Re: USES=pathfix broken?

2017-01-22 Thread Baptiste Daroussin 
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 08:46:49AM +0100, Antoine Brodin wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Don Lewis  wrote:
> > I've started getting a bunch of pkg-fallout@ email reporting missing
> > libdata/pkgconfig/*.pc files.  It looks like the *.pc files are getting
> > installed under lib/pkgconfig.
> >
> > [snip]
> >  /bin/mkdir -p 
> > '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/mtbl/work/stage/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig'
> >  install  -m 0644 mtbl/libmtbl.pc 
> > '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/mtbl/work/stage/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig'
> > [snip]
> > ===>  Building package for mtbl-0.8.0
> > pkg-static: Unable to access file 
> > /wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/mtbl/work/stage/usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/libmtbl.pc:
> >  No such file or directory
> > [snip]
> >
> > So far the problems have been with limited to
> > [package - head-amd64-default] and
> > [exp - 103i386-default-build-as-user].  The latter would seem to
> > eliminate the recent sed changes in -CURRENT as a cause.  I'm not seeing
> > any problems with the r432015 revision of the ports tree, and I don't
> > see any suspicious commits to ports/Mk after that point.
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> There seems to be a regression in pkgconf 1.2.0, see
> https://github.com/pkgconf/pkgconf/issues/108
> 
Fixed thanks for reporting! (both upstream and in ports)

Best regards,
Bapt


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: USES=pathfix broken?

2017-01-21 Thread Antoine Brodin 
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Don Lewis  wrote:
> I've started getting a bunch of pkg-fallout@ email reporting missing
> libdata/pkgconfig/*.pc files.  It looks like the *.pc files are getting
> installed under lib/pkgconfig.
>
> [snip]
>  /bin/mkdir -p 
> '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/mtbl/work/stage/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig'
>  install  -m 0644 mtbl/libmtbl.pc 
> '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/mtbl/work/stage/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig'
> [snip]
> ===>  Building package for mtbl-0.8.0
> pkg-static: Unable to access file 
> /wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/mtbl/work/stage/usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/libmtbl.pc:
>  No such file or directory
> [snip]
>
> So far the problems have been with limited to
> [package - head-amd64-default] and
> [exp - 103i386-default-build-as-user].  The latter would seem to
> eliminate the recent sed changes in -CURRENT as a cause.  I'm not seeing
> any problems with the r432015 revision of the ports tree, and I don't
> see any suspicious commits to ports/Mk after that point.


Hi,

There seems to be a regression in pkgconf 1.2.0, see
https://github.com/pkgconf/pkgconf/issues/108

Antoine
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

USES=pathfix broken?

2017-01-21 Thread Don Lewis 
I've started getting a bunch of pkg-fallout@ email reporting missing
libdata/pkgconfig/*.pc files.  It looks like the *.pc files are getting
installed under lib/pkgconfig.

[snip]
 /bin/mkdir -p 
'/wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/mtbl/work/stage/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig'
 install  -m 0644 mtbl/libmtbl.pc 
'/wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/mtbl/work/stage/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig'
[snip]
===>  Building package for mtbl-0.8.0
pkg-static: Unable to access file 
/wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/mtbl/work/stage/usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/libmtbl.pc:
 No such file or directory
[snip]

So far the problems have been with limited to
[package - head-amd64-default] and
[exp - 103i386-default-build-as-user].  The latter would seem to
eliminate the recent sed changes in -CURRENT as a cause.  I'm not seeing
any problems with the r432015 revision of the ports tree, and I don't
see any suspicious commits to ports/Mk after that point.

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"