Re: how to deal with unzip on -CURRENT?

2010-01-21 Thread Carlos A. M. dos Santos
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Yuri Pankov yuri.pan...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 11:43:21PM +0100, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
 Hi all,

 I've got a PR (ports/142091), which made me think about the base
 version of unzip that was recently enabled in HEAD. I think that the
 current version of that port is correct and just UNZIP_CMD should be
 set to the base version on -CURRENT in bsd.port.mk. Or do I have to
 enforce ports unzip as a dependency by full path? Were there similar
 issues? Is there a conventional/preferred solution for this?

 Thanks,

 --
 Gabor Kovesdan
 FreeBSD Volunteer

 EMAIL: ga...@freebsd.org .:|:. ga...@kovesdan.org
 WEB:   http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gabor .:|:. http://kovesdan.org

 I think it was fixed in bsd.port.mk 1.633:
 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk.diff?r1=1.632;r2=1.633

I think it also solves ports/141795.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


how to deal with unzip on -CURRENT?

2010-01-20 Thread Gabor Kovesdan

Hi all,

I've got a PR (ports/142091), which made me think about the base version 
of unzip that was recently enabled in HEAD. I think that the current 
version of that port is correct and just UNZIP_CMD should be set to the 
base version on -CURRENT in bsd.port.mk. Or do I have to enforce ports 
unzip as a dependency by full path? Were there similar issues? Is there 
a conventional/preferred solution for this?


Thanks,

--
Gabor Kovesdan
FreeBSD Volunteer

EMAIL: ga...@freebsd.org .:|:. ga...@kovesdan.org
WEB:   http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gabor .:|:. http://kovesdan.org

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: how to deal with unzip on -CURRENT?

2010-01-20 Thread Yuri Pankov
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 11:43:21PM +0100, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 I've got a PR (ports/142091), which made me think about the base
 version of unzip that was recently enabled in HEAD. I think that the
 current version of that port is correct and just UNZIP_CMD should be
 set to the base version on -CURRENT in bsd.port.mk. Or do I have to
 enforce ports unzip as a dependency by full path? Were there similar
 issues? Is there a conventional/preferred solution for this?
 
 Thanks,
 
 -- 
 Gabor Kovesdan
 FreeBSD Volunteer
 
 EMAIL: ga...@freebsd.org .:|:. ga...@kovesdan.org
 WEB:   http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gabor .:|:. http://kovesdan.org

I think it was fixed in bsd.port.mk 1.633:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk.diff?r1=1.632;r2=1.633


HTH,
Yuri
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org