Re: Might an UPDATING entry be appropriate for a MINIMAL_PKG_VERSION bump?
David Wolfskill wrote on 2020/10/06 08:45:
>
> But in order for them to be built, you need to have updated
> ports-mgmt/pkg ahead of time, or this kind of thing happens:
>
> | ...
> | ===> Cleaning for nvidia-driver-440.100_1
> | ===> nvidia-driver-440.100_1 pkg(8) must be version 1.15.9 or greater, but
> | you have 1.15.8. You must upgrade the ports-mgmt/pkg port first.
> | *** Error code 1
> |
> | Stop.
>
Hmmm.
I've never bothered with that because I'm following the steps below :)
svnlite cleanup /usr/src
svnlite update /usr/src
rm -r -f /usr/obj/{*,.[^.]*,..?*}
svnlite revert -R /usr/src
patch -d /usr/src < mypatch
portsnap fetch update
portmaster -x \*-kmod-\[0-9gv\] -a
make -C /usr/src buildworld
make -C /usr/src buildkernel
mergemaster -p
make -C /usr/src installkernel
make -C /usr/src installworld
make -C /usr/src delete-old delete-old-libs
mergemaster
shutdown -r +1
>
> Hence my query: Is an UPDATING entry warranted when MINIMAL_PKG_VERSION is
> bumped?
>
Normally, when pkg appears in pkg version -L =, it is replaced
immediately because something of a bug in it has been fixed.
Rarely, though, there are more bugs :)
Best regards.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Might an UPDATING entry be appropriate for a MINIMAL_PKG_VERSION bump?
On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 08:31:05AM +0900, Tatsuki Makino wrote:
> Hello.
>
> In my case,
> -x \*-kmod-\[0-9gv\] is added to portmaster because all packages that
> install kernel modules contain -kmod in their names. This excludes *-kmod.
> And when they are upgraded, I won't be installing them right away.
>
> Then to install them I write PORTS_MODULES in src.conf.
> PORTS_MODULES=\
> graphics/drm-fbsd12.0-kmod\
> graphics/gpu-firmware-kmod
>
> They are created at the same time as the kernel.
>
But in order for them to be built, you need to have updated
ports-mgmt/pkg ahead of time, or this kind of thing happens:
| ...
| --- kernel.full ---
| linking kernel.full
| ctfmerge -L VERSION -g -o kernel.full ...
| text data bssdec hex filename
| 22900304 1840729 3667344 28408377 0x1b17a39 kernel.full
| Building /common/S1/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/CANARY/kernel.debug
| Building /common/S1/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/CANARY/kernel
| --- all ---
| ===> Ports module x11/nvidia-driver (all)
| cd ${PORTSDIR:-/usr/ports}/x11/nvidia-driver; env -u CC -u CXX -u CPP -u
MAKESYSPATH -u MK_AUTO_OBJ -u MAKEOBJDIR MAKEFLAGS="-j 16 -J 15,16 -j 16 -J
15,16 -D NO_MODULES_OBJ .MAKE.LEVEL.ENV=MAKELEVEL KERNEL=kernel TARGET=amd64
TARGET_ARCH=amd64" SYSDIR=/usr/src/sys
PATH=/common/S1/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/legacy/usr/sbin:/common/S1/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/legacy/usr/bin:/common/S1/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/legacy/bin:/common/S1/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/usr/sbin:/common/S1/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin
SRC_BASE=/usr/src OSVERSION=1202502
WRKDIRPREFIX=/common/S1/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/CANARY make -B clean build
| ===> Cleaning for nvidia-driver-440.100_1
| ===> nvidia-driver-440.100_1 pkg(8) must be version 1.15.9 or greater, but
| you have 1.15.8. You must upgrade the ports-mgmt/pkg port first.
| *** Error code 1
|
| Stop.
Hence my query: Is an UPDATING entry warranted when MINIMAL_PKG_VERSION is
bumped?
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org
"the end of the pandemic is in sight" -- Donald Trump (while infected
with SARS-COV-2)
See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: Might an UPDATING entry be appropriate for a MINIMAL_PKG_VERSION bump?
Hello. In my case, -x \*-kmod-\[0-9gv\] is added to portmaster because all packages that install kernel modules contain -kmod in their names. This excludes *-kmod. And when they are upgraded, I won't be installing them right away. Then to install them I write PORTS_MODULES in src.conf. PORTS_MODULES=\ graphics/drm-fbsd12.0-kmod\ graphics/gpu-firmware-kmod They are created at the same time as the kernel. Best regards. David Wolfskill wrote on 2020/10/05 21:54: > When I rebuild FreeBSD (stable/12) on my laptop, I also rebuild a ports > module (x11/nvidia-driver), since the laptop has an Nvidia graphics > card. > > However, a couple of times within the last few days, the kernel build > has failed because I normally wait to update ports until after I have > built and rebooted the newly-built base OS... and "?ports" includes > ports-mgmt/pkg. > > In each case (so far), I have then updated ports-mgmt/pkg, then > re-started the base OS build/install. > > I believe that it would be helpful to have an UPDATING entry reflect > that "evasive action" is required when MINIMAL_PKG_VERSION is bumped. > > Or, perhaps, I'm going about this all wrong...? If so, please let me > know a better way. > > Thanks. > > Peace, > david > ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
