linking with linux shared library
Hallo everybody, 1:) Suppose I have a Linux Library library.so. And I want to link it with my main.c compiled in FreeBSD. How can I achieve that? Thanks in advance! Simeon! __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new Resources site http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Good CPUTYPE setting for make.conf for mixed environment?
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 08:38:46PM -0500, Ryan Rempel wrote: I've got several machines that I want to maintain identical installations on. Some of them have athlon-xp CPUs and some have pentium4's. What would be a good CPUTYPE setting to use in make.conf? Would an athlon-xp run well (or at all) if I used pentium4? Would a pentium4 run well (or at all) if I used athlon-xp? No and no. Or should I use a lowest common denominator (and if so, what -- something like i686 perhaps?). I think i686 should be OK. I guess the other question is whether I should worry about this at all -- I've got no CPUTYPE setting in make.conf at the moment at all -- would a more tuned setting actually make that much difference? Probably not much of one. More important are your kernel settings (e.g. not compiling your kernel with i386/i486 support). Kris pgpI0693XRjLz.pgp Description: PGP signature
/usr/local/etc/rc.d and rcNG style scripts question
I read the handbook and the man page for rc and one question remains. For scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d it appears that the assumption is that all scripts are old style and so, no matter if they are rcGN style scripts or not, they will all run in lexographic order, right? Thanks Chad ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acer 4151LMI notebook help needed
1) mouse is not found. it is recognized as PS/2 mouse by NetBSD 2.0 live CD, Linux 2.4 (Knoppix tested), Windows XP. with FreeBSD (5.4) it isn't recognized at all 2) kernel boots at all when selecting 2 - ACPI enabled from boot menu. default boot reboots just after starting kernel. anyway LOTS of errors goes when booting 3) Novatel Wireless Merlin U530 (UMTS/GPRS) PCMCIA module doesn't work. it isn't attached at all. with linux it's detected as serial port and then pppd/chat combination works perfect to connect to internet (by GSM operator). thank you for any help Wojtek PS. 3 DVD's from full mirror already done and works fine. wasn't that difficult :) Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Sun May 8 10:21:06 UTC 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC ACPI APIC Table: STUPID MAPIC_00 Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.60GHz (1596.01-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0x6d8 Stepping = 8 Features=0xafe9fbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,TM,PBE real memory = 536735744 (511 MB) avail memory = 515563520 (491 MB) ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 1 ioapic0 Version 2.0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard npx0: math processor on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: INSYDE RSDT_000 on motherboard acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi0: Power Button (fixed) acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_ec0: Embedded Controller: GPE 0x1d port 0x66,0x62 on acpi0 ACPI-0501: *** Error: Handler for [EmbeddedControl] returned AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.BAT1._STA] (Node 0xc19bea00), AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE ACPI-0239: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.BAT1._STA] (Node 0xc19bea00), AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE ACPI-0501: *** Error: Handler for [EmbeddedControl] returned AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.BAT2._STA] (Node 0xc19be8e0), AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE ACPI-0239: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.BAT2._STA] (Node 0xc19be8e0), AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE Timecounter ACPI-fast frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: 24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz port 0x1008-0x100b on acpi0 cpu0: ACPI CPU (4 Cx states) on acpi0 acpi_throttle0: ACPI CPU Throttling on cpu0 acpi_lid0: Control Method Lid Switch on acpi0 acpi_button0: Power Button on acpi0 acpi_button1: Sleep Button on acpi0 pcib0: ACPI Host-PCI bridge port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: ACPI PCI bus on pcib0 pcib1: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge irq 16 at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: ACPI PCI bus on pcib1 pci1: display, VGA at device 0.0 (no driver attached) uhci0: Intel 82801FB/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6) USB controller USB-A port 0x1200-0x121f irq 23 at device 29.0 on pci0 usb0: Intel 82801FB/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6) USB controller USB-A on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: Intel 82801FB/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6) USB controller USB-B port 0x1220-0x123f irq 19 at device 29.1 on pci0 usb1: Intel 82801FB/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6) USB controller USB-B on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2: Intel 82801FB/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6) USB controller USB-C port 0x1240-0x125f irq 18 at device 29.2 on pci0 usb2: Intel 82801FB/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6) USB controller USB-C on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci3: Intel 82801FB/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6) USB controller USB-D port 0x1260-0x127f irq 16 at device 29.3 on pci0 usb3: Intel 82801FB/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6) USB controller USB-D on uhci3 usb3: USB revision 1.0 uhub3: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered pci0: serial bus, USB at device 29.7 (no driver attached) pcib2: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 30.0 on pci0 pci2: ACPI PCI bus on pcib2 fwohci0: Texas Instruments TSB43AB21/A/AI/A-EP mem 0xb0008000-0xb000bfff,0xb0004000-0xb00047ff irq 20 at device 0.0 on pci2 fwohci0: OHCI version 1.10 (ROM=0) fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channels is 4. fwohci0: EUI64 00:02:3f:53:71:40:00:e9 fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 1 ports. fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes. firewire0: IEEE1394(FireWire) bus on fwohci0 fwe0: Ethernet over FireWire on firewire0 if_fwe0: Fake Ethernet address: 02:02:3f:40:00:e9 fwe0: Ethernet address: 02:02:3f:40:00:e9 fwe0: if_start running deferred for Giant sbp0: SBP-2/SCSI over FireWire on firewire0 fwohci0: Initiate bus
HP LC II Netserver ACPI problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Following is from dmesg: vga0: Generic ISA VGA at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa-0xb on isa0 unknown: PNP0303 can't assign resources (port) unknown: PNP0f13 can't assign resources (irq) unknown: PNP0501 can't assign resources (port) unknown: PNP0700 can't assign resources (port) unknown: PNP0401 can't assign resources (port) I've read and googled for days and the following is what I'v either learned or think I've learned: 1. Can't use ACPI on here. Machine not capable, apparently. Hence, the following: ACPI-0159: *** Error: AcpiLoadTables: Could not get RSDP, AE_NO_ACPI_TABLES ACPI-0213: *** Error: AcpiLoadTables: Could not load tables: AE_NO_ACPI_TABLES ACPI: table load failed: AE_NO_ACPI_TABLES 2. Have apic enabled in kernel no problems that I know of 3. I think I'm supposed to disable plug and play in the bios but I can't find any simple way to do it. There are some choices under the Configuration portion of the bios menu under ISA non-Plug-and-Play Devices List of Memory resources, all available, none reserved List of Interrupt resources, all available, none reserved List of DMA resources, all available, none reserved List of I/O resources, all available, none reserved I have no idea how to match them up with the output of vga0 shown above, that is, to reserve the proper areas for its use. I tried working with it the other night wound up locking the computer up rock solid. Would not boot. Had to pull the cmos battery put back reset everything back to where it had been to boot again. One of the first things I did after reading in the mail archives, googling, etc., was to boot to ACPI enabled, I assume which loads a kernel module instead of it having to be compiled in. Have output of that error message above too. Any help would sure be appreciated. Tired of no sleep, trying to figure this out. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCl5eay0Ty5RZE55oRAkMuAJ9CiDSYXnQxCrRFnWH43QZWW7JI2wCgk0P6 DddWLVPPwlPZkUuU3/67Ao8= =yD5c -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Vinum problems on FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE
On 28 mei 2005, at 02:21, Kris Kirby wrote: Trying to make a mirror of two slices, but I see to be running into some issues here. I'm not on questions, so please CC me on all replies. Maybe it's a good idea to subscribe cuz then you would have been able to read what we wrote about this for the lastcouple of days # /etc/vinum.conf volume var plex name var.p0 org concat drive va device /dev/ad0s1g sd name var.p0.s0 drive va length 256m plex name var.p1 org concat drive vb device /dev/ad1s1d sd name var.p1.s0 drive vb length 256m When I create it, using -f, I get: vinum - l 2 drives: D vaState: up /dev/ad0s1g A: 1791/2048 MB (87%) - note triple allocation D vbState: up /dev/ad1s1d A: 255/512 MB (49%) 1 volumes: V var State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 256 MB 2 plexes: P var.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 256 MB P var.p1 C State: faulty Subdisks: 1 Size: 256 MB 2 subdisks: S var.p0.s0 State: up D: va Size: 256 MB S var.p1.s0 State: empty D: vb Size: 256 MB vinum does not like FBSD 5.4 or vice versa it is not supported you could manually 'setstate up var.p1.s0' and 'setstate up var.p1' that should work i tested it with a raid 1 mirror, removed the HD that came up ok and checked if the mirror would still come up, which it did i do definitely not recommend it though while you aren't still useing the raid, go use something else than vinum Doesn't seem like this is right. I also run into a problem when trying to do a resetconfig: vinum - resetconfig WARNING! This command will completely wipe out your vinum configuration. All data will be lost. If you really want to do this, enter the text NO FUTURE Enter text - NO FUTURE Can't find vinum config: Inappropriate ioctl for device you'll be getting this all the time if yu continue to use vinum in FBSD 5.4 and the configuration is still there after I try to resetconfig. When I reboot and do I vinum start, I get an error that there are no drives in the vinum config. do 'vinum read' but expect to have kernel panics... FreeBSD ginsu.catonic.net 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #1: Fri May 27 01:28:15 PDT 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/ compile/SMP i386 dmesg availible on request. No securelevel in place, at -1. Thanks in advance. again, i'd stay away from vinum/gvinum in FBSD 5.x if i were you... if you don't, come join me in the mental institute for stubbern vinum users :) Arno ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: vinum: Inappropriate ioctl for device
On 28 mei 2005, at 09:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] you're welcome maybe the complete vinum chapter should be removed from the handbook? Arno Perhaps the Vinum chapter should say up front that Vinum works with FreeBSD 4.x but not with 5.x jd yeah better idea Arno ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: how to build packages quickly?
On 5/28/05, Luciano Musacchio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi, for those who know gentoo, theres a program (quickpkg) that makes a binary package (from already installed ones) without the need to recompile the port, its possible to do that in fbsd? thanks -- pkg_create -b pkg-name might be what you need. man pkg_create for more info -- Kind regards Abu Khaled ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC
On 5/27/05, Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 27 May 2005 11:18, the author Dmitry Mityugov contributed to the dialogue on Re: Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC: On 5/27/05, Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: thread this to post top not do Please :-):-) (I have moved your input to bottom!) - it is easier to This is not a newsgroup. Yes, please. this is a mail list -- not a private communication This is not a file in which the latest letter gets pinned to the top!!! Please do not bring habits from the paper world to the electronic world! Please don't ask me to invent my own habits my friend. Most of them have been inspired by other people, and for good reasons. Netiquette is consideration for others It is always good to Google for an item before referring someone else to it. think of how easy it is to read - See how people can, with bottom posting, see the sequence of events .. and therefore understand what you say. If you come to a mail list, like this, and want help then those who might be otherwise be willing to help might be discouraged and ignore you. Forcing people to read your stuff out of sequence is really quite rude. . , Think about long paragraphs Think about reading the output from mail list threads and then responding to it.. Top posting is really inconsiderate and shows lack of experience I don't agree with this. Please, don't ask me why. Think about the effect of long paragraphs and then having to move backwards and forwards and you read one paragraph downwards and then are foprced to move upwards to read the subsequent posting Tha means scanning and rescanning. Top posting is neither sensible or practicable for the reader. I learnt from those who showed me when I started using email well before the internet began. Take care N/P. I read what Greg just posted here... If this is indeed how you live - well, I'll follow that. Dmitry ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems while starting rc.d local files
Towards the end of the boot process while starting the processes under /usr/local/etc/rc.d (I think) freebsd 5.4 warns about something wrong that I cannot find in the log files dmesg.boot, dmesg, messages. The warning (nothing fatal happens!) I eye is as follows: Pre-seeding PRNG: kickstart Loading configuration files This: not found and the sentence This: not found pops up till the end of the boot. Where can I find a glue on what's happening, what's going wrong? Vittorio ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Good CPUTYPE setting for make.conf for mixed environment?
On 5/27/05, Ryan Rempel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've got several machines that I want to maintain identical installations on. Some of them have athlon-xp CPUs and some have pentium4's. What would be a good CPUTYPE setting to use in make.conf? Would an athlon-xp run well (or at all) if I used pentium4? Would a pentium4 run well (or at all) if I used athlon-xp? Or should I use a lowest common denominator (and if so, what -- something like i686 perhaps?). I guess the other question is whether I should worry about this at all -- I've got no CPUTYPE setting in make.conf at the moment at all -- would a more tuned setting actually make that much difference? I would use i686 or pentium3 as a safe setting, assuming you not using any real old 486 or 586 cpu's. Chris ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: vinum: Inappropriate ioctl for device
[...] you're welcome maybe the complete vinum chapter should be removed from the handbook? Arno Perhaps the Vinum chapter should say up front that Vinum works with FreeBSD 4.x but not with 5.x jd Janos Dohanics [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.3dresearch.com/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Fwd: mlock: not setgid mail]
Anyone ? ---BeginMessage--- All, I have searched several places and everything I have seen reports that the only thing I need to do is chown /usr/local/libexec/mlock to root:mail but it currently is... take a look: May 24 12:54:59 tco1 /usr/local/libexec/mlock[29327]: (64) not setgid mail May 24 12:57:08 tco1 /usr/local/libexec/mlock[29382]: (64) not setgid mail May 24 12:57:08 tco1 /usr/local/libexec/mlock[29384]: (64) not setgid mail May 24 13:03:33 tco1 /usr/local/libexec/mlock[30399]: (64) not setgid mail May 24 13:04:23 tco1 /usr/local/libexec/mlock[30401]: (64) not setgid mail May 24 13:04:32 tco1 /usr/local/libexec/mlock[30403]: (64) not setgid mail tco1# ls -ail /usr/local/libexec/ total 4104 1626383 drwxr-xr-x 6 root wheel 512 May 24 13:00 . 1625088 drwxr-xr-x 16 root wheel 512 May 6 13:36 .. 1746408 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 May 3 22:35 autoconf259 1746417 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 May 3 22:35 automake19 1627965 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel63624 May 24 13:00 imapd 1627966 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel14568 May 24 13:00 ipop2d 1627967 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel22344 May 24 13:00 ipop3d 1672841 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 May 3 00:22 libtool13 1626599 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 May 2 23:43 libtool15 1627968 -rwx--s--x 1 root mail 5808 May 24 13:00 mlock 1628238 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4050712 May 5 17:08 mysqld I'm quite perplexed as to what to do about this, I also read a suggestion to rebuild the /usr/ports/mail/imap-uw so I did, but that has not assisted any. Any suggestions would be GREATLY appreciated. FYI: I'm currently using sendmail - imap-uw w/SSL - spamassassin - clamav Thanks again, Richard tco1# uname -a FreeBSD tco1.thecompanyonline.com 5.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE #0: Mon May 2 22:32:50 EDT 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/TCO1.2005.05.02.001 i386 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---End Message--- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tape record bigger than supplied buffer
I'm test piloting bacula on a FreeBSD 5.4-REL system. All seemed to work well in monitored tests. So last night I set up a job to run at night. When I came in this morning, all seemed to go well...the backup happened but I noticed 3 messages on the console: (sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): 65536-byte tape record bigger than supplied buffer (sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): 65536-byte tape record bigger than supplied buffer (sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): 65536-byte tape record bigger than supplied buffer Realizing this means what it does at face value, was any data lost (should i take this as a warning or as an error) ? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Good CPUTYPE setting for make.conf for mixed environment?
Ryan Rempel wrote: I've got several machines that I want to maintain identical installations on. Some of them have athlon-xp CPUs and some have pentium4's. What would be a good CPUTYPE setting to use in make.conf? Would an athlon-xp run well (or at all) if I used pentium4? Would a pentium4 run well (or at all) if I used athlon-xp? Or should I use a lowest common denominator (and if so, what -- something like i686 perhaps?). I guess the other question is whether I should worry about this at all -- I've got no CPUTYPE setting in make.conf at the moment at all -- would a more tuned setting actually make that much difference? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I would say if you are not fully loaded it would make no difference. Then if you are you need to check to see if even using CPUTYPE=i686 speeds up some and slows some down. It does not really matter for the kernel, the kernel does not use SSE or any special instructions AFAIK. /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vinum problems on FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE
Trying to make a mirror of two slices, but I see to be running into some issues here. I'm not on questions, so please CC me on all replies. # /etc/vinum.conf volume var plex name var.p0 org concat drive va device /dev/ad0s1g sd name var.p0.s0 drive va length 256m plex name var.p1 org concat drive vb device /dev/ad1s1d sd name var.p1.s0 drive vb length 256m When I create it, using -f, I get: vinum - l 2 drives: D vaState: up /dev/ad0s1g A: 1791/2048 MB (87%) - note triple allocation D vbState: up /dev/ad1s1d A: 255/512 MB (49%) 1 volumes: V var State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 256 MB 2 plexes: P var.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 256 MB P var.p1 C State: faulty Subdisks: 1 Size: 256 MB 2 subdisks: S var.p0.s0 State: up D: va Size: 256 MB S var.p1.s0 State: empty D: vb Size: 256 MB Doesn't seem like this is right. I also run into a problem when trying to do a resetconfig: vinum - resetconfig WARNING! This command will completely wipe out your vinum configuration. All data will be lost. If you really want to do this, enter the text NO FUTURE Enter text - NO FUTURE Can't find vinum config: Inappropriate ioctl for device and the configuration is still there after I try to resetconfig. When I reboot and do I vinum start, I get an error that there are no drives in the vinum config. FreeBSD ginsu.catonic.net 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #1: Fri May 27 01:28:15 PDT 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/SMP i386 dmesg availible on request. No securelevel in place, at -1. Thanks in advance. -- Kris Kirby [EMAIL PROTECTED] BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU! This message brought to you by the US Department of Homeland Security ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC
This is not a newsgroup. On 5/27/05, Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: thread this to post top not do Please :-):-) (I have moved your input to bottom!) - it is easier to Yes, please. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Migration Guide
Hi Have I missed something -- I do not see any notes for source upgrade from 5.3 to 5.4 in the Migration guide. There see notes on upgrade 4.x to 5.x. Are the procedures notes to be found elsewhere? Thanks david 40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters. English Owner Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus. Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing May bound for Europe via Panama Canal. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: avr-gcc
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:03:52PM +1000, Timothy Smith wrote: avr-gcc-3.4.3_1 is marked as broken: System's Pod::Man too old to generate the documentation.. anyone here used this or know how to get it working? Install a newer version of perl. Kris pgpA2LUWOWWeI.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Problem with HT support in 5.4
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 09:30:46AM -0500, Jacob S wrote: On Fri, 27 May 2005 18:05:48 +0400 Dmitry Mityugov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/27/05, Jacob S wrote: Hello list, I upgraded a few 5.3 servers to 5.4 yesterday and everything seemed to go well. After booting the new kernel, dmesg correctly showed 2 logical cpus (1 xeon with HT). However, when I look at top's output, it always shows at least 50% cpu idle time - even when the load is above 10. To confirm this, I ran burnP6 from the cpuburn port - even with over a hundred apache processes going, exim running and a few other things, top still reported the cpu as 50% idle. The 'C' column in top, between 'State' and 'Time' also shows everything as being run on cpu 0. `ps ax | grep cpu` reports this: 11 ?? RL 0:00.00 [idle: cpu1] 12 ?? RL 931:45.24 [idle: cpu0] 108 ?? DL 0:04.02 [schedcpu] So it looks like smp support is enabled and it sees the HT enabled processor, but it's not using the second logical cpu. Is there something I missed in compiling the kernel, or is this a bug? I have confirmed it on two 5.4 servers now. Oh, wait, it is probably just the last HT security patch, ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-05:09.htt.asc. hmm... So basically, SMP can be enabled, but it won't use HT even if it sees a capable processor? By default..it's a trivial matter of setting a loader tunable. Please read the advisory. Kris pgp4zRpCkeSYZ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: two ISP connections, three nics, and a NAT
Multihoming two wan links can be accomplisheed by using zebra or just ipfw and natd. - Original Message - From: Muhammad Reza [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 6:32 AM Subject: Re: two ISP connections, three nics, and a NAT At 11:06 AM 5/12/2005, you wrote: I have two ISP connections, a DSL line and a Cable Modem line. I want to plug both connections into a FreeBSD box that has three nics in it, one nic for each ISP connection and the last nic for my NAT. How can I bind the connections together without any other sort of router? I setup something similar that may be useful We have a small office with a 12/24ths of a T-1 line for an absurd amount of money as our primary connection. Cheap residential cable service became available with quadruple the bandwidth [incoming only] for cheap. I installed an extra NIC the to cable modem and setup the Squid proxy / cache on a f'bsd box that was already running other services. Then used some Squid options and IPFW to get all Squid's traffic running over the cable line. This gets us faster web and ftp downloads, and off-loads the T-1 for other things. -Wayne ___ I have similar network configuration (dual home ISP without routing protocol enabled), and looking for some solution with BSD robust TCP/IP stack. PF came with this solution; http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html but this solution is based on packet filtering anyway, not routing. You no need to specified your default gateway and you will have problem if you have Squid running on your gateway box or have NAT rule, that translate your host public address into private LAN host address, and (maybe) many more... Meanwhile, my gateway box is Linux-2.4.x with iproute2, and can accomplished this matter. But i really want to change this into *BSD, i heard that guys from OpenBSD work on this (http://www.openbsd.org/plus36.html, Permit multiple default route), but not worked in my test. .. what about FreeBSD ? regards .:NewBie:. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
why can't FBSD create /dev/ad0s2e?
On my one box that has a 5G windows installation, I had (after the w2k) my RH-8.0. Last night I deleted the Linux stuff leaving only NTFS. I then tryed to install' FreeBSD on the remaining ~~34G, but when I went to the menu to create the slices, a screen showed the err message Can't create /dev/ad0s2e [or whatever]. Am I doing something dense? Upon quitting F1 pointed to ?? which I let bring up windows. Only a week ago I booted RH without any problem so it doesn't seem likely that the roughly 33-34GB are suddenly trashed. I did try to use *all* of the remaining disk, then use the FBSD bootloader, then chose A for the automatic default. Got error message; then started over and tried using 30G, then 25G, then 15 and 10GB. Any suggestions on what I can try next? gary -- Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.thought.org Public service Unix ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adding a FormFeed to an LPR printcap file?
Hello: Could someone suggest a way to add a form feed to the end of a print document in LPR? I have a printer that doesn't eject the last page when the print job is finished; and I can't seem to find this in the manual. My guess is I need to add it to my printer filter, but its not clear to me what I need to add. I'm running freeBSD 5.3-Release. Thanks in advance. Harold. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
how to build packages quickly?
hi, for those who know gentoo, theres a program (quickpkg) that makes a binary package (from already installed ones) without the need to recompile the port, its possible to do that in fbsd? thanks -- Los buenos artistas copian, los grandes roban -- Steve Jobs ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
portupgrade, pkgdb hang
I am a newcomer to freebsd and am still trying to get to grips with package management. When I try to do a binary upgrade of a package it hangs. Recently I tried to upgrade sylpheed-claws and nothing happened for 2 hours. I got the following message: # portupgrade -v -P sylpheed-claws --- Session started at: Sat, 28 May 2005 08:53:35 + [Updating the pkgdb format:bdb1_btree in /var/db/pkg ... - 260 packages found (-1 +7) (...) I get similar behaviour when I try to do pkgdb -F I am running through a proxy and have PACKAGESITE=ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5-stable/Latest/; in my /etc/profile I assume that I'm doing something wrong. Can somebody help? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
test
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 checking if server down or some other problem with subscription. sorry. === Unix is like a wigwam. No gates, no windows, and an apache inside. === -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCmEoHy0Ty5RZE55oRAg0+AJ9Z3zm0k+B8+hZAwKYfpaVMH7ZkUwCdFN0z DBSeua7hmMAMJ9WMWTap0B8= =nYOx -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with HT support in 5.4
On Fri, 27 May 2005 09:30:46 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions you wrote: Oh, wait, it is probably just the last HT security patch, ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-05:09.htt.asc. hmm... So basically, SMP can be enabled, but it won't use HT even if it sees a capable processor? Unless you use the ULE scheduler (which is broken and buggy on RELENG_5) there is no benefit to using HT. In fact, it will make some things worse. ---Mike Mike Tancsa, Sentex communications http://www.sentex.net Providing Internet Access since 1994 [EMAIL PROTECTED], (http://www.tancsa.com) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC
On Friday 27 May 2005 11:18, the author Dmitry Mityugov contributed to the dialogue on Re: Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC: On 5/27/05, Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: thread this to post top not do Please :-):-) (I have moved your input to bottom!) - it is easier to This is not a newsgroup. Yes, please. this is a mail list -- not a private communication This is not a file in which the latest letter gets pinned to the top!!! Please do not bring habits from the paper world to the electronic world! Netiquette is consideration for others think of how easy it is to read - See how people can, with bottom posting, see the sequence of events .. and therefore understand what you say. If you come to a mail list, like this, and want help then those who might be otherwise be willing to help might be discouraged and ignore you. Forcing people to read your stuff out of sequence is really quite rude. . , Think about long paragraphs Think about reading the output from mail list threads and then responding to it.. Top posting is really inconsiderate and shows lack of experience Think about the effect of long paragraphs and then having to move backwards and forwards and you read one paragraph downwards and then are foprced to move upwards to read the subsequent posting Tha means scanning and rescanning. Top posting is neither sensible or practicable for the reader. I learnt from those who showed me when I started using email well before the internet began. Take care David -- 40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters. English Owner Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus. Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing May bound for Europe via Panama Canal. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Top Posting (was: [Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC])
On Friday 27 May 2005 12:09, the author Dmitry Mityugov contributed to the dialogue on Re: Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC: On 5/27/05, Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 27 May 2005 11:18, the author Dmitry Mityugov contributed to the dialogue on Re: Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC: On 5/27/05, Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: thread this to post top not do Please :-):-) (I have moved your input to bottom!) - it is easier to This is not a newsgroup. Yes, please. this is a mail list -- not a private communication This is not a file in which the latest letter gets pinned to the top!!! Please do not bring habits from the paper world to the electronic world! Please don't ask me to invent my own habits my friend. Most of them have been inspired by other people, and for good reasons. Netiquette is consideration for others It is always good to Google for an item before referring someone else to it. I dont agree with that -- otherwise I would google everything I wrote!! think of how easy it is to read - See how people can, with bottom posting, see the sequence of events .. and therefore understand what you say. If you come to a mail list, like this, and want help then those who might be otherwise be willing to help might be discouraged and ignore you. Forcing people to read your stuff out of sequence is really quite rude. . , Think about long paragraphs Think about reading the output from mail list threads and then responding to it.. Top posting is really inconsiderate and shows lack of experience I don't agree with this. Please, don't ask me why. Dont need to know -- but I appreciate your relevant interjection :-) Think about the effect of long paragraphs and then having to move backwards and forwards and you read one paragraph downwards and then are foprced to move upwards to read the subsequent posting Tha means scanning and rescanning. Top posting is neither sensible or practicable for the reader. I learnt from those who showed me when I started using email well before the internet began. Take care N/P. I read what Greg just posted here... If this is indeed how you live - well, I'll follow that. I dont know what Greg posted Take care David -- 40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters. English Owner Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus. Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing May bound for Europe via Panama Canal. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: vinum: Inappropriate ioctl for device
On 27 mei 2005, at 16:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] not very encouraging... Is it a RAID 5 you were able to make work under 5.4? jd hey yeah a 3x160 GB RAID5 and 2x80 GB RAID 1 in FreeBSD 5.4-p1 i get the same error message everytime i start vinum or whenever i execute a command in vinum and really loads of kernel panics whenever i try to get it to work after a crash i have an unorthodox way of recovering from this because it's nearly impossible to do stuff in vinum without causing kernel panics yesterday evrything was ruined again (after upgrading to p1) i wiped the complete config (rest config - NO FUTURE) read in the config file (create RAID5) set every state up manually (setstate up ...) and rebuild parity took about 10 hours to rebuild but then everything is back up and running i tried Gvinum too but that doesn't have the setstate nor the ruibld parity command and still you can't stop gvinum (gvinum stop doesn't work, nor does kldunload geom_vinum.ko) i have no way of changing to a different soft raid due to lack of space to backup so i'm stuck with this for as lo0ng as it takes :) so, one advice don't do it hehehe Arno Many thanx... I guess I better stick with 4.11 jd you're welcome maybe the complete vinum chapter should be removed from the handbook? Arno ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
help with: ports over unionfs on a jail
hey, i have the ports dir mounted over unionfs on a jail (/usr/ports /usr/jail/usr/ports unionfs rw 0 0) and when i do a make install for some port within a jail it says: make: No such file or directory i have no idea of whats going on :/, i'll appreciate some help (the jail is built the way man says and /usr/bin/make exists) -- Los buenos artistas copian, los grandes roban -- Steve Jobs ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Software by the original manufacturerat generic prices
All software - duty-free prices http://yhxp.b0xqestmq3tiqub.shopofyourdream.com Oppression can only survive through silence. Honest differences are often a healthy sign of progress. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
need help
Hi, i have a FreeBsd 4.11 i used it as a firewall and a gateway. it was working properly as for 2 months. now seems theres a problem.. i can ping any from outside. but the users cant browse even ping a yahoo.com you guys have any idea wahts gonna be a problem. i did ipfw add allow ip from any to any. but still no luck thnks.,... - Yahoo! Mail Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with HT support in 5.4
Oh, wait, it is probably just the last HT security patch, ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-05:09.htt.asc. hmm... So basically, SMP can be enabled, but it won't use HT even if it sees a capable processor? Not sure but after reading: NOTE: For users that are certain that their environment is not affected by this vulnerability, such as single-user systems, Hyper-Threading Technology may be re-enabled by setting the tunable machdep.hyperthreading_allowed. I whould try: # echo machdep.hyperthreading_allowed=1 /boot/loader.conf but I am a newbie to FreeBSD using a Pentium II, and indeed the only user -I hope- of my system. --Paul ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Weird NFS problems
Oh, something else to try: I checked through my notes and discovered that I had gotten UDP to work in a similar configuration before. What I did was bind the IP address to fxp0 instead of em0. By doing this, the kernel seems to send the data at a pace suitable for the slow interface. -Jon On Fri, 27 May 2005, Don Lewis wrote: On 26 May, Skylar Thompson wrote: I'm having some problems with NFS serving on a FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE machine. The FreeBSD machine is the NFS/NIS server for a group of four Linux clusters. The network archictecture looks like this: 234/24 234/24 Cluster 1 ---|--- Cluster 3 | --- em0| File server | fxp0 | -- Cluster 2 ---|--- Cluster 4 234/24230/24 em0 and fxp0 are bridged, and em0 has a 234/24 IP address while fxp0 is just in promiscuous mode. 234/24 is an 802.1q VLAN on the fxp0 side of the server, so packets are untagged at the switch just before fxp0, and are forwarded to em0 through the bridge. The problem manifests itself in large UDP NFS requests from Clusters 3 and 4. The export can be mounted fine from both those clusters, and small transfers such as with ls work fine, but the moment any serious data transfer starts, the entire mount just hangs. Running ethereal on the file server shows a a lot of fragmented packets, and RPC retransmissions on just a single request. Reducing the read and write NFS buffers on the Linux clients to 1kB from the default of 4kB solves the issue, but kills the transfer rate. The moment I go to 2kB, the problem reappearss. Clusters 1 and 2 use the default of 4kB buffers, and have no problems communicating to em0. Poking through the list archives, I ran across this message (http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2003-May/001007.html) that reveals a bug in the fxp(4) driver in 4-RELEASE that incorrectly detects the capabilities of the NIC. Is this still an issue in 5-RELEASE, or am I looking at a different problem? Any ideas on how I can get the NFS buffers up to a reasonable level? That problem was fixed quite some time ago. Which transfer direction fails? Client writing to server Client reading from server Both? Do you see all the fragments in the retransmitted request? ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Top Posting (was: [Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC])
hay enough of this BS about top posting. You have to wake up to the fact there are many people who belong to this list who are not UNIX bigots. Us win/outlook people have just as much right to post as the rest of you. And more to the point who the hell pointed this new comer of just 10 days (vizion) as the cop to be forcing his slanted views on the rest of us. To vizion aren't you suppose to be sailing your boat right now bound for Europe via Panama Canal. Only thing you have contributed is more background noise. This list was better with out you. so concentrate on your sailing before you get lost and need government help to save you from perishing at seas. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Vizion Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 3:17 PM Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Top Posting (was: [Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC]) On Friday 27 May 2005 12:09, the author Dmitry Mityugov contributed to the dialogue on Re: Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC: On 5/27/05, Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 27 May 2005 11:18, the author Dmitry Mityugov contributed to the dialogue on Re: Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC: On 5/27/05, Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: thread this to post top not do Please :-):-) (I have moved your input to bottom!) - it is easier to This is not a newsgroup. Yes, please. this is a mail list -- not a private communication This is not a file in which the latest letter gets pinned to the top!!! Please do not bring habits from the paper world to the electronic world! Please don't ask me to invent my own habits my friend. Most of them have been inspired by other people, and for good reasons. Netiquette is consideration for others It is always good to Google for an item before referring someone else to it. I dont agree with that -- otherwise I would google everything I wrote!! think of how easy it is to read - See how people can, with bottom posting, see the sequence of events .. and therefore understand what you say. If you come to a mail list, like this, and want help then those who might be otherwise be willing to help might be discouraged and ignore you. Forcing people to read your stuff out of sequence is really quite rude. . , Think about long paragraphs Think about reading the output from mail list threads and then responding to it.. Top posting is really inconsiderate and shows lack of experience I don't agree with this. Please, don't ask me why. Dont need to know -- but I appreciate your relevant interjection :-) Think about the effect of long paragraphs and then having to move backwards and forwards and you read one paragraph downwards and then are foprced to move upwards to read the subsequent posting Tha means scanning and rescanning. Top posting is neither sensible or practicable for the reader. I learnt from those who showed me when I started using email well before the internet began. Take care N/P. I read what Greg just posted here... If this is indeed how you live - well, I'll follow that. I dont know what Greg posted Take care David -- 40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters. English Owner Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus. Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing May bound for Europe via Panama Canal. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with HT support in 5.4
On 05/27/05 09:28 PM, Mike Tancsa sat at the `puter and typed: On Fri, 27 May 2005 09:30:46 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions you wrote: Oh, wait, it is probably just the last HT security patch, ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-05:09.htt.asc. hmm... So basically, SMP can be enabled, but it won't use HT even if it sees a capable processor? Unless you use the ULE scheduler (which is broken and buggy on RELENG_5) there is no benefit to using HT. In fact, it will make some things worse. Are you sure about that? I'm using the BSD scheduler on 5.3 (upgrading to 5.4 later today), with HT enabled, and I don't have problems. In fact, I can do a make buildworld AND play neverwinter nights at the same time without seeing any problems. Lou -- Louis LeBlanc FreeBSD-at-keyslapper-DOT-net Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :) Please send off-list email to: leblanc at keyslapper d.t net Key fingerprint = C5E7 4762 F071 CE3B ED51 4FB8 AF85 A2FE 80C8 D9A2 I do desire we may be better strangers. -- William Shakespeare, As You Like It ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Migration Guide
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 18:52, Vizion wrote: Hi Have I missed something -- I do not see any notes for source upgrade from 5.3 to 5.4 in the Migration guide. There see notes on upgrade 4.x to 5.x. Are the procedures notes to be found elsewhere? Thanks david David, Unless I am missing something, it is just a case of cvsup see the instructions in the handbook. Rob ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
running psybnc
hallow .. admin, i want running psybnc in there but why i can't my psybnc is not work in mirc ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5.4 nfs install
Hello, Trying to do a 5.4 nfs install. I've copied both disks to an nfs share, however i'm getting an error that i'm only using disk0 and that perl is on disk1, insert it. I've only got the one nfs installpoint and it has both disks copied to it. Is there an extra step with 5.4? Thanks. Dave. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Migration Guide
On 2005-05-27 10:52, Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Have I missed something -- I do not see any notes for source upgrade from 5.3 to 5.4 in the Migration guide. There see notes on upgrade 4.x to 5.x. The usual update procedure, described in the Handbook and /usr/src/UPDATING works fine for 5.3 - 5.4, so there is no need for a special Migration Guide. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems while starting rc.d local files
Vittorio De Martino [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Towards the end of the boot process while starting the processes under /usr/local/etc/rc.d (I think) freebsd 5.4 warns about something wrong that I cannot find in the log files dmesg.boot, dmesg, messages. The warning (nothing fatal happens!) I eye is as follows: Pre-seeding PRNG: kickstart Loading configuration files This: not found and the sentence This: not found pops up till the end of the boot. Where can I find a glue on what's happening, what's going wrong? One of the startup scripts is trying to execute a line that starts with the word This. Does that word appear in your rc.conf file? Have you edited any of the files in /etc/rc.d to mistakenly contain that, perhaps by removing the comment character (#) from the start of a line? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Man page viewing problems
J. Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: After searching the mailing list I couldn't find much regarding this issues (or manpages on groff) Well, if you can't show man pages, then you would have a problem with reading the ones about the formatter for the man pages... But the documentation for groff is in info pages anyway; the man pages for it are only a secondary output of the info. Try info groff. %man make.conf Formatting page, please wait.../usr/bin/groff: can't find `DESC' file /usr/bin/groff:fatal error: invalid device `ascii' Failed. /usr/bin/groff: can't find `DESC' file /usr/bin/groff:fatal error: invalid device `ascii' Looks like the fonts files are missing. Do you have the file /usr/share/groff_font/devascii/DESC? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Adding a FormFeed to an LPR printcap file?
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 23:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello: Could someone suggest a way to add a form feed to the end of a print document in LPR? I have a printer that doesn't eject the last page when the print job is finished; and I can't seem to find this in the manual. My guess is I need to add it to my printer filter, but its not clear to me what I need to add. I'm running freeBSD 5.3-Release. Thanks in advance. Harold. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think you have to remove the :sh parameter in /etc/printcap ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Files corrupt after copy!!!
I just copied my entire home directory from my Windows XP harddrive (ad6) running NTFS over to my FreeBSD harddrive (ad4) running UFS2: .. In the past I had faced a similar program. I found out that the errors were caused by the DMA controller. So I have disabled DMA hard disc and no write errors occur. So In the rc.d directory I have created a script that runs 'atacontrol mode [0-3] pio4 pio4' . Thus I make all hard discs to operate in PIO4 mode. Even though it is a bit slow I do not have any write errors at any disc any more. My machine has the following two controllers: atapci0: VIA 82C686 ATA66 controller port 0xd800-0xd80f at device 4.1 on pci0 atapci1: Promise ATA100 controller port 0x8400-0x843f,0x8800-0x8803,0x9000-0x9007,0x9400-0x9403,0x 9800-0x9807 mem 0xda00-0xda01 irq 10 at device 17.0 on pci0 So try to use PIO4 mode for your discs and see if your data is ok. --- Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Adding a FormFeed to an LPR printcap file?
Hi, I believe that :sh is called suppress header and that it suppresses the banner page. Form feed is a control character. hex 0c. In the past I have added it to the bottom of my text or PCL documents or added it in the printer interface script on UNIX systems that use the lpsystem print subsystem. I'm not sure if it would go in the :if or :of in the printcap or even how to add it (why I didn't respond earlier) I haven't worked on the BSD spooler since FreeBSD 3.3 so I'm a little rusty. You might look at the printer, I've seen on some where you can add a timeout to eject the last page and if you are doing job based or page based printing, you can set the value low. If you are doing line based printing, that could cause the printer to eject the paper before you finish printing. good luck, On 5/28/05, Mike Jeays [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 23:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello: Could someone suggest a way to add a form feed to the end of a print document in LPR? I have a printer that doesn't eject the last page when the print job is finished; and I can't seem to find this in the manual. My guess is I need to add it to my printer filter, but its not clear to me what I need to add. I'm running freeBSD 5.3-Release. Thanks in advance. Harold. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think you have to remove the :sh parameter in /etc/printcap ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Man page viewing problems
Lowell Gilbert wrote: J. Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: After searching the mailing list I couldn't find much regarding this issues (or manpages on groff) Well, if you can't show man pages, then you would have a problem with reading the ones about the formatter for the man pages... But the documentation for groff is in info pages anyway; the man pages for it are only a secondary output of the info. Try info groff. I viewed the pages on another machine. %man make.conf Formatting page, please wait.../usr/bin/groff: can't find `DESC' file /usr/bin/groff:fatal error: invalid device `ascii' Failed. /usr/bin/groff: can't find `DESC' file /usr/bin/groff:fatal error: invalid device `ascii' Looks like the fonts files are missing. Do you have the file /usr/share/groff_font/devascii/DESC? Yes the file exists. I copied groff, troff, grotty from another machine replacing my local copies and now manpages work correctly. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Migration Guide
On Saturday 28 May 2005 06:58, the author Robert Slade contributed to the dialogue on Re: Migration Guide: On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 18:52, Vizion wrote: Hi Have I missed something -- I do not see any notes for source upgrade from 5.3 to 5.4 in the Migration guide. There see notes on upgrade 4.x to 5.x. Are the procedures notes to be found elsewhere? Thanks david David, Unless I am missing something, it is just a case of cvsup see the instructions in the handbook. I understand that -- but I was thinking about contents of the Migration guide which does not seem to include notes which the release document states are in the migration guide! david Rob ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- 40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters. English Owner Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus. Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing May bound for Europe via Panama Canal. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Migration Guide
On Saturday 28 May 2005 07:30, the author Giorgos Keramidas contributed to the dialogue on Re: Migration Guide: On 2005-05-27 10:52, Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Have I missed something -- I do not see any notes for source upgrade from 5.3 to 5.4 in the Migration guide. There see notes on upgrade 4.x to 5.x. The usual update procedure, described in the Handbook and /usr/src/UPDATING works fine for 5.3 - 5.4, so there is no need for a special Migration Guide. I think that may be arguable but if true the release notes needs to be updated to reflect that position by removing all reference to the presence of updating notes in the migration guide for upgrade from 5.x to 5.4 and replace it with a handbook page reference. David -- 40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters. English Owner Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus. Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing May bound for Europe via Panama Canal. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Top Posting (was: [Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC])
hay enough of this BS about top posting. You have to wake up to the fact there are many people who belong to this list who are not UNIX bigots. No top posting has been the rule for the list for a long time - since the beginning as far as I know.The rule has nothing to do with UNIX. It is completely about being able to have a reasonable exchange of information. The list postings are conversational if they have more than one response and they often have many. Several people created cute little demonstrations of what it is like to read upside down conversations. It tends to discourage those with real knowledge, but too much real work to do to waste their time and energy deciphering non-sequential conversations, to contribute their useful information. Us win/outlook people have just as much right to post as the rest of you. And more to the point who the hell pointed this new comer of just 10 days (vizion) as the cop to be forcing his slanted views on the rest of us. To vizion aren't you suppose to be sailing your boat right now bound for Europe via Panama Canal. Only thing you have contributed is more background noise. This list was better with out you. so concentrate on your sailing before you get lost and need government help to save you from perishing at seas. As I say, no top posting was not his idea. He has just learned it from those with more experience on this list. Hope you will catch up eventually. Get with it! jerry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Vizion Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 3:17 PM Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Top Posting (was: [Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC]) On Friday 27 May 2005 12:09, the author Dmitry Mityugov contributed to the dialogue on Re: Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC: On 5/27/05, Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 27 May 2005 11:18, the author Dmitry Mityugov contributed to the dialogue on Re: Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC: On 5/27/05, Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: thread this to post top not do Please :-):-) (I have moved your input to bottom!) - it is easier to This is not a newsgroup. Yes, please. this is a mail list -- not a private communication This is not a file in which the latest letter gets pinned to the top!!! Please do not bring habits from the paper world to the electronic world! Please don't ask me to invent my own habits my friend. Most of them have been inspired by other people, and for good reasons. Netiquette is consideration for others It is always good to Google for an item before referring someone else to it. I dont agree with that -- otherwise I would google everything I wrote!! think of how easy it is to read - See how people can, with bottom posting, see the sequence of events .. and therefore understand what you say. If you come to a mail list, like this, and want help then those who might be otherwise be willing to help might be discouraged and ignore you. Forcing people to read your stuff out of sequence is really quite rude. . , Think about long paragraphs Think about reading the output from mail list threads and then responding to it.. Top posting is really inconsiderate and shows lack of experience I don't agree with this. Please, don't ask me why. Dont need to know -- but I appreciate your relevant interjection :-) Think about the effect of long paragraphs and then having to move backwards and forwards and you read one paragraph downwards and then are foprced to move upwards to read the subsequent posting Tha means scanning and rescanning. Top posting is neither sensible or practicable for the reader. I learnt from those who showed me when I started using email well before the internet began. Take care N/P. I read what Greg just posted here... If this is indeed how you live - well, I'll follow that. I dont know what Greg posted Take care David -- 40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters. English Owner Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus. Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing May bound for Europe via Panama Canal. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Top Posting (was: [Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC])
On Saturday 28 May 2005 06:42, the author [EMAIL PROTECTED] contributed to the dialogue on RE: Top Posting (was: [Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC]): -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Vizion Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 3:17 PM Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Top Posting (was: [Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC]) On Friday 27 May 2005 12:09, the author Dmitry Mityugov contributed to the dialogue on Re: Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC: On 5/27/05, Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 27 May 2005 11:18, the author Dmitry Mityugov contributed to the dialogue on Re: Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC: On 5/27/05, Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: thread this to post top not do Please :-):-) (I have moved your input to bottom!) - it is easier to This is not a newsgroup. Yes, please. this is a mail list -- not a private communication This is not a file in which the latest letter gets pinned to the top!!! Please do not bring habits from the paper world to the electronic world! Please don't ask me to invent my own habits my friend. Most of them have been inspired by other people, and for good reasons. Netiquette is consideration for others It is always good to Google for an item before referring someone else to it. I dont agree with that -- otherwise I would google everything I wrote!! think of how easy it is to read - See how people can, with bottom posting, see the sequence of events .. and therefore understand what you say. If you come to a mail list, like this, and want help then those who might be otherwise be willing to help might be discouraged and ignore you. Forcing people to read your stuff out of sequence is really quite rude. . , Think about long paragraphs Think about reading the output from mail list threads and then responding to it.. Top posting is really inconsiderate and shows lack of experience I don't agree with this. Please, don't ask me why. Dont need to know -- but I appreciate your relevant interjection :-) Think about the effect of long paragraphs and then having to move backwards and forwards and you read one paragraph downwards and then are foprced to move upwards to read the subsequent posting Tha means scanning and rescanning. Top posting is neither sensible or practicable for the reader. I learnt from those who showed me when I started using email well before the internet began. Take care N/P. I read what Greg just posted here... If this is indeed how you live - well, I'll follow that. I dont know what Greg posted Take care David hay enough of this BS about top posting. You have to wake up to the fact there are many people who belong to this list who are not UNIX bigots. Us win/outlook people have just as much right to post as the rest of you. And more to the point who the hell pointed this new comer of just 10 days (vizion) as the cop to be forcing his slanted views on the rest of us. To vizion aren't you suppose to be sailing your boat right now bound for Europe via Panama Canal. Only thing you have contributed is more background noise. This list was better with out you. so concentrate on your sailing before you get lost and need government help to save you from perishing at seas. If you really believe that top posting is better then this list gives you your democratic opportunity to convince me and everyone else who reads your posting. I am sad if you feel personally attacked by the suggestion that top posting is more thoughtful way of making a contribution to a discussion than bottom posting. If you hold a contrary view then please give us all the benefit of your advice. I am sad you seem to feel the need to make personal attacks on someone who hold an alternative view in the belief that that will advance your cause or intimidate debate. Unfortunately there is there is nothing i can do to convince you that such an aggresive approach may be as counter-productive on this list as it has been elsewhere. In the long term I believe you could realize that the act of top posting has the same effect whether we post from any type of computer system - (I use win XP/2000/98, apple, Linux or Freebsd) so do not believe you need to be influenced by the fact you are using Microsoft Outlook as your mailer. I believe, in a technical mailing list, the theme of concern for the reader is the central issue and that theme remains the same whatever mailer or OS you happen to use. I would like to persuade you to concentrate on that issue and not be be sidetracked by discussing my connection to the sea, which is as irrelevant to the discussion as your connection to Ohio. I want to hear what you have to say to support your point of view. I would suggest that how easy it is for readers to follow, and contribute, to the thread is what need to consider. I therefore believe that my use of unix, zenix, cpm and Dos before Dos
Re: Top Posting (was: [Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC])
someone wrote: Think about the effect of long paragraphs and then having to move backwards and forwards and you read one paragraph downwards and then are foprced to move upwards to read the subsequent posting Tha means scanning and rescanning. Top posting is neither sensible or practicable for the reader. I learnt from those who showed me when I started using email well before the internet began. Take care Utter BS. You don't have to move back and forth to the top and to the bottom. A lot of us follow a thread and don't like to have to read the whole thread each time an update is made. There are times when top posting is MORE APPROPRIATE and times when top post is LESS APPROPRIATE. Top posting is not evil and often is EASIER to read. And often not. But long drawn on threads are often read easier with top posting so that those of us who remember what happened earlier in the thread can get to the meat of it and we can just scroll down as much as necessary to catch up. If everyone top posted in a thread it is easy to read that way. Email user since before 1984. Chad ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Migration Guide
On 2005-05-28 08:58, Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 28 May 2005 07:30, the author Giorgos Keramidas contributed to the dialogue on Re: Migration Guide: On 2005-05-27 10:52, Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Have I missed something -- I do not see any notes for source upgrade from 5.3 to 5.4 in the Migration guide. There see notes on upgrade 4.x to 5.x. The usual update procedure, described in the Handbook and /usr/src/UPDATING works fine for 5.3 - 5.4, so there is no need for a special Migration Guide. I think that may be arguable but if true the release notes needs to be updated to reflect that position by removing all reference to the presence of updating notes in the migration guide for upgrade from 5.x to 5.4 and replace it with a handbook page reference. Certainly. It's too late to fix the release notes of 5.4, but if you note such places please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] :-) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Migration Guide
To [EMAIL PROTECTED] This thread from freebsd-question refers to release notes and is passed to you on recomendation of Giorgos Keramidas who contributed to the dialogue on Re: Migration Guide: On 2005-05-28 08:58, Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 28 May 2005 07:30, the author Giorgos Keramidas contributed to the dialogue on Re: Migration Guide: On 2005-05-27 10:52, Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Have I missed something -- I do not see any notes for source upgrade from 5.3 to 5.4 in the Migration guide. There see notes on upgrade 4.x to 5.x. The usual update procedure, described in the Handbook and /usr/src/UPDATING works fine for 5.3 - 5.4, so there is no need for a special Migration Guide. I think that may be arguable but if true the release notes needs to be updated to reflect that position by removing all reference to the presence of updating notes in the migration guide for upgrade from 5.x to 5.4 and replace it with a handbook page reference. Certainly. It's too late to fix the release notes of 5.4, but if you note such places please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] :-) -- 40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters. English Owner Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus. Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing May bound for Europe via Panama Canal. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
APC BX800-CN UPS or something similar
I'm considering purchasing an APC BX800-CN UPS for my home file server. What I don't understand, is what happens when the power comes back on? Does the UPS somehow turn the computer back on? Also, there are a number of deamons that could be run for APC UPS's but which one is most popular? Eugene ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: need help
Hi, i have a FreeBsd 4.11 i used it as a firewall and a gateway. it was working properly as for 2 months. now seems theres a problem.. i can ping any from outside. but the users cant browse even ping a yahoo.com you guys have any idea wahts gonna be a problem. i did ipfw add allow ip from any to any. but still no luck What messages does ping generate? Can't this be a DNS problem? I mean, can your users ping yahoo.com by it's IP address? Dmitry ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Top Posting (was: [Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC])
On Saturday 28 May 2005 09:28, the author Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC contributed to the dialogue on Re: Top Posting (was: [Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC]): someone wrote: Think about the effect of long paragraphs and then having to move backwards and forwards and you read one paragraph downwards and then are foprced to move upwards to read the subsequent posting Tha means scanning and rescanning. Top posting is neither sensible or practicable for the reader. I learnt from those who showed me when I started using email well before the internet began. Take care Utter BS. expletives are funny -- for those of use with a sense of humor :-) You don't have to move back and forth to the top and to the bottom. You need to move to the bottom before you post to remove unnecessary bottom material in any case. It is easy to forget to clean up when you top post - so why not move there and then post in the knowledge that you are thereby following the rules. You have to move back and forth if there are a series of postings and the first posting is at the bottom and the last at the top. You move down to read the post and then up past what you have read through the previous post and then down through that one etc.. I understand that people need to feel that their contribution is important. For this reason I wonder,if for some people, the idea of bottom posting does not appeal because it puts their words after those contributed by others. A lot of us follow a thread and don't like to have to read the whole thread each time an update is made. You dont have to read -- you just go to the end (sometimes you are surprised by postings you may have missed because you assumed you had read the whole thread and find out you had missed something- (I find top posters often fall into that trap) -- clean up and then post. My reaction is there is truth in what you say for those who remember previous postings however for the majority who have not (including those who take the postings as a daily archive for corporate reference) that is not true. That is why the rule on all FreeBSD lists is against top posting -- and always has been (as it is for most mail lists) Do you not think that in the immediacy of the dialogue it is easy to forget that the greatest value of our current contributions is the value they have as an archive? . There are times when top posting is MORE APPROPRIATE and times when top post is LESS APPROPRIATE. I hear you -- you do not need to shout grinz the question is more appropriate for whom? The reader or the writer?? For the to and fro of personal correspondence I think I might be tempted to agree with you. But to make an assumption that everyone is following the posting well I think that is one assumption too many. Top posting is not evil I would concur -- but as my argument does not depend upon evilness it is not to my mind a relevant point :-) and often is EASIER to read. Your notion depends upon the mental model you have created for yourself to represent the mailing list world. Why should you make such an assumption if your model does not take into account the reality that the communication is going to thousands of people most of whom will not read what is said for days? How can you make such an assumption if your model of readership does not take into account the fact that the majority of readers will not have any recollection of previous contributions? But long drawn on threads are often read easier with top posting so that those of us who remember what happened earlier in the thread can get to the meat of it and we can just scroll down as much as necessary to catch up. If everyone top posted in a thread it is easy to read that way. Are you not contradicting yourself here.. Email user since before 1984. Well me to -- well before then and before tcp/ip-- Oh the days of uucp - when you had to know the route take care david -- 40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters. English Owner Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus. Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing May bound for Europe via Panama Canal. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with HT support in 5.4
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 09:45:52AM -0400, Louis LeBlanc wrote: On 05/27/05 09:28 PM, Mike Tancsa sat at the `puter and typed: On Fri, 27 May 2005 09:30:46 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions you wrote: Oh, wait, it is probably just the last HT security patch, ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-05:09.htt.asc. hmm... So basically, SMP can be enabled, but it won't use HT even if it sees a capable processor? Unless you use the ULE scheduler (which is broken and buggy on RELENG_5) there is no benefit to using HT. In fact, it will make some things worse. Are you sure about that? I'm using the BSD scheduler on 5.3 (upgrading to 5.4 later today), with HT enabled, and I don't have problems. In fact, I can do a make buildworld AND play neverwinter nights at the same time without seeing any problems. He means that some workloads will be slower with HT than without. It's very much workload-specific though, so you have to test and see how it performs for you. Kris pgpWdqZsv14js.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: linking with linux shared library
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 03:10:13PM -0700, Simeon Nifos wrote: Hallo everybody, 1:) Suppose I have a Linux Library library.so. And I want to link it with my main.c compiled in FreeBSD. How can I achieve that? You can't. You may not need to though. What are you really trying to achieve? :) Kris pgpTtHzNGdKwS.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: help with: ports over unionfs on a jail
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 02:48:30AM +, Luciano Musacchio wrote: hey, i have the ports dir mounted over unionfs on a jail (/usr/ports /usr/jail/usr/ports unionfs rw 0 0) and when i do a make install for some port within a jail it says: make: No such file or directory i have no idea of whats going on :/, i'll appreciate some help Could be a unionfs bug (see the manpage). Kris pgpNJUim6Nl77.pgp Description: PGP signature
silk
Hi Has anyone any experience with any native XML query engines on freebsd (are there any) or as an alternative using a front end, like silk, to a relational database such as mysql? Does anyone know if there is a silk (or silk-like) port to freebsd.? Thanks david -- 40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters. English Owner Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus. Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing May bound for Europe via Panama Canal. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ath0: unable to attach hardware; HAL status 13
Hi, I checked out http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/hardware-i386.html#WLAN and saw that NetGear WG311T was supported by Atheros driver (ath). I went out to the store and got my self a NetGear WG311T PCI Card. I put it in my box that runs FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p15 #4. I Recompiled the kernel with: device ath device ath_hal device wlan Unfortunately it did not work. I got this error message from dmesg: ath0: Atheros 5212 mem 0xfeae-0xfeae irq 11 at device 13.0 on pci2 ath0: [GIANT-LOCKED] ath0: unable to attach hardware; HAL status 13 device_attach: ath0 attach return 6 ifconfig do not show anything... what do I need to do to get the card to work? It says it should work on the FreeBSD's homepage, so I assume it should work. thanks. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Migration Guide
If memory serves me right, Vizion wrote: To [EMAIL PROTECTED] This thread from freebsd-question refers to release notes and is passed to you on recomendation of Giorgos Keramidas who contributed to the dialogue on Re: Migration Guide: As Giorgos said, the release notes of 5.4 are frozen and no changes can be made to them. The release notes for 5-STABLE and 6-CURRENT have no references to the Migration Guide. There used to be some boiler-plate references to src/UPDATING but they were probably removed during those releases where the Migration Guide existed. Some suitably motivated doc committer could update them if necessary and bring them back. Note that the Migration Guide was intended to address concerns of users upgrading from 4.X to 5.X. This is implied in its abstract and is specifically stated in the introduction. Bruce. On 2005-05-28 08:58, Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 28 May 2005 07:30, the author Giorgos Keramidas contributed to the dialogue on Re: Migration Guide: On 2005-05-27 10:52, Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Have I missed something -- I do not see any notes for source upgrade from 5.3 to 5.4 in the Migration guide. There see notes on upgrade 4.x to 5.x. The usual update procedure, described in the Handbook and /usr/src/UPDATING works fine for 5.3 - 5.4, so there is no need for a special Migration Guide. I think that may be arguable but if true the release notes needs to be updated to reflect that position by removing all reference to the presence of updating notes in the migration guide for upgrade from 5.x to 5.4 and replace it with a handbook page reference. Certainly. It's too late to fix the release notes of 5.4, but if you note such places please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] :-) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
root not getting system email
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Can someone please help me with this. I read where it's safer to have an admin read root's mail than for the root user himself. So, I did the /etc/aliases newaliases thing, I tried the aliase in /etc/mail did a make there a make restart, tried a .forward file in roots home directory, tried the virtusertable local-host-names mailertable in /etc/mail, so far nothing but trouble. Here's the type of messages I'm getting when the system fails to relay roots mail: May 28 15:02:07 dualman sm-mta[2278]: j4SK270A002278: Losing ./qfj4SK270A002278: savemail panic May 28 15:02:06 dualman sm-mta[2277]: j4SK250A002277: SYSERR(root): rewrite: excessive recursion (max 50), ruleset canonify May 28 15:02:07 dualman sm-mta[2278]: j4SK270A002278: SYSERR(root): savemail: cannot save rejected email anywhere It also says the local user cannot be found, which I think is my screwup for whatever way I entered the user in aliases and virtusertable. Would it be wiser just to undo everything, and just try using the .forward file for root? Trying to get everything on here working right so I can teach myself how to do a cvsup learn to rebuild merge everything, but this is for sure holding me back. Thanks for any help I can get. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCmN6Ey0Ty5RZE55oRAn8dAKCWXOlhvwT7UGGxsKg7rKWZPiVsvwCbBqjo cFvRUcyfj5cCVXQ9GJfHY0A= =qqf0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Where's the grammar: hostname nor servname provided, or not known
Hello! Can someone please change this in the source: hostname nor servname provided, or not known To for instance: Unknown location. It appears for instance when I: ([EMAIL PROTECTED])(23:05:05/28/05) (%:~) ssh fafef ssh: fafef: hostname nor servname provided, or not known ([EMAIL PROTECTED])(23:11:05/28/05) (%:~) telnet kask kask: hostname nor servname provided, or not known Thanks! -- Fafa Hafiz Krantz Research Designer @ http://www.home.no/barbershop Enlightened @ http://www.home.no/barbershop/smart/sharon.pdf -- ___ Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: APC BX800-CN UPS or something similar
Eugene Hercun wrote: I'm considering purchasing an APC BX800-CN UPS for my home file server. What I don't understand, is what happens when the power comes back on? Does the UPS somehow turn the computer back on? Depends on your BIOS. Look for a setting something like automatic power restore that will detect when line power comes back and will restart the system. Otherwise, nothing. Also, there are a number of deamons that could be run for APC UPS's but which one is most popular? /usr/ports/sysutils/nut but with an APC you can always check out /usr/ports/sysutils/apcupsd, which is simpler to configure but less powerful (go figure). If that model ups only uses usb to talk to the computer you may want to do some checking on the hardware compatibility listing under the release you're using (www.freebsd.org). Last time I looked (admittedly ~2003) it wasn't supported nearly as well as the serial cabled ones. G ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: root not getting system email
Denny White wrote: Can someone please help me with this. I read where it's safer to have an admin read root's mail than for the root user himself. So, I did the /etc/aliases newaliases thing, I tried the aliase in /etc/mail did a make there a make restart, tried a .forward file in roots home directory, tried the virtusertable local-host-names mailertable in /etc/mail, so far nothing but trouble. Here's the type of messages I'm getting when the system fails to relay roots mail: May 28 15:02:07 dualman sm-mta[2278]: j4SK270A002278: Losing ./qfj4SK270A002278: savemail panic May 28 15:02:06 dualman sm-mta[2277]: j4SK250A002277: SYSERR(root): rewrite: excessive recursion (max 50), ruleset canonify May 28 15:02:07 dualman sm-mta[2278]: j4SK270A002278: SYSERR(root): savemail: cannot save rejected email anywhere It also says the local user cannot be found, which I think is my screwup for whatever way I entered the user in aliases and virtusertable. Would it be wiser just to undo everything, and just try using the .forward file for root? Trying to get everything on here working right so I can teach myself how to do a cvsup learn to rebuild merge everything, but this is for sure holding me back. Thanks for any help I can get. It's obvious your sendmail config is messed up. The easiest fix would be to undo EXACTLY what you changed from the default install until you can learn enough about sendmail to know the full implications of your alterations. All you should need to do to get system mail delivered to any other user is add email address (or valid user account name) to the root entry of /etc/mail/aliases, then run `newaliases`. As long as DNS is working properly you should be fine. If you can't get back to a fresh install, start by giving us some more information: /etc/mail/aliases and your *.mc file would be nice for starters. G ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD 5.3/5.4 - pxeboot hosting on em0 Intel 82540EM
Netboot and Installing FreeBSD over em0 GigE link I am having an issue with pxeboot/BTX loader mounting/contacting a TFTP server or NFS server that is hosted on machine with an Intel GigE em0 ethernet card. pxeboot comes over (via 82540EM bios), loader comes over, but the load says it can figure out what the root disk is. So the loader cannot find /boot/defaults/loader.conf, that is were it stops. Any ideas ? Anyone use the if_em on FreeBSD to perform netboots/ netinstalls ? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:6:0: class=0x02 card=0x002e8086 chip=0x100e8086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82540EM Gigabit Ethernet Controller' class= network subclass = ethernet Two near identical machines using this card in a cross-over (as the private link). I have a third machine that I have networked booted with the same kernel and loader/pxeboot binaries, and mfsboot, but both machines in that configuration are using fxp cards. ( BTW - the pxeboot documentation needs some correction for the 5.4 release. Will post my notes later. ) - David P. Discher * http://davidpdischer.com/ * C: x [EMAIL PROTECTED] *AIM: DavidDPD* H: x - ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debugging Threaded Applications
Are there any working tools available for debugging a threaded application in 5.3/5.4? Ktrace works fine but doesn't identify the threads so its almost impossible to figure out whats going on in a complex threaded application. Strace doesn't show threads either. Pstack causes all sorts of problems with the running application - usually creating multiple copies of it none of which work anymore. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Where's the grammar: hostname nor servname provided, or not known
On 2005-05-28 16:13, Fafa Hafiz Krantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello! Can someone please change this in the source: hostname nor servname provided, or not known To for instance: Unknown location. Hi, I've notified Hajimu UMEMOTO, who has been working around this area. Thanks :) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Where's the grammar: hostname nor servname provided, or not known
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 04:13:52PM -0500, Fafa Hafiz Krantz wrote: Hello! Can someone please change this in the source: hostname nor servname provided, or not known That's a bit archaic, but perfectly correct. See the most recent edition of Fowler's. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD
I'm trying to add a 120 GiB Seagate Barracuda (ST3120022A) HD. I've attached it as the sole device on IDE cable 2, jumpering it as a slave device. It is correctly detected by the BIOS as the Secondary Slave. The drive isn't detected by FreeBSD. There's no entry for it among the dmesg messages, and no device node gets created. I've tried disabling UDMA on the drive, to no avail. System info: Epox Nforce2 motherboard FreeBSD obygden 5.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Wed May 11 17:32:06 CEST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DEB i386 Parts of dmesg output: atapci0: nVidia nForce2 UDMA133 controller port 0xf000-0xf00f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 9.0 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 ... ad0: 38166MB ST340014A/8.01 [77545/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a End of dmesg output Ulf ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD
On Saturday 28 May 2005 16:48, the author Ulf Magnusson contributed to the dialogue on Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD: I'm trying to add a 120 GiB Seagate Barracuda (ST3120022A) HD. I've attached it as the sole device on IDE cable 2, jumpering it as a slave device. It is correctly detected by the BIOS as the Secondary Slave. The drive isn't detected by FreeBSD. There's no entry for it among the dmesg messages, and no device node gets created. I've tried disabling UDMA on the drive, to no avail. System info: Epox Nforce2 motherboard FreeBSD obygden 5.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Wed May 11 17:32:06 CEST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DEB i386 Parts of dmesg output: atapci0: nVidia nForce2 UDMA133 controller port 0xf000-0xf00f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 9.0 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 ... ad0: 38166MB ST340014A/8.01 [77545/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a End of dmesg output Can you please attach the full output from dmesg daid -- 40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters. English Owner Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus. Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing May bound for Europe via Panama Canal. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dynamic Hosting Recommendation
My cable company wants $25. a month just for a static IP address. Personally, I think that is ridiculous. I have been looking for a solution. One I found was TZO, http://www.tzo.com . I was wondering if anyone had any experience with them? If someone can recommend another service, I would be glad to look into it. Thanks. -- Gerard Seibert [EMAIL PROTECTED] The most important question when any new computer architecture is introduced is So what? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dynamic Hosting Recommendation
On Saturday 28 May 2005 17:33, the author Gerard Seibert contributed to the dialogue on Dynamic Hosting Recommendation: My cable company wants $25. a month just for a static IP address. Personally, I think that is ridiculous. I have been looking for a solution. One I found was TZO, http://www.tzo.com . I was wondering if anyone had any experience with them? If someone can recommend another service, I would be glad to look into it. Thanks. Depends what you want it for. If you want to run a web site and do not intend to generate transactions then a fake permanent (sometimes called masquerading) IP could work dor you -- but this means your IP address is a moving one and any business with a modicum of security will know the moment they check you out. You cannot successfully use masquerading to establish a successful business web site. But it might be great for home use. Personally I would shop around and look for a better deal .. I mean an extra charge of $25 a month is, I agree, ridiculous. You could probably get a hosting deal for that kind of money!!! My two pennorth david -- 40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters. English Owner Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus. Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing May bound for Europe via Panama Canal. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Adding a FormFeed to an LPR printcap file?
On Fri, 27 May 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could someone suggest a way to add a form feed to the end of a print document in LPR? I have a printer that doesn't eject the last page when the print job is finished; and I can't seem to find this in the manual. My guess is I need to add it to my printer filter, but its not clear to me what I need to add. What printer filter do you have now? -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dynamic Hosting Recommendation
On Saturday 28 May 2005 17:42, the author Vizion contributed to the dialogue on Re: Dynamic Hosting Recommendation: On Saturday 28 May 2005 17:33, the author Gerard Seibert contributed to the dialogue on Dynamic Hosting Recommendation: My cable company wants $25. a month just for a static IP address. Personally, I think that is ridiculous. I have been looking for a solution. One I found was TZO, http://www.tzo.com . I was wondering if anyone had any experience with them? If someone can recommend another service, I would be glad to look into it. Thanks. Depends what you want it for. If you want to run a web site and do not intend to generate transactions then a fake permanent (sometimes called masquerading) IP could work dor you -- but this means your IP address is a moving one and any business with a modicum of security will know the moment they check you out. You cannot successfully use masquerading to establish a successful business web site. But it might be great for home use. Personally I would shop around and look for a better deal .. I mean an extra charge of $25 a month is, I agree, ridiculous. You could probably get a hosting deal for that kind of money!!! My two pennorth PS I forgot to mention that mean ISPs will probably filter your packets and soon know you are masquerading -- it is easy to do and then you will be more vulnerable to being cut off.. so you might want to think carefully before you go down that route. If it is just for fun OK - but if you want to be a serious player than I would forget about masquerading - you might not want to give people the mistaken impression that you are cheapskating.. David -- 40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters. English Owner Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus. Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing May bound for Europe via Panama Canal. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD
From: Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Saturday 28 May 2005 16:48, the author Ulf Magnusson contributed to the dialogue on Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD: I'm trying to add a 120 GiB Seagate Barracuda (ST3120022A) HD. I've attached it as the sole device on IDE cable 2, jumpering it as a slavedevice. It is correctly detected by the BIOS as the Secondary Slave. The drive isn't detected by FreeBSD. There's no entry for it among thedmesg messages, and no device node gets created. I've tried disablingUDMA on the drive, to no avail. System info: Epox Nforce2 motherboard FreeBSD obygden 5.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Wed May 11 17:32:06CEST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DEB i386 Parts of dmesg output: atapci0: nVidia nForce2 UDMA133 controller port 0xf000-0xf00f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 9.0 on pci0ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 ... ad0: 38166MB ST340014A/8.01 [77545/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a End of dmesg output Can you please attach the full output from dmesg daid Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Wed May 11 17:32:06 CEST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DEB Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) processor (1403.19-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = AuthenticAMD Id = 0x644 Stepping = 4 Features=0x183fbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CM OV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR AMD Features=0xc044RSVD,AMIE,DSP,3DNow! real memory = 536805376 (511 MB) avail memory = 511438848 (487 MB) mptable_probe: MP Config Table has bad signature: ACPI APIC Table: Nvidia AWRDACPI ioapic0 Version 1.1 irqs 0-23 on motherboard npx0: math processor on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: Nvidia AWRDACPI on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter ACPI-fast frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: 24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz port 0x4008-0x400b on acpi0 cpu0: ACPI CPU on acpi0 acpi_button0: Power Button on acpi0 pcib0: ACPI Host-PCI bridge port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: ACPI PCI bus on pcib0 agp0: NVIDIA nForce2 AGP Controller mem 0xe000-0xe1ff at device 0.0 on pci0 pci0: memory, RAM at device 0.1 (no driver attached) pci0: memory, RAM at device 0.2 (no driver attached) pci0: memory, RAM at device 0.3 (no driver attached) pci0: memory, RAM at device 0.4 (no driver attached) pci0: memory, RAM at device 0.5 (no driver attached) isab0: PCI-ISA bridge at device 1.0 on pci0 isa0: ISA bus on isab0 pci0: serial bus, SMBus at device 1.1 (no driver attached) ohci0: OHCI (generic) USB controller mem 0xe4001000-0xe4001fff irq 22 at devic e 2.0 on pci0 usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: OHCI (generic) USB controller on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: nVidia OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered ohci1: OHCI (generic) USB controller mem 0xe4004000-0xe4004fff irq 21 at devic e 2.1 on pci0 usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb1: OHCI (generic) USB controller on ohci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: nVidia OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered pci0: serial bus, USB at device 2.2 (no driver attached) pcib1: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 8.0 on pci0 pci1: ACPI PCI bus on pcib1 xl0: 3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL port 0xd000-0xd07f mem 0xe300-0xe300 007f irq 16 at device 8.0 on pci1 miibus0: MII bus on xl0 xlphy0: 3c905C 10/100 internal PHY on miibus0 xlphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto xl0: Ethernet address: 00:04:76:1c:4b:d1 pcm0: Creative EMU10K1 port 0xd400-0xd41f irq 18 at device 10.0 on pci1 pcm0: SigmaTel STAC9708/11 AC97 Codec atapci0: nVidia nForce2 UDMA133 controller port 0xf000-0xf00f,0x376,0x170-0x17 7,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 9.0 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 pci0: serial bus, FireWire at device 13.0 (no driver attached) pcib2: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 30.0 on pci0 pci2: ACPI PCI bus on pcib2 nvidia0: GeForce3 mem 0xdc00-0xdc07,0xd800-0xdbff,0xd000-0 xd0ff irq 19 at device 0.0 on pci2 acpi_tz0: Thermal Zone on acpi0 fdc0: floppy drive controller port 0x3f7,0x3f0-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fd0: 1440-KB 3.5 drive on fdc0 drive 0 sio0: 16550A-compatible COM port port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio1: 16550A-compatible COM port port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 sio1: type 16550A ppc0: Standard parallel printer port port 0x778-0x77b,0x378-0x37f irq 7 on acp i0 ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode ppbus0: Parallel port bus on ppc0 lpt0: Printer on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port atkbdc0: Keyboard controller (i8042) port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0:
Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD
On Saturday 28 May 2005 18:08, the author Ulf Magnusson contributed to the dialogue on Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD: From: Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Saturday 28 May 2005 16:48, the author Ulf Magnusson contributed to the dialogue on Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD: I'm trying to add a 120 GiB Seagate Barracuda (ST3120022A) HD. I've attached it as the sole device on IDE cable 2, jumpering it as a slavedevice. It is correctly detected by the BIOS as the Secondary Slave. The drive isn't detected by FreeBSD. There's no entry for it among thedmesg messages, and no device node gets created. I've tried disablingUDMA on the drive, to no avail. System info: Epox Nforce2 motherboard FreeBSD obygden 5.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Wed May 11 17:32:06CEST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DEB i386 Parts of dmesg output: atapci0: nVidia nForce2 UDMA133 controller port 0xf000-0xf00f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 9.0 on pci0ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 ... ad0: 38166MB ST340014A/8.01 [77545/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a End of dmesg output Can you please attach the full output from dmesg daid Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Wed May 11 17:32:06 CEST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DEB Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) processor (1403.19-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = AuthenticAMD Id = 0x644 Stepping = 4 Features=0x183fbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA, CM OV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR AMD Features=0xc044RSVD,AMIE,DSP,3DNow! real memory = 536805376 (511 MB) avail memory = 511438848 (487 MB) mptable_probe: MP Config Table has bad signature: ACPI APIC Table: Nvidia AWRDACPI ioapic0 Version 1.1 irqs 0-23 on motherboard npx0: math processor on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: Nvidia AWRDACPI on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter ACPI-fast frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: 24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz port 0x4008-0x400b on acpi0 cpu0: ACPI CPU on acpi0 acpi_button0: Power Button on acpi0 pcib0: ACPI Host-PCI bridge port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: ACPI PCI bus on pcib0 agp0: NVIDIA nForce2 AGP Controller mem 0xe000-0xe1ff at device 0.0 on pci0 pci0: memory, RAM at device 0.1 (no driver attached) pci0: memory, RAM at device 0.2 (no driver attached) pci0: memory, RAM at device 0.3 (no driver attached) pci0: memory, RAM at device 0.4 (no driver attached) pci0: memory, RAM at device 0.5 (no driver attached) isab0: PCI-ISA bridge at device 1.0 on pci0 isa0: ISA bus on isab0 pci0: serial bus, SMBus at device 1.1 (no driver attached) ohci0: OHCI (generic) USB controller mem 0xe4001000-0xe4001fff irq 22 at devic e 2.0 on pci0 usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: OHCI (generic) USB controller on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: nVidia OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered ohci1: OHCI (generic) USB controller mem 0xe4004000-0xe4004fff irq 21 at devic e 2.1 on pci0 usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb1: OHCI (generic) USB controller on ohci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: nVidia OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered pci0: serial bus, USB at device 2.2 (no driver attached) pcib1: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 8.0 on pci0 pci1: ACPI PCI bus on pcib1 xl0: 3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL port 0xd000-0xd07f mem 0xe300-0xe300 007f irq 16 at device 8.0 on pci1 miibus0: MII bus on xl0 xlphy0: 3c905C 10/100 internal PHY on miibus0 xlphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto xl0: Ethernet address: 00:04:76:1c:4b:d1 pcm0: Creative EMU10K1 port 0xd400-0xd41f irq 18 at device 10.0 on pci1 pcm0: SigmaTel STAC9708/11 AC97 Codec atapci0: nVidia nForce2 UDMA133 controller port 0xf000-0xf00f,0x376,0x170-0x17 7,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 9.0 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 pci0: serial bus, FireWire at device 13.0 (no driver attached) pcib2: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 30.0 on pci0 pci2: ACPI PCI bus on pcib2 nvidia0: GeForce3 mem 0xdc00-0xdc07,0xd800-0xdbff,0xd000-0 xd0ff irq 19 at device 0.0 on pci2 acpi_tz0: Thermal Zone on acpi0 fdc0: floppy drive controller port 0x3f7,0x3f0-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fd0: 1440-KB 3.5 drive on fdc0 drive 0 sio0: 16550A-compatible COM port port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio1: 16550A-compatible COM port port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 sio1: type 16550A ppc0: Standard parallel printer port port 0x778-0x77b,0x378-0x37f irq 7 on acp i0 ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode ppbus0: Parallel port bus on ppc0 lpt0:
Re: Where's the grammar: hostname nor servname provided, or not known
On Sat, 28 May 2005, Bob Hall wrote: On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 04:13:52PM -0500, Fafa Hafiz Krantz wrote: Can someone please change this in the source: hostname nor servname provided, or not known That's a bit archaic, but perfectly correct. See the most recent edition of Fowler's. Not to mention that it's a little bit more informative than Fafa's proposed Unknown location. -- Chris Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** [ Busy Expunging | ] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD
- Original Message - From: Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sunday, May 29, 2005 3:11 am Subject: Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD On Saturday 28 May 2005 18:08, the author Ulf Magnusson contributed to the dialogue on Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD: From: Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Saturday 28 May 2005 16:48, the author Ulf Magnusson contributed to the dialogue on Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD: I'm trying to add a 120 GiB Seagate Barracuda (ST3120022A) HD. I've attached it as the sole device on IDE cable 2, jumpering it as a slavedevice. It is correctly detected by the BIOS as the Secondary Slave. The drive isn't detected by FreeBSD. There's no entry for it among thedmesg messages, and no device node gets created. I've tried disablingUDMA on the drive, to no avail. System info: Epox Nforce2 motherboard FreeBSD obygden 5.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Wed May 11 17:32:06CEST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DEB i386 Parts of dmesg output: atapci0: nVidia nForce2 UDMA133 controller port 0xf000-0xf00f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 9.0 on pci0ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 ... ad0: 38166MB ST340014A/8.01 [77545/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a End of dmesg output Can you please attach the full output from dmesg daid Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Wed May 11 17:32:06 CEST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DEB Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) processor (1403.19-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = AuthenticAMD Id = 0x644 Stepping = 4 Features=0x183fbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA, CM OV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR AMD Features=0xc044RSVD,AMIE,DSP,3DNow! real memory = 536805376 (511 MB) avail memory = 511438848 (487 MB) mptable_probe: MP Config Table has bad signature: ACPI APIC Table: Nvidia AWRDACPI ioapic0 Version 1.1 irqs 0-23 on motherboard npx0: math processor on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: Nvidia AWRDACPI on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter ACPI-fast frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: 24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz port 0x4008-0x400b on acpi0cpu0: ACPI CPU on acpi0 acpi_button0: Power Button on acpi0 pcib0: ACPI Host-PCI bridge port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: ACPI PCI bus on pcib0 agp0: NVIDIA nForce2 AGP Controller mem 0xe000-0xe1ff at device 0.0 on pci0 pci0: memory, RAM at device 0.1 (no driver attached) pci0: memory, RAM at device 0.2 (no driver attached) pci0: memory, RAM at device 0.3 (no driver attached) pci0: memory, RAM at device 0.4 (no driver attached) pci0: memory, RAM at device 0.5 (no driver attached) isab0: PCI-ISA bridge at device 1.0 on pci0 isa0: ISA bus on isab0 pci0: serial bus, SMBus at device 1.1 (no driver attached) ohci0: OHCI (generic) USB controller mem 0xe4001000-0xe4001fff irq 22 at devic e 2.0 on pci0 usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: OHCI (generic) USB controller on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: nVidia OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered ohci1: OHCI (generic) USB controller mem 0xe4004000-0xe4004fff irq 21 at devic e 2.1 on pci0 usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb1: OHCI (generic) USB controller on ohci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: nVidia OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered pci0: serial bus, USB at device 2.2 (no driver attached) pcib1: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 8.0 on pci0 pci1: ACPI PCI bus on pcib1 xl0: 3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL port 0xd000-0xd07f mem 0xe300-0xe300 007f irq 16 at device 8.0 on pci1 miibus0: MII bus on xl0 xlphy0: 3c905C 10/100 internal PHY on miibus0 xlphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto xl0: Ethernet address: 00:04:76:1c:4b:d1 pcm0: Creative EMU10K1 port 0xd400-0xd41f irq 18 at device 10.0 on pci1 pcm0: SigmaTel STAC9708/11 AC97 Codec atapci0: nVidia nForce2 UDMA133 controller port 0xf000-0xf00f,0x376,0x170-0x17 7,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 9.0 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 pci0: serial bus, FireWire at device 13.0 (no driver attached) pcib2: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 30.0 on pci0 pci2: ACPI PCI bus on pcib2 nvidia0: GeForce3 mem 0xdc00-0xdc07,0xd800-0xdbff,0xd000-0 xd0ff irq 19 at device 0.0 on pci2 acpi_tz0: Thermal Zone on acpi0 fdc0: floppy drive controller port 0x3f7,0x3f0-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fd0: 1440-KB 3.5 drive on fdc0 drive 0 sio0: 16550A-compatible COM port port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on
Re: Dynamic Hosting Recommendation
My cable company wants $25. a month just for a static IP address. Personally, I think that is ridiculous. I have been looking for a solution. One I found was TZO, http://www.tzo.com . I was wondering if anyone had any experience with them? If someone can recommend another service, I would be glad to look into it. Thanks. -- Gerard Seibert [EMAIL PROTECTED] The most important question when any new computer architecture is introduced is So what? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] dynds.org Andras Kende http://www.kende.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5.4 NFS install broken?
How does one create the NFS installation directory for FreeBSD-5.4 ? I.e. is it supposed to be as simple as dumping the entire contents of CD#1 CD#2 into a directory on an NFS server, and pointing 'sysinstall' to it? I've been doing 4.x 5.x NFS installs successfully with an NFS server's repositories setup in that manner, but with FreeBSD-5.4 , 'sysinstall' prompted for the next disc, and I had no apparent way of selecting a different media or different source. I'm thinking I must not be getting (parts of?) CD#2 into the right place, and/or need to update a table-of-contents file, or something equally simple. If there's a different/better way (e.g. not using CDs at all) to build a FreeBSD-5.4 repository suitable for NFS installation purposes, advice on that would also be welcome. The Handbook chapter on installations is pretty good, but it sort of glosses over the details in the Advanced Installation (2.13.6.1) section, and I suspect it might not be quite as simple for 5.4 . Thanks, sr. -- || Steve Rikli ||| My group's mission statement - || || Systems Administrator||| You want *what*? By *WHEN*?|| || ||| - Simon Burr, || || [EMAIL PROTECTED] ||| in alt.sysadmin.recovery || ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dynamic Hosting Recommendation
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 08:33:29PM -0400, Gerard Seibert wrote: My cable company wants $25. a month just for a static IP address. Personally, I think that is ridiculous. I have been looking for a solution. One I found was TZO, http://www.tzo.com . I was wondering if anyone had any experience with them? If someone can recommend another service, I would be glad to look into it. I've been very satisfied with http://zoneedit.com for several years now. -- Kelly D. Grills [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpKUTUj20hWw.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD
On Saturday 28 May 2005 06:31 pm, Ulf Magnusson wrote: - Original Message - From: Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sunday, May 29, 2005 3:11 am Subject: Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD On Saturday 28 May 2005 18:08, the author Ulf Magnusson contributed to the dialogue on Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD: From: Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Saturday 28 May 2005 16:48, the author Ulf Magnusson contributed to the dialogue on Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD: I'm trying to add a 120 GiB Seagate Barracuda (ST3120022A) HD. I've attached it as the sole device on IDE cable 2, jumpering it as a slavedevice. It is correctly detected by the BIOS as the Secondary Slave. FreeBSD has been known to have problems recognizing slave only drives. Change it to a master and see what happens. Kent The drive isn't detected by FreeBSD. There's no entry for it among thedmesg messages, and no device node gets created. I've tried disablingUDMA on the drive, to no avail. System info: Epox Nforce2 motherboard FreeBSD obygden 5.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Wed May 11 17:32:06CEST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DEB i386 Parts of dmesg output: atapci0: nVidia nForce2 UDMA133 controller port 0xf000-0xf00f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 9.0 on pci0ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 ... ad0: 38166MB ST340014A/8.01 [77545/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a End of dmesg output Can you please attach the full output from dmesg daid Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Wed May 11 17:32:06 CEST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DEB Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) processor (1403.19-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = AuthenticAMD Id = 0x644 Stepping = 4 Features=0x183fbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR, PGE,MCA, CM OV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR AMD Features=0xc044RSVD,AMIE,DSP,3DNow! real memory = 536805376 (511 MB) avail memory = 511438848 (487 MB) mptable_probe: MP Config Table has bad signature: ACPI APIC Table: Nvidia AWRDACPI ioapic0 Version 1.1 irqs 0-23 on motherboard npx0: math processor on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: Nvidia AWRDACPI on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter ACPI-fast frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: 24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz port 0x4008-0x400b on acpi0cpu0: ACPI CPU on acpi0 acpi_button0: Power Button on acpi0 pcib0: ACPI Host-PCI bridge port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: ACPI PCI bus on pcib0 agp0: NVIDIA nForce2 AGP Controller mem 0xe000-0xe1ff at device 0.0 on pci0 pci0: memory, RAM at device 0.1 (no driver attached) pci0: memory, RAM at device 0.2 (no driver attached) pci0: memory, RAM at device 0.3 (no driver attached) pci0: memory, RAM at device 0.4 (no driver attached) pci0: memory, RAM at device 0.5 (no driver attached) isab0: PCI-ISA bridge at device 1.0 on pci0 isa0: ISA bus on isab0 pci0: serial bus, SMBus at device 1.1 (no driver attached) ohci0: OHCI (generic) USB controller mem 0xe4001000-0xe4001fff irq 22 at devic e 2.0 on pci0 usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: OHCI (generic) USB controller on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: nVidia OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered ohci1: OHCI (generic) USB controller mem 0xe4004000-0xe4004fff irq 21 at devic e 2.1 on pci0 usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb1: OHCI (generic) USB controller on ohci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: nVidia OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered pci0: serial bus, USB at device 2.2 (no driver attached) pcib1: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 8.0 on pci0 pci1: ACPI PCI bus on pcib1 xl0: 3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL port 0xd000-0xd07f mem 0xe300-0xe300 007f irq 16 at device 8.0 on pci1 miibus0: MII bus on xl0 xlphy0: 3c905C 10/100 internal PHY on miibus0 xlphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto xl0: Ethernet address: 00:04:76:1c:4b:d1 pcm0: Creative EMU10K1 port 0xd400-0xd41f irq 18 at device 10.0 on pci1 pcm0: SigmaTel STAC9708/11 AC97 Codec atapci0: nVidia nForce2 UDMA133 controller port 0xf000-0xf00f,0x376,0x170-0x17 7,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 9.0 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 pci0: serial bus, FireWire at device 13.0 (no driver attached) pcib2: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 30.0 on pci0 pci2: ACPI PCI bus on pcib2 nvidia0:
Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD
On May 28, 2005, at 7:31 PM, Ulf Magnusson wrote (quote Dave): OK your drive is recognized as at1 Here is the page from the handbook on www.freebsd.org - if you follow the instructions you should be OK: --- 16.3 Adding Disks Originally contributed by David O'Brien. Lets say we want to add a new SCSI disk to a machine that currently ... Excuse me if I'm being slow, but exactly where did you glean that information? I don't have any at1 node in /dev, at1 isn't mentioned anywhere in the boot messages, and Fdisk still acts like it only knows of one drive. He is wrong. It appears he misread the second ATA bus ata1 as a drive. Chad ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 5.4 NFS install broken?
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 06:40:05PM -0700, Steve Rikli wrote: How does one create the NFS installation directory for FreeBSD-5.4 ? I.e. is it supposed to be as simple as dumping the entire contents of CD#1 CD#2 into a directory on an NFS server, and pointing 'sysinstall' to it? I've been doing 4.x 5.x NFS installs successfully with an NFS server's repositories setup in that manner, but with FreeBSD-5.4 , 'sysinstall' prompted for the next disc, and I had no apparent way of selecting a different media or different source. I'm thinking I must not be getting (parts of?) CD#2 into the right place, and/or need to update a table-of-contents file, or something equally simple. There were some changes to the installer before 5.4-RELEASE, and it's possible that none of the users tested this during the pre-release period :( Talk to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kris pgpTsU5XgWiK8.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD
On Saturday 28 May 2005 21:09, the author Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC contributed to the dialogue on Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD: On May 28, 2005, at 7:31 PM, Ulf Magnusson wrote (quote Dave): OK your drive is recognized as at1 Here is the page from the handbook on www.freebsd.org - if you follow the instructions you should be OK: --- 16.3 Adding Disks Originally contributed by David O'Brien. Lets say we want to add a new SCSI disk to a machine that currently ... Excuse me if I'm being slow, but exactly where did you glean that information? I don't have any at1 node in /dev, at1 isn't mentioned anywhere in the boot messages, and Fdisk still acts like it only knows of one drive. He is wrong. I agree It appears he misread the second ATA bus ata1 as a drive. true Change that drive to master on the second bus as Kent suggested and then follow the instructions in the handbook David -- 40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters. English Owner Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus. Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing May bound for Europe via Panama Canal. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: HP LC II Netserver ACPI problem
1. Can't use ACPI on here. Machine not capable, apparently. Hence, the following: In my BIOS, I can enable and disable ACPI. (IBM PC 300GL). Could it be just that ACPI is disable in BIOS? 2. Have apic enabled in kernel no problems that I know of Watch out ACPI and apic are two different things. Your problem is with ACPI, when I boot without ACPI (option 2 in 5.4-RELEASE, I get the same error messages. Couldn't these messages be simply ignored? --Paul ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
