RE: Adding a second disk to increase the space for /var on first dislk : but umount /var failed

2008-06-10 Thread Tobias Hoellrich
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of dhaneshk k
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:15 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Manolis Kiagias
> Subject: Adding a second disk to increase the space for /var 
> on first dislk : but umount /var failed
> 
> I am able to   umount  /mnt   but not   /var 
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# umount /var/
> umount: unmount of /var failed: Device busy
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# umount /mnt/
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# umount /var/
> umount: unmount of /var failed: Device busy
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# df -h
> Filesystem SizeUsed   Avail Capacity  Mounted on
> /dev/ad7s1a496M329M127M72%/
> devfs  1.0K1.0K  0B   100%/dev
> /dev/ad7s1e496M5.4M451M 1%/tmp
> /dev/ad7s1f 44G 38G2.9G93%/usr
> /dev/ad7s1d1.4G221M1.1G16%/var
> devfs  1.0K1.0K  0B   100%/var/named/dev
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# umount /dev/ad7s1
> ad7s1   ad7s1a  ad7s1b  ad7s1c  ad7s1d  ad7s1e  ad7s1f  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# umount /dev/ad7s1d 
> umount: unmount of /var failed: Device busy
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# umouny /var/ 
> bash: umouny: command not found
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# umouny /var 
> bash: umouny: command not found
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# umount /var
> umount: unmount of /var failed: Device busy
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# pwd
> /root
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# umount /var
> umount: unmount of /var failed: Device busy
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# 
> 
> 
> 
> getting an error   Error 
> org.freedesktop.Hal.Device.PermissionDeniedByPolicy.
> 
> Details  hal-storage-fixed -mountrefused uid 0   How 
> to fix this and umount /var
>  
> 
> Any hints most welcome : 


Did you switch to single user-mode (shutdown now) before trying to
umount /var? If you did, there may be some other process still using
files/dirs in "/var". If you have lsof installed
(/usr/ports/sysutils/lsof), you can identify (as root) which process
still using stuff in /var:

santafe# lsof +D /var/
COMMANDPID  USER   FD   TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME
dhclient   321 _dhcp  cwd   VDIR  0,100  512 14578696 /var/empty
dhclient   321 _dhcp  rtd   VDIR  0,100  512 14578696 /var/empty
dhclient   321 _dhcp  jld   VDIR  0,100  512 14578696 /var/empty
dhclient   321 _dhcp6w  VREG  0,100 1007 14582324
/var/db/dhclient.leases.msk0
devd   537  root4u  unix 0xc6a78188  0t0
/var/run/devd.pipe
devd   537  root5w  VREG  0,1003 14580313
/var/run/devd.pid
syslogd603  root3w  VREG  0,1003 14580315
/var/run/syslog.pid
syslogd603  root4u  unix 0xc6a84310  0t0
/var/run/log
syslogd603  root5u  unix 0xc6a84188  0t0
/var/run/logpriv
...

Stop the processes (dhclient, devd, syslogd, etc.) that still use /var
and then try to umount it again.

Hope this helps - Tobias
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


RE: dhclient and dhcpd

2008-06-10 Thread Tobias Hoellrich
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sam 
> Fourman Jr.
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:08 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: dhclient and dhcpd
> 
> quick question I can't seem to figure out
> I have a FreeBSD 7 computer and I am having trouble with dhclient
> 
> here is my setup
> 
> Ethernet cable directly from fxp0 to a DSL Modem(that serves 
> 192.168.0.x via
> DHCP)
> A wireless card(ral0) in hostap mode it has a static ip of 
> 192.168.1.1. I
> have dhcpd running and configured to listen on ral0 interface. it is
> supposed to had out DHCP(192.168.1.x) to wifi clients.
> 
> fxp0 needs to use dhclient to obtain a IP from the DSL modem
> the problem is, if I run dhclient fxp0, I get a reply from 
> the ral0 dhcpd
> server.
> how do I tell fxp0 to forget about ral0 and listen for the 
> DSL modem's dhcp
> server ?
> 
> isn't there some quick dhclient.conf setting?

man dhclient.conf suggests you should use:

reject 192.168.1.1;

Hope this helps
  Tobias
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


RE: Adding a second disk to increase the space for /var on first dislk : but umount /var failed

2008-06-10 Thread Tobias Hoellrich
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of dhaneshk k
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:15 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Manolis Kiagias
> Subject: Adding a second disk to increase the space for /var 
> on first dislk : but umount /var failed
> 
> I am able to   umount  /mnt   but not   /var 
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# umount /var/
> umount: unmount of /var failed: Device busy
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# umount /mnt/
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# umount /var/
> umount: unmount of /var failed: Device busy
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# df -h
> Filesystem SizeUsed   Avail Capacity  Mounted on
> /dev/ad7s1a496M329M127M72%/
> devfs  1.0K1.0K  0B   100%/dev
> /dev/ad7s1e496M5.4M451M 1%/tmp
> /dev/ad7s1f 44G 38G2.9G93%/usr
> /dev/ad7s1d1.4G221M1.1G16%/var
> devfs  1.0K1.0K  0B   100%/var/named/dev
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# umount /dev/ad7s1
> ad7s1   ad7s1a  ad7s1b  ad7s1c  ad7s1d  ad7s1e  ad7s1f  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# umount /dev/ad7s1d 
> umount: unmount of /var failed: Device busy
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# umouny /var/ 
> bash: umouny: command not found
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# umouny /var 
> bash: umouny: command not found
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# umount /var
> umount: unmount of /var failed: Device busy
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# pwd
> /root
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# umount /var
> umount: unmount of /var failed: Device busy
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# 
> 
> 
> 
> getting an error   Error 
> org.freedesktop.Hal.Device.PermissionDeniedByPolicy.
> 
> Details  hal-storage-fixed -mountrefused uid 0   How 
> to fix this and umount /var
>  
> 
> Any hints most welcome : 


Did you switch to single user-mode (shutdown now) before trying to
umount /var? If you did, there may be some other process still using
files/dirs in "/var". If you have lsof installed
(/usr/ports/sysutils/lsof), you can identify (as root) which process
still using stuff in /var:

santafe# lsof +D /var/
COMMANDPID  USER   FD   TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME
dhclient   321 _dhcp  cwd   VDIR  0,100  512 14578696 /var/empty
dhclient   321 _dhcp  rtd   VDIR  0,100  512 14578696 /var/empty
dhclient   321 _dhcp  jld   VDIR  0,100  512 14578696 /var/empty
dhclient   321 _dhcp6w  VREG  0,100 1007 14582324
/var/db/dhclient.leases.msk0
devd   537  root4u  unix 0xc6a78188  0t0
/var/run/devd.pipe
devd   537  root5w  VREG  0,1003 14580313
/var/run/devd.pid
syslogd603  root3w  VREG  0,1003 14580315
/var/run/syslog.pid
syslogd603  root4u  unix 0xc6a84310  0t0
/var/run/log
syslogd603  root5u  unix 0xc6a84188  0t0
/var/run/logpriv
...

Stop the processes (dhclient, devd, syslogd, etc.) that still use /var
and then try to umount it again.

Hope this helps - Tobias
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


RE: Make buildworld

2008-06-08 Thread Tobias Hoellrich
$ man make
...
-j max_jobs
  Specify the maximum number of jobs that make may have running at
  any one time.  Turns compatibility mode off, unless the -B flag
  is also specified. 

HTH - Tobias

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jos 
> Chrispijn
> Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2008 7:50 AM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Make buildworld
> 
> Can someone tell me the difference between 'make -j2 buildworld' and 
> 'make -j4 buildworld' ?
> 
> Thanks,
> Jos
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


RE: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Tobias Hoellrich
[Disclaimer: I work for Adobe Systems. I have nothing to do with the
Flash Player. I'm a grunt who works on other stuff. This is my personal
opinion as a long-time FreeBSD user and I'm not making any statements
for Adobe.]

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jona Joachim
> Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2008 4:58 PM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Flashplugin
> 
> Flash is a big pain IMO.
> The Flash question has been asked *a lot* of times on this list.
> The answer usually boils down to "use www/nspluginwrapper" or "use
> linux-firefox". Both "solutions" are far from optimal.
> My solution is to simply ignore Flash content. It makes your 
> "online experience"
> much more enjoyable. This is my personal choice of course.

I'm afraid that's the age-old question of demand. If there was enough
demand out there, I'm sure that any software manufacturer would consider
FreeBSD a platform that needs to be supported. 
Providing support for the Flash Player on FreeBSD is not a one-shot
thing. You don't have some summer intern create a port of the current
version of the player, release it and then be done with it. If a
platform is officially supported it means dedication of a lot of
resources: engineering and especially testing. Once a platform is
adopted it needs to be rev'ed whenever the other platforms are updated,
otherwise you end up again in a situation where a certain application
that requires new Flash Player features does not work for you. This all
means time and money. Adobe as any other public company has to justify
its actions to its shareholders. If anybody scrutinizes the books and
sees a substantial amount of engineering and QA resources being
dedicated to a platform that has very little desktop market penetration
and because of that some other important high-reach features were
dropped, I'm sure that public company would have to answer some
questions about it. 

Since the last discussion I actually contacted the Flash Player team and
asked what it would take to get an official port for Flash Player on
FreeBSD. I was asked to provide numbers that would indicate how many
*desktop* FreeBSD systems are out there and how many of them are used on
a *regular* basis. So, if anybody on this list can provide those
answers, I'd be more than happy to do my part and relay the answers back
to those people who can actually influence decisions in this area.
Again, I'm not speaking for Adobe, I'm just offering to help as much as
I can as a happy FreeBSD user (well, if it wasn't for
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=123735 on 8.0-CURRENT). 

> I think it is rather reducing when you have to beg unkind 
> vendors to eventually
> consider that you exist.
> I don't think proprietary binary formats have their place on 
> the web. The WWW is
> an information exchange platform, why would you want to 
> diffuse information
> around the globe when you know that a lot of people will not 
> be able to decipher
> it? It's a bit arrogant I think.

That's simply wrong. The Flash format byte-code is *not* proprietary. If
you want to, you can go ahead and create your own Flash Player. The
specifications for the format are freely available at:
http://www.adobe.com/openscreenproject/developers/

And Gnash (http://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/), which was started before
the spec was available, will certainly benefit from this. 

And to address a previous message: if your bank requires you to use the
Flash Player to make a transaction, then you will need to get in touch
with your bank and not blame it on the non-existence of the Flash Player
on your platform. A disabled person with a text-only browser or a
screen-reader will certainly have the same issues. 

My offer stands: if anybody can provide the numbers above, I'm going to
forward them to the right people and work things from my end. 

Don't beat me up, I'm for the support - even if I'm not using FreeBSD as
a desktop OS. 

Thanks and happy weekend - Tobias
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


RE: size of executable - g95 vs gfortran42 - shared libs?

2008-06-05 Thread Tobias Hoellrich
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> Anton Shterenlikht
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 7:21 AM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: size of executable - g95 vs gfortran42 - shared libs?
> 
> I use two different fortran90 compiler on a simple input file
> and get executables which differ in size by almost 3 orders of
> magnitude, see below. Is this something to do with the use
> of shared libraries?
> 
> % gfortran42 tmp.f90
> % ls -al a.out
> -rwxr-xr-x  1   9179  5 Jun 14:15 a.out
> % g95 tmp.f90
> % ls -al a.out
> -rwxr-xr-x  1 546413  5 Jun 14:15 a.out
> %
> 
> The program results seem to be identical.
> 
> many thanks
> anton

Run "file" and "ldd" on the executables to see the difference:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# file `which ls`
/bin/ls: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (FreeBSD),
for FreeBSD 8.0 (800038), dynamically linked (uses shared libs),
FreeBSD-style, stripped

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ldd `which ls`
/bin/ls:
libutil.so.7 => /lib/libutil.so.7 (0x28082000)
libncurses.so.7 => /lib/libncurses.so.7 (0x2809)
libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x280cf000)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#

Hope this helps
  Tobias
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


RE: gnash leave a blank page when visit youtube

2008-06-02 Thread Tobias Hoellrich
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derek Graham
> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 2:59 PM
> To: Gerard
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: gnash leave a blank page when visit youtube
> 
> I heard a rumor Microsoft was planning to create a linux version of 
> silverlight, I also heard a rumor that silverlight could 
> overcome flash 
> alltogether. Yeah I have heard the same, I listen to MacBreek 
> Weekly podcast 
> and hear all about it on there :)

Got to add that to my book of funny rumours :) Show me one true
cross-platform product from Microsoft that has been updated in sync with
the Windows versions over the years. If you find that, I guess we have
an answer; if you don't find one, I guess we have an answer as well ;-)

Tobias
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


RE: Unix command-line tools to edit SharePoint site?

2008-05-24 Thread Tobias Hoellrich
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kelly Jones
> Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2008 1:58 PM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Unix command-line tools to edit SharePoint site?
> 
> I begrudgingly use a Windows SharePoint server at a 
> customer's request.
> 
> I'd like to automate (command-line) updating and creating documents,
> lists, etc.
> 
> Is there a Unix tool that does this?
> 
> I know SharePoint has an "API", which basically spoofs the GET/POST
> calls that your browser would make(?).
> 
> Has anyone written a Unix command-line tool (or Perl module, etc) that
> abstracts this?

Kelly - HTTP::WebDav is your friend. It allows you to access your
SharePoint site from perl. You can retrieve data and store data. Also
take a look at hits perl-snippet:
http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=612797

Hope this helps
  Tobias
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Lock order reversal submissions?

2008-05-23 Thread Tobias Hoellrich
Does anybody happen to know where I can submit lock order reversal
outputs (like the one below)? I don't want to spam freebsd-current and
http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/lor.html seems to have not been
updated in over a year now. 

Thanks - Tobias


This is from 8.0-CURRENT:

May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel: lock order reversal:
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel: 1st 0xc6768df4 devfs (devfs) @
/usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2044
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel: 2nd 0xc681cc94 devfsmount (devfsmount) @
/usr/src/sys/fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:293
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel: KDB: stack backtrace:
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel:
db_trace_self_wrapper(c0b28775,c63f9bb4,c07b908e,c0b2afd0,c681cc94,...)
at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x26
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel:
kdb_backtrace(c0b2afd0,c681cc94,c0b1be5e,c0b1be5e,c0b1be78,...) at
kdb_backtrace+0x29
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel:
witness_checkorder(c681cc94,9,c0b1be78,125,123,...) at
witness_checkorder+0x6de
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel:
_sx_xlock(c681cc94,0,c0b1be78,125,c681cc94,...) at _sx_xlock+0x7d
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel:
devfs_allocv(c6858000,c686b000,c63f9c20,c6490d20,c6490dc4,...) at
devfs_allocv+0x142
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel:
devfs_root(c686b000,8,c0c9f334,c6490d20,4,...) at devfs_root+0x51
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel:
set_rootvnode(c0c9f320,0,c0b30d78,5f6,c07f6a20,...) at
set_rootvnode+0x2d
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel:
vfs_mountroot(c0c4c0d0,4,c0b20362,264,c63f9cc4,...) at
vfs_mountroot+0x34c
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel:
start_init(0,c63f9d38,c0b21cf9,30d,c648ed0c,...) at start_init+0x65
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel: fork_exit(c0744e00,0,c63f9d38) at
fork_exit+0xb8
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel: fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0x8
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel: --- trap 0, eip = 0, esp = 0xc63f9d70,
ebp = 0 ---
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel: Trying to mount root from
ufs:/dev/ad4s1a

May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel: lock order reversal: (sleepable after
non-sleepable)
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel: 1st 0xc68792c0 bufobj interlock (bufobj
interlock) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:2442
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel: 2nd 0xda4e5c80 bufwait (bufwait) @
/usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:2456
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel: KDB: stack backtrace:
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel:
db_trace_self_wrapper(c0b28775,c63f9790,c07b908e,c0b2afd0,da4e5c80,...)
at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x26
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel:
kdb_backtrace(c0b2afd0,da4e5c80,c0b2fd41,c0b2fd41,c0b2f2f0,...) at
kdb_backtrace+0x29
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel:
witness_checkorder(da4e5c80,9,c0b2f2f0,998,c0b24355,...) at
witness_checkorder+0x6de
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel:
__lockmgr_args(da4e5c80,81900,c68792c0,c0b2fc9d,50,...) at
__lockmgr_args+0x777
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel: getblk(c6879218,0,0,800,0,...) at
getblk+0x153
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel: breadn(c6879218,0,0,800,0,...) at
breadn+0x44
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel: bread(c6879218,0,0,800,0,...) at
bread+0x4c
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel:
ffs_blkatoff(c6879218,0,0,0,c63f99a8,...) at ffs_blkatoff+0xd1
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel:
ufs_lookup(c63f99ec,c6879218,c63f9b50,c6879218,c63f9a0c,...) at
ufs_lookup+0x2e6
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel:
VOP_CACHEDLOOKUP_APV(c0c025c0,c63f99ec,c63f9b50,c63f9b3c,c645e300,...)
at VOP_CACHEDLOOKUP_APV+0xa5
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel:
vfs_cache_lookup(c63f9a6c,c63f9a6c,50c,8,c6879218,...) at
vfs_cache_lookup+0xd0
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel:
VOP_LOOKUP_APV(c0c025c0,c63f9a6c,c0b30b26,1b0,c63f9b3c,...) at
VOP_LOOKUP_APV+0xa5
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel:
lookup(c63f9b24,c0b30b26,d8,c0,c645e42c,...) at lookup+0x57e
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel:
namei(c63f9b24,c63f9b28,c07b886c,c076fe5c,c0c9ebd0,...) at namei+0x44b
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel:
kern_unlinkat(c6490d20,ff9c,c0b311b5,1,c63f9c5c,...) at
kern_unlinkat+0x46
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel:
kern_unlink(c6490d20,c0b311b5,1,631,0,...) at kern_unlink+0x27
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel:
vfs_mountroot_try(c0b3136f,c0b1f07b,c0b17ad8,1,c07f6a20,...) at
vfs_mountroot_try+0x472
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel:
vfs_mountroot(c0c4c0d0,4,c0b20362,264,c63f9cc4,...) at
vfs_mountroot+0x40e
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel:
start_init(0,c63f9d38,c0b21cf9,30d,c648ed0c,...) at start_init+0x65
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel: fork_exit(c0744e00,0,c63f9d38) at
fork_exit+0xb8
May 22 10:57:08 santafe kernel: fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0x8

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


RE: Server crashing, no explanations

2008-05-20 Thread Tobias Hoellrich
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> Roberto Nunnari
> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 10:49 AM
> To: Alan Gilmour
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Server crashing, no explanations
> 
> Then, if crash dumps are enabled, it could be a HW failure..
> Once I had a server crashing with no dumps, and I found out
> it was I power supply problem.
> 
> Best regards.
> Robi
> 

Same here: my aging Dell with ECC Rambus (yes, Rambus) memory was
rebooting without producing a panic and thus without a chance for a
crash-dump, because one memory bank on the system was failing. 

However, the BIOS on the system was nice enough to tell me about the
memory errors and even tell me which module it thought it was. 

That may be something you should check on your system (meaning: BIOS
error log - if you happen to have one of those). 

Cheers - Tobias
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


7.0-STABLE panic on AMD64

2008-05-16 Thread Tobias Hoellrich
Hi all - I'm just in the process of replacing an aging Dell system with
a cheap Acer AMD64 box with the latest BIOS. I installed 7.0 from the
release ISOs, then updated the source-tree via cvsup to the latest
7.0-STABLE this morning. I rebuilt world and the kernel (SANTAFE kernel
conf is a plain copy of GENERIC) and I'm still seeing the same issue
when I boot:


FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Fri May 16 04:06:56 MDT 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SANTAFE
Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4200+ (2194.51-MHz
686-class CPU)
  Origin = "AuthenticAMD"  Id = 0x60fb2  Stepping = 2
 
Features=0x178bfbff
  Features2=0x2001
  AMD
Features=0xea500800
  AMD Features2=0x11f
  Cores per package: 2
real memory  = 1878917120 (1791 MB)
avail memory = 1828098048 (1743 MB)
ACPI APIC Table: 
AP #1 (PHY# 1) failed!
panic y/n? [y] 
FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs
 cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID:  0
 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID:  1
ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 4
ioapic0  irqs 0-23 on motherboard
kbd1 at kbdmux0
ath_hal: 0.9.20.3 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413,
RF5413)
acpi0:  on motherboard
acpi0: [ITHREAD]
acpi0: Power Button (fixed)
acpi0: reservation of 0, a (3) failed
acpi0: reservation of 10, 6fee (3) failed
Timecounter "ACPI-safe" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 850

Answering "n" to the panic, boots the system just fine and everything
seems to be operational. 

Would some kind soul know how I can avoid the panic and get to a clean
boot?

Thanks - Tobias
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"