Re: Cannot Update Source Tree After Move To Subversion 1.8

2013-06-26 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Tim.
You wrote 26 июня 2013 г., 3:26:24:

TD It seems that svn 1.8 does not like symlinks.  I have this:
TD /usr/src - /usr1/src-9-STABLE
TD I can do this fine:
TDsvn update /usr1/src-9-STABLE
TD But this causes svn to dump core:
TDsvn update /usr/src
TD At which point I have to do a cleanup to get the locks cleared out.
  It was reported to upstream and fixed in upstream:
  http://svn.apache.org/r1496007

  I'll backport patch to ports today night.

-- 
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: subversion and subversion16

2011-10-17 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, n.
You wrote 17 октября 2011 г., 11:55:08:


 There was a message in /usr/ports/UPDATING about subversion 1.6.x
  and 1.7.0
 my daily
 # pkg_version -vIL=  
 reports
 subversion-1.6.17_2needs updating (index has
  1.7.0_1)
 I didn't use subversion-freebsd in the past and I want to stick to
  version 1.6
 So from /usr/ports/UPDATING, I believe (c) applies to me
 I ran
 # cd /usr/ports/devel/subversion16
 # make config
 this showed me the same options as I always had...
 No trace of the new options, which I would probably have wanted to
  deselect if they
 were there, but I would have expected them to be there ??
 --  is this normal?
  It is strange. On my non-development system (one, where ports are updated by 
regular csup from official servers, so it looks like any other FreeBSD system 
in the world) make config shows this:

Options for subversion 1.6.17_4│
 │ 
┌┐ │
 │ │[X] 
P4_STYLE_MARKERS   Perforce-style conflict markers  │ │
 │ │[X] 
ENHANCED_KEYWORD   Enhanced svn:keyword support │ │
 │ │[X] 
FREEBSD_TEMPLATE   FreeBSD Project log template │ │
 │ │[X] 
MOD_DAV_SVNmod_dav_svn module for Apache 2.X│ │
 │ │[X] 
MOD_DONTDOTHAT mod_dontdothat for Apache 2.X│ │


 # portupgrade -o devel/subversion16 devel/subversion
 takes 3 seconds, no output
 -- is this normal?
  No. It is something strange...

 # portupgrade -m WITH_SUBVERSION_VER=16 -r devel/subversion16 
 takes also 3 seconfs, no output
 -- is this normal?
  
 What exactly do these things? I see not much change
  Could you, please, provide $FreeBSD$ line of devel/subversion16/Makefile? And 
inspect it by eyes, how OPTIONS lines looks like?

-- 
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: subversion and subversion16

2011-10-17 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, n.
You wrote 17 октября 2011 г., 12:51:28:

 might the reason be the following?
 Every night I do (from cron), a # portsnap fetch
 but not portsnap update, this I do just before  my weekly #
  portupgrade -yaRrpb
  
 I just did 
 # portsnap update
 This updated files in /usr/ports/devel/subversion16/files  (and
 also in /usr/ports/devel/subversion/files)
 with dates of yesterday 
  
 The $FreeBSD$ line is now:
 # $FreeBSD: ports/devel/subversion16/Makefile,v 1.138 2011/10/16 14:31:47 lev 
 Exp $
  
 (before that I believe (I look on another FreeBSD system with
 subversion, where I didn't change anything yet) is was v 1.137 2011/04/01)
  Yep! It is the cause.
  
 Is it safe if I do the (c) procedure all over again?
 or should I first reset something before ?
  Don't forget to `make config' in devel/subversion16 again.
 What woul normally be outputted with these (c) commands?
  It should be safe now. Output should show re-building of port from scratches.

-- 
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: 9.0 bata2 keymap

2011-09-18 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Chris.
You wrote 18 сентября 2011 г., 12:03:34:


 I had read the rest of your post, and found it rather difficult to
 follow. The fact remains that every other installer I have ever used
 gives the user the choice of keymap, so I don't really understand your
 problem.
 IMHO, main problem is, that in bsdinstall it is completely unclear
how to have English keymap and other one and switch between them.
 For example, it is very natural to select Russian in Russia, but,
nobody (ok, may be ALMOST nobody) in Russia want to enter Russian
hostname, usernames and root password. And it is completely unobvious
how to switch back to English after selecting Russian keymap.

 I think, other national keymaps have exactly same problem. And if
Western-European ones allow to enter basic ASCII letters (and only
add some diacritics, and, maybe, alert keys placement, like Z-A swap),
and things like Dvorak allows it too (for sure!), but more specific
national keymaps doesn't contain ASCII (Latin) letters at all.

 IMHO, selecting one and only one keymap without selecting at leas
two of them and switching key have very limited use. It could be used
to select variants of English maps (QWERTY vs Dvorak, different
placement of additional characters, etc) and to select Latin-based
maps with some extended characters.

 All other (Russian and other Cyrillic, Japan, Arabic, etc.,) need TWO
keymaps right at installation time and configurable/known way to
switch between them.

-- 
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org