Re: devel/subversion* ports and www/neon26

2008-06-04 Thread Edwin Groothuis 
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 11:02:34AM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > Since www/neon28 was moved into ports, subversion still depends upon
> > www/neon26 (which conflicts w/ 2.8). I have been able to tell subversion
> > to use neon 2.8 by modifying the subversion Makefile appropriately. Is
> > there any specific reason to not move subversion to default to use
> > www/neon28 instead of www/neon26 ?
> 
> [cross-posting to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Subversion 1.4 does not officially support neon 0.28 (albeit it
> may work, if there are no API and/or ABI incompatibility issues).
> 
> Subversion 1.5 will support it.

That means that devel/subversion-devel and devel/subversion-freebsd
can move to www/neon28.

Edwin

-- 
Edwin Groothuis  |Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]|  Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: devel/subversion* ports and www/neon26

2008-06-04 Thread Peter Samuelson 

(Seen on [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 11:25:06AM -0400, Coleman Kane wrote:
> > Since www/neon28 was moved into ports, subversion still depends upon
> > www/neon26 (which conflicts w/ 2.8). I have been able to tell subversion
> > to use neon 2.8 by modifying the subversion Makefile appropriately. Is
> > there any specific reason to not move subversion to default to use
> > www/neon28 instead of www/neon26 ?

As Stefan has said, Subversion 1.4 does not support neon 0.28.
However, we are using it in Debian unstable, with the following patch:

  svn export svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-subversion/trunk/debian/patches/neon27

(The patch name reflects the fact that neon 0.28 is API-compatible with
neon 0.27.)
-- 
Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: devel/subversion* ports and www/neon26

2008-06-04 Thread Stefan Sperling 
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 11:25:06AM -0400, Coleman Kane wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Since www/neon28 was moved into ports, subversion still depends upon
> www/neon26 (which conflicts w/ 2.8). I have been able to tell subversion
> to use neon 2.8 by modifying the subversion Makefile appropriately. Is
> there any specific reason to not move subversion to default to use
> www/neon28 instead of www/neon26 ?

[cross-posting to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subversion 1.4 does not officially support neon 0.28 (albeit it
may work, if there are no API and/or ABI incompatibility issues).

Subversion 1.5 will support it.

The INSTALL notes in trunk were updated to mention support for Neon 0.28
in trunk on Tue, 19 Feb 2008:

  $ svn log -r29432 http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/INSTALL
  
  r29432 | pburba | 2008-02-19 18:01:57 +0100 (Tue, 19 Feb 2008) | 2 lines

  * INSTALL: Note that we support Neon 0.28.

  

This happened after 1.5.x was branched.

The INSTALL notes on the 1.5.x branch don't mention support for neon-0.28.
But the autoconf macros were updated on the 1.5.x branch to support neon
0.28, so the 1.5 release will support Neon 0.28:

  $ svn log -r29469 
http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/branches/1.5.x/build/ac-macros/neon.m4
  
  r29469 | hwright | 2008-02-21 05:45:29 +0100 (Thu, 21 Feb 2008) | 8 lines

  Merge r29379 and r29401 from trunk:

   * r29379, r29401
 Support Neon 0.28.
 Votes:
   +1: arfrever
   +1: pburba (r29401)

  

I will try to make sure the INSTALL notes get updated to mention
neon-0.28 support before 1.5 is released.

Stefan


pgpgwox4VVQWG.pgp
Description: PGP signature