Re: LEGAL and your ports

2014-02-17 Thread Takefu 
I do not understand.
I want you to evaluate whether this patch is correct.

--- libaacplus-2.0.2_2.patch begins here ---
diff -ruN /usr/ports/audio/libaacplus/Makefile ./Makefile
--- /usr/ports/audio/libaacplus/Makefile2013-12-11 23:35:36.0 
+0900
+++ ./Makefile  2014-02-17 19:23:37.0 +0900
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
 COMMENT=   HE-AAC+ Codec as Shared Library

 RESTRICTED=unclear legal status, probably need licenses from 3GPP, Via 
Licensing and Coding Technologies
+NO_CDROM=  Distribution requires acceptance of license agreement
+NO_PACKAGE=${NO_CDROM}

 CONFLICTS= aacplusenc-0*

--- libaacplus-2.0.2_2.patch ends here ---
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: LEGAL and your ports

2014-02-17 Thread Antoine Brodin 
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Takefu tak...@airport.fm wrote:
 I do not understand.
 I want you to evaluate whether this patch is correct.

 --- libaacplus-2.0.2_2.patch begins here ---
 diff -ruN /usr/ports/audio/libaacplus/Makefile ./Makefile
 --- /usr/ports/audio/libaacplus/Makefile2013-12-11 23:35:36.0 
 +0900
 +++ ./Makefile  2014-02-17 19:23:37.0 +0900
 @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
  COMMENT=   HE-AAC+ Codec as Shared Library

  RESTRICTED=unclear legal status, probably need licenses from 3GPP, Via 
 Licensing and Coding Technologies
 +NO_CDROM=  Distribution requires acceptance of license agreement
 +NO_PACKAGE=${NO_CDROM}

  CONFLICTS= aacplusenc-0*

 --- libaacplus-2.0.2_2.patch ends here ---

Hi,

According to the porters handbook:
NO_CDROM or NO_PACKAGE should not be set along with RESTRICTED since
the latter variable implies the former ones.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/porting-restrictions.html

Cheers,

Antoine
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: LEGAL and your ports

2014-02-17 Thread Takefu 
Are you good with this?

---
 COMMENT=   HE-AAC+ Codec as Shared Library

-RESTRICTED=unclear legal status, probably need licenses from 3GPP, Via 
Licensing and Coding Technologies
+NO_CDROM=  Distribution requires acceptance of license agreement
+NO_PACKAGE=${NO_CDROM}

---


Antoine Brodin さんは書きました (2014/02/17 21:15):

 According to the porters handbook:
 NO_CDROM or NO_PACKAGE should not be set along with RESTRICTED since
 the latter variable implies the former ones.
 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/porting-restrictions.html

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: LEGAL and your ports

2014-02-17 Thread Eitan Adler 
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Takefu tak...@airport.fm wrote:
 Are you good with this?

 ---
  COMMENT=   HE-AAC+ Codec as Shared Library

 -RESTRICTED=unclear legal status, probably need licenses from 3GPP, Via 
 Licensing and Coding Technologies
 +NO_CDROM=  Distribution requires acceptance of license agreement
 +NO_PACKAGE=${NO_CDROM}

Works for me.  Make sure /usr/ports/LEGAL says the same thing.

-- 
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: LEGAL and your ports

2014-02-17 Thread Takefu 
Does not have to be changed?

Eitan Adler さんは書きました (2014/02/18 10:47):

 
 Works for me.  Make sure /usr/ports/LEGAL says the same thing.
 


-- 

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org