Re: Good idea or Bad idea?
-fomit-frame-pointer IS EVIL. Do not use it. portupgrade won't build
with it, cause ruby hates -fomit-frame-pointer. I would just do a
fresh binary install. 6.0 is quite an amazing release... The speed
is remarkable. My machine goes way faster than it did before.
I am using the following CFLAGS successfully with xorg and XFCE4:
CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe -ffast-math
CPUTYPE=p4
I can't speak to building FreeBSD from source. I build all my ports
from source, but didn't bother building the world from source...
On 11/9/05, Mike Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all!
I'm running FreeBSD 5.4 now, and of course I'm thinking about my upgrade
to 6.0. What I'm wondering is if it's a Good Idea or a Bad Idea (tm) to
build everything from source. I have experience building linux from scratch
(linuxfromscratch.org) and I have learned that sometimes it's just a better
idea to use binary packages (i.e. building everything from source can be
a waste of time if there is no performance gain, and it's easy to screw up.)
I have no trouble following docs, so I'm not really worried about blowing
everything up in the process (even though I might haha...) I'm just wondering
if there are any real (noticeable) performance increases if I build my kernel
and base system from source. Of course either way my ports will be compiled.
Any feedback is appreciated - especially in regards to {C,XX}FLAGS and even
more appreciated in the case of DO NOT USE -br34k-all when compiling __ ;)
I've had my share of oops I guess didn't like -fomit-frame-pointer in
the past with linux ;)
Thanks!
Mike
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
xfce4-desktop
I think xfce4-desktop port is broken. I updated my ports tree earlier tonight and did a portupgrade tonight and it broke. It worked earlier today... It appears some xfce4 ports have gone to 4.3.2.1 and some have not: [EMAIL PROTECTED] pkg_info | grep xfce gtk-xfce-engine-2.2.8 An XFCE engine for GTK 2.0 libxfce4gui-4.2.3 XFce 4 widget library required by xfce4 and xfwm4 libxfce4mcs-4.2.3 XFce 4 settings management library used by most XFce 4 modu libxfce4util-4.2.3.1 XFce 4 library with non-graphical helper functions xfce-4.2.3.1The meta-port for the XFce 4 desktop environment xfce4-appfinder-4.2.3 Find application in the system supporting Desktop entry for xfce4-desktop-4.2.3 XFce 4 desktop background manager and root menu xfce4-fm-4.2.3 XFce 4 file manager xfce4-icon-theme-4.2.3 Icon themes for XFce 4 xfce4-iconbox-4.2.3 XFce 4 icon box, an alternative taskbar xfce4-mcs-manager-4.2.3 XFce 4 settings manager xfce4-mcs-plugins-4.2.3 XFce 4 settings manager plugins xfce4-mixer-4.2.3 XFce 4 volume mixer module for xfce4-panel xfce4-panel-4.2.3 XFce 4 panel module xfce4-print-4.2.3 XFce 4 graphical frontend for printing xfce4-session-4.2.3 Session manager for the Xfce 4 desktop environment xfce4-systray-4.2.3 XFce 4 system tray module for xfce4-panel xfce4-toys-4.2.3Toys for the XFce 4 panel xfce4-trigger-launcher-4.2.3 A command trigger plugin for xfce4-panel xfce4-utils-4.2.3 XFce 4 essential utilities and scripts xfce4-wm-4.2.3.1XFce 4 window manager Anyone got any ideas? xfce still works, just no desktop background, and no right clicking on the desktop. And of course the X11 standard screen of grey squares where the desktop picture used to be. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Getting Listed
On your site you seem to categorize FreeBSD under Linux. FreeBSD is not Linux! On 11/4/05, Ryan Cloke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How can I get listed as a FreeBSD Publisher? My Information is: TheLinuxStore.ca Shanty Bay, ON L0L2L0 Canada Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|| WWW: http://www.thelinuxstore.ca/ -- Ryan Cloke [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.thelinuxstore.ca MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 251920249 Get Firefox! http://spreadfirefox.com/community/?q=affiliatesid=136833t=81 Get Thunderbird! http://spreadfirefox.com/community/?q=affiliatesid=136833t=179 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re[2]: Real IP under NAT
Chuck, pf can do this: Bidirectional Mapping (1:1 mapping) A bidirectional mapping can be established by using the binat rule. A binat rule establishes a one to one mapping between an internal IP address and an external address. This can be useful, for example, to provide a web server on the internal network with its own external IP address. Connections from the Internet to the external address will be translated to the internal address and connections from the web server (such as DNS requests) will be translated to the external address. TCP and UDP ports are never modified with binat rules as they are with nat rules. Example: web_serv_int = 192.168.1.100 web_serv_ext = 24.5.0.6 binat on tl0 from $web_serv_int to any - $web_serv_ext http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/nat.html Blake On 7/18/05, DerAlSem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Chuck, Monday, July 18, 2005, 7:16:38 PM, you wrote: DerAlSem wrote: [ ... ] I've 5 external (real) IP, one is assigned on external if. Also there are 20 internal computers with 192.168.0.* ip's (NAT+IPFW). I need to assign one of that computer an external ip. Somebody told me, that it can be done with ARP-proxy, but i couldn't find any info on that. 10x in advance. See man natd: -redirect_address localIP publicIP Redirect traffic for public IP address to a machine on the local network. This function is known as static NAT. Nor- mally static NAT is useful if your ISP has allocated a small block of IP addresses to you, but it can even be used in the case of single address: redirect_address 10.0.0.8 0.0.0.0 The above command would redirect all incoming traffic to machine 10.0.0.8. No, that won't work, because i need an external IP on LAN machine. Ext IP adresses - 1.2.3.1-1.2.3.5 Gate ext_if - 1.2.3.1 Gate int_if - 192.168.0.1 LAN (via NAT) machines - 192.168.0.2-20 Another LAN (via NAT) machine - 1.2.3.2 How? -- Best regards, DerAlSemmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
