Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure
On 03.01.2012 22:32, Greg Larkin wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/29/11 6:44 AM, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: Hi Porters! I am happy to announce that redports.org has finally reached the point where I think It's safe to be used by everybody! In case you never heard of it before redports is the result of an idea born at EuroBSDCon 2011 in Karlsruhe to give Port Maintainers and Port Committers a public service to test their new ports or ports patches during development or before submitting a ports PR. [...] Wow! Stellar job, Bernhard, and I'm looking forward to using redports.org for fixing ports that are broken under clang. Hope you don't want to do that today because during the night the current building machine paniced and needs someone power cycling it. I will do this in the evening so no builds today :( It looks like I could get some hardware from portmgr so hopefully more hardware and redundancy is available soon. I noticed one minor typo on https://redports.org/buildgroups: automaticaly - automatically Thanks, it's fixed now! -- Bernhard Froehlich http://www.bluelife.at/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure
On 02.01.2012 23:32, Doug Barton wrote: Is there such a thing as a redports mailing list? I neither have the infrastructure nor the time to setup and maintain my own list so I created one on Google Groups: redpo...@googlegroups.com https://groups.google.com/group/redports IRC was easy: #redports on Freenode irc://irc.freenode.net#redports -- Bernhard Froehlich http://www.bluelife.at/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 1/4/12 3:07 AM, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: On 03.01.2012 22:32, Greg Larkin wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/29/11 6:44 AM, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: Hi Porters! I am happy to announce that redports.org has finally reached the point where I think It's safe to be used by everybody! In case you never heard of it before redports is the result of an idea born at EuroBSDCon 2011 in Karlsruhe to give Port Maintainers and Port Committers a public service to test their new ports or ports patches during development or before submitting a ports PR. [...] Wow! Stellar job, Bernhard, and I'm looking forward to using redports.org for fixing ports that are broken under clang. Hope you don't want to do that today because during the night the current building machine paniced and needs someone power cycling it. I will do this in the evening so no builds today :( It looks like I could get some hardware from portmgr so hopefully more hardware and redundancy is available soon. I noticed one minor typo on https://redports.org/buildgroups: automaticaly - automatically Thanks, it's fixed now! Hi again Bernhard, It looks like ports are building fine now. As I was building the first port on your system, I thought of an enhancement, and I am interested to know how difficult it would be to implement. I maintain various p5- and py- ports, and I often want to test them under multiple versions of Perl and Python, in case there are conditional behaviors in the Makefile. Assuming you're not planning on allowing users to create their own builds, what about adding the ability to set build variables in a make.conf file? For instance, if I commit etc/make.conf to my personal repository location, redports would overlay my options before starting the build. Then I could do things like force Python version 2.7, Perl version 5.10, etc. What do you think? Thank you, Greg - -- Greg Larkin http://www.FreeBSD.org/ - The Power To Serve http://www.sourcehosting.net/ - Ready. Set. Code. http://twitter.com/cpucycle/ - Follow you, follow me -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk8EmIsACgkQ0sRouByUApAegQCgxgLcmbZihiQUtUj2TzYXPhrY xncAoLZ19vyGQP1bPnaNdfbNa6Gm6Bcg =Bus6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure
On 04.01.2012 19:21, Greg Larkin wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 1/4/12 3:07 AM, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: On 03.01.2012 22:32, Greg Larkin wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/29/11 6:44 AM, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: Hi Porters! I am happy to announce that redports.org has finally reached the point where I think It's safe to be used by everybody! In case you never heard of it before redports is the result of an idea born at EuroBSDCon 2011 in Karlsruhe to give Port Maintainers and Port Committers a public service to test their new ports or ports patches during development or before submitting a ports PR. [...] Wow! Stellar job, Bernhard, and I'm looking forward to using redports.org for fixing ports that are broken under clang. Hope you don't want to do that today because during the night the current building machine paniced and needs someone power cycling it. I will do this in the evening so no builds today :( It looks like I could get some hardware from portmgr so hopefully more hardware and redundancy is available soon. I noticed one minor typo on https://redports.org/buildgroups: automaticaly - automatically Thanks, it's fixed now! Hi again Bernhard, It looks like ports are building fine now. As I was building the first port on your system, I thought of an enhancement, and I am interested to know how difficult it would be to implement. I maintain various p5- and py- ports, and I often want to test them under multiple versions of Perl and Python, in case there are conditional behaviors in the Makefile. Assuming you're not planning on allowing users to create their own builds, what about adding the ability to set build variables in a make.conf file? For instance, if I commit etc/make.conf to my personal repository location, redports would overlay my options before starting the build. Then I could do things like force Python version 2.7, Perl version 5.10, etc. What do you think? That sounds a lot like OPTIONS support. Tinderbox is already able to do that so the only thing I need to solve are that it has to work in a shared environment. That means it will have to build all dependencies from scratch all the time because there are too many combinations and we don't really support mixing and matching weird combinations of slave ports (though everybody does it). Then add some user interface to enter contents of make.conf. OPTIONS support is already on my todo since the very beginning but I have no idea on when I will be able to work on that. -- Bernhard Froehlich http://www.bluelife.at/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure
On 01/04/2012 06:00, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: On 02.01.2012 23:32, Doug Barton wrote: Is there such a thing as a redports mailing list? I neither have the infrastructure nor the time to setup and maintain my own list so I created one on Google Groups: redpo...@googlegroups.com https://groups.google.com/group/redports IRC was easy: #redports on Freenode irc://irc.freenode.net#redports That's awesome! Perhaps now the discussion about redports can start migrating to that group? Doug -- You can observe a lot just by watching. -- Yogi Berra Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure
On 02.01.2012 23:32, Doug Barton wrote: Is there such a thing as a redports mailing list? No, currently not. There is no mail infrastructure for redports yet. If people want such a list or an IRC channel I could certainly do it but it's not high priority for me right now. -- Bernhard Froehlich http://www.bluelife.at/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/29/11 6:44 AM, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: Hi Porters! I am happy to announce that redports.org has finally reached the point where I think It's safe to be used by everybody! In case you never heard of it before redports is the result of an idea born at EuroBSDCon 2011 in Karlsruhe to give Port Maintainers and Port Committers a public service to test their new ports or ports patches during development or before submitting a ports PR. [...] Wow! Stellar job, Bernhard, and I'm looking forward to using redports.org for fixing ports that are broken under clang. I noticed one minor typo on https://redports.org/buildgroups: automaticaly - automatically Cheers, Greg - -- Greg Larkin http://www.FreeBSD.org/ - The Power To Serve http://www.sourcehosting.net/ - Ready. Set. Code. http://twitter.com/cpucycle/ - Follow you, follow me -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk8Dc+wACgkQ0sRouByUApDt0gCgmNYGJ/bA0adaETAiwUGzDJqx 5joAn19+4/ioBXGo4LwkSyUH5/GGmdWA =RnRh -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure
On 01.01.2012 21:03, Vitaly Magerya wrote: Hi again. I've got this issue: an update to one port depends on an update to another one, and I'd like to test both before submitting. So the question is this: if I've got both ports in the repository, when rebuilding the dependent port, will redports use the dependency from official ports tree, or from my repository? Redports will use your whole repository as an overlay to the original ports tree but it also caches already build packages based on PKGVERSION. So if you have a port in your tree which is different from the original port then you should take care that you bump PORTREVISION or PORTVERSION/DISTVERSION. To do what you want just commit both ports to your tree and trigger a build of the slave port. You can verify that everything was as expected by looking at the buildlog where you can see which packages in which versions were used as dependency. -- Bernhard Fröhlich http://www.bluelife.at/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure
On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 12:44:58 +0100, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: Hi Porters! I am happy to announce that redports.org has finally reached the point where I think It's safe to be used by everybody! In case you never heard of it before redports is the result of an idea born at EuroBSDCon 2011 in Karlsruhe to give Port Maintainers and Port Committers a public service to test their new ports or ports patches during development or before submitting a ports PR. Many people test ports only on their own machine because of lack of hardware. Redports gives you instant access to build environments for FreeBSD 7.4, 8.2, 9-CURRENT, 10-CURRENT on i386 and amd64 and even special ones that use CLANG/LLVM or GCC 4.5 as ports compiler. For everyone familiar with FreeBSD Ports Tinderbox [1] it's pretty obvious how it works. In fact redports is build on top of multiple Tinderboxes so it is scalable, fast and reliable. With your account you get your own Subversion Repository to maintain your ports and with every commit to the repository all affected ports are automatically built. When registering an account please read the UserGuide [2] first to get an idea of how to work with it. Feedback and new Ideas are welcome! Best regards, Bernhard Fröhlich (decke@) [1] http://tinderbox.marcuscom.com/ [2] http://redports.org/wiki/UserGuide This is awesome, thanks! Uli ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure
Is there such a thing as a redports mailing list? -- You can observe a lot just by watching. -- Yogi Berra Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure
On Sa., 31. Dez. 2011 23:26:14 CET, Vitaly Magerya vmage...@gmail.com wrote: Bernhard, is there a time limit on build execution, or some other kind of hang prevention? Yes, there is some limit in tinderbox but I think it's somewhere around 24 hours. My port (lang/stklos) has a known problem with hanging on 9.x, and it's already been building for 90 minutes (normally it takes one)... So, if you'll read this message before it is finished, please just kill it. This brings me to a feature request: being able to abort your own builds before they are finished. This should be possible so I've added it to the todo list for the upcoming versions. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure
Hi again. I've got this issue: an update to one port depends on an update to another one, and I'd like to test both before submitting. So the question is this: if I've got both ports in the repository, when rebuilding the dependent port, will redports use the dependency from official ports tree, or from my repository? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure
Bernhard, is there a time limit on build execution, or some other kind of hang prevention? My port (lang/stklos) has a known problem with hanging on 9.x, and it's already been building for 90 minutes (normally it takes one)... So, if you'll read this message before it is finished, please just kill it. This brings me to a feature request: being able to abort your own builds before they are finished. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure
On Do., 29. Dez. 2011 19:13:46 CET, Stephen Montgomery-Smith step...@missouri.edu wrote: I am trying this out. Looking at the instructions on https://redports.org/wiki/UserGuide: svn co https://svn.redports.org/yourusername mkdir www cp -pr /usr/ports/www/phpvirtualbox www/ svn add www svn commit -m phpvirtualbox added shouldn't there be a second line cd yourusername or something like that? Yes, thanks for spotting that! It's fixed now. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure
On Do., 29. Dez. 2011 17:55:06 CET, Marin Atanasov Nikolov dna...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Frank Laszlo fr...@franksworld.org wrote: On 12/29/11 6:44 AM, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: Hi Porters! I am happy to announce that redports.org has finally reached the point where I think It's safe to be used by everybody! FYI, I'm getting a 502 bad gateway error when loading the page. Me too :( BTW, has anyone considered evaluating Jenkins [1] for doing the same thing? Jenkins is quite interesting IMO, and is worth testing it out :) [1] http://jenkins-ci.org/ Regards, Marin I spend a few months planning and researching how to best implement the idea in a way that fits into the FreeBSD ecosystem. Throwing that all away and using a java based finished product will take a lot more time to only reimplement the status quo. Redports has been designed with care to heavily use Tinderbox and ZFS for actual building and only reimplement what is really needed. The result is easily extendable and written in C, shell and python for the Trac plugin. http://svn.bluelife.at/index.cgi/redports/browse/trunk ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure
Bernhard Froehlich wrote: Hi Porters! I am happy to announce that redports.org has finally reached the point where I think It's safe to be used by everybody! First of all, this is pretty great. Next, questions, comments feature requests. 1. It would be good to see what is currently in the queue for each backend (or buildgroup) right now; just to get an estimation of when your build will finish (e.g. in a few minutes vs. in a month). An actual estimation would be even better. 2. GCC 4.5 buildgroup currently shows 0 queued builds, but for some reason my build in that buildgroup does not start. Is there really nothing queued there? 3. On My builds page I see two strange builds in waiting state: one for buildgroup GCC another for 4.5; should that be one buidgroup GCC 4.5? 4. Is each backend a separate physical (or virtual) machine (i.e. do they all operate independently)? Are more machines planned? 5. Is there a way to see all the build archive, not just yours when you are logged in? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure
On Do., 29. Dez. 2011 15:26:12 CET, Vitaly Magerya vmage...@gmail.com wrote: Bernhard Froehlich wrote: Hi Porters! I am happy to announce that redports.org has finally reached the point where I think It's safe to be used by everybody! First of all, this is pretty great. Next, questions, comments feature requests. 1. It would be good to see what is currently in the queue for each backend (or buildgroup) right now; just to get an estimation of when your build will finish (e.g. in a few minutes vs. in a month). An actual estimation would be even better. Showing the buildqueue is easy but making predictions from the list is nearly impossible. There is a scheduling algorithm that tries to be fair but it cannot do much more than that. 2. GCC 4.5 buildgroup currently shows 0 queued builds, but for some reason my build in that buildgroup does not start. Is there really nothing queued there? Currently all builds are on the same machine and there is a limit of 2 parallel builds for this machine. 3. On My builds page I see two strange builds in waiting state: one for buildgroup GCC another for 4.5; should that be one buidgroup GCC 4.5? Sounds like a bug. I will have a look at that. 4. Is each backend a separate physical (or virtual) machine (i.e. do they all operate independently)? Are more machines planned? There is currently only one backend machine that is limited to two parallel builds. It is a 6 core Phenom II with 16GB Ram so performance is quite decent but more hardware will be needed over time. I would also like to get get some Tier-2 hardware like powerpc or sparc if there is enough interest. So organizing more hardware is on my todo but it will take some time. 5. Is there a way to see all the build archive, not just yours when you are logged in? No currently not but this is only a cosmetic thing and easy to fix. I've put it on my todo. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure
FYI: me too. 502 Bad Gateway -- nginx/1.0.11 * -- * *Iqbal Aroussi* *+212 665 025 032* *iq...@aroussi.name* On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 16:08, Frank Laszlo fr...@franksworld.org wrote: On 12/29/11 6:44 AM, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: Hi Porters! I am happy to announce that redports.org has finally reached the point where I think It's safe to be used by everybody! FYI, I'm getting a 502 bad gateway error when loading the page. -- Frank Laszlo __**_ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-portshttp://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@**freebsd.orgfreebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure
On 12/29/11 6:44 AM, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: Hi Porters! I am happy to announce that redports.org has finally reached the point where I think It's safe to be used by everybody! FYI, I'm getting a 502 bad gateway error when loading the page. -- Frank Laszlo ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Frank Laszlo fr...@franksworld.org wrote: On 12/29/11 6:44 AM, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: Hi Porters! I am happy to announce that redports.org has finally reached the point where I think It's safe to be used by everybody! FYI, I'm getting a 502 bad gateway error when loading the page. Me too :( BTW, has anyone considered evaluating Jenkins [1] for doing the same thing? Jenkins is quite interesting IMO, and is worth testing it out :) [1] http://jenkins-ci.org/ Regards, Marin -- Frank Laszlo ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Marin Atanasov Nikolov dnaeon AT gmail DOT com daemon AT unix-heaven DOT org http://www.unix-heaven.org/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011, Frank Laszlo wrote: I am happy to announce that redports.org has finally reached the point where I think It's safe to be used by everybody! FYI, I'm getting a 502 bad gateway error when loading the page. In nginx case, it's usually a sympthom of broken/stalled/stopped backend. -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: ma...@freebsd.org ] *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- ma...@rinet.ru *** ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure
Account created. Am I the first user of your redports.org ? wen 2011/12/29 Bernhard Froehlich de...@freebsd.org Hi Porters! I am happy to announce that redports.org has finally reached the point where I think It's safe to be used by everybody! In case you never heard of it before redports is the result of an idea born at EuroBSDCon 2011 in Karlsruhe to give Port Maintainers and Port Committers a public service to test their new ports or ports patches during development or before submitting a ports PR. Many people test ports only on their own machine because of lack of hardware. Redports gives you instant access to build environments for FreeBSD 7.4, 8.2, 9-CURRENT, 10-CURRENT on i386 and amd64 and even special ones that use CLANG/LLVM or GCC 4.5 as ports compiler. For everyone familiar with FreeBSD Ports Tinderbox [1] it's pretty obvious how it works. In fact redports is build on top of multiple Tinderboxes so it is scalable, fast and reliable. With your account you get your own Subversion Repository to maintain your ports and with every commit to the repository all affected ports are automatically built. When registering an account please read the UserGuide [2] first to get an idea of how to work with it. Feedback and new Ideas are welcome! Best regards, Bernhard Fröhlich (decke@) [1] http://tinderbox.marcuscom.**com/ http://tinderbox.marcuscom.com/ [2] http://redports.org/wiki/**UserGuidehttp://redports.org/wiki/UserGuide -- Bernhard Froehlich http://www.bluelife.at/ __**_ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-portshttp://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@**freebsd.orgfreebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure
I am trying this out. Looking at the instructions on https://redports.org/wiki/UserGuide: svn co https://svn.redports.org/yourusername mkdir www cp -pr /usr/ports/www/phpvirtualbox www/ svn add www svn commit -m phpvirtualbox added shouldn't there be a second line cd yourusername or something like that? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure
Hi Porters! I am happy to announce that redports.org has finally reached the point where I think It's safe to be used by everybody! In case you never heard of it before redports is the result of an idea born at EuroBSDCon 2011 in Karlsruhe to give Port Maintainers and Port Committers a public service to test their new ports or ports patches during development or before submitting a ports PR. Many people test ports only on their own machine because of lack of hardware. Redports gives you instant access to build environments for FreeBSD 7.4, 8.2, 9-CURRENT, 10-CURRENT on i386 and amd64 and even special ones that use CLANG/LLVM or GCC 4.5 as ports compiler. For everyone familiar with FreeBSD Ports Tinderbox [1] it's pretty obvious how it works. In fact redports is build on top of multiple Tinderboxes so it is scalable, fast and reliable. With your account you get your own Subversion Repository to maintain your ports and with every commit to the repository all affected ports are automatically built. When registering an account please read the UserGuide [2] first to get an idea of how to work with it. Feedback and new Ideas are welcome! Best regards, Bernhard Fröhlich (decke@) [1] http://tinderbox.marcuscom.com/ [2] http://redports.org/wiki/UserGuide -- Bernhard Froehlich http://www.bluelife.at/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
