On Wed, 21 May 2008 11:56:59 -0500, Alexey Shuvaev
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list!
I am working on update to x11-toolkits/gtkdatabox2 and it has recently
got
an html reference (built using gtk-doc). The gtkdatabox2 is a rather
rarely used port and its reference consists of app. 25 files (for now).
What is better,
- to create separate gtkdatabox-reference port, or
- to intstall documentation from the existing port, under the
control of NOPORTDOCS variable?
It's up to you. If it was my port, I would have chosen #2 option since
it's very small and I dislike reference framework. If it's big then I
possible would choice #1.
The second question is about bsd.gnome-reference.mk framework discussed
recently[1]. Althoug gtkdatabox is not an official part of gnome,
it uses the same structure and therefore could be handled in the same way
as other official gnome components. Are there any reasons to use one
of:
- devel/glib20-reference/bsd.gnome-reference.mk framework
- handling docs on one's own?
It doesn't has to be only for GNOME. We have glib*-reference,
cairo-reference and others that aren't part of GNOME.
Cheers,
Mezz
Thanks,
Alexey.
1. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2008-May/048645.html
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2008-May/048647.html
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
