Re: Attempted upgrade of ghostscript8-8.64_7 - ghostscript-8.70 failed
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 05:18:40AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: This was under stable/6; it may be relevant to note that as I have 4 slices configured on my laptop's disk, each of which is bootable (stable/6, stable/7, stable/8, head), /usr/ports is actually a symlink from each of those slices to a file system that is mountable regardless of which slice is booted. The fetch eventually ompleted; the build started, but ended thus: ... checking for strerror... yes checking for strrchr... yes checking for strspn... yes checking for strstr... yes configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile config.status: creating cups/pstopxl config.status: creating cups/pstoraster === Building for ghostscript8-8.70 /bin/ln -s -f /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/epag-3.09/gdevepag.c /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/base /bin/mkdir -p /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/obj /bin/mkdir -p /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/bin /bin/mkdir -p /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/freetype/include /bin/ln -s -f /usr/local/include/ft2build.h /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/freetype/include/ft2build.h /bin/ln -s -f /usr/local/include/freetype2/freetype /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/freetype/include/freetype /bin/mkdir -p /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/freetype/objs /bin/ln -s -f /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/freetype/objs/freetype214MT_D.so /bin/mv /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/base/write_t[12].[ch] /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/base/wrfont.[ch] /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/psi mv: rename /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/base/write_t[12].[ch] to /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/psi/write_t[12].[ch]: No such file or directory mv: rename /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/base/wrfont.[ch] to /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/psi/wrfont.[ch]: No such file or directory *** Error code 1 Stop in /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8. *** Error code 1 Stop in /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8. === make failed for print/ghostscript8 === Aborting update === Update for ghostscript8-8.64_7 failed === Aborting update As a reality check: g1-119(6.4-S)[4] ls -lT /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/base/write* ls: No match. g1-119(6.4-S)[5] (Though I note that /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/base/ does seem to be populated with several other files.) is this i386? I reported this already for sparc and ia64: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2009-December/058432.html -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Attempted upgrade of ghostscript8-8.64_7 - ghostscript-8.70 failed
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 01:27:31PM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: ... (Though I note that /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/base/ does seem to be populated with several other files.) is this i386? Aye I reported this already for sparc and ia64: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2009-December/058432.html Ah, yes -- I reall you did... (sorry; I glanced at the note for ia64 and made a silly assumption -- and I know what *that* means). ... Peace, david -- David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org Depriving a girl or boy of an opportunity for education is evil. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. pgpbzXQU9xFOx.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Attempted upgrade of ghostscript8-8.64_7 - ghostscript-8.70 failed
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 05:32:38 -0800 David Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org wrote: On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 01:27:31PM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: ... (Though I note that /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/base/ does seem to be populated with several other files.) is this i386? Aye I reported this already for sparc and ia64: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2009-December/058432.html Ah, yes -- I reall you did... (sorry; I glanced at the note for ia64 and made a silly assumption -- and I know what *that* means). ... I just updated this using make deinstall reinstall clean on AMD64 9-CURRENT without any errors: drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Dec 20 11:08 ghostscript8-8.70 --- Gary Jennejohn ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Attempted upgrade of ghostscript8-8.64_7 - ghostscript-8.70 failed
On 20.12.2009 14:18 (UTC+1), David Wolfskill wrote:
This was under stable/6; it may be relevant to note that as I have 4
slices configured on my laptop's disk, each of which is bootable
(stable/6, stable/7, stable/8, head), /usr/ports is actually a symlink
from each of those slices to a file system that is mountable regardless
of which slice is booted.
The fetch eventually ompleted; the build started, but ended thus:
...
checking for strerror... yes
checking for strrchr... yes
checking for strspn... yes
checking for strstr... yes
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating Makefile
config.status: creating cups/pstopxl
config.status: creating cups/pstoraster
=== Building for ghostscript8-8.70
/bin/ln -s -f
/bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/epag-3.09/gdevepag.c
/bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/base
/bin/mkdir -p /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/obj
/bin/mkdir -p /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/bin
/bin/mkdir -p
/bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/freetype/include
/bin/ln -s -f /usr/local/include/ft2build.h
/bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/freetype/include/ft2build.h
/bin/ln -s -f /usr/local/include/freetype2/freetype
/bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/freetype/include/freetype
/bin/mkdir -p /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/freetype/objs
/bin/ln -s -f /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so
/bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/freetype/objs/freetype214MT_D.so
/bin/mv
/bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/base/write_t[12].[ch]
/bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/base/wrfont.[ch]
/bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/psi
mv: rename
/bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/base/write_t[12].[ch] to
/bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/psi/write_t[12].[ch]: No
such file or directory
mv: rename /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/base/wrfont.[ch]
to /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/psi/wrfont.[ch]: No such
file or directory
*** Error code 1
Stop in /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8.
=== make failed for print/ghostscript8
=== Aborting update
=== Update for ghostscript8-8.64_7 failed
=== Aborting update
For me this occurs on i386 and amd64, both 9.0-CURRENT. Commenting out
lines 249-251 of print/ghostscript8/Makefile seems to help:
249,251c249,251
${MV} ${WRKSRC}/base/write_t[12].[ch] \
${WRKSRC}/base/wrfont.[ch] \
${WRKSRC}/psi
---
# ${MV} ${WRKSRC}/base/write_t[12].[ch] \
# ${WRKSRC}/base/wrfont.[ch] \
# ${WRKSRC}/psi
---
A second issue is with Makefile option
[ ] FT_BRIDGEFreeType bridge
If I choose this option [X] the build breaks with following messages:
cc -DHAVE_MKSTEMP -DHAVE_HYPOT -DHAVE_FONTCONFIG -O2 -pipe
-fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -DUPD_SIGNAL=0 -I. -I/usr/ports/prin
/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/jasper/src/libjasper/include
-I/usr/local/include/libpng -I/usr/local/include -Wall -Wst
ict-prototypes -Wundef -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wwrite-strings -Wno-strict-aliasing -Wdeclaration-after-s atement
-fno-builtin -fno-common -DHAVE_STDINT_H -DGX_COLOR_INDEX_TYPE=unsigned
long int -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -DU E_LIBICONV_GNU
-DUSE_LIBPAPER -DGS_DEVS_SHARED
-DGS_DEVS_SHARED_DIR=\/usr/local/lib/ghostscript/8.70\ -I./psi
-I./obj/../so bj -I./obj/../soobj -I./base -o ./obj/../soobj/fapi_ft.o
-c ./psi/fapi_ft.c
In file included from ./psi/fapi_ft.c:32:
/usr/local/include/ft2build.h:56:38: error: freetype/config/ftheader.h:
No such file or directory
[..snip..]
Thanks in advance for any help,
Rainer Hurling
As a reality check:
g1-119(6.4-S)[4] ls -lT
/bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/base/write*
ls: No match.
g1-119(6.4-S)[5]
(Though I note that /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/base/
does seem to be populated with several other files.)
Peace,
david
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Attempted upgrade of ghostscript8-8.64_7 - ghostscript-8.70 failed
David Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org wrote in 20091220133238.gr...@bunrab.catwhisker.org: da On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 01:27:31PM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: da ... da (Though I note that /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/base/ da does seem to be populated with several other files.) da da is this i386? da da Aye da da I reported this already for sparc and ia64: da http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2009-December/058432.html da da Ah, yes -- I reall you did... (sorry; I glanced at the note for ia64 da and made a silly assumption -- and I know what *that* means). Fixed just now. This build error occurred only when WITH_FT_BRIDGE was enabled regardless of the platform. -- Hiroki pgpI8AZITeXef.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Attempted upgrade of ghostscript8-8.64_7 - ghostscript-8.70 failed
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 02:06:39AM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: David Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org wrote in 20091220133238.gr...@bunrab.catwhisker.org: da On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 01:27:31PM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: da ... da (Though I note that /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/base/ da does seem to be populated with several other files.) da da is this i386? da da Aye da da I reported this already for sparc and ia64: da http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2009-December/058432.html da da Ah, yes -- I reall you did... (sorry; I glanced at the note for ia64 da and made a silly assumption -- and I know what *that* means). Fixed just now. This build error occurred only when WITH_FT_BRIDGE was enabled regardless of the platform. many thanks! -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Attempted upgrade of ghostscript8-8.64_7 - ghostscript-8.70 failed
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 02:06:39AM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: Fixed just now. This build error occurred only when WITH_FT_BRIDGE was enabled regardless of the platform. I'm still not able to build this. I've updated my ports tree which hasn't helped. Is there anything else I can do to get it to build? Jamie pgpSCKka0TnzA.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Attempted upgrade of ghostscript8-8.64_7 - ghostscript-8.70 failed
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:54:42AM +, Jamie Griffin wrote: On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 02:06:39AM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: Fixed just now. This build error occurred only when WITH_FT_BRIDGE was enabled regardless of the platform. I'm still not able to build this. I've updated my ports tree which hasn't helped. Is there anything else I can do to get it to build? I just used the usual portmaster --force-config -Bd ghost no problems on ia64 or sparc64. If you don't use portmaster, I'd do cd /usr/ports/print/ghostscript8 make distclean make rmconfig make -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Attempted upgrade of ghostscript8-8.64_7 - ghostscript-8.70 failed
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:54:42AM +, Jamie Griffin wrote: On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 02:06:39AM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: Fixed just now. This build error occurred only when WITH_FT_BRIDGE was enabled regardless of the platform. I'm still not able to build this. I've updated my ports tree which hasn't helped. Is there anything else I can do to get it to build? I hand-applied the patch in question; re-running portmaster after that allowed the upgrade to succeed in my case. Peace, david -- David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org Depriving a girl or boy of an opportunity for education is evil. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. pgpQQrthMdroP.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Attempted upgrade of ghostscript8-8.64_7 - ghostscript-8.70 failed
Jamie Griffin j...@koderize.com wrote in 20091221005442.ga54...@bsdbox.koderize.com: jg On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 02:06:39AM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: jg jg Fixed just now. This build error occurred only when WITH_FT_BRIDGE jg was enabled regardless of the platform. jg jg I'm still not able to build this. I've updated my ports tree which jg hasn't helped. Is there anything else I can do to get it to build? If you are still suffering from the build failure, please send me privately the error log and output of make showconfig. -- Hiroki pgpupQEMBmB1h.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Attempted upgrade of ghostscript8-8.64_7 - ghostscript-8.70 failed
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:57:50AM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: cd /usr/ports/print/ghostscript8 make distclean make rmconfig make This did the trick. Oddly, though, I did do this about an hour ago and it still failed but, and probably completely coincidental, I rebooted and gave it another go and it worked. Weird. Anyway, thanks for the advice guys. Jamie pgpraqp43AJIy.pgp Description: PGP signature
