Upgrading glib

2005-11-18 Thread Paul Waring
I've just done a cvsup on the following release:

*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_4

and one of the packages due for an update is glib, which has gone from
version 2.8.3 to 2.8.4. Given that I've built almost everything on my
system from source using ports, do I need to rebuild things once I've
upgraded glib? I've had problems before when updating Perl and having to
rebuild all the p5-* modules, so I'm not sure with glib being a
library of sorts whether or not I'll need to rebuild things.

Thanks in advance.

Paul

-- 
Rogue Tory
http://www.roguetory.org.uk
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Better laptop support in 6.0?

2005-11-11 Thread Paul Waring
A while back I spent a lot of time trying to get FreeBSD 5.3 working on
my Toshiba Satellite Pro M10 laptop with no success. I was wondering if
version 6 adds anything that would be more likely to make it possible to
install FreeBSD on my laptop? I currently use it on a server system with
no problems and it would be nice to have it on another system as well.
I've found the hardware support for desktop machines to be good, but
when it comes to laptops it seems to be a pain to get even the CDs to
boot sometimes - though NetBSD and various Linux distributions work. 

Paul

-- 
Rogue Tory
http://www.roguetory.org.uk
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Better laptop support in 6.0?

2005-11-11 Thread Paul Waring
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 02:51:15AM -0800, Peter Clutton wrote:
 I can't comment on your previous problems, as I've got FreeBSD 5.4
 running on a state of the art Sony vaio laptop, I use it for
 everything. Not sure what could be causing the CDs not to work,
 without error messages, but by that description it may not have been
 OS related.

As far as I remember, the CDs wouldn't even boot into the install
process at one point. They worked fine on another machine, and other
installation CDs for things like NetBSD worked, so I think it probably
was OS related. Perhaps FreeBSD is just missing support for my laptop's
hardware, but I'm surprised that other things worked.

 One of the focuses was on Wireless
 support aswell, if you had any trouble with that.

Wireless support would be useful, but I'm generally plugged into a wired
ethernet network so it's not of huge importance.

Paul

-- 
Rogue Tory
http://www.roguetory.org.uk
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: build ports without X -- make.conf

2005-11-07 Thread Paul Waring
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 01:16:27PM -0500, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
 In BSD 4.x, there was a section in the make.conf manpage that said you 
 could define WITHOUT_X11 and ports would build without it (for things like 
 ghostscript, cvsup, etc, which have distinctly different ports)
 
 For some reason this is gone in 5.x -- what's the appropriate way to do 
 this now (since WITHOUT_X11 still worked on a couple ports I've tried.)

Who told you it had gone? I've been using WITHOUT_X11=yes ever since I
started using FreeBSD as a server operating system, and it's always had
the intended result, even up until now as I'm ready to go from 5.4-6.0.

Paul

-- 
Rogue Tory
http://www.roguetory.org.uk
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: how to setup DNS server and making sub-domains in DSL server

2005-11-06 Thread Paul Waring
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 11:38:59AM -0800, Edwin D. Vinas wrote:
 1) Is it correct that I only need to register or pay for the main domain?

Yes, provided you choose a registrar who will allow you to change the
namservers on the daomin - i.e. they don't force you to use their
nameservers in conjunction with a web hosting package or something
(123-reg.co.uk will definitely work as I use them for a similar setup to
the one you describe).

 2) Is it correct that through my local DNS server, I can add sub hosts (sub1
 to sub3) without anymore registering those sub domains and pay for them in
 my main domain provider?

That's correct. Adding a subdomain is generally a case of adding one
line to the zone file for that particular domain (assuming you're just
adding a simple subdomain that isn't going to be delegated or receive
mail or anything comlicated like that) and telling Bind to reload the
zone file (/etc/rc.d/named reload will usually work, although I find I
often have to use restart instead of reload for some reason).

 3) Provided that I already have successfully setup my local DNS server,
 Apache virtual hosting and main domain activated, is it straightforward that
 I can already access the sub domains (i.e., websites) from the Internet?

Assuming you're not behind a firewall of any type (or you setup the
relevant rules), then it should be fairly simple to make everything
accessible from the rest of the Internet. If your main domain works,
then any subdomains on the same machine should do as well.

 4) Do I need to register sub1, sub2 and sub3 in any external domain
 provider?

No, you'd just tell your registrar to change the nameservers to whatever
your local DNS servers are. Most will have a control panel allowing you
to do this easily.

 5) Can you provide some sample configs if you are already doing this setup?
   Thank you in advance!

What kind of sample config? If you're not doing anything special, any
tutorial on DNS/Bind will show you how to setup subdomains.

Paul

-- 
Rogue Tory
http://www.roguetory.org.uk
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: how to setup DNS server and making sub-domains in DSL server

2005-11-06 Thread Paul Waring
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 02:01:00PM -0600, Chris wrote:
 Your fisrt and hardest roadblock will be getting your provider to allow
 YOU to be authoritive for the IP or IP's you use.

That's not necessary - I host the DNS, web sites and mail for a dozen
different domains off an IP address for which I don't control the DNS
(in fact it doesn't even have a DNS record). Reverse DNS control is
always useful, but not a requirement for what he wants to do.

Paul

-- 
Rogue Tory
http://www.roguetory.org.uk
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: how to setup DNS server and making sub-domains in DSL server

2005-11-06 Thread Paul Waring
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 04:41:06PM -0600, Chris wrote:
 It may not be necessary - but to do it right... I for one like to have
 mu IP's resolve both forward and reverse. It's just professional looking
 as a whole.

I like to have my IPs resolve both ways too, but try finding an ISP who
will either give you that sort of control through delegation or is
willing to setup the required reverse DNS records on their side. If
you're lucky you'll get customer114324.myisp.net to play with. I don't
know of any residential ISPs, at least not in the UK, who will do that
sort of thing.

Having said that, there's nothing particularly wrong about not having
reverse DNS records for IPs, or having ones that don't match. It only
really matters if you're sending out email to people with overly
aggressive spam filters that check for that sort of thing.

Paul

-- 
Rogue Tory
http://www.roguetory.org.uk
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: how to setup DNS server and making sub-domains in DSL server

2005-11-06 Thread Paul Waring
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 06:22:58PM -0600, Eric F Crist wrote:
 Actually, my ISP, ipHouse.net is one who's willing to configure  
 reverse DNS for you.  Qwest Communications is another one who'll  
 setup DNS for you, and they're HUGE.  If you choose to go with  
 ipHouse, tell them I sent you -- then I get free DSL for a month!

If you read my post, you'll see I said at least not in the UK. Neither
Qwest nor ipHouse have operations outside the USA as far as I can tell.

Paul

-- 
Rogue Tory
http://www.roguetory.org.uk
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: BIND and NAT

2005-05-15 Thread Paul Waring
On 5/15/05, Joe Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have a small question regarding a DNS issue I am having. I have a bsd box
 setup for a domain I am hosting..it has FBSD 5.3 and Bind 9.3. It sits
 behind a NAT device and is in a DMZ. The problem is when I setup the domain
 I told it to point to the public ip which is translated to the private IP on
 which DNS listens. Now when I try to go to the site it keeps trying to
 connect to the private IP the site is on instead of the correct public ip.
 Is this an issue with the DNS files being setup for the private network or
 should it matter?

If your DNS server is giving out the private IP address to machines on
the other side of the NAT device then yes, that does matter because
they won't be able to connect to it. If you want to run your DNS from
behind a NAT device (using port forwarding from a public IP perhaps -
that's what I do) then you might want to look into the concepts of
views in Bind, which will allow you to give out the private IP for
the domain to any machine on the same subnet (e.g. 192.168.0.x) and
the public IP address to any machine on the other side of the NAT
device. This is what I do when running my DNS from behind a router on
a private IP range and it works very well. It's a bit fiddly to setup
as each zone you have needs to be in both views (internal and
external) but otherwise it's fairly simple to setup.

Paul

-- 
Rogue Tory
http://www.roguetory.org.uk
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Cvsup problems

2005-04-20 Thread Paul Waring
On 4/19/05, Cody Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'm having cvsup update issues right now.  When I try to update I get:
 Cannot connect to cvsupxx.us.freebsd.org: Connection refused
 Will retry at xx:xx:xx
 No matter which server I try.

I had this problem a couple of days ago with the UK cvsup mirrors, the
only two things I could think of were:

1. I'd tried to cvsup once too often (e.g. two or three times in 24
hours) - don't think this was the case but I wouldn't be surprised if
the mirror maintainers impose temporary bans on IPs that try to
connect more than X times in a given period.

2. Some sort of update was pushed out that caused things to break on
the mirrors.

The problem seemed to go away for a couple of days but it's back for
me at the moment.

Paul

-- 
Rogue Tory
www.roguetory.org.uk
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Installing portupgrade without X.org

2005-04-09 Thread Paul Waring
I'm currently trying to get portupgrade onto my new FreeBSD system by
running make install clean from /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade (after
doing a recent cvsup). Everything seems to go along fine, it starts
fetching all the packages it requires and then suddenly I see a
download for X.org. This is a server system and there's no monitor
attached so installing X is a bit pointless and a waste of time for
me, but I don't know how to say install this port *without* X
dependancies as this is the first time I've come across this problem
(when I installed cvsup I used the -without-gui port so it wasn't a
problem).

I've searched around but the only relevant material I've managed to
find is something about installing the JDK without X.org which seems
to be specific to that case and all the other results seem to be about
problems installing X which I don't want to do. I'm fairly new to BSD
and I've never got this far setting up a system from scratch before
(every other time I've stumbled somewhere on the way) so any
advice/pointers would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance.

Paul

-- 
Rogue Tory
www.roguetory.org.uk
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Installing portupgrade without X.org

2005-04-09 Thread Paul Waring
On Apr 9, 2005 5:23 PM, Glenn Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 adding WITHOUT_X11=yes to /etc/make.conf will keep all your ports from
 trying to pull in X as a dependency.  I use that on all my server systems
 for exactly that reason.

Cheers Glenn, that solved the problem (I was having the same issue
with vim so I was glad to hear of a way to disable it globally).

Paul

-- 
Rogue Tory
www.roguetory.org.uk
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: portupgrade failing on firefox and thunderbird

2005-04-04 Thread Paul Waring
On Apr 4, 2005 4:31 PM, Richard Danter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I am trying to update my installations of firefox and thunderbird. I
 have done this several times in the past with no problems but lately I
 get the following errors (see below). Anyone else seeing this? I can
 update other ports just fine...

I had this problem last night with upgrading python, I found running:

cvsup /usr/ports/supfile

again and then running portupgrade python fixed things. No idea why,
best idea I can think of is that one of the files got corrupted during
transfer or there was network timeout on my end.

Obviously substitute /usr/ports/supfile for the location of your supfile. :)

Paul

-- 
Rogue Tory
www.roguetory.org.uk
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: which shell irc client do you like ?

2005-03-28 Thread Paul Waring
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 22:11:27 +, Chuck Robey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Just curious if you folks have tried the mozilla application, available
 only from mozilla (not firefox) called chatzilla?  I have tried nearly
 all of the other IRC clients, it's not a minimal one, but it's very very
 nice.

I've tried it, and the last time I did it crashed repeatedly and
brought firefox down with it. Plus I had to set it up on every machine
I connected from and tell it which channels to join, whereas with
irssi I can leave it running 24/7 and so never miss any messages or
have to mess about rejoining a load of different channels/networks.

Seeing as I'm typing in commands like /join and /msg anyway, I don't
see much point in an IRC client with a GUI - where's the extra
functionality?

Paul

-- 
Rogue Tory
www.roguetory.org.uk
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: which shell irc client do you like ?

2005-03-27 Thread Paul Waring
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 01:56:50 +0100, Gert Cuykens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 i am looking for a very simple colored one, in the style of
 
 me 19:10# bla bla
 you 19:10# bla bla
 
 no menus or borders

I don't know what you mean by no menus or borders, but irssi is pretty
stripped down and can be run from the console:

http://www.irssi.org/

I run it from a screen session all the time and it works well once you
get the hang of it. I think you can make it beep when new messages
come in but because I run it on a remote server I've never bothered to
look into/activate this feature.

Paul

-- 
Rogue Tory
www.roguetory.org.uk
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: which shell irc client do you like ?

2005-03-27 Thread Paul Waring
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 16:28:29 + (UTC), Christopher Nehren
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Surely you have screen(1) set up to show terminal beeps to you
 *somehow*, right? I personally prefer having it use esdplay because I
 usually have rhythmbox going, but you should be able to use a good ol'
 terminal bell.

No I don't, because it's not a feature that I see any need for. I'm
sure there is a way to do it but if I don't want that particular
feature I'm not going to spend time looking for how to enable it.

Paul

-- 
Rogue Tory
www.roguetory.org.uk
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: irc msn yahoo shell chat

2005-03-25 Thread Paul Waring
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 18:21:17 +0100, Gert Cuykens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Anything better then centericq ? I would like a very simple IRC style
 shell chat ?

I've not used it myself, but several people I know swear by BitlBee:

http://www.bitlbee.org/

Paul

-- 
Rogue Tory
www.roguetory.org.uk
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


5.3 install hangs part way through booting

2005-03-23 Thread Paul Waring
I've been trying to get FreeBSD installed on my laptop for some time
now, but I've always ended up running into the same problem of the
system hanging at boot. At the moment I'm using the 5.3 release CDs
(tried both the boot-only and minimal ones) and I can get to the
Welcome to BSD! screen fine. However, when I choose the default
option from there I get some messages scrolling up about it booting
the kernel and detecting some ACPI stuff, but after a few seconds it
gets to this message and then hangs:

uhci0: Intel 82801DB (ICH4) USB Controller USB-A port 0xefe0-0xefff
irq 11 at device 29.0 on pci0
uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED]

I've had a look around on Google but not found anything to do with
this issue or with my laptop (Toshiba Satellite M10 Pro, 1.3Ghz
Centrino with 256Mb RAM). One of the BSD people I know suggested
booting with ACPI disabled, which I tried but this time it hung on the
following message:

pcib1: PCIBIOS PCI-PCI bridge at device 1.0 on pci0
pci1: PCI bus on pcib1

which is actually less into the booting process than it gets with ACPI
enabled so I don't think this helped very much. Booting in safe mode
also hangs at this point.

I've not been able to find any information elsewhere that sheds light
on this (allthough I could be looking in the wrong places - since I
don't have a clue what is actually wrong I'm probably not using the
right search terms). Windows 2000/XP both work fine, as does every
version of Linux I've tried (the machine dual boots 2000/Ubuntu at the
moment) but I really want to get FreeBSD on it.

Does anyone have any ideas on what could be wrong, or what I should
try to get around the problem?

Thanks in advance.

Paul

-- 
Rogue Tory
www.roguetory.org.uk
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]