RE: Apache 2.0.50 port is busted
I have it working thanks to the port maintainer... Basically it builds and installs fine. Those error messages are a part of libtool and can be ignored. Now I wonder why that isn't just patched like so many other ports are to eliminate those messages since .la are not used to avoid people asking or posting about that problem. Jeff -Original Message- From: Alexander Liebau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 6:39 PM To: Josh Paetzel Cc: Jeffrey Wheat; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AW: Apache 2.0.50 port is busted but why do some ppl have problems compiling apache on a fresh install? kinda weird isnt it? -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: Josh Paetzel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Samstag, 31. Juli 2004 00:33 An: Alexander Liebau Cc: Jeffrey Wheat; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: Apache 2.0.50 port is busted On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 11:45:55PM +0200, Alexander Liebau wrote: i had the same problem, asked the same questions and noone was able to help :/ -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Jeffrey Wheat Gesendet: Freitag, 30. Juli 2004 23:31 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Apache 2.0.50 port is busted Has anyone else attempted to build the apache-2.0.50 port from cvs'd port tree a couple hours ago? I am trying to build this on a 5.2.1 (i386) box and it looks like the libtool bug is as present as ever: === Compressing manual pages for apache-2.0.50 === Registering installation for apache-2.0.50 Josh Paetzel !DSPAM:410ace3e771204662273925! ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apache 2.0.50 port is busted
Has anyone else attempted to build the apache-2.0.50 port from cvs'd port tree a couple hours ago? I am trying to build this on a 5.2.1 (i386) box and it looks like the libtool bug is as present as ever: grep: /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_dir.la: No such file or directory grep: /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_dir.la: No such file or directory Warning! dlname not found in /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_dir.la. Assuming installing a .so rather than a libtool archive. /usr/ports/www/apache2/work/httpd-2.0.50/srclib/apr/libtool --silent --mode=install cp mod_imap.la /usr/local/libexec/apache2/ grep: /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_imap.la: No such file or directory grep: /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_imap.la: No such file or directory Warning! dlname not found in /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_imap.la. Assuming installing a .so rather than a libtool archive. /usr/ports/www/apache2/work/httpd-2.0.50/srclib/apr/libtool --silent --mode=install cp mod_actions.la /usr/local/libexec/apache2/ grep: /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_actions.la: No such file or directory grep: /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_actions.la: No such file or directory Warning! dlname not found in /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_actions.la. Assuming installing a .so rather than a libtool archive. This happens for every module during the build. This server is a fresh install (today). I tried this yesterday with a fresh install and had the same results. The 2.0.48 port will build and install correctly though. If anyone knows why this is happening, I would appreciate an email as I had to unsubscribe from the lists due to too much other email already. Thanks! Jeffrey ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4.9 kernel panics and crashes
I've got a server that has been rebuilt from the board up that is crashing every few hours with various page faults. This is a FreeBSD 4.9 system with a P4 3.2G HT processor, 2G of DDR, 3ware 6400 controller, 2 Intel Fast100 ethernet cards on an Intel D865PERL motherboard. The server runs Exim 4.30 and clamav-devel out of a current ports cvs update. Here is one the current crashes: May 6 08:15:14 mail /kernel: May 6 08:15:14 mail /kernel: May 6 08:15:14 mail /kernel: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode May 6 08:15:14 mail /kernel: fault virtual address = 0x8018 May 6 08:15:14 mail /kernel: fault code= supervisor read, page not present May 6 08:15:14 mail /kernel: instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc017aab8 May 6 08:15:14 mail /kernel: stack pointer = 0x10:0xe911acc8 May 6 08:15:14 mail /kernel: frame pointer = 0x10:0xe911acd4 May 6 08:15:14 mail /kernel: code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b May 6 08:15:14 mail /kernel: = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 May 6 08:15:14 mail /kernel: processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 May 6 08:15:14 mail /kernel: current process = 7035 (tar) May 6 08:15:14 mail /kernel: interrupt mask= none May 6 08:15:14 mail /kernel: trap number = 12 May 6 08:15:14 mail /kernel: panic: page fault May 6 08:15:14 mail /kernel: May 6 08:15:14 mail /kernel: syncing disks... 128 14 1 May 6 08:15:14 mail /kernel: done May 6 08:15:14 mail /kernel: Uptime: 8m40s May 6 08:15:14 mail /kernel: twe0: failed to delete unit 0 May 6 08:15:14 mail /kernel: Automatic reboot in 15 seconds - press a key on the console to abort If anyone can offer advice, please email me. I am willing to try anything at this point. A side note, acpi has not been built into this kernel per warnings of instability. Many thanks in advance, Jeffrey ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 4.8 on i386
This seems familiar to a problem I had at one point. There is a change on location of the kernel so I had to install new bootstraps to get around this. See `man disklabel` for info on installing the new bootstraps. Hope this helps, Jeff -Original Message- From: Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 4.8 on i386 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Are there issues with trying to install 4.8 on i386 machines? I've tried upgrading from 4.2 on ISO cd to using the FTP site directly, even tried a clean install from the ISO but the istall continues to fall apart while retrieving anything with the Xserver and the binary itself. I just, this AM, used the FTP direct upgrade (thinking my ISO burn was faulty), skipped through the Xserve stuff that failed and allegedly did a successful upgrade. On reboot I get: booting(kernel)... can't load 'kernel' can't load 'kernel.old' no bootable kernel ok I have a Mylex 760 raid card, is this the impediment? The 4.2 is successful without a hitch. I have an AMI 3.0 bios, a Super p6dgs/dbs motherboard. I've downloaded the ISO from different FTP sites and still get the same result from ISO install attempts. Any words for the unwise here? thanks, Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED] I won't call you unwise, but it's a lng way from 4.2 to 4.8. If you've still got a 4.2 world and a 4.2 kernel, I'd try to use cvsup/makebuildworld/../../../mergemaster (etc.) to get to 4.4, then 4.6, then 4.8 or 4.9.. Can you explain the phrase FTP direct upgrade a little more clearly? Do you mean using /stand/sysinstall? You may need to wait until some bigger brains see your question : ( Kevin Kinsey DaleCo, S.P. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free bsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.532 / Virus Database: 326 - Release Date: 10/27/2003 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.532 / Virus Database: 326 - Release Date: 10/27/2003 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IPV6 help needed
Hi all. I am trying to get an ipv6 network setup and I am running into snags. I have 2 server and a cisco router. The servers that get their addresses via nd prefix advertisements from the router. The two servers can ping each other but not the router. I suspect it is something simple as the servers are seeing the router to get their addresses. My network is native ipv6. From the router I can get to the outside world. All help is very much appreciated. TIA, Jeff My configs are as such: router: ! ipv6 unicast-routing ! interface fastethernet0 ipv6 address 2001:530:DEAD::/64 eui-64 ipv6 nd prefix 2001:530:DEAD::/64 servers: rc.conf: ipv6_enable=YES ifconfig -a output: (first server) inet6 fe80::202:b3ff:fe10:ee05%fxp0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet6 2001:530:dead:0:202:b3ff:fe10:ee05 prefixlen 64 autoconf ifconfig -a output: (second server) inet6 fe80::2a0:c9ff:fea2:6ec5%fxp0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet6 2001:530:dead:0:2a0:c9ff:fea2:6ec5 prefixlen 64 autoconf ping results: % ping6 2001:530:dead:0:202:b3ff:fe10:ee05 PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2001:530:dead:0:202:b3ff:fe10:ee05 -- 2001:530:dead:0:202:b3ff:fe10:ee05 16 bytes from 2001:530:dead:0:202:b3ff:fe10:ee05, icmp_seq=0 hlim=64 time=0.079 ms 16 bytes from 2001:530:dead:0:202:b3ff:fe10:ee05, icmp_seq=1 hlim=64 time=0.071 ms 16 bytes from 2001:530:dead:0:202:b3ff:fe10:ee05, icmp_seq=2 hlim=64 time=0.164 ms router trace: rhsc-7206#traceroute ipv6 www4.us.freebsd.org Type escape sequence to abort. Tracing the route to freebsd.n.flirble.org (2001:6F8:0:102::1000:1) 1 2001:530:1:1::9 0 msec 0 msec 0 msec 2 2001:470:1FFF:2::20 84 msec 84 msec 84 msec 3 fe0-0-2-0.gr0.bwnyc.us.easynet.net (2001:458:26:2::580) 452 msec 452 msec 452 msec 4 so0-1-1-0.gr0.hsnyc.us.easynet.net (2001:6F8::18:11:1) 456 msec 456 msec 452 msec 5 fe0-1-0.gr3.hsnyc.us.easynet.net (2001:6F8:0:101::3) 476 msec 456 msec 460 msec 6 freebsd.n.flirble.org (2001:6F8:0:102::1000:1) 456 msec 456 msec 456 msec --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.529 / Virus Database: 324 - Release Date: 10/16/2003 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest stable fixes are unstable
After applying the last set of patches via a cvs run of RELENG_4, I have servers crashing and rebooting that had run for months on end prior to the fixes. This is happening on 4.8-STABLE (now called 4.9-RC) and on 5.0-STABLE servers. I am really concerned about about this as are my higher ups. I have been running FreeBSD on my servers for the past 8 years and I am very familiar with how to build kernels, update source trees, etc. Reverting back to the sources prior to the recent kernel changes, makes things stable again. Can anyone shed light on this or speak up if you are having the same problems? Thanks in advance, Jeff --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.522 / Virus Database: 320 - Release Date: 9/29/2003 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Latest stable fixes are unstable
Kris, Apologies for being so vague... All that happens on the 4.8(4.9RC) servers is they suddenly reboot without leaving anything in the log files at all, so it is very difficult to provide more details on the crash. On the 5.0 servers, I get page faults. I am going to enable crash dumps on these servers now. Jeff -Original Message- From: Kris Kennaway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 4:09 PM To: Jeffrey Wheat Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Latest stable fixes are unstable On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 03:36:55PM -0400, Jeffrey Wheat wrote: After applying the last set of patches via a cvs run of RELENG_4, I have servers crashing and rebooting that had run for months on end prior to the fixes. This is happening on 4.8-STABLE (now called 4.9-RC) and on 5.0-STABLE servers. I am really concerned about about this as are my higher ups. I have been running FreeBSD on my servers for the past 8 years and I am very familiar with how to build kernels, update source trees, etc. Reverting back to the sources prior to the recent kernel changes, makes things stable again. Can anyone shed light on this or speak up if you are having the same problems? Please, don't tell us a single detail about the problems so we can keep neglecting to fix them. Thanks. :-) Kris --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.522 / Virus Database: 320 - Release Date: 9/29/2003 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.522 / Virus Database: 320 - Release Date: 9/29/2003 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
