mounting novell drives
Hello, FreeBSD support team, I have a server with Novell Netware 5.1. How I can mount Novell drives in FreeBSD? -- Best regards, NetAdmin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mounting network share problem
Hello, FreeBSD support team, I have some problems with network configuration in FreeBSD. My task is to mount network share on Win2003 server (Network with domain) to some folder, for example, /mnt I wrote: # mount_nfs server:share /mnt and see error: [udp] RPC: RPC timeout But my computer sees all computers in domain when ping some of them... -- Best regards, NetAdmin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD 5.3 and ed0
On Sat, 2004-11-06 at 21:43, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 09:29:27PM -0500, Gerard Samuel wrote: Im trying to move from FreeBSD 4.10 to 5.3. When I used to install 3.x/4.x on this box, I would configure the network card during the install process. According to the manual, the device config part of the install, was taken out, but the network card doesnt get identified by FreeBSD 5.3. I tried selecting #6 during the install boot menu, and entered - boot -c in the hopes to get the device config screen, but I didn't get that. Is it possible to get that pre FBSD 5.x device config screen, or is there some way to configure that network card during the install process?? I believe you can set a hint variable from the loader prompt. The defaults are: hint.ed.0.at=isa hint.ed.0.disabled=1 hint.ed.0.port=0x280 hint.ed.0.irq=10 hint.ed.0.maddr=0xd8000 Kris For what it's worth, here are my ed0 settings. # uname -a FreeBSD foxdaemon.com 5.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE #0: Sat Nov 6 12:56:51 EST 2004 # ifconfig -m ed0 ed0: flags=108943UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500 inet 24.172.XXX.XXX netmask 0xfffc broadcast 24.172.XXX.XXX ether 00:e0:29:4e:58:ab # dmesg | grep ed0 ed0: NE2000 PCI Ethernet (RealTek 8029) port 0x9000-0x901f irq 7 at device 11.0 on pci0 ed0: [GIANT-LOCKED] ed0: Ethernet address: 00:e0:29:4e:58:ab -- NetAdmin for the FoxChat.Net IRC Network. The FoxSurfer Group signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Little oddity...
I recently upgraded from 5.1-Release to 5.3-Release and noticed a couple of odd things that perhaps someone can shed some light on. 1. The splash screen worked with 5.1 and now it doesn't with 5.3. I have the following in my kernel; device splash # Splash screen and screen saver support So, I tried doing the following; kldload /boot/kernel/splash_bmp.ko and got the following error; module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (splash_bmp, 0xc21a5810, 0) error 2 I could have swore I saw something in the handbook about it but I can't seem to find it now. Thanks, Mark -- NetAdmin for the FoxChat.Net IRC Network. The FoxSurfer Group signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
make.conf question
I have a P4 2.4G Intel proc on an Asus P4S533 motherboard running FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE-p17. /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh is showing Release now and not RC1 so I thought I'd give it a shot. I'm trying to figure out what are the best/appropriate flags to use in /etc/make.conf I had the following; CPUTYPE=p4 CFLAGS= -O -pipe CXXFLAGS+= -fmemoize-lookups -fsave-memoized but after running make buildworld it crashed on the (-fmemoize-lookups -fsave-memoized) flags so I commented them and I'm rerunning make buildworld (stupid me, I didn't copy the error when it failed). So far there have been no errors. How does one know what flags to use in /etc/make.conf? I thought I had the right ones. Regards, Mark -- NetAdmin for the FoxChat.Net IRC Network. The FoxSurfer Group signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
RE: The release of 5.3
Saw the mention of em nics and wanted to double check for my own piece of mind... I have a Supermicro SuperServer 5013G-I P4 3.06GHz 1U with Dual Intel 82540EM Gigabit Ethernet that I'm waiting to put 5.3 Release on. http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.2R/hardware-i386.html#ETHERNET shows - Gigabit Ethernet NICs based on the Intel 82542 and 82543 controller chips (gx(4) and em(4) drivers), plus NICs supported by the Intel 82540EM, 82544, 82545EM, and 82546EB controller chips (em(4) driver only) Can I safely presume (without getting flamed) that my nic's will be supported? Regards -- NetAdmin for the FoxChat.Net IRC Network. The FoxSurfer Group signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: dummynet
try this, it works for me.
${fwcmd} add pipe 1 { tcp or udp } from ${oip} to any 21
${fwcmd} pipe 1 config mask src-ip 0x00ff bw 128Kbit/s queue
20Kbytes
You can set the 128Kbit/s to anything but I'm not sure I'd use 2Kbit/s.
You may need to play with the 0x00ff. Just install whatmask from
/usr/ports/net-mgmt/whatmask
Regards
On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 23:49, synrat wrote:
yeah it kinda seems broken. i can see the pipes being
hit by traffic, but no bandwidth limitation is done whatsoever.
I tried specifying dedicated port based pipes, that didn't work,
I tried using queues for port specification while specifying pipes
with the the same port numbers, that didn't work. I tried connecting
pipes to the queues, no result as well.
for example, to limit outgoing ftp, I tried this,
${fwcmd} add pipe 6 tcp from ${oip} 21 to any out xmit ${oif}
${fwcmd} pipe 6 config bw $2Kbit/s
no effect.
${fwcmd} add pipe 6 tcp from ${oip} 21 to any out xmit ${oif}
${fwcmd} pipe 6 config bw $2Kbit/s
${fwcmd} add queue 6 tcp from ${oip} 21 to any out
no effect.
${fwcmd} add pipe 6 tcp from ${oip} 21 to any out xmit ${oif}
${fwcmd} pipe 6 config bw $2Kbit/s
${fwcmd} add queue 6 tcp from ${oip} 21 to any out
${fwcmd} queue 6 config pipe 6
setsockopt error.
I guess it craps out when trying to bind queue to the pipe. Why ?? who
knows I really can't make much sense from what I've read about
dummynet in ipfw and dummynet man pages, if anyone knows of a good
manual, please let me know.
Drew Tomlinson wrote:
On 10/11/2004 5:47 PM synrat wrote:
Can someone tell me about a good way to troubleshoot pipes/queues or
point me in the rigtt direction. I'm trying to restrict outgoing ftp
traffic and create some pipes for VOIP. dummynet and pipe rules load
fine ( and are in the kernel ) but seem to have no effect. I did read
the manual pages 20 times over. I tried adding pipes before doing
config bw on them, but that didn't make any difference.
thanx a lot in advance.
I have tried using DUMMYNET also and don't see any effect. If you find
an answer, please let me know. It's my goal to give highest priority to
ssh connection, next highest priority to the traffic originating on
machine bigdaddy port 8080, and then all remaining traffic gets passed
when there's nothing else going on. I have DSL with a 128K uplink.
Here is my rule set in case someone can find my error:
# Flush before we define
$fwcmd -f queue flush
$fwcmd -f pipe flush
$fwcmd pipe 1 config queue 128Kbyte
$fwcmd queue 1 config pipe 1 weight 85 queue 8Kbyte
$fwcmd queue 2 config pipe 1 weight 1 queue 112Kbyte
$fwcmd queue 3 config pipe 1 weight 100 queue 8Kbyte
$fwcmd add queue 1 ip from bigdaddy 8080 to any out via $oif
$fwcmd add queue 3 ip from any 22 to any out via $oif
$fwcmd add queue 2 ip from not bigdaddy not 8080 to any out via $oif
$fwcmd add queue 2 ip from bigdaddy not 8080 to any out via $oif
And I have these options compiled into my kernel:
options IPFIREWALL
options DUMMYNET
options HZ=1000
Thanks,
Drew
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
NetAdmin for the FoxChat.Net IRC Network.
The FoxSurfer Group
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: rmdir
rm -rf somedirectory check out - man rm On Sat, 2004-10-16 at 02:35, metallarch wrote: How can i remove not empty directory for console? rmdir -? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- NetAdmin for the FoxChat.Net IRC Network. The FoxSurfer Group signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: dummynet
This is what I have on one of my subnet IP's. Did it this way to keep
my kids from sucking up all the upstream from p2p clients and webcam
with their friends. There may be a better way to do it and I'm almost
sure there is, but this seems to do what I need it to do. Hope it
helps.
inwr2 = subnet IP/24 Example - 172.16.0.0/24
iif2 = inside interface nic Example - ed0
if [ -n ${natd_interface} ]; then
${fwcmd} add 50 divert natd all from any to any via
${natd_interface}
${fwcmd} add 150 skipto 2 ip from any to any bridged
${fwcmd} add 151 pipe 1 { tcp or udp } from ${inwr2} to any 80-65000
via ${iif2}
${fwcmd} pipe 1 config mask src-ip 0x00ff bw 128Kbit/s queue
20Kbytes
${fwcmd} add 152 pipe 2 all from ${inwr2} to any out via ${iif2}
${fwcmd} pipe 2 config mask src-ip 0x00ff bw 768Kbit/s queue
20Kbytes
${fwcmd} add 153 pipe 3 all from any to ${inwr2} in via ${iif2}
${fwcmd} pipe 3 config mask dst-ip 0x00ff bw 1280Kbit/s queue
20Kbytes
#ipfw show
00151 112861 101818182 pipe 1 { tcp or udp } from 172.16.0.0/24 to
any dst-port 80-65000 via ed0
0015241312 pipe 2 ip from 172.16.0.0/24 to
any out via ed0
00153 62 10299pipe 3 ip from any to
172.16.0.0/24 in via ed0
On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 20:47, synrat wrote:
Can someone tell me about a good way to troubleshoot pipes/queues or
point me in the rigtt direction. I'm trying to restrict outgoing ftp
traffic and create some pipes for VOIP. dummynet and pipe rules load
fine ( and are in the kernel ) but seem to have no effect. I did read
the manual pages 20 times over. I tried adding pipes before doing
config bw on them, but that didn't make any difference.
thanx a lot in advance.
something like this :
# APPLIES TO INCOMING PACKETS (DOWNLOADS)
${fwcmd} pipe 1 config bw 1300Kbit/s
${fwcmd} pipe 3 config bw 100Kbit/s
${fwcmd} queue 1 config weight 5 pipe 1
${fwcmd} add queue 1 ip from any to 192.168.1.4
${fwcmd} queue 2 config weight 5 pipe 1
${fwcmd} add queue 2 ip from any to 192.168.1.3
${fwcmd} queue 3 config weight 10 pipe 3
${fwcmd} add queue 3 udp from any to 192.168.1.2
# APPLIES TO OUTGOING PACKETS (UPLOADS)
${fwcmd} pipe 2 config bw 1000Kbit/s
${fwcmd} pipe 4 config bw 100Kbit/s
${fwcmd} queue 4 config weight 5 pipe 2
${fwcmd} add queue 4 ip from 192.168.1.4 to any
${fwcmd} queue 5 config weight 5 pipe 2
${fwcmd} add queue 5 ip from 192.168.1.3 to any
${fwcmd} queue 6 config weight 10 pipe 4
${fwcmd} add queue 6 udp from 192.168.1.2 to any
THIS IS FOR OUTGOING FTP
${fwcmd} add pipe 7 tcp from 216.254.116.226 21 to any out via
${oif}
${fwcmd} pipe 7 config bw 3Kbit/s
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
NetAdmin for the FoxChat.Net IRC Network.
The FoxSurfer Group
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
RE: What version of FBSD does Yahoo run?
dang, how long is this thread gonna go on? Is it that important? I see a lot of good questions and equally good answers on this list, but I think this particular thread is starting to stoop beneath us all... On Sat, 2004-10-09 at 00:56, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 7:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: What version of FBSD does Yahoo run? In a message dated 10/8/04 2:25:52 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You guys are the ones making the claims that 5.3 is going to be so great. I just wonder how you come to that conclusion if you don't have any definitive tests. I dont have a release to test, so when its done I'll test it. -- NetAdmin for the FoxChat.Net IRC Network. The FoxSurfer Group signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Ipfw accept rule
Here are my dummy net rules. Not sure if they are exactly work or not
but they keep my kids from using all the upstream bandwidth.
If anyone has a better way, please by all means let me know. The only
thing I'm not sure of, is where it goes in the rule set. Here is where
I have mine and how it is set up. Hope this helps.
case ${natd_enable} in
[Yy][Ee][Ss])
if [ -n ${natd_interface} ]; then
${fwcmd} add divert natd all from any to any via
${natd_interface}
fi
;;
esac
${fwcmd} add skipto 2 ip from any to any bridged
#-- DUMMYNET Config --
#
${fwcmd} add pipe 1 { tcp or udp } from ${iip1} to any 80-65000
${fwcmd} pipe 1 config mask src-ip 0xff00 bw 384Kbit/s queue
20Kbytes
#
${fwcmd} add pipe 2 ip from ${iip1} to any out
${fwcmd} pipe 2 config mask src-ip 0xff00 bw 1024Kbit/s queue
20Kbytes
#
${fwcmd} add pipe 3 ip from any to ${iip1} in
${fwcmd} pipe 3 config mask dst-ip 0xff00 bw 1024Kbit/s queue
20Kbytes
${iip1} = 192.168.1.0/24
I used whatmask in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/whatmask to help figure out
what the netmask was for my subnet in case you use a different subnet
than I.
On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 02:48, Bikrant Neupane wrote:
Hi,
When a packet hits allow | accept | pass | permit rule the packet is
accepted and the search is retiminated at that point.
I need to accept the packet but still want the packet to continue travers
rules further below. However, once it hits deny | drop rule it should be
dropped and the search should terminate at that point. Is that possible with
IPFW?
regards,
Bikrant
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
NetAdmin for the FoxChat.Net IRC Network.
The FoxSurfer Group
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: IRC
On FoxChat we have a #FreeBSD and a #Geekspeak channel. You can get there by going to irc.foxchat.net or ircd.foxchat.net On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 13:31, hide110 wrote: Are there any IRC chatrooms that you guys know of where people get together for Unix related topics or just general related topics? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- NetAdmin for the FoxChat.Net IRC Network. The FoxSurfer Group signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
panic: rtqkill route really not free
I'm running FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE-p2 and today was the second time in 3 days that my box has rebooted with (panic: rtqkill route really not free). I've looked on the web but can't find anything relevant. Has anyone else run across this? If so, could you point me to some help in trying to figure out how to correct it? Regards, Mark -- Admin for the FoxChat.Net IRC Network. The FoxSurfer Group signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
