Re: Atom 330 testing

[P.Moulin]

Testing a mini-ITX Intel D945GCLF2 motherboard with Atom 330 processor.


Hi, [sorry to re-open this one month old thread]

I have also this D945GCLF2. All is running nearly fine, but on heavy load
and after the system is powered up for a couple of days, it panics.

The system is running 7.1-RC1 (7th dec 2008) as a Generic kernel, and a
gmirrored WDC+seagate backup drive. The bios is still in 99 release.

Since I have read some is using also this board as an home server, does
someone else is also having this issue (panic under heavy load when up 
for a few days) ?



T.I.A.  PM.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

linux_base and SMP support ?

[P.Moulin]

Hi there.

I recently added linux_base-fc4 on a host, to run linux
setiathome enhanced versions (aka crunchers).

The problem is that on multicore engines (core 2 duo, pentium D, etc...)
where before there was 2 freebsd-crunchers on 2 differents core,
now, with linux-crunchers, the 2 crunchers are sharing only 1 core.

Can someone tell me what's wrong with this ?  Have I missed something ?
Is it an incompatibility from linux_base with smp hardware ?

This problem seems to affects only freebsd 6.x, not the 7 branch.
My kernels are all compiled with SMP support.

I'm working for years with freebsd, but consider I'm really a newbee
with linux.

T.I.A.  PM.


PS: if you want to join us:
http://boincstats.com/stats/team_graph.php?pr=sah&id=2119
(we have the 5th position in our country statistics; we are one of the
oldiest team in our country; we tend to use mostly freebsd powered
engines (56% freebsd today, 73% if you consider "Darwin" being a
"freebsd").

(thanks to read this, not so long, email till this line ;-)



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"