Re: ipfw and tun0

2005-07-24 Thread Dirk GOUDERS

 > > Well, I am a little bit confused, because usually, I run machines with
 > > "real" NICs and if I activate firewall rules that drop packets from
 > > that NIC, I can run tcpdump on that NIC and will not see the dropped
 > > packets.
 > 
 > Are you 100% certain of that?

No, I now realize, that I was always inspecting ipfw's log messages
and just assumed that dropped packets do not appear to tcpdump without
ever verifying that assumption.  Thanks for pointing that out.

 > > Does that mean, that there is no way, to inspect the network
 > > traffic from tun0 after it has been "cleaned up" by ipfw and that is
 > > not forwarded to the internal NIC?
 > 
 > You can either add a log rule after your IPFW reject rules, and have the 
 > firewall itself log the traffic which is permitted through, or you could use
 > another divert rule and force that traffic into a daemon which looks at the 
 > packets (this is how natd works, after all).

I guess, I will use ipfw's logging facility.

Thanks again for clarification.

Dirk
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: ipfw and tun0

2005-07-24 Thread Dirk GOUDERS

 > >>> I just started to use an ADSL line with PPPoE and want run a firewall 
 > >>> between it and my local network. What I am wondering about is that even
 > >>> if I only have the default everything-blocking rule (deny ip from any to
 > >>> any) I still see incoming packets on tun0 with tcpdump.
 > 
 > If you are using PPPoE, the system de-encapsulates the IP traffic off of the
 > PPP session via the tun0 interface.  tun0 can be treated as your "external 
 > interface" when writing firewall rules, setting up NAT, etc.

Well, I am a little bit confused, because usually, I run machines with
"real" NICs and if I activate firewall rules that drop packets from
that NIC, I can run tcpdump on that NIC and will not see the dropped
packets.  This is the naive view, I have about this:


NIC device (e.g. xl0)

 -
 packets -> packets ->... packets -> packets ->
 -
   ^^
   ||
  Here, ipfw checks   Here, tcpdump listens
  the packets against and doesn't see dropped
  its rules and probably  packets
  drops packets

In the case of tun0, this order seems to be reverse...

 > Right.  This implies that the firewall rules are working.  If you
 > want to see what the situation looks like to a client machine
 > behind the firewall, either tcpdump on a client machine, or tcpdump
 > on the internal interface of the firewall box...

Does that mean, that there is no way, to inspect the network
traffic from tun0 after it has been "cleaned up" by ipfw and that is
not forwarded to the internal NIC?

Dirk
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: ipfw and tun0

2005-07-22 Thread Dirk GOUDERS

 > >I just started to use an ADSL line with PPPoE and want run a firewall
 > >between it and my local network.  What I am wondering about is that
 > >even if I only have the default everything-blocking rule (deny ip from
 > >any to any) I still see incoming packets on tun0 with tcpdump.
 > >
 > >Is this, because the firewall rules get checked after the packets
 > >leave the tun0 interface?  On what interface should I run tcpdump then
 > >to check if my rules are working as expected?
 > 
 > Just a guess, here  tun0 doesn't exist when the firewall rc
 > script is run, so you may have to explicity state the name
 > of the interface since it wouldn't be listed during device
 > polling at boot time?

Well, it seems as if my firewall rules work as expected -- with just
the default rule, I cannot do anything on the net.

Another example is that I saw several SYN packets directed to
unprivileged ports that got answered with a RST packet by my machine.
When I block those SYN packets, I still see them on tun0 but the RST
responses disappear.  Also, ipfw's counters show that it recognizes
those packets...

Sorry for not mentioning that earlier.

Dirk
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


ipfw and tun0

2005-07-21 Thread Dirk Gouders
Hello,

I just started to use an ADSL line with PPPoE and want run a firewall
between it and my local network.  What I am wondering about is that
even if I only have the default everything-blocking rule (deny ip from
any to any) I still see incoming packets on tun0 with tcpdump.

Is this, because the firewall rules get checked after the packets
leave the tun0 interface?  On what interface should I run tcpdump then
to check if my rules are working as expected?

Dirk
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"