Re: Using kqueue with 2 threads
Hello,
Am 10.04.2012 21:52, schrieb Ben Short:
EV_SET(ke, fd, EVFILT_VNODE, EV_ADD, NOTE_DELETE | NOTE_RENAME |
NOTE_EXTEND, 0, NULL);
if (kevent(kq,ke, 1, NULL, 0, NULL) == -1) {
std::cerr kevent produced error: strerror(errno)
std::endl;
}[/CODE]
Did i understand right, that after registering and firing one event the
kevent() function doesn't block any more?
If so, register the events with EV_ADD | EV_CLEAR. With this flag, the
event state is cleared and kevent() is still blocking(man kqueue).
That flag was solving my problem...
Matthias
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
SV: pf firewall and ftp
To solve the ftp pre 4.7 part, you can start reading here http://home.nuug.no/~peter/pf/en/long-firewall.html#FTPPROBLEM /Hasse -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] På vegne af Fbsd8 Sendt: den 16 april 2012 04:31 Til: FreeBSD Questions; FreeBSD Current; FreeBSD doc Emne: Re: pf firewall and ftp Fbsd8 wrote: Running 9.0 as a gateway host with pf firewall enabled. FTP is launched by inetd. Both active and passive ftp works from lan pc's to the host ftp. The lan ftp session can be initiated from the host or any lan pc and things work because there are no rules on the lan interface except single pass all rule. But I can not do host initiated or lan initiated ftp sessions to the public internet. Get operation not permitted message. Tried to setup ftp-proxy per openbsd pf manual without any joy. Looking for working rule set with nat and ftp services to study and learn from. OK I have uncovered what the problem is. The pf version running on Freebsd 9.0 matches the version running on openbsd 4.5. Found it on man pf at the end. The documentation on the Openbsd website for pf is for Openbsd 5.0 and it has warning saying NOTE: This information is for OpenBSD 4.7. NAT configuration was significantly different in earlier versions. http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ has more info about how back dated the 9.0 Freebsd production version of pf is. The Freebsd handbook had a detailed section on pf including rules examples matching the version of pf included with 9.0 But someone allowed it to be removed in the current version of the handbook. So here we are with an outdated version of pf in the current production 9.0 version of Freebsd and there is no documentation available on nat rule syntax in the handbook or at openbsd/pf. Going to dig through the 9.0 pf man pages for the info ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
blu ray recorders
today BD recordable disks have prices that make sense as well as recorders. but as i never had one i want to ask - how it is used under FreeBSD. Does growisofs work just like with DVD-R or other tools are needed? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
ia64 vs amd64
Hi I have Corei3 540 What is the best fit to this processor: ia64 or amd64? and what one from those is more stable? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: SV: pf firewall and ftp
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:39:38AM +0200, Hasse Hansson wrote: To solve the ftp pre 4.7 part, you can start reading here http://home.nuug.no/~peter/pf/en/long-firewall.html#FTPPROBLEM /Hasse -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] På vegne af Fbsd8 Sendt: den 16 april 2012 04:31 Til: FreeBSD Questions; FreeBSD Current; FreeBSD doc Emne: Re: pf firewall and ftp Fbsd8 wrote: Running 9.0 as a gateway host with pf firewall enabled. FTP is launched by inetd. Both active and passive ftp works from lan pc's to the host ftp. The lan ftp session can be initiated from the host or any lan pc and things work because there are no rules on the lan interface except single pass all rule. But I can not do host initiated or lan initiated ftp sessions to the public internet. Get operation not permitted message. Tried to setup ftp-proxy per openbsd pf manual without any joy. Looking for working rule set with nat and ftp services to study and learn from. OK I have uncovered what the problem is. The pf version running on Freebsd 9.0 matches the version running on openbsd 4.5. Found it on man pf at the end. The documentation on the Openbsd website for pf is for Openbsd 5.0 and it has warning saying NOTE: This information is for OpenBSD 4.7. NAT configuration was significantly different in earlier versions. http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ has more info about how back dated the 9.0 Freebsd production version of pf is. The Freebsd handbook had a detailed section on pf including rules examples matching the version of pf included with 9.0 But someone allowed it to be removed in the current version of the handbook. So here we are with an outdated version of pf in the current production 9.0 version of Freebsd and there is no documentation available on nat rule syntax in the handbook or at openbsd/pf. The version of PF in FreeBSD is corresponds to the one in OpenBSD 4.5. There are old versions of the OpenBSD PF FAQ on mirrors: http://ftp2.eu.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/doc/history/pf-faq45.pdf http://ftp2.eu.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/doc/history/pf-faq45.txt Going to dig through the 9.0 pf man pages for the info The rules should also be documented in the man pages. -- Denny Lin ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ia64 vs amd64
ia64 is for the Intel Itanium chips, and not compatible with standard Intel architecture. amd64 is what you want to use. It's what you need for a standard x86 architecture chip that's 64bit. On 4/16/2012 9:08 AM, Eugen Konkov wrote: Hi I have Corei3 540 What is the best fit to this processor: ia64 or amd64? and what one from those is more stable? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Brad Mettee PC HotShots, Inc. Westminster, MD (410) 848-0588 - Let us bring out the **Power** of your PCs. - - Custom Business Software Solutions since 1991 - Visit us http://www.pchotshots.com for information about our company. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ia64 vs amd64
Hi, On Monday 16 April 2012 20:08:13 Eugen Konkov wrote: I have Corei3 540 only the amd64 will run on that CPU. If you have less than 4GB of RAM you could also run the i386 version. What is the best fit to this processor: ia64 or amd64? and what one from those is more stable? I do not think that people will pay the price tag a ia64 machine just for a bit of more fun. The reasons for running ia64 are very different ones. Erich ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
newfs create to little inodes
Does newfs always must create sufficient count of inodes? or I must supply some addition options when creating FS? #df -ih Filesystem size used avail capacity iused ifree %iused mounted on /dev/ad0s1a 4.9G 2.1G 2.4G 47% 331k0 100% /mnt/disk1 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: newfs create to little inodes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 4/16/12 10:01 AM, Eugen Konkov wrote: Does newfs always must create sufficient count of inodes? or I must supply some addition options when creating FS? #df -ih Filesystem size used avail capacity iused ifree %iused mounted on /dev/ad0s1a 4.9G 2.1G 2.4G 47% 331k0 100% /mnt/disk1 Hello Eugen, Yes, please check the -i option of newfs: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=newfs Hope that helps, Greg - -- Greg Larkin http://www.FreeBSD.org/ - The Power To Serve http://www.sourcehosting.net/ - Ready. Set. Code. http://twitter.com/cpucycle/ - Follow you, follow me -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+MLKsACgkQ0sRouByUApDePACeOwLbPFzGnsKeslOoyMOHwE/6 BX0AmwVYPFq5BX8Pnpm0vOS18g/5hI6T =hL8L -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re[2]: newfs create to little inodes
Здравствуйте, Greg. Вы писали 16 апреля 2012 г., 17:28:59: GL -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- GL Hash: SHA1 GL On 4/16/12 10:01 AM, Eugen Konkov wrote: Does newfs always must create sufficient count of inodes? or I must supply some addition options when creating FS? #df -ih Filesystem size used avail capacity iused ifree %iused mounted on /dev/ad0s1a 4.9G 2.1G 2.4G 47% 331k0 100% /mnt/disk1 GL Hello Eugen, GL Yes, please check the -i option of newfs: GL http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=newfs GL Hope that helps, GL Greg unhappy defaults for disks about ~5G capacity because of this default create only 350k inodes installig system and extract ports eats about 95% of inodes =( but about 50% disk space are free yet -- С уважением, Eugen mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: newfs create to little inodes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 4/16/12 11:07 AM, Eugen Konkov wrote: Здравствуйте, Greg. Вы писали 16 апреля 2012 г., 17:28:59: GL -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- GL Hash: SHA1 GL On 4/16/12 10:01 AM, Eugen Konkov wrote: Does newfs always must create sufficient count of inodes? or I must supply some addition options when creating FS? #df -ih Filesystem size used avail capacity iused ifree %iused mounted on /dev/ad0s1a 4.9G 2.1G 2.4G 47% 331k 0 100% /mnt/disk1 GL Hello Eugen, GL Yes, please check the -i option of newfs: GL http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=newfs GL Hope that helps, GL Greg unhappy defaults for disks about ~5G capacity because of this default create only 350k inodes installig system and extract ports eats about 95% of inodes =( but about 50% disk space are free yet Yes, please try increasing the number of inodes when you create the filesystem. The -i option is used to do that if you are not happy with the default picked by newfs. Regards, Greg - -- Greg Larkin http://www.FreeBSD.org/ - The Power To Serve http://www.sourcehosting.net/ - Ready. Set. Code. http://twitter.com/cpucycle/ - Follow you, follow me -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+MPSIACgkQ0sRouByUApDNQQCgp9PuMZMfeg/7lxbdWUcnUfUP kasAoIQEbx7FjV7Xw8eV1BcJ1cvWPpX6 =0DLy -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: newfs create to little inodes
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Mon Apr 16 09:03:45 2012 Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 17:01:57 +0300 From: Eugen Konkov kes-...@yandex.ru To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: newfs create to little inodes Does newfs always must create sufficient count of inodes? This begs the question of 'what is a sufficient count of inodes? It is well-known that the required 'inode densidy' depends on the usage of the filesystem. Newfs uses defaults that are 'reasonable' for 'typical' use, and are rarely insuficient. *IF*, however, you know you will be creating lots of 'tiny' files on a particular filesystem, it is a GOOD IDEAT(tm) to use non-default settings. or I must supply some addition options when creating FS? Read the fine manpage applies. along with 'know your useage'. #df -ih Filesystem size used avail capacity iused ifree %iused mounted on /dev/ad0s1a 4.9G 2.1G 2.4G 47% 331k0 100% /mnt/disk1 Yup. RTFM is -definitely- indicated. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re[2]: newfs create to little inodes
Здравствуйте, Greg. Вы писали 16 апреля 2012 г., 18:39:14: GL -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- GL Hash: SHA1 GL On 4/16/12 11:07 AM, Eugen Konkov wrote: Здравствуйте, Greg. Вы писали 16 апреля 2012 г., 17:28:59: GL -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- GL Hash: SHA1 GL On 4/16/12 10:01 AM, Eugen Konkov wrote: Does newfs always must create sufficient count of inodes? or I must supply some addition options when creating FS? #df -ih Filesystem size used avail capacity iused ifree %iused mounted on /dev/ad0s1a 4.9G 2.1G 2.4G 47% 331k 0 100% /mnt/disk1 GL Hello Eugen, GL Yes, please check the -i option of newfs: GL http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=newfs GL Hope that helps, GL Greg unhappy defaults for disks about ~5G capacity because of this default create only 350k inodes installig system and extract ports eats about 95% of inodes =( but about 50% disk space are free yet GL Yes, please try increasing the number of inodes when you create the GL filesystem. The -i option is used to do that if you are not happy GL with the default picked by newfs. I use newfs -U -i 1024 /dev/ad0s1a I think I got enogh inodes But maybe post the PR: use -i 1024 as default for disks ~5G when doing newfs? -- С уважением, Eugen mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Re[2]: newfs create to little inodes
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:07:30 +0300 From: Eugen Konkov kes-...@yandex.ru Subject: Re[2]: newfs create to little inodes GL On 4/16/12 10:01 AM, Eugen Konkov wrote: Does newfs always must create sufficient count of inodes? or I must supply some addition options when creating FS? #df -ih Filesystem size used avail capacity iused ifree %iused mounted on /dev/ad0s1a 4.9G 2.1G 2.4G 47% 331k0 100% /mnt/disk1 GL Hello Eugen, GL Yes, please check the -i option of newfs: GL http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=newfs GL Hope that helps, GL Greg unhappy defaults for disks about ~5G capacity because of this default create only 350k inodes installig system and extract ports eats about 95% of inodes =( but about 50% disk space are free yet You may want to look at what kind of a filesystem you are using. With a 'standard' Berkeley 'FFS' I get 540+k inodes on a 4 gig partiton, with a standard 'newfs'. I get a virtually identical 'density' on a 7+gig partition (941k inodes). You show roughly -half- that inode density, which implies different filesystem characteristics, or a newfs-equvalent with non-default parameters. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re[2]: newfs create to little inodes
Does newfs always must create sufficient count of inodes? RB This begs the question of 'what is a sufficient count of inodes? RB It is well-known that the required 'inode densidy' depends on the usage RB of the filesystem. RB Newfs uses defaults that are 'reasonable' for 'typical' use, and are RB rarely insuficient. 'typical' use: install system and install ports fetch sources and buildworld this cause me insuficient inodes Filesystem size used avail capacity iused ifree %iused mounted on /dev/ad0s1a 4.9G 2.1G 2.4G 47% 331k0 100% /mnt/disk1 I know 'man' and can read that. I only ask to use different values for disks with size ~5G. this change will make life easier for newbies. I only question: 'Is this change will make life easier for others'? I do not ask, why I can not do something, or help me or else. RB *IF*, however, you know you will be creating lots of 'tiny' files on a RB particular filesystem, it is a GOOD IDEAT(tm) to use non-default settings. or I must supply some addition options when creating FS? RB Read the fine manpage applies. along with 'know your useage'. #df -ih Filesystem size used avail capacity iused ifree %iused mounted on /dev/ad0s1a 4.9G 2.1G 2.4G 47% 331k0 100% /mnt/disk1 RB Yup. RTFM is -definitely- indicated. -- С уважением, Eugen mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: pf firewall and ftp
There's also web available manuals for probably every release of OpenBSD here: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=pf.confmanpath=OpenBSD+4.5 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Re[2]: newfs create to little inodes
From kes-...@yandex.ru Mon Apr 16 11:33:26 2012
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 19:32:44 +0300
From: Eugen Konkov kes-...@yandex.ru
To: Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re[2]: newfs create to little inodes
Does newfs always must create sufficient count of inodes?
RB This begs the question of 'what is a sufficient count of inodes?
RB It is well-known that the required 'inode densidy' depends on the usage
RB of the filesystem.
RB Newfs uses defaults that are 'reasonable' for 'typical' use, and are
RB rarely insuficient.
'typical' use: install system and install ports
fetch sources and buildworld
this cause me insuficient inodes
Something about -your- installation is causing you to run out of inodes.
A 'normal' FFS newfs with all default values would have roughly twice the
number of inodes you show. And, assumig similar size files, would
let the disk fill to over 94% capacity before runnig out of inodes.
Filesystem size used avail capacity iused ifree %iused mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a 4.9G 2.1G 2.4G 47% 331k0 100% /mnt/disk1
I know 'man' and can read that.
but apparently _didn't_, since it discusses the calculation for default
inode counts, and effective average file size.
Those figures do -not- match what you claim is the situation on your
machine.
It would be wise to determine _why_ your system is 'non-standard' in
that respect, before requesting a change in 'standard' behavior.
I only ask to use different values for
disks with size ~5G. this change will make life easier for newbies.
You need to figure out why YOU have only half the 'normaal' number of
inodes on -your- filesystem.
I only question: 'Is this change will make life easier for others'?
I do not ask, why I can not do something, or help me or else.
Quote: or must I supply somme additional options when creating FS?' unquote.
That sure looks like a 'help me' request.
RB *IF*, however, you know you will be creating lots of 'tiny' files on a
RB particular filesystem, it is a GOOD IDEAT(tm) to use non-default settings.
or I must
supply some addition options when creating FS?
RB Read the fine manpage applies. along with 'know your useage'.
#df -ih
Filesystem size used avail capacity iused ifree %iused mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a 4.9G 2.1G 2.4G 47% 331k0 100% /mnt/disk1
RB Yup. RTFM is -definitely- indicated.
--
N oaa{c-cedilia}aeieaei,
Eugen mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ia64 vs amd64
ia64 is for itanium. amd64 is for 64-bit X86 ISA, name is because AMD was first to introduce it with opteron family. On Mon, 16 Apr 2012, Eugen Konkov wrote: Hi I have Corei3 540 What is the best fit to this processor: ia64 or amd64? and what one from those is more stable? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: newfs create to little inodes
Does newfs always must create sufficient count of inodes? or I must supply some addition options when creating FS? yes man newfs (-i option) #df -ih Filesystem size used avail capacity iused ifree %iused mounted on /dev/ad0s1a 4.9G 2.1G 2.4G 47% 331k0 100% /mnt/disk1 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: newfs create to little inodes
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote: Does newfs always must create sufficient count of inodes? or I must supply some addition options when creating FS? yes man newfs (-i option) There are many use cases for a filesystem - if you have mostly very large files, the defaults in newfs reserve too many inodes per X number of blocks - if you have mostly small files, there will be too few. It takes experience and a little luck to create filesystem in which free blocks and free inodes get consumed proportionally. Start by reading the man page and grok deeply. - M ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Re[2]: newfs create to little inodes
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com wrote: Something about -your- installation is causing you to run out of inodes. This is a release engineering issue in 9.0, not just his installation. The defaults are screwed up. See bin/162659. -- Rob Farmer ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Re[2]: newfs create to little inodes
Rob Farmer wrote: On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com wrote: Something about -your- installation is causing you to run out of inodes. This is a release engineering issue in 9.0, not just his installation. The defaults are screwed up. See bin/162659. Yes - I experienced this early on with first attempts at looking over 9.0 in a Virtualbox VM. I don't remember if it was 5 or 6GB size of the initial 'everything in one filesystem (/)' install which triggered it, but when I increased it to 8GB, and/or larger, the error the OP describes went away. -Mike ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Problems using usb wireless adapter
--
Message: 4
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 23:44:11 +0900
From: fake fake four.troublesome.he...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Problems using usb wireless adapter
To: Erich Dollansky erichfreebsdl...@ovitrap.com
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID:
CA+rxiGD2dggApC=NPK13LqcS-nsiM-d=yy9a6jkfektamex...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
then I configed the several files.
(I use WEP to connect to the internet.)
If you are using WEP, can you try this patch (missing ic_cipher at line 2037)?
2037c2037
if (k-wk_cipher == IEEE80211_CIPHER_WEP) {
---
if (k-wk_cipher-ic_cipher == IEEE80211_CIPHER_WEP) {
AK
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
