Re: how to deal with unzip on -CURRENT?
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Yuri Pankov wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 11:43:21PM +0100, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I've got a PR (ports/142091), which made me think about the base >> version of unzip that was recently enabled in HEAD. I think that the >> current version of that port is correct and just UNZIP_CMD should be >> set to the base version on -CURRENT in bsd.port.mk. Or do I have to >> enforce ports unzip as a dependency by full path? Were there similar >> issues? Is there a conventional/preferred solution for this? >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> Gabor Kovesdan >> FreeBSD Volunteer >> >> EMAIL: ga...@freebsd.org .:|:. ga...@kovesdan.org >> WEB: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gabor .:|:. http://kovesdan.org > > I think it was fixed in bsd.port.mk 1.633: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk.diff?r1=1.632;r2=1.633 I think it also solves ports/141795. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: how to deal with unzip on -CURRENT?
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 11:43:21PM +0100, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > Hi all, > > I've got a PR (ports/142091), which made me think about the base > version of unzip that was recently enabled in HEAD. I think that the > current version of that port is correct and just UNZIP_CMD should be > set to the base version on -CURRENT in bsd.port.mk. Or do I have to > enforce ports unzip as a dependency by full path? Were there similar > issues? Is there a conventional/preferred solution for this? > > Thanks, > > -- > Gabor Kovesdan > FreeBSD Volunteer > > EMAIL: ga...@freebsd.org .:|:. ga...@kovesdan.org > WEB: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gabor .:|:. http://kovesdan.org I think it was fixed in bsd.port.mk 1.633: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk.diff?r1=1.632;r2=1.633 HTH, Yuri ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
how to deal with unzip on -CURRENT?
Hi all, I've got a PR (ports/142091), which made me think about the base version of unzip that was recently enabled in HEAD. I think that the current version of that port is correct and just UNZIP_CMD should be set to the base version on -CURRENT in bsd.port.mk. Or do I have to enforce ports unzip as a dependency by full path? Were there similar issues? Is there a conventional/preferred solution for this? Thanks, -- Gabor Kovesdan FreeBSD Volunteer EMAIL: ga...@freebsd.org .:|:. ga...@kovesdan.org WEB: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gabor .:|:. http://kovesdan.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
