nfsiod on FreeBSD 4.11
I'm running a FreeBSD 5.3-p5 server and several FreeBSD 4.11 clients. The clients run high levels of concurrency (web servers running several hundred processes at a time). The clients NFS connection tend to lockup when running nfsiod but (so far) appear not to when not running nfsiod. When the lockup occurs the send-q and recv-q on both ends tends to have somewhere around 33000 bytes. Even when the sendspace and recvspace is set to 65536. Any idea what each side is waiting for? If there's something I can do to help debug the issue let me know. -- Michael Conlen ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
growfs
Any idea why a growfs to this size works growfs: 493962.0MB (1011634176 sectors) block size 16384, fragment size 2048 using 2688 cylinder groups of 183.77MB, 11761 blks, 23552 inodes. with soft updates super-block backups (for fsck -b #) at: 1010881632, 1011257984 but a growfs to server# growfs -s 101222 /dev/da1s1d We strongly recommend you to make a backup before growing the Filesystem Did you backup your data (Yes/No) ? Yes new file systemsize is: 253055000 frags Warning: 209472 sector(s) cannot be allocated. growfs: 494145.8MB (1012010528 sectors) block size 16384, fragment size 2048 using 2689 cylinder groups of 183.77MB, 11761 blks, 23552 inodes. with soft updates super-block backups (for fsck -b #) at: 1011634336 growfs: rdfs: seek error: 237231962044550260: Unknown error: 0 fails while there is plenty of disk space available. The error doesn't seem to make sense and I'm thinking there's some value that's flipped out. -- Michael Conlen ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please don't change Beastie to another crap logo such as NetBSD!!!
On Feb 11, 2005, at 6:14 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote: Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC writes: And the standard answer is RTFM I don't know of anything in the manuals or on the Web site that answers this type of question. This is a mailing list for questions about how to use FreeBSD, not why you should or shouldn't use FreeBSD. We generally don't care if you use FreeBSD or not. -- Michael Conlen ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pf and different MTUs
I'm using FreeBSD and PF as a firewall between two networks. I want to change the MTU on one network to 9k but I have to leave the MTU on the other network at 1500 bytes. Will the system handle the fragmenting for me going from the larger MTU to the smaller? -- Michael Conlen ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pf and different MTUs
On Jan 28, 2005, at 4:36 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote: Michael E.Conlen wrote: I'm using FreeBSD and PF as a firewall between two networks. I want to change the MTU on one network to 9k but I have to leave the MTU on the other network at 1500 bytes. Will the system handle the fragmenting for me going from the larger MTU to the smaller? Sure. However, if you have a lot of traffic using jumbo frames going over that 1500 MTU segment, you might be better off using an MTU of 1500 everywhere. At least half the traffic I use now doesn't go over that link and would benefit from the larger MTU. In addition I'm constrained on resources for those servers where as I can add additional firewalls without great expense. On the other side there is a good bit of traffic going over those links that would use jumbo frames but not all of it would. In addition the cost of using two separate networks for the traffic would be more than adding two more firewalls (based on the cost of doubling the number of ports) so I'm figuring this is the way to go. Thanks. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pf for FreeBSD
On Sep 28, 2004, at 8:33 AM, shane mullins wrote: Why not just run OpenBSD if you want to use pf? I use both Free and OpenBSD. But, pf is much easier to set up on OpenBSD. Just install OpenBSD, enable routing, enable pf in rc.conf and you are done. I can tell you in my case OpenBSD doesn't provide drivers for the hardware I have. -- Michael Conlen [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SNMP
For FreeBSD I recommend the Net-SNMP package www.net-snmp.org. It's a very good package, highly extensible, and generally reliable. Be sure to configure it properly so that it's secure. change the community string, and restrict what IP addresses can access it. Use SNMP v3 if at all possible. -- Michael Conlen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tkachenko, Artem N Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 5:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Freebsd-Config (E-mail); Freebsd-Hackers (E-mail) Subject: SNMP Hi, I am new to SNMP. I was asked to set up SNMP agents and a manager on some of the computers in the lab. Can someone recommend some SNMP programs that I can use or a good link on the Internet? I need it for both FreeBSD and Windows machines. Thank you very much for you time. Best regards Artem ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
