Re: interface alias at start-up
FWIW: That doesnt work for me :( any other way? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 27 Aug 2005 14:26:32 -0700 Carstea Catalin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: how tu setting-up interface alias at start-up # example /etc/rc.conf part defaultrouter=192.168.2.1 ifconfig_rl0=inet 192.168.2.222 netmask 255.255.255.0 ifconfig_rl0_alias0=inet 192.168.2.2 netmask 0x ifconfig_rl0_alias1=inet 192.168.2.3 netmask 0x ifconfig_rl0_alias2=inet 192.168.2.4 netmask 0x ifconfig_rl0_alias3=inet 192.168.2.5 netmask 0x ifconfig_rl0_alias4=inet 192.168.2.6 netmask 0x ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: interface alias at start-up
ifconfig_xl0=inet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx netmask 255.255.255.128 ifconfig_xl0_alias=inet 172.16.2.138 netmask 255.255.255.0 yea they are in different networks. i will try the 255.255.255.255 thing when i get back to work. that seems odd that you have to put a host netmask on there :/ Glenn Dawson wrote: At 02:54 PM 8/27/2005, John Barbieri wrote: FWIW: That doesnt work for me :( One other thing. If the aliases you're trying to create are on a different network, the subnet mask of the first one has to be the real mask, and any further aliases in that same network have to use a mask of 255.255.255.255. Example: ifconfig_fxp0=inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 ifconfig_fxp0_alias0=inet 10.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.255 ifconfig_fxp0_alias1=inet 10.1.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 ifconfig_fxp0_alias2=inet 10.1.1.2 netmask 255.255.255.255 -Glenn any other way? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 27 Aug 2005 14:26:32 -0700 Carstea Catalin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: how tu setting-up interface alias at start-up # example /etc/rc.conf part defaultrouter=192.168.2.1 ifconfig_rl0=inet 192.168.2.222 netmask 255.255.255.0 ifconfig_rl0_alias0=inet 192.168.2.2 netmask 0x ifconfig_rl0_alias1=inet 192.168.2.3 netmask 0x ifconfig_rl0_alias2=inet 192.168.2.4 netmask 0x ifconfig_rl0_alias3=inet 192.168.2.5 netmask 0x ifconfig_rl0_alias4=inet 192.168.2.6 netmask 0x ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question
Ports collection is your freind :) /usr/ports/www/firefox or /usr/ports/www/linux-firefox cd to either dir, make install clean :) jon freddy wrote: When I get my new computer and I am going to run FreeBSD, also, I want to still run the browser Firefox. But if you go to Firefox's website it also lists other OS, but not FreeBSD. But I see that a lot of my friends that run FreeBSD use firefox. Would I install the Linux package because it is also a Unix System? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Using Multiple Internet Connections with FreeBSD
Thanks for the reply, but this isnt exactly what I was looking for. This one is used to force packets out to a specific network depending on the destination IP address and such. I was looking for something that would allow for both rundunancy and speed increase, similar to PPP multi-link or connection teaming (which, from what ive read, can effecticly double bandwidth). Thanks again John Philip Hallstrom wrote: To start off, I have a FreeBSD router running Nat and dhcp, it is currently the router for my LAN. I was wondering if there was a way to aggregate more then one internet connection using FreeBSD? That is, have 2 or 3 internet connections coming in on seperate NICs, and being able to have the box route and nat the packets accordingly to the lan, thus giving the experience of more bandwidth. Is it even possible? Has someone done it before? and if you have, do you have a webpage that you followed instructions from? I haven't done it, but I've saved the following email/posts that talked about this... I've left them intact so you can see the context... good luck! From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 24 09:35:16 2003 Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 18:46:34 -0600 From: Gerd Knops [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Simon Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Two ISP's. Two IP. One default route... Simon Nielsen wrote: Hello I currently have two internet connections though two different ISP's. One is a ADSL and another is shared with the rest of my dorm. The shared line is rather slow because many people are using it. I must have an IP on the shared connection since that's the only place where I can be sure to have a non changing IP for my DNS. But the ADSL is much faster so I would like to use that as much as possible. I can give my machine an IP on each connection but I can of course only set one default route. The default route is currently set to the ADSL. The problem is that when a connection is made to IP on the shared connection my computer uses the ADSL IP to respond and that does not work. Is there a solution to this? I thought about maybe it is possible to route differently when a connection is made on the shared connection but I can't find out how to do it. Yes, it can be done (though I have not found it documented anywhere). I really think there should be separate routing tables for each interface, but I don't know of any such feature in any Unix. However ipfw can be abused for the above task. Assuming: - ipfw is set to pass on default - your ADSL IP/network is a.a.a.a/aa - your shared IP/network is s.s.s.s/ss - your ADSL gateway is set as default route - your shared gateway is s.s.s.gw the following ipfw rules do the trick: # Pass anything that should go via normal routes # This rule is really just to speed up the bulk # of the packets add 1000 allow all from a.a.a.a to any # Pass anything to local addresses on ADSL network add 1010 allow all from any to a.a.a.a/aa # Pass anything to local addesses on shared network add 1020 allow all from any to s.s.s.s/ss # And here the trick: if the source address is the one # from the shared network, pass packets to the # gateway on the shared network add 1030 fwd s.s.s.gw all from s.s.s.s to any With the above connections will leave your system on the same route they entered it. Great for redundant mail and dns setup! If you already use ipfw you need to adapt the above rules accordingly. The important part is that packets coming from your host's shared address going to the 'outside' (and only those packets) are forwarded to the shared networks gateway. Gerd From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 24 09:35:23 2003 Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 09:34:48 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Simon Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Two ISP's. Two IP. One default route... Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 10:35:16 -0800 (PST) Resent-From: Philip Hallstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resent-To: Philip Hallstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resent-Subject: Re: Two ISP's. Two IP. One default route... Simon Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] types: I currently have two internet connections though two different ISP's. One is a ADSL and another is shared with the rest of my dorm. The shared line is rather slow because many people are using it. I must have an IP on the shared connection since that's the only place where I can be sure to have a non changing IP for my DNS. But the ADSL is much faster so I would like to use that as much as possible. Question: what are you using the static IP for? I.e. - who connects to it, and vice versa? I can give my machine an IP on each connection but I can of course only set one default route. The default route is currently set to the ADSL. The problem is that when a connection is made to IP on the shared connection my computer uses the ADSL IP to respond and that does not
Using Multiple Internet Connections with FreeBSD
Howdy, To start off, I have a FreeBSD router running Nat and dhcp, it is currently the router for my LAN. I was wondering if there was a way to aggregate more then one internet connection using FreeBSD? That is, have 2 or 3 internet connections coming in on seperate NICs, and being able to have the box route and nat the packets accordingly to the lan, thus giving the experience of more bandwidth. Is it even possible? Has someone done it before? and if you have, do you have a webpage that you followed instructions from? Ive been searching around, but I have not been able to find a straight answer. I was hoping you guys could help Thanks in advance John ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RAID0 problem array broken
I am also having this problem under FreeBSD 5.3. IDE RAID is HPT372 and SATA is Silicon Image 3114 dmesg shows: ad1: 19073MB Maxtor 5T020H2/TAH71DP0 [38752/16/63] at ata0-slave UDMA100 acd0: CDRW HL-DT-ST GCE-8160B/1.02 at ata1-master PIO4 ad4: 190782MB WDC WD2000JD-00HBB0/08.02D08 [387621/16/63] at ata2-master SATA150 ad10: 190782MB WDC WD2000JD-00HBB0/08.02D08 [387621/16/63] at ata5-master SATA150 ad12: 190782MB WDC WD2000JB-00EVA0/15.05R15 [387621/16/63] at ata6-master UDMA100 ar0: ERROR - array broken ar0: 381564MB ATA RAID0 array [48642/255/63] status: BROKEN subdisks: disk0 READY on ad12 at ata6-master disk1 DOWN no device found for this disk First, the two SATAs are supposed to be a RAID0 array, but FreeBSD does not see them that way, so i have not played with any partitioning. ad12: 190782MB WDC WD2000JB-00EVA0/15.05R15 [387621/16/63] at ata6-master UDMA100 Thats one of the drives for the RAID, but the second drive is not showing up, what gives? The BIOS for the card can see it, but not FreeBSD. In FreeBSD 4.x, the IDE RAID works fine, but I cant get the SATA Raid to work. Its always that way, I can get one work, but not the other. I need an OS that can do both :( what was the command you useed to disable the DMA? I want to give that a shot to. I see that its sysctl, but what were the flags. Thanks, John Matthias F. Brandstetter wrote: -- quoting Karsten Fuhrmann -- But now my ar0 stripe will not be recognised anymore. /var/log/messages showed this : Dec 17 03:24:44 darkstar kernel: ad6: FAILURE - ATA_IDENTIFY timed out Dec 17 03:24:49 darkstar kernel: ad6: FAILURE - ATA_IDENTIFY timed out Dec 17 03:24:49 darkstar kernel: ad6: deleted from ar0 disk1 Dec 17 03:24:49 darkstar kernel: ar0: ERROR - array broken Dec 17 03:24:49 darkstar kernel: ad6: WARNING - removed from configuration Dec 17 03:24:49 darkstar kernel: ar0: ERROR - array broken I had a very similar problem with a RAID1 on a raid hardware controller. I managed to re-build the broken array from within the controller's BIOS during bootup. It seems this error comes from the broken DMA support on 5.3, so I disabled DMA for my disks on this server via sysctl. Hey guys, what's the status of this DMA issue? Greetings, Matthias ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Silicon Image 3114
Hey there. I want to run a RAID 0 array on a Silicon Image 3114 SATA RAID adapter, but cant find drivers. I found some links on how to patch the kernel, but they dont tell you how to do that, or what needs to be done to do it. Does anyone have an idea, or can point me in the direction, on how to set this up?? is it relativly easy?? im running FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE, on a Tyan Tiger Motherboard. Thanks in advanced. John ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: rj-45 connector
The sequence is important if your running high speed, like GigE, since each pair of wires is wound a bit different for the others. The sequence is: white/orange orange white/green blue white/blue green white/brown brown This is when holding the connector face down (eg, the clip is facing down) http://yoda.uvi.edu/InfoTech/rj45.htm johne edw wrote: dear sir, i've 3 computers and i want to connect them togather as a workgroup network via a hub. i know that the both ends of cable must have the same sequense of color .please advice me if that the color sequence of wires connected to rj-45 connector is important or not?..i mean, in another word, is there a special sequense of color ? or any sequense of color will be valid when the both ends have the same color sequense ? i wish that response will come on soonbest regards - Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Question for the list about install BSD4.9 from FTP over CD
If I were to install FreeBSD by doing FTP rather than from a disc, will I get updated sources EG: install 4.9 release, which doesn't support my nic right off, but there is an update driver that does Just wondering cause if that works that would be cool. I guess I could do CVSup to also get the driver, but after adding it into my kernel config, my kernel errors out when im trying to compile it. Thanks in advanced John ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Question on Linksys EG21032 (a different one)
I know I have asked this before, but I just noticed something different I ran CVSup on the box with the Linksys EG1032V2 I more'd the if_sk.c in /usr/src/sys/pci, and I noticed that the Linkysys EG1032 is listed there, as well as D-Link DGE-530T Gigabit Ethernet. From my understanding, these cards did not work well at first with bsd. My question is, if this is listed there, is there a way to load that driver up? Ive tried rebooting the box and such, but that didn't work. When I do ifconfig, it comes up as faith0, and /stand/sysinstall says unknown ehternet adapter Any help is appreciated. Thanks John Barbieri ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Question about the Linksys EG1032V2
Hello there list. I was wondering if anyone has found a driver or knows a way of getting the Linksys EG1032V2 gigabit Ethernet card to work under FreeBSD 4.9RC-2 I bought this card because it said it was supported, but luck be have it, I got the 2nd version of the card, which changed chipsets. If anyone knows how to get this card to work that would be awesome. Thanks and have a good day. John ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Question About Gigabit Ethernet Adapters.
Hello there. I recently acquired two gigabit Ethernet cards, as well as a switch. The cards are a NetGear GA311 and Linksys 1032v2 After reading some docs, I found out the Linksys is the only one that is supposed to work in FreeBSD 4.9RC2 However, even this will not work in 4.9 Is there a way I could get some drivers for the card? Or a way to automatically update the drivers? Please help, I don't want to go to 5.x right now :-( Thanks in advanced. John Barbieri ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
