Re: www/epiphany wants graphics/gdk-pixbuf that's not available in ports
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 08:09:06PM +0200, Koop Mast wrote: > > Epiphany depends on graphics/gdk-pixbuf2 not the really older gdk- > pixbuf. > That's the key point I had missed, thanks for clarifying! > > I think your trying to build ports from the HEAD ports tree, but have > quartery packages installed. Gdk-pixbuf2 was updated to 2.36 in April, > so that version is not available as a package in the 2017Q2 quartery > branch. > The ports tree has been maintained with svn. This is an ARM system (RPI2) so packages are of no (or very little) direct use. The dependencies are still causing trouble, so I've decided to give portmaster a try. Last time I tried portmaster it wasn't much help, but that was a long time ago. At this stage there's little to lose. Many thanks for your reply! bob prohaska > -Koop > > > Is something entirely mixed up? This is on RPI2 running -current, but > > that isn't obviously relevant: Far as I can see, port names aren't > > platform > > specific. I.e., "ports is ports". (apologies to Walt Kelley)?? > > > > Thanks for reading, > > > > bob prohaska > > > > ___ > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.o > > rg" > ___ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: www/epiphany wants graphics/gdk-pixbuf that's not available in ports
On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 20:16 -0700, bob prohaska wrote: Hi, > For some reason the port of www/epiphany is asking for a version > of graphics/gdk-pixbuf (2.36.5) later than the most recent version > available via svn ( 2.32.3). Epiphany depends on graphics/gdk-pixbuf2 not the really older gdk- pixbuf. > Perhaps more curiously, when looking in graphics/gdk-pixbuf the > directory > listing reports the presence of gdk-pixbuf-0.22.0 which seems most > confusing. That's the source directory which gave rise to 2.32.3 > found > by www/epiphany. I think your trying to build ports from the HEAD ports tree, but have quartery packages installed. Gdk-pixbuf2 was updated to 2.36 in April, so that version is not available as a package in the 2017Q2 quartery branch. -Koop > Is something entirely mixed up? This is on RPI2 running -current, but > that isn't obviously relevant: Far as I can see, port names aren't > platform > specific. I.e., "ports is ports". (apologies to Walt Kelley) > > Thanks for reading, > > bob prohaska > > ___ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.o > rg" ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
www/epiphany wants graphics/gdk-pixbuf that's not available in ports
For some reason the port of www/epiphany is asking for a version of graphics/gdk-pixbuf (2.36.5) later than the most recent version available via svn ( 2.32.3). Perhaps more curiously, when looking in graphics/gdk-pixbuf the directory listing reports the presence of gdk-pixbuf-0.22.0 which seems most confusing. That's the source directory which gave rise to 2.32.3 found by www/epiphany. Is something entirely mixed up? This is on RPI2 running -current, but that isn't obviously relevant: Far as I can see, port names aren't platform specific. I.e., "ports is ports". (apologies to Walt Kelley) Thanks for reading, bob prohaska ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
