Re: Ports marked as IGNORE - (cups-pdf) (urlview) why - how long?
Looks like all the PR's were not in place before the test was run on pointyhat. pointyhat doesn't have anything to do with PRs. It runs based on what is checked into CVS when its runs start. How would it be able to do otherwise? The ports PR count is currently 998. How is a computer program going to know which ones are relevant or correct? I deduced from the information on my system that the error was more likely due to a false positive for failure by the testing procedure rather than due to an inherent failure in the code. build error != install error. If you look at the two error logs, you'll see that those are install errors (files required to be installed not installed; files required to be deinstalled not being deinstalled). Ports that do not allow a clean install/deinstall cycle are broken, whether they compile or not. mcl Yes I agree BUT it is suggested that the reason that there was not a clean install/deinstall cycle was because the pointyhat test may have been done without the benefit of PR ports 141375. Here is Mathew Seaman's take on it: Looks like the problem would have been fixed in PR ports/141375, which modified the cups-base port to create the directory in question. As that fix was applied on the 12th at 19:39 and the last pointyhat test on cups-pdf appears to have been on the same day at 20:57 I reckon pointyhat just missed getting the fix for at least one of its test cases by about that much. What we need now is another test on pointyhat to see whether his speculation is accurate. It seems highly probable to me. Time will tell David ___ Well that was it! Compiles and installs when the Makefile is amended. So the pointy hat run must have started before the fix was applied even though the test was done after. I suppose the only thing that could prevent similar false positives for failure would be for the pointy hat test cycle to include a second check on failures after the run ends to pick up any fixes which had been applied between the start of the run and any individual test. However this is probably such a rare occurence that the effort to amend the procedure may not be justified. It is a useful reminder that pointyhat failures can, under such restricted circumstances, be misleading. Mind you I would prefer a few extra false failures than one false passes!! David ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Ports marked as IGNORE - (cups-pdf) (urlview) why - how long?
David Southwell wrote: Hi just curious about: - print/cups-pdf (marked as IGNORE) - textproc/urlview (marked as IGNORE) Anyone know what is happening with these? Get IGNORE with portupgrade -a. $ cd /usr/ports/print/cups-pdf $ make === cups-pdf-2.5.0 is marked as broken: does not install. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/local/ports/print/cups-pdf. $ portmaster . === Port directory: /usr/ports/print/cups-pdf === This port is marked BROKEN === does not install === If you are sure you can build it, remove the BROKEN line in the Makefile and try again. hth, Doug PS, Josh, if this e-mail address still works for you, howdy! :) I am wondering what changes have taken place to change this from a functioning port to one that justifies it being labelled as broken. It must have compiled OK for me as I already have cups-pdf-2.5.0 installed which appears to be the same version. I heard some rumour that it was failing on ubuntu but not on freebsd. Is there any truth in that? Is there any provision to ensure that something which should be marked as broken for ubuntu is not, in consequence,automatically marked as broken when on freebsd? dns1# pkg_info |grep cups cups-base-1.4.2_3 Common UNIX Printing System: Server cups-client-1.4.2_3 Common UNIX Printing System: Library cups cups-image-1.4.2_3 Common UNIX Printing System: Library cupsimage cups-pdf-2.5.0 A virtual printer for CUPS to produce PDF files cups-pstoraster-8.15.4_4 Postscript interpreter for CUPS printing to non-PS printers cups-samba-6.0_2The Common UNIX Printing System: MS Windows client drivers cups-smb-backend-1.0_2 A CUPS backend for printing to Windows servers gnome-cups-manager-0.31_10,1 Admistration tool for cups gutenprint-cups-5.2.4 GutenPrint Printer Driver libgnomecups-0.2.3_2,1 Support library for gnome cups admistration py26-cups-1.9.46CUPS bindings for Python dns1# ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Ports marked as IGNORE - (cups-pdf) (urlview) why - how long?
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:23:58AM +, David Southwell wrote: David Southwell wrote: Hi just curious about: - print/cups-pdf (marked as IGNORE) - textproc/urlview (marked as IGNORE) Anyone know what is happening with these? Get IGNORE with portupgrade -a. $ cd /usr/ports/print/cups-pdf $ make === cups-pdf-2.5.0 is marked as broken: does not install. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/local/ports/print/cups-pdf. $ portmaster . === Port directory: /usr/ports/print/cups-pdf === This port is marked BROKEN === does not install === If you are sure you can build it, remove the BROKEN line in the Makefile and try again. hth, Doug PS, Josh, if this e-mail address still works for you, howdy! :) I am wondering what changes have taken place to change this from a functioning port to one that justifies it being labelled as broken. It must have compiled OK for me as I already have cups-pdf-2.5.0 installed which appears to be the same version. I heard some rumour that it was failing on ubuntu but not on freebsd. Is there any truth in that? Is there any provision to ensure that something which should be marked as broken for ubuntu is not, in consequence,automatically marked as broken when on freebsd? dns1# pkg_info |grep cups cups-base-1.4.2_3 Common UNIX Printing System: Server cups-client-1.4.2_3 Common UNIX Printing System: Library cups cups-image-1.4.2_3 Common UNIX Printing System: Library cupsimage cups-pdf-2.5.0 A virtual printer for CUPS to produce PDF files cups-pstoraster-8.15.4_4 Postscript interpreter for CUPS printing to non-PS printers cups-samba-6.0_2The Common UNIX Printing System: MS Windows client drivers cups-smb-backend-1.0_2 A CUPS backend for printing to Windows servers gnome-cups-manager-0.31_10,1 Admistration tool for cups gutenprint-cups-5.2.4 GutenPrint Printer Driver libgnomecups-0.2.3_2,1 Support library for gnome cups admistration py26-cups-1.9.46CUPS bindings for Python dns1# Strange, but you can try to figure out what happening at pointyhat: http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/si...@olofsson.de-date.html 0.02$, Alexey. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Ports marked as IGNORE - (cups-pdf) (urlview) why - how long?
On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 11:23 +, David Southwell wrote: David Southwell wrote: Hi just curious about: - print/cups-pdf (marked as IGNORE) - textproc/urlview (marked as IGNORE) Anyone know what is happening with these? Get IGNORE with portupgrade -a. $ cd /usr/ports/print/cups-pdf $ make === cups-pdf-2.5.0 is marked as broken: does not install. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/local/ports/print/cups-pdf. $ portmaster . === Port directory: /usr/ports/print/cups-pdf === This port is marked BROKEN === does not install === If you are sure you can build it, remove the BROKEN line in the Makefile and try again. hth, Doug PS, Josh, if this e-mail address still works for you, howdy! :) I am wondering what changes have taken place to change this from a functioning port to one that justifies it being labelled as broken. It must have compiled OK for me as I already have cups-pdf-2.5.0 installed which appears to be the same version. I heard some rumour that it was failing on ubuntu but not on freebsd. Is there any truth in that? Is there any provision to ensure that something which should be marked as broken for ubuntu is not, in consequence,automatically marked as broken when on freebsd? No. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/print/cups-pdf/Makefile http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=printportname=cups-pdf -Koop dns1# pkg_info |grep cups cups-base-1.4.2_3 Common UNIX Printing System: Server cups-client-1.4.2_3 Common UNIX Printing System: Library cups cups-image-1.4.2_3 Common UNIX Printing System: Library cupsimage cups-pdf-2.5.0 A virtual printer for CUPS to produce PDF files cups-pstoraster-8.15.4_4 Postscript interpreter for CUPS printing to non-PS printers cups-samba-6.0_2The Common UNIX Printing System: MS Windows client drivers cups-smb-backend-1.0_2 A CUPS backend for printing to Windows servers gnome-cups-manager-0.31_10,1 Admistration tool for cups gutenprint-cups-5.2.4 GutenPrint Printer Driver libgnomecups-0.2.3_2,1 Support library for gnome cups admistration py26-cups-1.9.46CUPS bindings for Python dns1# ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Ports marked as IGNORE - (cups-pdf) (urlview) why - how long?
Selon David Southwell da...@vizion2000.net le Mar 22 déc 12:23:58 2009 : [Cc: trimmed] I am wondering what changes have taken place to change this from a functioning port to one that justifies it being labelled as broken. It must have compiled OK for me as I already have cups-pdf-2.5.0 installed which appears to be the same version. I heard some rumour that it was failing on ubuntu but not on freebsd. Is there any truth in that? Just answering about urlview: a patch is included in PR ports/141148 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=141148 Feel free to apply it! Regards, -- Th. Thomas. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Ports marked as IGNORE - (cups-pdf) (urlview) why - how long?
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:23:58AM +, David Southwell wrote: David Southwell wrote: Hi just curious about: - print/cups-pdf (marked as IGNORE) - textproc/urlview (marked as IGNORE) Anyone know what is happening with these? Get IGNORE with portupgrade -a. $ cd /usr/ports/print/cups-pdf $ make === cups-pdf-2.5.0 is marked as broken: does not install. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/local/ports/print/cups-pdf. $ portmaster . === Port directory: /usr/ports/print/cups-pdf === This port is marked BROKEN === does not install === If you are sure you can build it, remove the BROKEN line in the Makefile and try again. hth, Doug PS, Josh, if this e-mail address still works for you, howdy! :) I am wondering what changes have taken place to change this from a functioning port to one that justifies it being labelled as broken. It must have compiled OK for me as I already have cups-pdf-2.5.0 installed which appears to be the same version. I heard some rumour that it was failing on ubuntu but not on freebsd. Is there any truth in that? Is there any provision to ensure that something which should be marked as broken for ubuntu is not, in consequence,automatically marked as broken when on freebsd? dns1# pkg_info |grep cups cups-base-1.4.2_3 Common UNIX Printing System: Server cups-client-1.4.2_3 Common UNIX Printing System: Library cups cups-image-1.4.2_3 Common UNIX Printing System: Library cupsimage cups-pdf-2.5.0 A virtual printer for CUPS to produce PDF files cups-pstoraster-8.15.4_4 Postscript interpreter for CUPS printing to non-PS printers cups-samba-6.0_2The Common UNIX Printing System: MS Windows client drivers cups-smb-backend-1.0_2 A CUPS backend for printing to Windows servers gnome-cups-manager-0.31_10,1 Admistration tool for cups gutenprint-cups-5.2.4 GutenPrint Printer Driver libgnomecups-0.2.3_2,1 Support library for gnome cups admistration py26-cups-1.9.46CUPS bindings for Python dns1# Strange, but you can try to figure out what happening at pointyhat: http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/si...@olofsson.de-date.html Maybe it was failing for pointhat - but certainly did not fail on my Freebsd p3 amd64 (Intel Quad core). It was after I upgraded to 2.5.0 that it was labelled as broken. I have removed the Broke line from Makefile. It compiles without compalining but I have not tried to deinstall/reinstall in case I break the appl. Comments please? david ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Ports marked as IGNORE - (cups-pdf) (urlview) why - how long?
Thierry added his wisdom on 22nd Dec: Selon David Southwell da...@vizion2000.net le Mar 22 déc 12:23:58 2009 : On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:23:58AM +, David Southwell wrote: David Southwell wrote: Hi just curious about: - print/cups-pdf (marked as IGNORE) - textproc/urlview (marked as IGNORE) Anyone know what is happening with these? Get IGNORE with portupgrade -a. $ cd /usr/ports/print/cups-pdf $ make === cups-pdf-2.5.0 is marked as broken: does not install. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/local/ports/print/cups-pdf. $ portmaster . === Port directory: /usr/ports/print/cups-pdf === This port is marked BROKEN === does not install === If you are sure you can build it, remove the BROKEN line in the Makefile and try again. hth, Doug PS, Josh, if this e-mail address still works for you, howdy! :) I am wondering what changes have taken place to change this from a functioning port to one that justifies it being labelled as broken. It must have compiled OK for me as I already have cups-pdf-2.5.0 installed which appears to be the same version. I heard some rumour that it was failing on ubuntu but not on freebsd. Is there any truth in that? Is there any provision to ensure that something which should be marked as broken for ubuntu is not, in consequence,automatically marked as broken when on freebsd? dns1# pkg_info |grep cups cups-base-1.4.2_3 Common UNIX Printing System: Server cups-client-1.4.2_3 Common UNIX Printing System: Library cups cups-image-1.4.2_3 Common UNIX Printing System: Library cupsimage cups-pdf-2.5.0 A virtual printer for CUPS to produce PDF files cups-pstoraster-8.15.4_4 Postscript interpreter for CUPS printing to non-PS printers cups-samba-6.0_2The Common UNIX Printing System: MS Windows client drivers cups-smb-backend-1.0_2 A CUPS backend for printing to Windows servers gnome-cups-manager-0.31_10,1 Admistration tool for cups gutenprint-cups-5.2.4 GutenPrint Printer Driver libgnomecups-0.2.3_2,1 Support library for gnome cups admistration py26-cups-1.9.46CUPS bindings for Python dns1# Strange, but you can try to figure out what happening at pointyhat: http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/si...@olofsson.de-date.html Maybe it was failing for pointhat - but certainly did not fail on my Freebsd p3 amd64 (Intel Quad core). It was after I upgraded to 2.5.0 that it was labelled as broken. I have removed the Broke line from Makefile. It compiles without compalining but I have not tried to deinstall/reinstall in case I break the appl. Comments please? Just answering about urlview: a patch is included in PR ports/141148 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=141148 Feel free to apply it! Regards, Thanks Th Thats great - so urlview solved -- anyone able to solve the anomalies on cups- pdf? David ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Ports marked as IGNORE - (cups-pdf) (urlview) why - how long?
David Southwell wrote: On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:23:58AM +, David Southwell wrote: Strange, but you can try to figure out what happening at pointyhat: http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/si...@olofsson.de-date.html Maybe it was failing for pointhat - but certainly did not fail on my Freebsd p3 amd64 (Intel Quad core). It was after I upgraded to 2.5.0 that it was labelled as broken. I have removed the Broke line from Makefile. It compiles without compalining but I have not tried to deinstall/reinstall in case I break the appl. Comments please? Looks like the problem would have been fixed in PR ports/141375, which modified the cups-base port to create the directory in question. As that fix was applied on the 12th at 19:39 and the last pointyhat test on cups-pdf appears to have been on the same day at 20:57 I reckon pointyhat just missed getting the fix for at least one of its test cases by about that much. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Ports marked as IGNORE - (cups-pdf) (urlview) why - how long?
David Southwell wrote: On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:23:58AM +, David Southwell wrote: Strange, but you can try to figure out what happening at pointyhat: http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/si...@olofsson.de-date.html Maybe it was failing for pointhat - but certainly did not fail on my Freebsd p3 amd64 (Intel Quad core). It was after I upgraded to 2.5.0 that it was labelled as broken. I have removed the Broke line from Makefile. It compiles without compalining but I have not tried to deinstall/reinstall in case I break the appl. Comments please? Looks like the problem would have been fixed in PR ports/141375, which modified the cups-base port to create the directory in question. As that fix was applied on the 12th at 19:39 and the last pointyhat test on cups-pdf appears to have been on the same day at 20:57 I reckon pointyhat just missed getting the fix for at least one of its test cases by about that much. Cheers, Matthew Well spotted Mathew! So can anyone test it out afresh on pointyhat and commit as appropriate? Thanks David ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Ports marked as IGNORE - (cups-pdf) (urlview) why - how long?
David Southwell wrote: === cups-pdf-2.5.0 is marked as broken: does not install. I have removed the Broke line from Makefile. It compiles without compalining Why do you think the fact that it compiles is relevant? :) Doug -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover!http://SupersetSolutions.com/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Ports marked as IGNORE - (cups-pdf) (urlview) why - how long?
Looks like all the PR's were not in place before the test was run on pointyhat. pointyhat doesn't have anything to do with PRs. It runs based on what is checked into CVS when its runs start. How would it be able to do otherwise? The ports PR count is currently 998. How is a computer program going to know which ones are relevant or correct? I deduced from the information on my system that the error was more likely due to a false positive for failure by the testing procedure rather than due to an inherent failure in the code. build error != install error. If you look at the two error logs, you'll see that those are install errors (files required to be installed not installed; files required to be deinstalled not being deinstalled). Ports that do not allow a clean install/deinstall cycle are broken, whether they compile or not. mcl Yes I agree BUT it is suggested that the reason that there was not a clean install/deinstall cycle was because the pointyhat test may have been done without the benefit of PR ports 141375. Here is Mathew Seaman's take on it: Looks like the problem would have been fixed in PR ports/141375, which modified the cups-base port to create the directory in question. As that fix was applied on the 12th at 19:39 and the last pointyhat test on cups-pdf appears to have been on the same day at 20:57 I reckon pointyhat just missed getting the fix for at least one of its test cases by about that much. What we need now is another test on pointyhat to see whether his speculation is accurate. It seems highly probable to me. Time will tell David ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Ports marked as IGNORE - (cups-pdf) (urlview) why - how long?
Hi just curious about: - print/cups-pdf (marked as IGNORE) - textproc/urlview (marked as IGNORE) Anyone know what is happening with these? Get IGNORE with portupgrade -a. Thanks in advance for some info David ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Ports marked as IGNORE - (cups-pdf) (urlview) why - how long?
David Southwell wrote: Hi just curious about: - print/cups-pdf (marked as IGNORE) - textproc/urlview (marked as IGNORE) Anyone know what is happening with these? Get IGNORE with portupgrade -a. $ cd /usr/ports/print/cups-pdf $ make === cups-pdf-2.5.0 is marked as broken: does not install. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/local/ports/print/cups-pdf. $ portmaster . === Port directory: /usr/ports/print/cups-pdf === This port is marked BROKEN === does not install === If you are sure you can build it, remove the BROKEN line in the Makefile and try again. hth, Doug PS, Josh, if this e-mail address still works for you, howdy! :) -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover!http://SupersetSolutions.com/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
