Re: Port Request: OpenSCAP

2019-03-26 Thread Paul Pathiakis via freebsd-ports
 Just came across that about 4 mos ago.  :)  Seemed like the next generation of 
tighter security for pfSense.  

So, HardenedBSD is fork of FreeBSD that is pushing in more defense 
(passive/active) into all the FreeBSD derivatives?  Very cool.  Nicer to have 
something that only has 20 or so CVEs every year versus 200 or more. ;)  

I just followed a large number of links and found G2 as well.  Nice!
OpenSCAP, if it could at least give me some sense and peace of mind that I can 
run it, get a result on paper and show the 'certifiers' that we have complied, 
I'd be very happy.  

Thank you for responding so quickly!
P

On Tuesday, March 26, 2019, 1:50:34 PM EDT, Shawn Webb 
 wrote:  
 
 I'm not really a compliance guru, so I can't say whether HardenedBSD
comes closer to . I have looked into
Common Criteria/NIAP briefly for US Federal Government deployments in
certain high-security enclaves. HardenedBSD does come closer with
CC/NIAP, though there are still gaps to fill.

Have you looked at OPNsense? It's a fork of pfSense built on top of
HardenedBSD.

Thanks,

-- 
Shawn Webb
Cofounder and Security Engineer
HardenedBSD

Tor-ified Signal:    +1 443-546-8752
Tor+XMPP+OTR:        latt...@is.a.hacker.sx
GPG Key ID:          0x6A84658F52456EEE
GPG Key Fingerprint: 2ABA B6BD EF6A F486 BE89  3D9E 6A84 658F 5245 6EEE

On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 05:42:43PM +, Paul Pathiakis wrote:
>  Sorry for the top-post.
> Shawn,
> It seems that NIST, FIPS 140-2, and things along those lines are quickly 
> becoming a complete reality for all people dealing with the US Gov't no 
> matter what the size company.
> So, encryption modules must be FIPs approved for compliance and NIST 800-171 
> is the other compliance that is needed.
> 
> I've been tasked with creating an entire, new infrastructure that 
> meets/complies with those specs.?? So, I dug in a little bit and found SCAP 
> which lead to OpenSCAP.?? So, I get to put the whole thing behind pfSense 
> firewalls and show that everything I'm running is compliant with both 
> standards.
> 
> 
> Does HardenedBSD meet the requirements? :D?? (crosses fingers)
> Paul
>  
> 
> On Tuesday, March 26, 2019, 1:06:25 PM EDT, Shawn Webb 
>  wrote:  
>  
>  On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 05:02:48PM +, Paul Pathiakis via freebsd-ports 
>wrote:
> > https://www.open-scap.org/
> > 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > It's the US NIST scanner for operating system compliance.
> > 
> > I'd like to use FreeBSD and FreeNAS in various places but it has to pass 
> > compliance.
> 
> I just asked my coworkers about it. They created OpenSCAP. :)
> 
> What compliance requirements are you looking to pass?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -- 
> Shawn Webb
> Cofounder and Security Engineer
> HardenedBSD
> 
> Tor-ified Signal:?? ?? +1 443-546-8752
> Tor+XMPP+OTR:?? ?? ?? ?? latt...@is.a.hacker.sx
> GPG Key ID:?? ?? ?? ?? ?? 0x6A84658F52456EEE
> GPG Key Fingerprint: 2ABA B6BD EF6A F486 BE89?? 3D9E 6A84 658F 5245 6EEE    
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Port Request: OpenSCAP

2019-03-26 Thread Shawn Webb
I'm not really a compliance guru, so I can't say whether HardenedBSD
comes closer to . I have looked into
Common Criteria/NIAP briefly for US Federal Government deployments in
certain high-security enclaves. HardenedBSD does come closer with
CC/NIAP, though there are still gaps to fill.

Have you looked at OPNsense? It's a fork of pfSense built on top of
HardenedBSD.

Thanks,

-- 
Shawn Webb
Cofounder and Security Engineer
HardenedBSD

Tor-ified Signal:+1 443-546-8752
Tor+XMPP+OTR:latt...@is.a.hacker.sx
GPG Key ID:  0x6A84658F52456EEE
GPG Key Fingerprint: 2ABA B6BD EF6A F486 BE89  3D9E 6A84 658F 5245 6EEE

On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 05:42:43PM +, Paul Pathiakis wrote:
>   Sorry for the top-post.
> Shawn,
> It seems that NIST, FIPS 140-2, and things along those lines are quickly 
> becoming a complete reality for all people dealing with the US Gov't no 
> matter what the size company.
> So, encryption modules must be FIPs approved for compliance and NIST 800-171 
> is the other compliance that is needed.
> 
> I've been tasked with creating an entire, new infrastructure that 
> meets/complies with those specs.?? So, I dug in a little bit and found SCAP 
> which lead to OpenSCAP.?? So, I get to put the whole thing behind pfSense 
> firewalls and show that everything I'm running is compliant with both 
> standards.
> 
> 
> Does HardenedBSD meet the requirements? :D?? (crosses fingers)
> Paul
>  
> 
> On Tuesday, March 26, 2019, 1:06:25 PM EDT, Shawn Webb 
>  wrote:  
>  
>  On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 05:02:48PM +, Paul Pathiakis via freebsd-ports 
> wrote:
> > https://www.open-scap.org/
> > 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > It's the US NIST scanner for operating system compliance.
> > 
> > I'd like to use FreeBSD and FreeNAS in various places but it has to pass 
> > compliance.
> 
> I just asked my coworkers about it. They created OpenSCAP. :)
> 
> What compliance requirements are you looking to pass?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -- 
> Shawn Webb
> Cofounder and Security Engineer
> HardenedBSD
> 
> Tor-ified Signal:?? ?? +1 443-546-8752
> Tor+XMPP+OTR:?? ?? ?? ?? latt...@is.a.hacker.sx
> GPG Key ID:?? ?? ?? ?? ?? 0x6A84658F52456EEE
> GPG Key Fingerprint: 2ABA B6BD EF6A F486 BE89?? 3D9E 6A84 658F 5245 6EEE  


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: Port Request: OpenSCAP

2019-03-26 Thread Paul Pathiakis via freebsd-ports
  Sorry for the top-post.
Shawn,
It seems that NIST, FIPS 140-2, and things along those lines are quickly 
becoming a complete reality for all people dealing with the US Gov't no matter 
what the size company.
So, encryption modules must be FIPs approved for compliance and NIST 800-171 is 
the other compliance that is needed.

I've been tasked with creating an entire, new infrastructure that 
meets/complies with those specs.  So, I dug in a little bit and found SCAP 
which lead to OpenSCAP.  So, I get to put the whole thing behind pfSense 
firewalls and show that everything I'm running is compliant with both standards.


Does HardenedBSD meet the requirements? :D  (crosses fingers)
Paul
 

On Tuesday, March 26, 2019, 1:06:25 PM EDT, Shawn Webb 
 wrote:  
 
 On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 05:02:48PM +, Paul Pathiakis via freebsd-ports 
wrote:
> https://www.open-scap.org/
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> It's the US NIST scanner for operating system compliance.
> 
> I'd like to use FreeBSD and FreeNAS in various places but it has to pass 
> compliance.

I just asked my coworkers about it. They created OpenSCAP. :)

What compliance requirements are you looking to pass?

Thanks,

-- 
Shawn Webb
Cofounder and Security Engineer
HardenedBSD

Tor-ified Signal:    +1 443-546-8752
Tor+XMPP+OTR:        latt...@is.a.hacker.sx
GPG Key ID:          0x6A84658F52456EEE
GPG Key Fingerprint: 2ABA B6BD EF6A F486 BE89  3D9E 6A84 658F 5245 6EEE  
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Port Request: OpenSCAP

2019-03-26 Thread Shawn Webb
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 05:02:48PM +, Paul Pathiakis via freebsd-ports 
wrote:
> https://www.open-scap.org/
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> It's the US NIST scanner for operating system compliance.
> 
> I'd like to use FreeBSD and FreeNAS in various places but it has to pass 
> compliance.

I just asked my coworkers about it. They created OpenSCAP. :)

What compliance requirements are you looking to pass?

Thanks,

-- 
Shawn Webb
Cofounder and Security Engineer
HardenedBSD

Tor-ified Signal:+1 443-546-8752
Tor+XMPP+OTR:latt...@is.a.hacker.sx
GPG Key ID:  0x6A84658F52456EEE
GPG Key Fingerprint: 2ABA B6BD EF6A F486 BE89  3D9E 6A84 658F 5245 6EEE


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature