31, Wesley Shields wrote: On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:25:39PM +0300, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: On 24.02.2010 02:45, Wesley Shields wrote: I asked for someone to send me a copy of the original tarball, the one that matches the current distinfo file. So far no one has. I don't have one but QAT may. Hopefully itectu@ can confirm or deny that. -- WXS 4.2.1 was released. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=144258 I've grabbed this PR and will be committing it once I review it. I'm not going to suggest a course of action for you, but I would like to say that for me I would still like to get a copy of the tarball that matches what's in ports now to compare against the current version. But I'm just paranoid like that. :) Doug I've removed all the conversations from homebank author after patch from this PR was commited ). But he is released the new version (4.2.1) after i ask him if distfile was rerolled. Latter he is addmitted that reroll was the bad idea. There is only 4.2.1 and 4.0.2 and past versions: http://homebank.free.fr/public/ Original 4.2 distfile was removed. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Checksum mismatch for ports/finance/homebank-4.2
On 02/24/10 09:31, Wesley Shields wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:25:39PM +0300, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: >> On 24.02.2010 02:45, Wesley Shields wrote: I asked for someone to send me a copy of the original tarball, the one that matches the current distinfo file. So far no one has. >>> >>> I don't have one but QAT may. Hopefully itectu@ can confirm or deny >>> that. >>> >>> -- WXS >> >> 4.2.1 was released. >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=144258 > > I've grabbed this PR and will be committing it once I review it. I'm not going to suggest a course of action for you, but I would like to say that for me I would still like to get a copy of the tarball that matches what's in ports now to compare against the current version. But I'm just paranoid like that. :) Doug -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover!http://SupersetSolutions.com/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Checksum mismatch for ports/finance/homebank-4.2
On 24.02.2010 20:31, Wesley Shields wrote: On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:25:39PM +0300, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: On 24.02.2010 02:45, Wesley Shields wrote: I asked for someone to send me a copy of the original tarball, the one that matches the current distinfo file. So far no one has. I don't have one but QAT may. Hopefully itectu@ can confirm or deny that. -- WXS 4.2.1 was released. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=144258 I've grabbed this PR and will be committing it once I review it. The port currently has no maintainer, would you like to maintain it? -- WXS Thanks! Sorry but i'm not experienced enough to maintain this port. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Checksum mismatch for ports/finance/homebank-4.2
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:25:39PM +0300, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > On 24.02.2010 02:45, Wesley Shields wrote: > >> I asked for someone to send me a copy of the original tarball, the one > >> that matches the current distinfo file. So far no one has. > > > > I don't have one but QAT may. Hopefully itectu@ can confirm or deny > > that. > > > > -- WXS > > 4.2.1 was released. > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=144258 I've grabbed this PR and will be committing it once I review it. The port currently has no maintainer, would you like to maintain it? -- WXS ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Checksum mismatch for ports/finance/homebank-4.2
On 24.02.2010 02:45, Wesley Shields wrote: I asked for someone to send me a copy of the original tarball, the one that matches the current distinfo file. So far no one has. I don't have one but QAT may. Hopefully itectu@ can confirm or deny that. -- WXS 4.2.1 was released. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=144258 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Checksum mismatch for ports/finance/homebank-4.2
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 01:09:53PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > On 02/23/10 00:18, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > > On 15.02.2010 00:58, Doug Barton wrote: > >> On 02/14/10 13:56, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > >>> Hi. > >>> > >>> I've contacted the author. It confirm that it was rerrolled: > >> > >> That's fine, but our process mandates that any committer who makes the > >> update needs to verify the diff between the two tarballs. > >> > >> > >> Doug > >> > > > > So is there any news about this? > > The port is now marked as broken in ports tree. > > I asked for someone to send me a copy of the original tarball, the one > that matches the current distinfo file. So far no one has. I don't have one but QAT may. Hopefully itectu@ can confirm or deny that. -- WXS ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Checksum mismatch for ports/finance/homebank-4.2
On 24.02.2010 00:09, Doug Barton wrote: On 02/23/10 00:18, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: On 15.02.2010 00:58, Doug Barton wrote: On 02/14/10 13:56, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: Hi. I've contacted the author. It confirm that it was rerrolled: That's fine, but our process mandates that any committer who makes the update needs to verify the diff between the two tarballs. Doug So is there any news about this? The port is now marked as broken in ports tree. I asked for someone to send me a copy of the original tarball, the one that matches the current distinfo file. So far no one has. Yes, i see. So what we should now do, are we have to wait for next HomeBank release? ). I'm just afraid that this port will not go into 7.3 packages because of this situation with rerolling. PS. I'm using it (installed with changed distinfo) more than a week, and it's fine to me. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Checksum mismatch for ports/finance/homebank-4.2
On 02/23/10 00:18, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > On 15.02.2010 00:58, Doug Barton wrote: >> On 02/14/10 13:56, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: >>> Hi. >>> >>> I've contacted the author. It confirm that it was rerrolled: >> >> That's fine, but our process mandates that any committer who makes the >> update needs to verify the diff between the two tarballs. >> >> >> Doug >> > > So is there any news about this? > The port is now marked as broken in ports tree. I asked for someone to send me a copy of the original tarball, the one that matches the current distinfo file. So far no one has. -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover!http://SupersetSolutions.com/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Checksum mismatch for ports/finance/homebank-4.2
On 15.02.2010 00:58, Doug Barton wrote: On 02/14/10 13:56, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: Hi. I've contacted the author. It confirm that it was rerrolled: That's fine, but our process mandates that any committer who makes the update needs to verify the diff between the two tarballs. Doug So is there any news about this? The port is now marked as broken in ports tree. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Checksum mismatch for ports/finance/homebank-4.2
On 02/14/10 13:56, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: Hi. I've contacted the author. It confirm that it was rerrolled: That's fine, but our process mandates that any committer who makes the update needs to verify the diff between the two tarballs. Doug -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover!http://SupersetSolutions.com/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Checksum mismatch for ports/finance/homebank-4.2
Hi. I've contacted the author. It confirm that it was rerrolled: == Hi, It is intentional, done by myself to fix a problem into the package. Regards, Max. - Mail Original - De: "Ruslan Mahmatkhanov" À: homeb...@free.fr Envoyé: Dimanche 14 Février 2010 21h45:52 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne Objet: 4.2 tarball size Good day! Was 4.2 tarball rerolled after release? It had size of 2611432 and md5 checksum 558be92f996c339e87ad396795691364, but now it has 2611439 and 5d76ab58f6e211c6cc3902b3f38ff22d accordingly. And mtime it has is 12 Feb 16:12. Was it intentional or it was somehow backdoored )? Thanks. == Can please anybody commit attached patch? On 15.02.2010 00:28, Doug Barton wrote: On 02/14/10 03:46, hanno Krusken wrote: Hi there, since the last upgrade there is a "Checksum mismatch for FBSD port/finance/homebank-4.2" see my log file from portupgrade running FreeBSD-8.0-releng-p2 Does anyone have the old distfile (the one corresponding to what's currently in the ports tree)? If so, can you make it available for comparison? Doug --- distinfo.orig 2010-02-13 11:46:43.0 +0300 +++ distinfo2010-02-15 00:53:32.0 +0300 @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ -MD5 (homebank-4.2.tar.gz) = 558be92f996c339e87ad396795691364 -SHA256 (homebank-4.2.tar.gz) = 0bb52d4d4ca2ed128fe614d4ad1cf1923004392f5651f12389256d336898e834 -SIZE (homebank-4.2.tar.gz) = 2611432 +MD5 (homebank-4.2.tar.gz) = 5d76ab58f6e211c6cc3902b3f38ff22d +SHA256 (homebank-4.2.tar.gz) = 67b7026deccd14023dbfecdd46983d0337f039fb1896222620d39423fae61224 +SIZE (homebank-4.2.tar.gz) = 2611439 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Checksum mismatch for ports/finance/homebank-4.2
On 02/14/10 03:46, hanno Krusken wrote: Hi there, since the last upgrade there is a "Checksum mismatch for FBSD port/finance/homebank-4.2" see my log file from portupgrade running FreeBSD-8.0-releng-p2 Does anyone have the old distfile (the one corresponding to what's currently in the ports tree)? If so, can you make it available for comparison? Doug -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover!http://SupersetSolutions.com/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Checksum mismatch for ports/finance/homebank-4.2
On 14.02.2010 14:46, hanno Krusken wrote: Hi there, since the last upgrade there is a "Checksum mismatch for FBSD port/finance/homebank-4.2" see my log file from portupgrade running FreeBSD-8.0-releng-p2 ===> Cleaning for homebank-4.2 ===> Found saved configuration for homebank-4.1 => homebank-4.2.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch from http://homebank.free.fr/public/. fetch: http://homebank.free.fr/public/homebank-4.2.tar.gz: size mismatch: expected 2611432, actual 2611439 Seems like tarball was rerolled. 4.2 was released on 10 February, but tarball's mtime is 12 Feb 16:12. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Checksum mismatch for ports/finance/homebank-4.2
Hi there, since the last upgrade there is a "Checksum mismatch for FBSD port/finance/homebank-4.2" see my log file from portupgrade running FreeBSD-8.0-releng-p2 ===> Cleaning for homebank-4.2 ===> Found saved configuration for homebank-4.1 => homebank-4.2.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch from http://homebank.free.fr/public/. fetch: http://homebank.free.fr/public/homebank-4.2.tar.gz: size mismatch: expected 2611432, actual 2611439 => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. fetch: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/homebank-4.2.tar.gz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/Latest/. fetch: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/Latest/homebank-4.2.tar.gz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp3.dk.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. fetch: ftp://ftp3.dk.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/homebank-4.2.tar.gz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp2.dk.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. fetch: ftp://ftp2.dk.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/homebank-4.2.tar.gz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.uk.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. fetch: ftp://ftp.uk.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/homebank-4.2.tar.gz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this => port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/ and try again. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/finance/homebank. hope the issue can be fixed soon... thanks -- Hanno Krusken Important note: please do not replay with any HTML tags in your mail which will be blocked and deleted. Regarding known SPAM, VIRUS and junk mail sender, which often use this way of fooling recipients with fancy images and HTML-artwork. Remember that I'm using a very strict spam setup on top of it. Thanks for your understanding. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: garr sourceforge mirror is broken [Was: Re: Checksum mismatch]
* Dmitry Marakasov (amd...@amdmi3.ru) wrote: > > > => Attempting to fetch from > > > http://garr.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/netpbm/. > > > netpbm-10.26.62.tgz 100% of 2485 kB 379 kBps > > > ===> Extracting for netpbm-10.26.62 > > > => MD5 Checksum mismatch for netpbm-10.26.62.tgz. > > > => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for netpbm-10.26.62.tgz. > > I've commented the mirror out for now. The mirror seems to be fixed. At least mesalib and netpbm witch were broken before now download correctly. It still doesn't seem to be in SF's list of mirrors, but we may consider turning it back on. -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amd...@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amd...@jabber.ruhttp://www.amdmi3.ru ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: garr sourceforge mirror is broken [Was: Re: Checksum mismatch]
* Dmitry Marakasov (amd...@amdmi3.ru) wrote: > > => Attempting to fetch from > > http://garr.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/netpbm/. > > netpbm-10.26.62.tgz 100% of 2485 kB 379 kBps > > ===> Extracting for netpbm-10.26.62 > > => MD5 Checksum mismatch for netpbm-10.26.62.tgz. > > => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for netpbm-10.26.62.tgz. I've commented the mirror out for now. -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amd...@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amd...@jabber.ruhttp://www.amdmi3.ru ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
garr sourceforge mirror is broken [Was: Re: Checksum mismatch]
* Hans Petter Selasky (hsela...@c2i.net) wrote: > ===> Installing for transfig-3.2.5 > ===> transfig-3.2.5 depends on executable: ppmtogif - not found > ===>Verifying install for ppmtogif in /usr/ports/graphics/netpbm > ===> WARNING: Vulnerability database out of date, checking anyway > => netpbm-10.26.62.tgz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. > => Attempting to fetch from > http://garr.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/netpbm/. > netpbm-10.26.62.tgz 100% of 2485 kB 379 kBps > ===> Extracting for netpbm-10.26.62 > => MD5 Checksum mismatch for netpbm-10.26.62.tgz. > => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for netpbm-10.26.62.tgz. Seems like garr sourceforge mirror is broken. libGLU% make fetch-urlall-list | while read url; do echo $url; wget -q $url -O- | md5; done http://garr.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/mesa3d/MesaLib-7.4.2.tar.bz2 2cec5b1ed86a6b62cacb310dcc39de61 http://superb-east.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/mesa3d/MesaLib-7.4.2.tar.bz2 b10a76e32bde4645cfc34ea0416d7d8b http://nchc.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/mesa3d/MesaLib-7.4.2.tar.bz2 b10a76e32bde4645cfc34ea0416d7d8b http://kent.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/mesa3d/MesaLib-7.4.2.tar.bz2 b10a76e32bde4645cfc34ea0416d7d8b http://easynews.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/mesa3d/MesaLib-7.4.2.tar.bz2 b10a76e32bde4645cfc34ea0416d7d8b http://ufpr.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/mesa3d/MesaLib-7.4.2.tar.bz2 b10a76e32bde4645cfc34ea0416d7d8b http://mesh.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/mesa3d/MesaLib-7.4.2.tar.bz2 b10a76e32bde4645cfc34ea0416d7d8b http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/mesa3d/MesaLib-7.4.2.tar.bz2 b10a76e32bde4645cfc34ea0416d7d8b ftp://ftp.fu-berlin.de/pub/unix/X11/graphics/Mesa/MesaLib-7.4.2.tar.bz2 b10a76e32bde4645cfc34ea0416d7d8b ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/MesaLib-7.4.2.tar.bz2 b10a76e32bde4645cfc34ea0416d7d8b Maybe we should move it to the end of mirror list in bsd.sites.mk ASAP? -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amd...@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amd...@jabber.ruhttp://www.amdmi3.ru ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Checksum mismatch
===> Installing for transfig-3.2.5 ===> transfig-3.2.5 depends on executable: ppmtogif - not found ===>Verifying install for ppmtogif in /usr/ports/graphics/netpbm ===> WARNING: Vulnerability database out of date, checking anyway => netpbm-10.26.62.tgz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch from http://garr.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/netpbm/. netpbm-10.26.62.tgz 100% of 2485 kB 379 kBps ===> Extracting for netpbm-10.26.62 => MD5 Checksum mismatch for netpbm-10.26.62.tgz. => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for netpbm-10.26.62.tgz. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
gnustep-make-2.0.0 - Checksum mismatch
Hi, In my attempt to install and check out Etoile, I stumbled upon this checksum mismatch for the gnustep-make-2.0.0.tar.gz file: ===> Extracting for gnustep-make-2.0.0 => MD5 Checksum mismatch for gnustep-make-2.0.0.tar.gz. => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for gnustep-make-2.0.0.tar.gz. ===> Refetch for 1 more times files: gnustep-make-2.0.0.tar.gz gnustep-make-2.0.0.tar.gz => gnustep-make-2.0.0.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.planetmirror.com/pub/gnustep/gnustep/core/. fetch: ftp://ftp.planetmirror.com/pub/gnustep/gnustep/core/gnustep-make-2.0.0.tar.gz: size mismatch: expected 441630, actual 443627 => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/gnustep/core/. fetch: ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/gnustep/core/gnustep-make-2.0.0.tar.gz: Unknown error: 0 => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.easynet.nl/mirror/GNUstep/pub/gnustep/core/. fetch: ftp://ftp.easynet.nl/mirror/GNUstep/pub/gnustep/core/gnustep-make-2.0.0.tar.gz: size mismatch: expected 441630, actual 443627 => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. fetch: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/gnustep-make-2.0.0.tar.gz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this => port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/ and try again. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/gnustep-make. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/gnustep-make. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/gnustep-base. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/etoile. I downloaded the file from one of the server, but the error persisted. Is this just an error in the distinfo file? Kind regards, Vassilis -- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ports/102499: lftp asc file checksum mismatch
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 01:48:02AM +0300, Roman Kurakin wrote: that lftp gets a corrupted distfile when fetching through a squid proxy. This is because in the default configuration squid fetches all plain text files in ftp ascii mode, which does CR/LF translation and botches up the checksum. IIRC this is not a bug and squid do not translate in all cases Any way the file is marked as a text and any such translation do not look like a violation. I guess it was done for convenience of M$ users. "Bug" in the sense of broken behaviour. IMO it is broken behaviour for squid to force a non-default translation policy on the client. If a FTP client really wants a non-default translation mode the protocol allows them to specify it. IIRC it is impossible to switch this off in squid (this is the only thing they was wrong). It can be corrected by editing squid's mime.conf. My point of view that we should not blame the squid, this wouldn't help. Now I know that there is such problem, you know, a couple of peoples who will read this. But for the rest the project would look in the bad way. More over not all peoples can control which proxy in front of them even if they know about this problem. My idea was to tech a fetch to request a binary mode for all files despite of their mime type. This may not be hard to do, can you look into it? I've made a patch but it was ugly and was broken by update of libfetch. I'll try to check the current state of libfetch and update my patch. rik The other option would be for the squid port to install a fixed mime.conf. Kris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ports/102499: lftp asc file checksum mismatch
* Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The other option would be for the squid port to install a fixed > mime.conf. I'd love to, having been bitten by this myself (but only when fetching files from a FreeBSD ftpd IIRC). If there is consensus that the port should be fixed this way, hand me a patch and I'll update the port accordingly. It might be a good idea to bring this to the Squid folks' attention, too. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ports/102499: lftp asc file checksum mismatch
On Wed, 2007-Jan-24 18:04:57 -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: >> IIRC it is impossible to switch this >> off in squid (this is the only thing they was wrong). > >It can be corrected by editing squid's mime.conf. ... >The other option would be for the squid port to install a fixed >mime.conf. Note that this would not the issue where someone is fetching ports from behind a SQUID proxy that they do not control (eg corporate firewall). It looks like distinfo can contain multiple checksums for a file and the checksum test will pass if any checksum is correct. In this case, another option would be to provide two sets of checksum entries for the problematic files: One for the file with CR-LF and one for the file with just LF. -- Peter Jeremy pgpLGBW6UaOy6.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: ports/102499: lftp asc file checksum mismatch
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 11:58:13PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > My point of view that we should not blame the squid, this wouldn't > > We have to blame squid. We can't blame lftp port. > > Also, what's the use of these .asc files anyway? We could just lose > their fetching from the port. They do nothing. Maybe, but this also affects a handful of other ports too. > > My idea was to tech a fetch to request a binary mode for all files > > despite of their mime type. > > fetch does binary mode for all files. It's the squid which talks ascii > with the original ftp site. > > > > IMO this is a bug in the squid configuration. > > Agreed. Kris pgpvO7fVyUPsZ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: ports/102499: lftp asc file checksum mismatch
> My point of view that we should not blame the squid, this wouldn't We have to blame squid. We can't blame lftp port. Also, what's the use of these .asc files anyway? We could just lose their fetching from the port. They do nothing. > My idea was to tech a fetch to request a binary mode for all files > despite of their mime type. fetch does binary mode for all files. It's the squid which talks ascii with the original ftp site. > > IMO this is a bug in the squid configuration. Agreed. -- Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Why do we need a film of "Lord of the Rings" when we have the book? Because watching a cg enhanced Legolas fire a flaming arrow into the heart of a warg is cool? - [EMAIL PROTECTED] in rec.games.roguelike.angband ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ports/102499: lftp asc file checksum mismatch
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 01:48:02AM +0300, Roman Kurakin wrote: > >that lftp gets a corrupted distfile when fetching through a squid > >proxy. This is because in the default configuration squid fetches all > >plain text files in ftp ascii mode, which does CR/LF translation and > >botches up the checksum. > > > IIRC this is not a bug and squid do not translate in all cases > Any way the file is marked as a text and any such translation > do not look like a violation. I guess it was done for > convenience of M$ users. "Bug" in the sense of broken behaviour. IMO it is broken behaviour for squid to force a non-default translation policy on the client. If a FTP client really wants a non-default translation mode the protocol allows them to specify it. > IIRC it is impossible to switch this > off in squid (this is the only thing they was wrong). It can be corrected by editing squid's mime.conf. > My point of view that we should not blame the squid, this wouldn't > help. Now I know that there is such problem, you know, a couple > of peoples who will read this. But for the rest the project would > look in the bad way. More over not all peoples can control which > proxy in front of them even if they know about this problem. My > idea was to tech a fetch to request a binary mode for all files > despite of their mime type. This may not be hard to do, can you look into it? The other option would be for the squid port to install a fixed mime.conf. Kris pgpAA3MIHh3SN.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: ports/102499: lftp asc file checksum mismatch
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 12:55:09AM +0300, Roman Kurakin wrote: I am crossposting this to both bugs@ and ports@ so all who will join this discussion keep this in mind if you'll reply. Pav Lucistnik wrote: So, what's the status on this one? My opinion is that the whole ticket is bogus and should be closed. No, it shouldn't. Sorry I didn't have enough time to investigate the problem further, but it is a real pain for port distribution. IIRC the point I've reached was: all software works correctly. All files correct but port can't be build. The reason that default behaviors are not the same on all levels and conversion of new line from single char to double could occur. The solution is to request text file as binary than all layers will bypass it without modifications or to convert newline explicitly for all text files before computation of checksum to the one default value (I guess to single-char variant). So the problem not in the port itself but in the set of conditions. And probably this bug report should be reopened with other description. I didnt see earlier mails in the thread, but I assume the problem is All that was discussed in gnuts, it is not much. that lftp gets a corrupted distfile when fetching through a squid proxy. This is because in the default configuration squid fetches all plain text files in ftp ascii mode, which does CR/LF translation and botches up the checksum. IIRC this is not a bug and squid do not translate in all cases. Any way the file is marked as a text and any such translation do not look like a violation. I guess it was done for convenience of M$ users. IIRC it is impossible to switch this off in squid (this is the only thing they was wrong). My point of view that we should not blame the squid, this wouldn't help. Now I know that there is such problem, you know, a couple of peoples who will read this. But for the rest the project would look in the bad way. More over not all peoples can control which proxy in front of them even if they know about this problem. My idea was to tech a fetch to request a binary mode for all files despite of their mime type. rik IMO this is a bug in the squid configuration. Kris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ports/102499: lftp asc file checksum mismatch
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 12:55:09AM +0300, Roman Kurakin wrote: > I am crossposting this to both bugs@ and ports@ so all who will join this > discussion keep this in mind if you'll reply. > > Pav Lucistnik wrote: > >So, what's the status on this one? My opinion is that the whole ticket > >is bogus and should be closed. > > > No, it shouldn't. Sorry I didn't have enough time to investigate the > problem further, > but it is a real pain for port distribution. IIRC the point I've reached > was: > all software works correctly. All files correct but port can't be build. The > reason that default behaviors are not the same on all levels and conversion > of new line from single char to double could occur. The solution is to > request text file as binary than all layers will bypass it without > modifications or to convert newline explicitly for all text files before > computation of checksum to the one default value (I guess to single-char > variant). > > So the problem not in the port itself but in the set of conditions. And > probably > this bug report should be reopened with other description. I didnt see earlier mails in the thread, but I assume the problem is that lftp gets a corrupted distfile when fetching through a squid proxy. This is because in the default configuration squid fetches all plain text files in ftp ascii mode, which does CR/LF translation and botches up the checksum. IMO this is a bug in the squid configuration. Kris pgpH5i7gDOstF.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: ports/102499: lftp asc file checksum mismatch
I am crossposting this to both bugs@ and ports@ so all who will join this discussion keep this in mind if you'll reply. Pav Lucistnik wrote: So, what's the status on this one? My opinion is that the whole ticket is bogus and should be closed. No, it shouldn't. Sorry I didn't have enough time to investigate the problem further, but it is a real pain for port distribution. IIRC the point I've reached was: all software works correctly. All files correct but port can't be build. The reason that default behaviors are not the same on all levels and conversion of new line from single char to double could occur. The solution is to request text file as binary than all layers will bypass it without modifications or to convert newline explicitly for all text files before computation of checksum to the one default value (I guess to single-char variant). So the problem not in the port itself but in the set of conditions. And probably this bug report should be reopened with other description. rik ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Checksum mismatch for print/teTeX-texmf
Brooks Davis wrote: On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 10:24:17AM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote: Running portupgrade with current ports from cvs, I got this failure - print/teTeX-texmf (teTeX-texmf-3.0_3) (checksum mismatch). I also had checksum mismatchs for multimedia/mplayer-skins, but I was able to get past that by rm'ing the config and using only the default skin. Anyone know anything about these two problems? Have the maintainers been informed? I've often had problems with the teTeX-texmf dist files. Deleting and redownloading them usually works (as annoying as that is.) Thanks, Brooks. This worked for me as well. -- Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Checksum mismatch for print/teTeX-texmf
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 10:24:17AM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote: > Running portupgrade with current ports from cvs, I got this failure - > print/teTeX-texmf (teTeX-texmf-3.0_3) (checksum mismatch). I also had > checksum mismatchs for multimedia/mplayer-skins, but I was able to get > past that by rm'ing the config and using only the default skin. > > Anyone know anything about these two problems? Have the maintainers > been informed? I've often had problems with the teTeX-texmf dist files. Deleting and redownloading them usually works (as annoying as that is.) -- Brooks pgpqmRiwgBLYi.pgp Description: PGP signature
Checksum mismatch for print/teTeX-texmf
Running portupgrade with current ports from cvs, I got this failure - print/teTeX-texmf (teTeX-texmf-3.0_3) (checksum mismatch). I also had checksum mismatchs for multimedia/mplayer-skins, but I was able to get past that by rm'ing the config and using only the default skin. Anyone know anything about these two problems? Have the maintainers been informed? -- Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
