Realtek 3-port NIC driver not loading

[Jeremy Jongsma]

I have two Realtek cards in my box - one single port 8619, and one
3-port 8619 (Jetway AD3RTLANG).  FreeBSD loads the driver for the single
port, but not the other three.  It does list them all in pciconf with
the same chipset, output below:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:8:0:   class=0x02 card=0x816910ec chip=0x816910ec rev=0x10
hdr=0x00
class= network
subclass = ethernet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:9:0: class=0x02 card=0x10ec16f3 chip=0x816910ec rev=0x10
hdr=0x00
class= network
subclass = ethernet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:11:0:class=0x02 card=0x10ec16f3 chip=0x816910ec
rev=0x10 hdr=0x00
class= network
subclass = ethernet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:12:0:class=0x02 card=0x10ec16f3 chip=0x816910ec
rev=0x10 hdr=0x00
class= network
subclass = ethernet

The strange thing is - when I loaded FreeNAS 0.671 (6.1 based), it works
perfectly.  When I use any other 6.1 or 6.2 installation, it displays
the following messages on boot for the 3-port card:

pci0: network, ethernet at device 9.0 (no driver attached)
pci0: network, ethernet at device 11.0 (no driver attached)
pci0: network, ethernet at device 12.0 (no driver attached)

I'm somewhat new to BSD.  Can someone point me in the right direction?

-- 
Jeremy Jongsma [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Traders Media

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Advice on which FreeBSD firewall package to choose.

[Jeremy Jongsma]

I can't speak to the advantages or disadvantages of each of those
options, but from other lists I get the sense the pf is the best option
out there.  If you want something quick to setup, pfSense and m0n0wall
are prebuilt firewall packages based on FreeBSD that will do exactly
what you're looking for.  pfSense uses pf and ALTQ, m0n0wall uses ipfw
and ipfilter.

http://m0n0.ch/wall/
http://www.pfsense.com/

We use redundant 5-port pfSense boxes for our firewall - works quite
well.

-j

On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 10:25 +1300, Brett Davidson wrote:

 Before I start, I'm familiar with IPTables from Linux but am wanting to
 use FreeBSD as a firewalling router after seeing it in action on a
 heavily-loaded webserver. I like the efficiency of the TCP stack.
 
 Upon reading the handbook I found that I can have my choice of three
 firewalls; pf, iptables and ipfw.
 
 What would be the most useful (and easiest) package to use given the
 following scenario:
 
 A FreeBSD router comprising of four physical interfaces -
   Eth0 is the outside 10Mbyte/s cable connection to the Internet.
   Eth1 is a 100Mbit DMZ housing a webserver.
   Eth2 is a 100Mb DMZ housing a 802.11g Wireless Access Router. 
   (My normal preference is to isolate Wireless LANs from physical
 LANS).
   Eth3 is the inside LAN. 
 
 Software-based VPN connections out from both the Inside LAN and Wireless
 DMZ are required. (Allowing VPN tunnels through the firewall; not
 tunnels terminated at the firewall).
 
 Against prudence, they wish to allow torrent connections to the inside
 lan and ICQ connections to both the Inside LAN and the Wireless DMZ. The
 torrent and ICQ connections will need to be bandwidth-managed so that is
 a major consideration for the choice of which firewall to use. Is there
 an equivalent to HTB on FreeBSD?
 
 I look forward to your answers...
 
 Regards,
 Brett.
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


tradersmedia
Jeremy Jongsma
Director of Bits  Bytes

p 312.386.1130 x221  |  f 312.386.1263  |  c 312.399.4513
e [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]