Re: clang support for compiler:openmp

[Brooks Davis]

On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 10:12:59PM +0100, Matthieu Volat wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 16:59:36 +
> Brooks Davis  wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 08:36:22AM +0100, Marcus von Appen wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > is there a specific reason, why we do not (yet) have openmp support for
> > > clang via compiler:openmp? With devel/openmp in the ports tree, I'd
> > > expect compiler:openmp to set
> > > 
> > > LIB_DEPENDS+=   libomp.so:devel/openmp
> > > 
> > > for compiler=clang. CFLAGS and LIBS/LDFLAGS might be tweaked on a
> > > per-port level.
> > 
> > I talked with Baptiste about this in Belgrade.  I think the best way
> > forward would be to remove the OPENMP option from the llvm ports and
> > alter the clang-patch-fopenmp.diff patch to use the .so from
> > devel/openmp.
> > 
> > I have a major deadline at the end of the week so it definitely won't
> > happen this week.
> > 
> 
> Would not that make that every clang use the llvm 3.8 libomp snapshot? It 
> might be useful to use later versions in some cases, but anyway, that would 
> be great!

It would mean sticking to a single version, but I'd be pretty surprised
if mixing them ended well so that's probably for the best.

> It would also be awesome if base clang would be able to find omp.h and libomp 
> more "out of the box" once the package is installed...

libomp is pretty easy once I realized I needed to hardcode the path to
the .so, I'll have to see what's involved for omp.h.

-- Brooks


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: clang support for compiler:openmp

[Matthieu Volat]

On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 18:59:26 -0300
"Nilton Jose Rizzo"  wrote:

> Em Mon, 7 Nov 2016 22:12:59 +0100, Matthieu Volat escreveu
> > On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 16:59:36 +
> > Brooks Davis  wrote:
> > [...]

> 
>   I have one question about a llvm and clang ports.  it's possible
> port the llvm 3.9 and clang 4.0.0 with cuda support?
> 
> 

I don't think we'll see that anytime soon: even if there are now some compilers 
that produce cuda PTX bytecode, you neeed userland and kernel code to actually 
compile it to native GPU code/push it/do data transfert, and only the nvidia 
official driver do that for now.

There's some of that in the linux compatibility part of the nvidia driver, and 
some people managed to use it in the past, but right now, I'm not so sure.


-- Mazhe


pgpvVxoF50Yx7.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: clang support for compiler:openmp

[Nilton Jose Rizzo]

Em Mon, 7 Nov 2016 22:12:59 +0100, Matthieu Volat escreveu
> On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 16:59:36 +
> Brooks Davis  wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 08:36:22AM +0100, Marcus von Appen wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > is there a specific reason, why we do not (yet) have openmp support for
> > > clang via compiler:openmp? With devel/openmp in the ports tree, I'd
> > > expect compiler:openmp to set
> > > 
> > > LIB_DEPENDS+=   libomp.so:devel/openmp
> > > 
> > > for compiler=clang. CFLAGS and LIBS/LDFLAGS might be tweaked on a
> > > per-port level.
> > 
> > I talked with Baptiste about this in Belgrade.  I think the best way
> > forward would be to remove the OPENMP option from the llvm ports and
> > alter the clang-patch-fopenmp.diff patch to use the .so from
> > devel/openmp.
> > 
> > I have a major deadline at the end of the week so it definitely won't
> > happen this week.
> >
> 
> Would not that make that every clang use the llvm 3.8 libomp 
> snapshot? It might be useful to use later versions in some cases,
>  but anyway, that would be great!
> 
> It would also be awesome if base clang would be able to find omp.h 
> and libomp more "out of the box" once the package is installed...
> 
> -- Mazhe

  I have one question about a llvm and clang ports.  it's possible
port the llvm 3.9 and clang 4.0.0 with cuda support?


---
/*
**Nilton José RizzoUFRRJ
**http://www.rizzo.eng.br  http://www.ufrrj.br
**http://lattes.cnpq.br/0079460703536198
**/

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: clang support for compiler:openmp

[Matthieu Volat]

On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 16:59:36 +
Brooks Davis  wrote:

> On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 08:36:22AM +0100, Marcus von Appen wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > is there a specific reason, why we do not (yet) have openmp support for
> > clang via compiler:openmp? With devel/openmp in the ports tree, I'd
> > expect compiler:openmp to set
> > 
> > LIB_DEPENDS+=   libomp.so:devel/openmp
> > 
> > for compiler=clang. CFLAGS and LIBS/LDFLAGS might be tweaked on a
> > per-port level.
> 
> I talked with Baptiste about this in Belgrade.  I think the best way
> forward would be to remove the OPENMP option from the llvm ports and
> alter the clang-patch-fopenmp.diff patch to use the .so from
> devel/openmp.
> 
> I have a major deadline at the end of the week so it definitely won't
> happen this week.
> 

Would not that make that every clang use the llvm 3.8 libomp snapshot? It might 
be useful to use later versions in some cases, but anyway, that would be great!

It would also be awesome if base clang would be able to find omp.h and libomp 
more "out of the box" once the package is installed...

-- Mazhe


pgpl3cmFmrGvS.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature