Re: request for exp-run, comments: eliminate USE_X_PREFIX
* Pav Lucistnik (p...@freebsd.org) wrote: Here's it: http://people.freebsd.org/~amdmi3/xprefix_obliterate.1.patch Thank you, queued. Ok, it's already finished and the only failure is x11/libsx which I've mistakingly patched in another working copy. I've checked in and two ports dependent on it locally. So, may I commit it? -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amd...@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amd...@jabber.ruhttp://www.amdmi3.ru ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: request for exp-run, comments: eliminate USE_X_PREFIX
* Dmitry Marakasov (amd...@hades.panopticon) wrote: Ok, it's already finished and the only failure is x11/libsx which I've s/already/almost/ -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amd...@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amd...@jabber.ruhttp://www.amdmi3.ru ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: request for exp-run, comments: eliminate USE_X_PREFIX
Dmitry Marakasov píše v út 09. 06. 2009 v 18:33 +0400: * Pav Lucistnik (p...@freebsd.org) wrote: Here's it: http://people.freebsd.org/~amdmi3/xprefix_obliterate.1.patch Thank you, queued. Ok, it's already finished and the only failure is x11/libsx which I've mistakingly patched in another working copy. I've checked in and two ports dependent on it locally. So, may I commit it? Where are you tracking the progress of it? I'm curious. There's still few hundreds to go. I will send you an email when it's really finished. -- Pav Lucistnik p...@oook.cz p...@freebsd.org Homer 1. American bonehead 2. Pull a Homer - to succeed despite idiocy signature.asc Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
Re: request for exp-run, comments: eliminate USE_X_PREFIX
* Pav Lucistnik (p...@freebsd.org) wrote: Where are you tracking the progress of it? I'm curious. http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-7-exp-latest/ Btw, I remember there was some more useful view, something like `previously unknown failures list'. Was there really, and where? There's still few hundreds to go. I will send you an email when it's really finished. Ok. -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amd...@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amd...@jabber.ruhttp://www.amdmi3.ru ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: request for exp-run, comments: eliminate USE_X_PREFIX
Dmitry Marakasov píše v út 09. 06. 2009 v 18:48 +0400: * Pav Lucistnik (p...@freebsd.org) wrote: Where are you tracking the progress of it? I'm curious. http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-7-exp-latest/ Btw, I remember there was some more useful view, something like `previously unknown failures list'. Was there really, and where? This page is as useful as it gets. -- Pav Lucistnik p...@oook.cz p...@freebsd.org Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. -- Arthur C. Clarke signature.asc Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
Re: request for exp-run, comments: eliminate USE_X_PREFIX
* Erwin Lansing (er...@freebsd.org) wrote: i386 is operated by erwin@ so try talking to him. But I must warn you that i386 run will take about a week, due to much older hardware we have available for it. And there are two other builds in queue before you, so it will take a while. Let me know if can do it without pointyhat or amd64, otherwise we'll schedule it as soon as possible. I think that's unnecessary, I've run all ports dependent on xview in a tinderbox. Found single extra failure, games/imaze, fixed. -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amd...@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amd...@jabber.ruhttp://www.amdmi3.ru ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: request for exp-run, comments: eliminate USE_X_PREFIX
Dmitry Marakasov píše v so 06. 06. 2009 v 07:13 +0400: * Pav Lucistnik (p...@freebsd.org) wrote: The experimental run is nearly over, so far 15 failures found and sent in separate mails. Once you have next iteration of the patch, I'll be happy to run it again. Here's it: http://people.freebsd.org/~amdmi3/xprefix_obliterate.1.patch Thank you, queued. Also I forgot to mention that this is better to be run on i386, as many ports depend on xview which is i386-only. i386 is operated by erwin@ so try talking to him. But I must warn you that i386 run will take about a week, due to much older hardware we have available for it. -- Pav Lucistnik p...@oook.cz p...@freebsd.org Quantum physics was developed in the 1930's, as a result of a bet between Albert Einstein and Niels Bohr, to see who could come up with the most ridiculous theory and still have it published. signature.asc Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
Re: request for exp-run, comments: eliminate USE_X_PREFIX
* Pav Lucistnik (p...@freebsd.org) wrote: Also I forgot to mention that this is better to be run on i386, as many ports depend on xview which is i386-only. i386 is operated by erwin@ so try talking to him. But I must warn you that i386 run will take about a week, due to much older hardware we have available for it. Ah, ok then, I'll try to run as many as possible in my tinderbox. -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amd...@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amd...@jabber.ruhttp://www.amdmi3.ru ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: request for exp-run, comments: eliminate USE_X_PREFIX
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 05:36:26PM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote: Also I forgot to mention that this is better to be run on i386, as many ports depend on xview which is i386-only. i386 is operated by erwin@ so try talking to him. But I must warn you that i386 run will take about a week, due to much older hardware we have available for it. And there are two other builds in queue before you, so it will take a while. Let me know if can do it without pointyhat or amd64, otherwise we'll schedule it as soon as possible. -erwin -- Erwin Lansing http://droso.org Prediction is very difficult especially about the futureer...@freebsd.org pgpJgHqAEFJ50.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: request for exp-run, comments: eliminate USE_X_PREFIX
Dmitry Marakasov píše v po 01. 06. 2009 v 20:02 +0400: Thought we've switched to modular xorg more than a year ago, some ports still define USE_XLIB and thus depend on all X libraries (even when it's not really required). Which is even worse, USE_XLIB is implicitely defined for ports that define USE_IMAKE, some of which don't require any X libraries at all. This patch adds USE_XORG to (hopefully) all USE_IMAKE ports and some (but not all) USE_XLIB ports. It also makes USE_IMAKE ports no more implicitely define USE_XLIB and eliminates all mentions of USE_X_PREFIX from bsd.port.mk. It requires an exp-run, as though I've tested all changed ports in a local tinderbox, there may be ports with incomplete X dependencies further down dependency chains. http://people.freebsd.org/~amdmi3/xprefix_obliterate.patch Comments are welcome. Actually I think we could drop X11BASE related bits as well. This looks very useful, indeed, I was tempted to try to do some work in this direction myself. Your patch looks like a lot of work went into it already - let me run it on pointyhat. -- Pav Lucistnik p...@oook.cz p...@freebsd.org Sun couldn't care less about Linux other than it now being necessary in order to be buzzword compliant. -- Al Dente signature.asc Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
