If a port requires xorg-server's source tree, how to write Makefile?
Hi,
A few times I've already posted freebsd-ports list that I'm working for
creating a port net/tigervnc. It is almost be done but I have a
question.
TigerVNC's source tree is not complete to make everything. We have to
put freebsd-patched xorg-server's source tree into its tree. I tried
like this. It builds fine with WITH_NEW_XORG and old xorg.
Is this a bad idea? Should I take another way?
post-extract:
${MAKE} -C ../../x11-servers/xorg-server patch
${CP} -R
../../x11-servers/xorg-server/work/xorg-server-${XORG_VERSION}/* \
${WRKSRC}/unix/xserver/
post-clean:
${MAKE} -C ../../x11-servers/xorg-server clean
This tarball is my temporary working port.
http://www.club.kyutech.ac.jp/~meta/temp/tigervnc-port.tar.gz
--
`whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w`
meta m...@vmeta.jp
TigerVNC project is to merge enhancements of all different VNCs and
has unity in mind. For further information. Please see:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.tight-vnc.general/8610/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: If a port requires xorg-server's source tree, how to write Makefile?
On 03/02/2013 13:30, meta wrote:
Hi,
A few times I've already posted freebsd-ports list that I'm working for
creating a port net/tigervnc. It is almost be done but I have a question.
TigerVNC's source tree is not complete to make everything. We have to
put freebsd-patched xorg-server's source tree into its tree. I tried
like this. It builds fine with WITH_NEW_XORG and old xorg.
Is this a bad idea? Should I take another way?
post-extract:
${MAKE} -C ../../x11-servers/xorg-server patch
${CP} -R ../../x11-servers/xorg-server/work/xorg-server-${XORG_VERSION}/* \
${WRKSRC}/unix/xserver/
post-clean:
${MAKE} -C ../../x11-servers/xorg-server clean
BUILD_DEPENDS= ${NONEXISTENT}:${PORTSDIR}/x11-servers/xorg-server:extract
See the Porters' Handbook section 5.8.
Regards
--
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: If a port requires xorg-server's source tree, how to write Makefile?
On 3 Feb 2013 13:44, Dominic Fandrey kamik...@bsdforen.de wrote:
On 03/02/2013 13:30, meta wrote:
Hi,
A few times I've already posted freebsd-ports list that I'm working for
creating a port net/tigervnc. It is almost be done but I have a
question.
TigerVNC's source tree is not complete to make everything. We have to
put freebsd-patched xorg-server's source tree into its tree. I tried
like this. It builds fine with WITH_NEW_XORG and old xorg.
Is this a bad idea? Should I take another way?
post-extract:
${MAKE} -C ../../x11-servers/xorg-server patch
${CP} -R
../../x11-servers/xorg-server/work/xorg-server-${XORG_VERSION}/* \
${WRKSRC}/unix/xserver/
post-clean:
${MAKE} -C ../../x11-servers/xorg-server clean
BUILD_DEPENDS= ${NONEXISTENT}:${PORTSDIR}/x11-servers/xorg-server:extract
See the Porters' Handbook section 5.8.
I think you need :patch here, to get the patched version.
Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: If a port requires xorg-server's source tree, how to write Makefile?
2013-02-03 23:07, Chris Rees wrote:
On 3 Feb 2013 13:44, Dominic Fandrey kamik...@bsdforen.de wrote:
BUILD_DEPENDS=
${NONEXISTENT}:${PORTSDIR}/x11-servers/xorg-server:extract
See the Porters' Handbook section 5.8.
I think you need :patch here, to get the patched version.
Thanks. The target :patch was corect.
Actually writing it in PATCH_DEPENDS went well.
--
`whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w`
meta m...@vmeta.jp
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: If a port requires xorg-server's source tree, how to write Makefile?
On 3 February 2013 10:16, meta m...@vmeta.jp wrote:
2013-02-03 23:07, Chris Rees wrote:
On 3 Feb 2013 13:44, Dominic Fandrey kamik...@bsdforen.de wrote:
BUILD_DEPENDS=
${NONEXISTENT}:${PORTSDIR}/x11-servers/xorg-server:extract
See the Porters' Handbook section 5.8.
I think you need :patch here, to get the patched version.
Thanks. The target :patch was corect.
Actually writing it in PATCH_DEPENDS went well.
Is xorg's source required to patch this port?
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: If a port requires xorg-server's source tree, how to write Makefile?
2013-02-04 10:16 Eitan Adler wrote:
On 3 February 2013 10:16, meta m...@vmeta.jp wrote:
2013-02-03 23:07, Chris Rees wrote:
On 3 Feb 2013 13:44, Dominic Fandrey kamik...@bsdforen.de wrote:
BUILD_DEPENDS=
${NONEXISTENT}:${PORTSDIR}/x11-servers/xorg-server:extract
See the Porters' Handbook section 5.8.
I think you need :patch here, to get the patched version.
Thanks. The target :patch was corect.
Actually writing it in PATCH_DEPENDS went well.
Is xorg's source required to patch this port?
I think it is yes. Xorg's source has to be extracted and copied into
its source tree before
patch target. Then this port patches xorg's source which copied into
port's source.
--
`whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w`
meta m...@vmeta.jp
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
