quotas + jail ?

2006-01-11 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Hello,

I have simple question - is possible to use quotas in jail(8) environment ?

I set up my system as follows:
1. this is setting in main environment
cat /etc/fstab | grep VSERVERS
/dev/ad3s1f /VSERVERS   ufs
rw,noatime,groupquota=/VSERVERS/machine1/quotagroup,userquota=/VSERVERS/machine1/quotauser

2   2

2. this is setting in jail(8)
/dev/ad3s1f  /ufs
rw,noatime,soft-updates,groupquota=/quotagroup,userquota=/quotauser

But still cannot use quotas in jail. I thought if I have access to
quotagroup and quotauser files, I can simply use quotas advantages.

I try

[EMAIL PROTECTED] /etc/rc.d/quota restart
quotaoff: /: Operation not permitted
quotaoff: /: Operation not permitted
Checking quotas: done.
Enabling quotas:quotaon: using /quotagroup on
quotaon: /: Operation not permitted
quotaon: using /quotauser on
quotaon: /: Operation not permitted
 done.


It seems to be impossible ( some kernel restriction ). :-( Is there some
way to allow this ? My last idea was to replicate users and groups to
main system and use quotas from it - but it is not good solution if we
have several hundreds users in jail(8).

Thank you !

Vladimir Dvorak

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: quotas + jail ?

2006-01-11 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Björn König wrote:

 Vladimir Dvorak schrieb:

 I have simple question - is possible to use quotas in jail(8)
 environment ?
 [...]

 It seems to be impossible ( some kernel restriction ). :-( Is there some
 way to allow this ? My last idea was to replicate users and groups to
 main system and use quotas from it - but it is not good solution if we
 have several hundreds users in jail(8).


 You don't need to replicate users and groups, just use UIDs and GIDs.
 There is a serious disadvantage: if you set quota for a specific UID
 then it affects all users with the same UID in different jails and
 even at the host; I guess this is not what you want.

 If you want to restrict the space that can be consumed by a jail then
 you might use memory devices, i.e.

 # create 1 GiB file
 $ dd if=/dev/zero of=myjail321 count=16k bs=64k
 $ mdconfig -af myjail321
 md321
 $ mkdir /jail/myjail321
 $ mount /dev/md321 /jail/myjail321
 $ cd /usr/src
 $ make installworld DESTDIR=/jail/myjail321

 and so on ...


 Regards
 Björn

Thank you Björn,

I thing it is possible. I will shift existing UIDs ( in jail) to higher
values (5- ) and apply quotas on them. I will try to eliminate UID
mixing.

Thank you for your suggestion.

Vladimir
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: sk0: watchdog timeout

2005-11-28 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Bernhard Fischer wrote:

If you change hardware settings, you should also maintain the same
settings on both ends of the wire, i.e. at the computer *and* the
ethernet switch.
  

[SNIP]

I just forced it to use 100baseTX /
full-duplex which I think was used before I forced it as well.



That's exactly what I ment. If you force your sk0 to 100-full do the same with 
your switch. If you set sk0 to auto-config -- do it with your switch.

Watch your interface-counters: 

netstat -I sk0 -b -d -t

If the hardware (cards, cabeling, plugs, ...) is ok, there shouldn't be any 
errors for days or even weeks!

Regards,
bh
  

Hi Bernhard,

thanks for your message. I suppose we all know something about
networking, but this is hardware/driver related problem ( with the
highest probability ). I used my server in two different environments -
at home and now at serverhouse. No difference.
Still getting (from time to time ):

sk0: watchdog timeout
sk0: link state changed to DOWN
sk0: watchdog timeout
sk0: link state changed to UP
sk0: watchdog timeout
sk0: link state changed to DOWN
sk0: watchdog timeout
sk0: link state changed to UP
sk0: watchdog timeout
sk0: link state changed to DOWN

messages. But server still running. I am out of ideas how can we solve
our problem and I am about to buy new network card, because this
stressfull situation is not good. ;-)

Vladimir
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: sk0: watchdog timeout

2005-11-28 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Danial Thom wrote:

--- Vladimir Dvorak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  

Bernhard Fischer wrote:



If you change hardware settings, you should
  

also maintain the same


settings on both ends of the wire, i.e. at
  

the computer *and* the


ethernet switch.
 

  

[SNIP]

I just forced it to use 100baseTX /
full-duplex which I think was used before I


forced it as well.


   



That's exactly what I ment. If you force your
  

sk0 to 100-full do the same with 


your switch. If you set sk0 to auto-config --
  

do it with your switch.


Watch your interface-counters: 

netstat -I sk0 -b -d -t

If the hardware (cards, cabeling, plugs, ...)
  

is ok, there shouldn't be any 


errors for days or even weeks!

Regards,
bh
 

  

Hi Bernhard,

thanks for your message. I suppose we all know
something about
networking, but this is hardware/driver related
problem ( with the
highest probability ). I used my server in two
different environments -
at home and now at serverhouse. No difference.
Still getting (from time to time ):

sk0: watchdog timeout
sk0: link state changed to DOWN
sk0: watchdog timeout
sk0: link state changed to UP
sk0: watchdog timeout
sk0: link state changed to DOWN
sk0: watchdog timeout
sk0: link state changed to UP
sk0: watchdog timeout
sk0: link state changed to DOWN

messages. But server still running. I am out of
ideas how can we solve
our problem and I am about to buy new network
card, because this
stressfull situation is not good. ;-)

Vladimir



There are generally 2 cases in which you'll get a
watchdog timeout message on a network card
driver. 

1) Your machine is in livelock (ie overrun)
2) There is a problem with the interrupts

Clearly you should know if 1) was occurring. With
2), it could be a driver or hardware problem or
both.

DT

  

Hi,

thanks for reply. The first case ( overrun ) is impossible, the server
has (for now) very low traffic ( load is 0.00 almost all the time ). The
second case is right answer. ;-) I suspect driver related problem.
Before FreeBSD 6.0, there were Linux Debian and I didn`t mentioned any
problem. I had there for several days FreeBSD 5.4  and watchdogs appear
too.

Vladimir


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: sk0: watchdog timeout

2005-11-27 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Hans Nieser wrote:

 Nicolas Blais wrote:

 On November 26, 2005 09:15 am, Hans Nieser wrote:
  

 A long, long time ago Vladimir Dvorak wrote:
   

 Hello,

 I have a problem with network card. From time to time kernel says

 sk0: watchdog timeout
 

 I just ran into the same issue. I have an ASUS A8N-SLI Deluxe in my
 desktop machine which runs FreeBSD 6.0+Xorg+Gnome. It has two on-board
 NICs, the nvidia one and a Marvel one. The nvidia was one big
 disaster and
 was giving me device timeouts so I never bothered with that one again.
   


 I have an sk0 too on one of my computer's onboard A8V-DX which will
 timeout once in a while too.  I found a way to reduce down time by
 modifying my rc.conf to force 'full-duplex 100Mbps'.  Now, even when
 it goes into a watchdog timeout, I quickly get back my link within
 that second.

 This is what my rc.conf line looks like:

 ifconfig_sk0=inet 192.168.1.100 media 100baseTX mediaopt full-duplex
 netmask 255.255.255.0
  

I found some other solution here:
http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/if_sk.html

There is recommended to use correct on-chip RAM size:

6. use correct on-chip RAM size; committed to HEAD
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2004-November/035293.html

Can some of you know how ?

Thank you.

Vladimir Dvorak

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


SQUID + antivirus content filter

2005-11-18 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Hello *,

I would like to secure network against themselves with proxy and
antivirus solution.

My prerequisities are:
SQUID, CLAMAV

What software would you recommend for such things ? ( I unsuccesfully
tried Viralator in combination with SquidGuard. )
There are other projects like Dansguardian or squid-vscan (which is
neccessary to patch squid sources and this is the last step on my
production server ).
Do you know some good howto, solution ?

Thank you,

Vladimir


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Why my Freebsd 4.11 box keeps rebooting ?

2005-11-18 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Jian Guo wrote:

Hi,

My Freebsd 4.11 boxes is used as a firewall and proxy
server.(ipfilter 3.4.35, squid 2.5 stable 7 is
intalled on Dell Poweredge700). 

On 11/11/2005 and only on that day, the box keep
rebooting  every 20 mins to several hours. After the
first reboot, I diable the proxy server and only let
firewall run.( another service is sshd and no other
service). After 20 mins it rebooted again, so I
swithed to a backup firewall, the same configuration
4.11 only sshd ipfilter and no proxy, but different
hardware. Then 30 mins later it rebooted again.

Then I swithed back the original box(only firewall)
and try find any log errors, but I could find nothing
wrong and the system was runnig normal,no over load,
no much traffic. And it kept rebooting for several
times. In the everning, it remained stable, and keeps
running without problems until now(for a week). 

I am so confused with it. I am the only one that
managed the box, and I checked the login files ,
nobody just me.

Any body has some clues about it?


Thanks,

Jian

Name: Jian Guo
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  

Hello Jian,

isn`t it electricity infrastructure problem ? Do you have stable UPS ?

Vladimir
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: SQUID + antivirus content filter

2005-11-18 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Vladimir Dvorak wrote:

Hello *,

I would like to secure network against themselves with proxy and
antivirus solution.

My prerequisities are:
SQUID, CLAMAV

What software would you recommend for such things ? ( I unsuccesfully
tried Viralator in combination with SquidGuard. )
There are other projects like Dansguardian or squid-vscan (which is
neccessary to patch squid sources and this is the last step on my
production server ).
Do you know some good howto, solution ?

Thank you,

Vladimir

  


I found relatively interesting solution HAVP too:
http://www.server-side.de/documentation.htm

Vladimir


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Jail and priority

2005-11-15 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Hello all,

simple question: is possible to decrease or increate priority for whole
jail without making script which parses all jail processes ?

Thank you,

Vladimir
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


system lacks resources

2005-11-14 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Hello list,

I have problem with loaded Postfix server.  I use Postfix, Amavis,
Spamassassin, Cyrus-Imap.
When the server is under mail load, these messages appears in logs:

(host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 450 4.4.1 Can't connect to 127.0.0.1
port 10025, Net::SMTP: connect: Operation not permitted (Operation not
permitted) at /usr/local/sbin/amavisd line 4323, GEN4 line 839.,
MTA([127.0.0.1]:10025), id=63072-10 (in reply to end of DATA command))

When the load decreases, these messages are delivered.

I thing this is problem related to allowed system resources. Has anyone
met this problem ? How can I increase or where to tune system variables
? /etc/login.conf ?

Thank you,

Vladimir
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: sk0: watchdog timeout

2005-11-04 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Nicolas Blais wrote:

On November 3, 2005 06:37 pm, martinko wrote:
  

Vladimir Dvorak wrote:


Hello,

I have a problem with network card. From time to time kernel says

sk0: watchdog timeout

It has (probably) random behavior.

I use FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p8, motherboard is ASUS A8V Deluxe (AMD64,
Athlon64XP 3200+) and internal network card from pciconf -v -l

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:10:0: class=0x02 card=0x811a1043 chip=0x432011ab 
rev=0x13
hdr=0x00
vendor   = 'Marvell Semiconductor (Was: Galileo Technology Ltd)'
device   = '88E8001 Gigabit 32-bit Ethernet Controller with
Integrated PHY'
class= network
subclass = ethernet


This machine should be sent to serverhouse and I am not sure, if it is
ready. :-( Can anyone tell me what is the solution ? To buy another
netcard ?

Thank you,

Vladimir Dvorak




___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  

the same chip here and i see the messages from time to time too.
not sure what's the problem or if there is any at all.
so far card has been working alright, or at least i haven't noticed any
issues.

m.




Same here too:

sk0: watchdog timeout
sk0: watchdog timeout
sk0: watchdog timeout

with occasional :
sk0: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 10 pkt len 10)
sk0: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 11 pkt len 11)

Network is running fine, though sometimes accessing the internet takes 2-3 
seconds (as if the DNS was not responding) but then is fine. 

  

Yes, the same feeling. This error is independend on load. I downloaded
tens of GB and nothing happend, but usually after boot this error
occures ( I do not know if it is really error).
Tonight I tested small pings on this machine from several stations in
network, no watchdog timeout message.
Once I mentioned 1-2 seconds networking break, when I 'dmesg'
immediatelly after that, the watchdog was there.
Im not sure if I can put it as production server :-(. But   I will
try. ;-)

Vladimir
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


cannot jkill JAIL

2005-11-04 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Hi,

cannot jkill jail.

I have in /etc/rc.conf this:

jail_enable=yes
jail_list=firma1
jail_set_hostname_allow=NO

jail_firma1_rootdir=/mnt/JAILS/10.0.0.166
jail_firma1_hostname=company1.domain.com
jail_firma1_ip=10.0.0.166
jail_firma1_exec_start=/bin/sh /etc/rc
jail_firma1_exec_stop=/bin/sh /etc/rc.shutdown
jail_firma1_exec_devfs_enable=YES

After boot process I ssh to host system and look for jail like this:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] jls
   JID  IP Address  Hostname  Path
 1  10.0.0.166  company1.domain.com  
/mnt/JAILS/10.0.0.166

And the problem ? I cannot jkill this jail

[EMAIL PROTECTED] jkill -r 1
jkill: couldn't connect to kernel: bad namelist - no kernbase
[EMAIL PROTECTED] jkill -k 1
jkill: couldn't connect to kernel: bad namelist - no kernbase
[EMAIL PROTECTED] jkill -f -k 1
jkill: couldn't connect to kernel: bad namelist - no kernbase

No chance. :-( ( but as you can see, jls reports jail running and I can
via SSH connect to)

What I am doing wrong ?

Thank you,

Vladimir


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: cannot jkill JAIL

2005-11-04 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Vladimir Dvorak wrote:

Hi,

cannot jkill jail.

I have in /etc/rc.conf this:

jail_enable=yes
jail_list=firma1
jail_set_hostname_allow=NO

jail_firma1_rootdir=/mnt/JAILS/10.0.0.166
jail_firma1_hostname=company1.domain.com
jail_firma1_ip=10.0.0.166
jail_firma1_exec_start=/bin/sh /etc/rc
jail_firma1_exec_stop=/bin/sh /etc/rc.shutdown
jail_firma1_exec_devfs_enable=YES

After boot process I ssh to host system and look for jail like this:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] jls
   JID  IP Address  Hostname  Path
 1  10.0.0.166  company1.domain.com  
/mnt/JAILS/10.0.0.166

And the problem ? I cannot jkill this jail

[EMAIL PROTECTED] jkill -r 1
jkill: couldn't connect to kernel: bad namelist - no kernbase
[EMAIL PROTECTED] jkill -k 1
jkill: couldn't connect to kernel: bad namelist - no kernbase
[EMAIL PROTECTED] jkill -f -k 1
jkill: couldn't connect to kernel: bad namelist - no kernbase

No chance. :-( ( but as you can see, jls reports jail running and I can
via SSH connect to)

What I am doing wrong ?

Thank you,

Vladimir

  

Now it is solved.

I should mount devfs into the jail also. ('mount_devfs devfs
/mnt/JAILS/10.0.0.167/dev')

Vladimir

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


sk0: watchdog timeout

2005-11-03 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Hello,

I have a problem with network card. From time to time kernel says

sk0: watchdog timeout

It has (probably) random behavior.

I use FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p8, motherboard is ASUS A8V Deluxe (AMD64,
Athlon64XP 3200+) and internal network card from pciconf -v -l

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:10:0: class=0x02 card=0x811a1043 chip=0x432011ab rev=0x13
hdr=0x00
vendor   = 'Marvell Semiconductor (Was: Galileo Technology Ltd)'
device   = '88E8001 Gigabit 32-bit Ethernet Controller with
Integrated PHY'
class= network
subclass = ethernet


This machine should be sent to serverhouse and I am not sure, if it is
ready. :-( Can anyone tell me what is the solution ? To buy another
netcard ?

Thank you,

Vladimir Dvorak




___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


make.conf - question

2005-10-31 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Hello,

where can I found ALL parameters suited for /etc/make.conf ? For
example, I wanted install some software from ports without X11, but

man 5 make.conf

doesn`t include WITHOUT_X11 option.

Fortunatelly I found this page

http://www.gsp.com/cgi-bin/man.cgi?section=5topic=make.conf

and included some necessary parameters into my make.conf.

Ok, I found this

--- man make.conf ---
The purpose of make.conf is not to run commands or perform compilation
 actions directly.  Instead, it is included by the various makefiles in
 /usr/src, /usr/ports and /usr/doc which conditionalize their internal
 actions according to the settings found there.
--- cut ---

in man page, but im not sure where exactly should I look ?

(OS: 5.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE )

Thank you,

Vladimir

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


proftpd + disable reverze UID/GID mapping

2005-09-15 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Hello *,

I am using ProFTPd with MySQL authentication. Is possible to disable
UID/GID mapping ?

I can log into existing ftp account but when I use for example ftp
command 'ls', connection is immediatedly terminated. The reason of
termination is, that proftpd is trying to map UID/GID number to
user/group names. In proftpd.conf I have:

SQLUserInfoftp login password id + 1 as uid 1 as
gid path NULL

The error is obvious in SQL query ( /var/log/mysql.log ):

Query   SELECT login, password, id + 1 as uid, 1
 as gid, path FROM ftp WHERE (id + 1 as uid = 0) LIMIT

Is possible to disable this mapping ? 'PersistentPasswd off' seems
doesn`t work.

Vladimir
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: proftpd + disable reverze UID/GID mapping

2005-09-15 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Vladimir Dvorak wrote:

Hello *,

I am using ProFTPd with MySQL authentication. Is possible to disable
UID/GID mapping ?

I can log into existing ftp account but when I use for example ftp
command 'ls', connection is immediatedly terminated. The reason of
termination is, that proftpd is trying to map UID/GID number to
user/group names. In proftpd.conf I have:

SQLUserInfoftp login password id + 1 as uid 1 as
gid path NULL

The error is obvious in SQL query ( /var/log/mysql.log ):

Query   SELECT login, password, id + 1 as uid, 1
 as gid, path FROM ftp WHERE (id + 1 as uid = 0) LIMIT

Is possible to disable this mapping ? 'PersistentPasswd off' seems
doesn`t work.

Vladimir
  

If there is directory, which has the same uid as user logged in, its ok.
Problem occures when this directory has another uid - then proftpd
uid/gid subsystem tries to query mysql to find out proper name to
uid/gid number.

Vladimir
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: cyrus-imap + virtualdomains

2005-09-14 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Erik Norgaard wrote:

 Vladimir Dvorak wrote:

 Only cyrus-imap22 or later supports virtual domains, I assume you use
 this version. It should be supported by default.


 I am using 2.1.18 version.

 There should be VirtualDomains supported too: (since 2.1.x)
 http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/download/imapd/changes.html


 No, I think you read it wrong: Changes to the Cyrus IMAP Server since
 2.1.x  meaning that these changes are since the 2.1.x branch and are
 supported in 2.2.0 and higher.

 Same document, 2.2.0:

 * A large number of bugs involving virtual domain support have been
   fixed

 (meaning that even if I'm wrong about it for 2.1.x, better upgrade
 beyond 2.2.0 to get past those bugs).

 I suggest you upgrade, anyway, since I don't use that version and
 things has changed significantly, I can't really give you the advice
 will work - only what works for 2.2.x.

 Cheers, Erik

Yes, you are right. Now I am using 2.2.12 and virtdomains seem to be
working. But I found another strange problem:

devel:/var/run# cyradm -u [EMAIL PROTECTED] localhost
IMAP Password:
localhost.localdomain cm user.test

^^^ it works; user test is included into defaultdomain.

But when I try:
localhost.localdomain cm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
createmailbox: Invalid mailbox name

Cyrus is strange software, isn`t it ? :-)

Vladimir
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: cyrus-imap + virtualdomains

2005-09-14 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Erik Norgaard wrote:

 Vladimir Dvorak wrote:

 Yes, you are right. Now I am using 2.2.12 and virtdomains seem to be
 working. But I found another strange problem:

 devel:/var/run# cyradm -u [EMAIL PROTECTED] localhost
 IMAP Password:
 localhost.localdomain cm user.test

 ^^^ it works; user test is included into defaultdomain.

 But when I try:
 localhost.localdomain cm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 createmailbox: Invalid mailbox name

 Cyrus is strange software, isn`t it ? :-)


 No, by loging in as [EMAIL PROTECTED] you get access to mailboxes under the
 devel domain, point is that different virtual domains can have
 different admins. You specify this in the imapd.conf.

 Try loging in just as cyrus:

   # cyradm -u cyrus localhost

 Cheers, Erik

Erik, we both are about to solve the problem. ;-) Yes, you are probably
right. When I cyradm -u cyrus, I have in maillog:

Sep 14 09:08:37 devel imap[9491]: badlogin: localhost.localdomain
[127.0.0.1] plaintext [EMAIL PROTECTED] SASL(-13): user not found:
checkpass failed

When I add [EMAIL PROTECTED], it will manage 'localdomain' users and I
will be on the same place (probably, for now not tried). :-( Erik, how
can I log as cyrus without domain ?

Thank you!

Vladimir
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: cyrus-imap + virtualdomains

2005-09-14 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Erik Norgaard wrote:

 Vladimir Dvorak wrote:

 Yes, you are right. Now I am using 2.2.12 and virtdomains seem to be
 working. But I found another strange problem:

 devel:/var/run# cyradm -u [EMAIL PROTECTED] localhost
 IMAP Password:
 localhost.localdomain cm user.test

 ^^^ it works; user test is included into defaultdomain.

 But when I try:
 localhost.localdomain cm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 createmailbox: Invalid mailbox name

 Cyrus is strange software, isn`t it ? :-)


 No, by loging in as [EMAIL PROTECTED] you get access to mailboxes under the
 devel domain, point is that different virtual domains can have
 different admins. You specify this in the imapd.conf.

 Try loging in just as cyrus:

   # cyradm -u cyrus localhost

 Cheers, Erik

You are right. I can create

localhostcm  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

when I has been connected as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Its not good to have admin for
each domain in database ( because it will be huge; all auth and other
information are stored in MySQL backend ). I need some _super-cyrus_
user, which will be able to create arbitrary mailbox with domain.
Several month ago I set it up on Linux Gentoo system and there it was
simple and it behaves as I required - cyrus user was able to create and
delete all mailboxes what he want.

Vladimir
  
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: cyrus-imap + virtualdomains

2005-09-14 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Erik Norgaard wrote:

 Vladimir Dvorak wrote:

 Erik, we both are about to solve the problem. ;-) Yes, you are probably
 right. When I cyradm -u cyrus, I have in maillog:

 Sep 14 09:08:37 devel imap[9491]: badlogin: localhost.localdomain
 [127.0.0.1] plaintext [EMAIL PROTECTED] SASL(-13): user not found:
 checkpass failed

 When I add [EMAIL PROTECTED], it will manage 'localdomain' users and I
 will be on the same place (probably, for now not tried). :-( Erik, how
 can I log as cyrus without domain ?


 Please post your imapd.conf (remove comments) - I posted mine
 yesterday.  Check the content of the admins entry, does it specify
 domain?

 I think that cyradm authenticates against sasldb and not system
 password (or maybe falls back on system password) - this I understand
 - is to separate ordinary users and administrators - but can also be
 quite annoying.

 If you have added an entry to sasldb with saslpasswd2 then it could be
 for the devel realm.

 You can try to rename sasldb and see what happens, then if it doesn't
 work create it with new entries where you make sure not to specify realm:

   # saslpasswd2 cyrus

 Also, reading above there may be a difference between:

   # cyradm -u cyrus

 and

   # cyradm -u cyrus localhost

 Cheers, Erik

config is in attachement

configdirectory: /var/lib/cyrus
defaultpartition: default
partition-default: /var/spool/cyrus/mail-new
partition-news: /var/spool/cyrus/news
newsspool: /var/spool/news
altnamespace: no
unixhierarchysep: yes 
admins: cyrus
allowanonymouslogin: no
popminpoll: 1
autocreatequota: 0
umask: 077
sieveusehomedir: false
sievedir: /var/spool/sieve
hashimapspool: true
allowplaintext: yes
sasl_auto_transition: no
tls_cert_file: /etc/cyrus-global.pem
tls_key_file: /etc/cyrus-global.key
tls_ca_path: /etc/ssl/certs
tls_session_timeout: 1440
tls_cipher_list: TLSv1:SSLv3:SSLv2:!NULL:!EXPORT:!DES:!LOW:@STRENGTH
lmtpsocket: /var/run/cyrus/socket/lmtp
idlesocket: /var/run/cyrus/socket/idle
notifysocket: /var/run/cyrus/socket/notify
sasl_pwcheck_method: auxprop
sasl_auxprop_plugin: sql
sasl_sql_engine: mysql
sasl_mech_list: PLAIN LOGIN
sasl_sql_user: mysqluser 
sasl_sql_passwd: xyxyxy
sasl_sql_database: hosting
sasl_sql_hostnames: localhost   
sasl_sql_select: SELECT password FROM email WHERE address = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
virtdomains: yes 


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: cyrus-imap + virtualdomains

2005-09-14 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Erik Norgaard wrote:

 Vladimir Dvorak wrote:

 Erik, we both are about to solve the problem. ;-) Yes, you are probably
 right. When I cyradm -u cyrus, I have in maillog:

 Sep 14 09:08:37 devel imap[9491]: badlogin: localhost.localdomain
 [127.0.0.1] plaintext [EMAIL PROTECTED] SASL(-13): user not found:
 checkpass failed

 When I add [EMAIL PROTECTED], it will manage 'localdomain' users and I
 will be on the same place (probably, for now not tried). :-( Erik, how
 can I log as cyrus without domain ?


 Please post your imapd.conf (remove comments) - I posted mine
 yesterday.  Check the content of the admins entry, does it specify
 domain?

 I think that cyradm authenticates against sasldb and not system
 password (or maybe falls back on system password) - this I understand
 - is to separate ordinary users and administrators - but can also be
 quite annoying.

 If you have added an entry to sasldb with saslpasswd2 then it could be
 for the devel realm.

 You can try to rename sasldb and see what happens, then if it doesn't
 work create it with new entries where you make sure not to specify realm:

   # saslpasswd2 cyrus

 Also, reading above there may be a difference between:

   # cyradm -u cyrus

 and

   # cyradm -u cyrus localhost

 Cheers, Erik

Heureeka Erik! :-)

Now I can log as cyrus without @localdomain - modified /etc/hosts. ;-)

Thank you very much for your support!!!

Vladimir
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


cyrus-imap + virtualdomains

2005-09-13 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Hi *,

I get stucked in this problem for serveral hours and now I am out of any
ideas.

I add
   
virtdomains: yes
loginrealms: devel testdomain.org

into imapd.conf, then I created mailbox using following commands:

devel~: cyradm -u [EMAIL PROTECTED] localhost
Password: 
localhost cm [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Now, I can authenticate and work with this mailbox.

But problem occurs, when I create for example

localhostcm [EMAIL PROTECTED]

and try to login. In maillog appears

plaintext [EMAIL PROTECTED] SASL(-13): authentication failure:
cross-realm login [EMAIL PROTECTED] denied

It is clear - when I put test2domain.org behind the loginrealms item, it
works.

My question is: is possible to allow * domains to loginrealms ( because
this server will serve a lot of domains and adding domain items is not
effective) ?

Thank you very much!

Vladimir



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: cyrus-imap + virtualdomains

2005-09-13 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Erik Norgaard wrote:

 Vladimir Dvorak wrote:

 I add
virtdomains: yes
 loginrealms: devel testdomain.org

 into imapd.conf, then I created mailbox using following commands:

 devel~: cyradm -u [EMAIL PROTECTED] localhost
 Password: 
 localhost cm [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Now, I can authenticate and work with this mailbox.

 But problem occurs, when I create for example

 localhostcm [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 and try to login. In maillog appears

 plaintext [EMAIL PROTECTED] SASL(-13): authentication failure:
 cross-realm login [EMAIL PROTECTED] denied

 It is clear - when I put test2domain.org behind the loginrealms item, it
 works.

 My question is: is possible to allow * domains to loginrealms ( because
 this server will serve a lot of domains and adding domain items is not
 effective) ?


 There are a few things that comes into mind: First, you write your
 login realms as devel testdomain.org - I don't see test2domain.org
 anywhere.

 Second, depending on you mail client you may have to separate login
 name and realm with a % instead of @.

 Third, the newly created mailbox may have wrong permissions - check.

 Finally:

 In my config I have only:

   defaultdomain: mydefaultdomain.org
   virtdomains: yes

 and no list of loginrealms. Adding a virtual domain is as simple as
 adding a mailbox as you did:  cm [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 I use sasl to authenticate against the system password so myuser
 (@mydefaultdomain.org) and myuser%myvirtualdomain.org is the same user.

 Since cyrus does not deliver mail (is not an MTA) cyrus can safely
 assume that incoming mail matching user/domain is destined for storage
 in that users mailbox. For this reason I guess, there should be no
 need to specify realms in the config.

 Cheers, Erik

Ok, I followed you instructions and my config looks:

defaultdomain: devel
virtdomains: yes

Now I login as admin cyrus and try to create mailbox:

devel:~# cyradm -u cyrus localhost
IMAP Password:
  localhost.localdomain cm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
createmailbox: Permission denied

In maillog is nothing, what permissions I should increace ? Do you have
any idea ?

Thank you.

Vladimir

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: cyrus-imap + virtualdomains

2005-09-13 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Vladimir Dvorak wrote:

Erik Norgaard wrote:

  

Vladimir Dvorak wrote:



I add
   virtdomains: yes
loginrealms: devel testdomain.org

into imapd.conf, then I created mailbox using following commands:

devel~: cyradm -u [EMAIL PROTECTED] localhost
Password: 
localhost cm [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Now, I can authenticate and work with this mailbox.

But problem occurs, when I create for example

localhostcm [EMAIL PROTECTED]

and try to login. In maillog appears

plaintext [EMAIL PROTECTED] SASL(-13): authentication failure:
cross-realm login [EMAIL PROTECTED] denied

It is clear - when I put test2domain.org behind the loginrealms item, it
works.

My question is: is possible to allow * domains to loginrealms ( because
this server will serve a lot of domains and adding domain items is not
effective) ?
  

There are a few things that comes into mind: First, you write your
login realms as devel testdomain.org - I don't see test2domain.org
anywhere.

Second, depending on you mail client you may have to separate login
name and realm with a % instead of @.

Third, the newly created mailbox may have wrong permissions - check.

Finally:

In my config I have only:

  defaultdomain: mydefaultdomain.org
  virtdomains: yes

and no list of loginrealms. Adding a virtual domain is as simple as
adding a mailbox as you did:  cm [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I use sasl to authenticate against the system password so myuser
(@mydefaultdomain.org) and myuser%myvirtualdomain.org is the same user.

Since cyrus does not deliver mail (is not an MTA) cyrus can safely
assume that incoming mail matching user/domain is destined for storage
in that users mailbox. For this reason I guess, there should be no
need to specify realms in the config.

Cheers, Erik



Ok, I followed you instructions and my config looks:

defaultdomain: devel
virtdomains: yes

Now I login as admin cyrus and try to create mailbox:

devel:~# cyradm -u cyrus localhost
IMAP Password:
  localhost.localdomain cm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
createmailbox: Permission denied

In maillog is nothing, what permissions I should increace ? Do you have
any idea ?

Thank you.

Vladimir

  

It seems to be working but

localhost.localdomain cm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
createmailbox: Permission denied
localhost.localdomain cm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
localhost.localdomain cm [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Why I cannot create [EMAIL PROTECTED] directly ? Because of cyrus`s directory
structure ? Or when I need mailbox with 'dot' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?

Vladimir
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: cyrus-imap + virtualdomains

2005-09-13 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Erik Norgaard wrote:

 Vladimir Dvorak wrote:

 Ok, I followed you instructions and my config looks:

 defaultdomain: devel
 virtdomains: yes

 Now I login as admin cyrus and try to create mailbox:

 devel:~# cyradm -u cyrus localhost
 IMAP Password:
   localhost.localdomain cm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 createmailbox: Permission denied

 In maillog is nothing, what permissions I should increace ? Do you have
 any idea ?


 Since you don't have any working mailboxes yet, it might be wise to
 delete what is and start over just to avoid any hanging problems.

 I just tried:

 localhost cm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 localhost lam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] lrswipcda

 I have no testuser (so I haven't tested login) nor a virtualdomain.org
 in my dns or elsewhere.

 Which versions do you use? Admittedly, I spent about a week getting
 things to work last year - now most is forgotten :-) - try to
 subscribe also to the cyrus list for better support.

 Keep up :-)
 Erik

Thank you Erik. ;-)

Vladimir
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: cyrus-imap + virtualdomains

2005-09-13 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Erik Norgaard wrote:

 Vladimir Dvorak wrote:

 It seems to be working but

 localhost.localdomain cm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 createmailbox: Permission denied
 localhost.localdomain cm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 localhost.localdomain cm [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Why I cannot create [EMAIL PROTECTED] directly ? Because of cyrus`s directory
 structure ? Or when I need mailbox with 'dot' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?


 Try to be a bit systematic, clear up any previous mess, stop cyrus and
 check the file permissions on the directories, if they are ok, start
 cyrus again.

 On my server mailboxes in the default domain are stored in
 /var/imap/spool/user while virtial domain mail boxes are in
 /var/imap/spool/domain with one subdir for each domain.

And here is the problem (probably ). I have no 'domain' directory. :-(
It doesn`t seem that 'virtdomain: yes' has some effect. Is there need to
compile cyrus-imap with virtualdomains support ?

 So, if you have got file permissions wrong on that directory cyrus
 won't create any mailboxes.

 After creating a mailbox use lm to see what mailboxes are created, and
 then lam mailbox to check the permissions. Include that in your next
 mail.

 I just looked back in the archive from the cyrus mailing list and
 cyrus imap does some stuff with reverse dns and if it fails strange
 things may occur:

 Aparently, cyrus-imap does a reverse lookup of the ip on the inter-
 face that recieves the connection. This must resolve to a host
 under the defaultdomain.

 So, adding the line '192.168.0.4 top.example.com' to /etc/hosts
 solved the problem.

 This is my imapd.conf:

 configdirectory: /var/imap
 partition-default: /var/imap/spool
 altnamespace: yes
 userprefix: common
 sharedprefix: shared
 defaultdomain: example.com
 virtdomains: yes
 allowplaintext: yes
 allowplainwithouttls: no
 admins: cyrus root
 defaultacl: anyone lrs
 sieveusehomedir: false
 sievedir: /var/imap/sieve
 sasl_pwcheck_method: saslauthd
 sasl_mech_list: plain
 tls_cert_file: /var/imap/ssl/mail.crt
 tls_key_file: /var/imap/ssl/mail.pem
 tls_ca_file: /var/imap/ssl/ca.crt
 lmtpsocket: /var/imap/socket/lmtp

 /var/imap/spool and everything under that path is:
 drwx--  11 cyrus mail   512 13 Sep 12:10 spool


All permissions are ok, I am sure. Its default installation.

Vladimir
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: cyrus-imap + virtualdomains

2005-09-13 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Erik Norgaard wrote:

 Vladimir Dvorak wrote:

 On my server mailboxes in the default domain are stored in
 /var/imap/spool/user while virtial domain mail boxes are in
 /var/imap/spool/domain with one subdir for each domain.


 And here is the problem (probably ). I have no 'domain' directory. :-(
 It doesn`t seem that 'virtdomain: yes' has some effect. Is there need to
 compile cyrus-imap with virtualdomains support ?


 Only cyrus-imap22 or later supports virtual domains, I assume you use
 this version. It should be supported by default.

I am using 2.1.18 version.

There should be VirtualDomains supported too: (since 2.1.x)
http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/download/imapd/changes.html

 Take a look into the pkg-plist file for cyrus-imap22 and see what
 comes with it, there may be some binary that fixes the directory
 structure - reconstruct maybe?. Otherwise try to create the directory
 manually and set permissions.

 Cheers, Erik


Vladimir
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


OpenOffice+AMD64

2005-08-23 Thread Vladimir Dvorak

Hello *,

does anybody know what is the status of OpenOffice for AMD64 
architecture ? Is possible to install OO in some chroot lib32 
environment ? Or this cause is wasting the time for now ?


Thank you.

Vladimir

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: OpenOffice+AMD64

2005-08-23 Thread Vladimir Dvorak

Mark Kane wrote:


Vladimir Dvorak wrote:

does anybody know what is the status of OpenOffice for AMD64 
architecture ? Is possible to install OO in some chroot lib32 
environment ? Or this cause is wasting the time for now ?



Hi. I am not sure the status of it for AMD64, but I do know it 
requires Java. Unfortunately there is no Java for AMD64 yet.


I found this link, but I didn't think Linux binary compatibility was 
possible in the amd64 version. Every time I try to install a port that 
requires Java such as Azureus on my FreeBSD/amd64 machine, it says 
something like Only for i386, and you are running amd64.


http://people.freebsd.org/~tjr/linux32.html

For an alternative, look at AbiWord for word processing and Gnumeric 
for spreadsheets. I'm sure there are others as well.


-Mark


Thank you Mark.

OOfice are possible to build without JAVA support (make -DWITHOUT_JAVA). 

I use Abiword and Gnumeric instead of OO now, but there is no 
connectivity with OO sxw files - which I have a lot (from times when I 
used i386/Linux).


Thank you for that link I will look at it.

Vladimir
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: wrap sshd

2005-06-11 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Osmany Guirola Cruz wrote:

Hi
 i am trying to restrict the ssh access to my machine from a specific
machine and i am using hosts.allow but does not wor for me this is
my /etc/hosts.allow file


sshd : capella.cigb.edu.cu : deny

then i restart the sshd daemon and doe not work i still have access from
this machine ...

Thanks
  

You have better to deny everything and allow several certain hosts or networks. 
It is much more secure schema, than have tone of records of bad guy`s hosts in 
your tcp-wrappers config file.

But I admit, that in some cases sense of your question is relevant. But I am 
not sure in which cases ? :-)

Vladimir Dvorak

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: make installkernel fails instantly w/ signal 11

2005-06-11 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Keyser wrote:

In an effort to get the simplest of compiled c++ programs (compiled with g++) 
to actually run without a segfault on my box I'm trying to update everything.  
So I cvsup'd src-all and ports-all.  Then I did:

make -j4 buildworld (which worked)
make -DALWAYS_CHECK MAKE buildkernel (which also worked)

However, then when I try to installkernel I get a signal 11 immediately as 
shown below.  I've tried it in single user mode with the same result.  Not 
sure what I'm doing wrong?  I've read signal 11 is usually caused by hardware 
issues but it seems strange this box could build both world and kernel without 
any problems if that were the case.

vitoc# cd /usr/src
vitoc# pwd
/usr/src
vitoc# ls
COPYRIGHT   UPDATINGgnu rescue  usr.bin
LOCKS   bin include sbinusr.sbin
MAINTAINERS contrib kerberos5   secure
Makefilecrypto  lib share
Makefile.inc1   etc libexec sys
README  games   release tools
vitoc# make -DALWAYS_CHECK_MAKE installkernel
--
  

Making hierarchy


--
cd /usr/src;  MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj  MACHINE_ARCH=i386  MACHINE=i386  
CPUTYPE=  GROFF_BIN_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/bin  
GROFF_FONT_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/share/groff_font  
GROFF_TMAC_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/share/tmac 
PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/games:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/games:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin
 /usr/obj/usr/src/make.i386/make -f Makefile.inc1 hierarchy
cd /usr/src/etc;/usr/obj/usr/src/make.i386/make distrib-dirs
mtree -eU  -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.root.dist -p /
mtree -eU  -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.var.dist -p /var
*** Signal 11

Stop in /usr/src/etc.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/src.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/src.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/src.
vitoc#

I've literally done everything by the book but maybe I've missed something 
obvious to someone else?
  

Cut and pasted from /usr/src/Makefile
 - - - CUT - - -
# Make sure we have an up-to-date make(1). Only world and buildworld
# should do this as those are the initial targets used for upgrades.
# The user can define ALWAYS_CHECK_MAKE to have this check performed
# for all targets.
#
 - - - CUT - - -

Try make and install kernel without -DALWAYS_CHECK_MAKE.

 Vladimir Dvorak


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: netstat problem

2005-06-11 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Nicolas Salvo wrote:

Hi
 Maybe this is a stupid question but.. After an upgrade from 5.3 to
5.4 the output of the netstat comand doesn't show anything about tcp
or the services running with tcp. Any ideas?
  

You haven`t  apparently world and kernel synchronized. In other words:
build kernel and world from 5.4 and install them again.

I am true if it helps. ;-)

 Vladimir Dvorak


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Postfix and Queues

2005-03-25 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Hi *,
I have little, but not annoying problem with Postfix and queuing 
management. When two or more big (understand 2 MB) emails are in active 
queue, Postfix is trying to deliver them simultaneously. But moth ago 
began to apear following message in /var/log/mail :

5BCED8EFE3* 4534286 Fri Mar 25 14:25:35  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(lost connection with mailserver.domain.com [aa.bb.cc.dd] while sending 
message body)

^^ this message is in defer queue and wait for its time, when next try 
to deliver comes. During this time comes another big email from local 
user, which get stucked in defer queue too. The link start to have very 
high load of outgoing mail traffic, but all of them are unsuccesfully 
delivered.

Well, is there any chance to reduce queue to one mail in active queue ?
The system runs postfix-19991231pl08-29 - I know its very old.
Thank you in advance.
Vladimir
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Postfix and Queues

2005-03-25 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Vladimir Dvorak wrote:
Hi *,
I have little, but not annoying problem with Postfix and queuing 
management. When two or more big (understand 2 MB) emails are in 
active queue, Postfix is trying to deliver them simultaneously. But 
moth ago began to apear following message in /var/log/mail :

5BCED8EFE3* 4534286 Fri Mar 25 14:25:35  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(lost connection with mailserver.domain.com [aa.bb.cc.dd] while 
sending message body)

^^ this message is in defer queue and wait for its time, when next try 
to deliver comes. During this time comes another big email from local 
user, which get stucked in defer queue too. The link start to have 
very high load of outgoing mail traffic, but all of them are 
unsuccesfully delivered.

Well, is there any chance to reduce queue to one mail in active queue ?
The system runs postfix-19991231pl08-29 - I know its very old.
Thank you in advance.

I found solution.
There is (in front of this mailserver) OpenBSD firewall with scrub in 
all. Problem appears, when this messages are targeted to Microsoft MX. 
MS servers badly handle with IP headers and sets Dont fragment bit, 
when this packet is fragmented. :-)

Excerpt from man pf.conf:
Some operating systems are known to generate fragmented packets with 
the dont-fragment bit set. 

If you want to avoid this problem, leave scrub in all and use scrub 
in no-df.

If you have another solution, you are welcome! :-)
Vladimir Dvorak
--
* VDSOFT.ORG   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  *
* (+420) 602 944 941 http://www.vdsoft.org *
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


SSH with Kerberos authentication

2005-03-16 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Hi *,
I get stucked for several hours with configuring SSH authentication via Kerberos. I tested the same configuration on Linux and there was no problem.
I suspect pam_krb5.so. 

My requisities:
FreeBSD  5.3-RELEASE-p5
Kerberos comming with base system (heimdal implementation (Heimdal 0.6.1))
in /etc/krb5.conf
[libdefaults]
  default_realm = ATREY
[realms]
   ATREY = {
   kdc = 172.16.10.1
   kpasswd_server = 172.16.10.1
   }
[logging]
  kdc = FILE:/var/log/kdc.log
  kdc = SYSLOG:DEBUG
  default = SYSLOG:DEBUG:USER
[appdefaults]
   kinit = {
   forwardable= true
   }
[kdc]
   database = {
   realm = ATREY
   }
require-preauth = no
v4-realm= ATREY
key-file = /var/heimdal/heimdal.mkey

in /etc/pam.d/sshd have:
authsufficient  pam_krb5.so  try_first_pass  debug
authrequiredpam_unix.so
account  required  pam_krb5.so debug
session   optional   pam_krb5.so  debug
password   sufficient  pam_krb5.so  debug
From client view :

debug1: Authentications that can continue: 
publickey,gssapi-with-mic,password,keyboard-interactive
debug1: Next authentication method: gssapi-with-mic
debug1: Authentications that can continue: 
publickey,gssapi-with-mic,password,keyboard-interactive
debug1: Next authentication method: publickey
debug1: Trying private key: /home/dvorakv/.ssh/identity
debug1: Trying private key: /home/dvorakv/.ssh/id_rsa
debug1: Trying private key: /home/dvorakv/.ssh/id_dsa
debug1: Next authentication method: keyboard-interactive
Password:
pam_krb5: pam_sm_authenticate: Kerberos 5 error
pam_krb5: pam_sm_authenticate: Kerberos 5 refuses you
At server site in /var/log/auth.log there is notning to public. :-( In 
/var/log/kdc.log :

What more - debug parameter standing after pam_krb5.so doesn`t increase 
verbosity of output.
Here is my configuration method:
1.kstash 
Password: 

2. edit /etc/krb5.conf
3. kadmin -l
kadmin init ATREY
..
4. add principals
kadmin add dvorakv

5. run kdc,kpasswd,kadmind
/etc/rc.d/{kerberos,kadmind,kpasswd} start
6. test if i can get a ticket 
kinit dvorakv
password: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ kinit dvorakv
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'s Password: 
kinit: NOTICE: ticket renewable lifetime is 1 week
   
 everything ok, but SSH and PAM! :-(

And the last remark - this server runs in jail(8) - but there shouldn`t be a 
problem.
Any ideas ? Is /etc/pam.d/sshd correct ? Is there anything what I am 
missing ? Is there anything special in FreeBSD besides Linux.
Thank you, Vladimir
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: inode

2005-03-16 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Gert Cuykens wrote:
What is a inode ? I installed freebsd 5.3 on a 2gb harddisk and it
tells me there are not enough inodes ? Aldo there is diskspace
availeble ?
Does it mean there are to many directories ? Can you fix this ?
 

I suppose there is no disk space available on some partition. When this 
message apears ? Or, you can check it out bu df -h command.

Vladimir
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: no route to host - urgent problem

2005-03-16 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Laszlo Zsolt Nagy wrote:
Hi All!
I could compile a new kernel (4.8 p27). It logs in to an ADSL line 
with ppp (tun0 created). But I cannot ping even myself.
This is a router, the other device is connected to a local network 
172.16.0/20

messiasping 127.0.0.1
ping:sendto:no route to host
messiasnetstat -nr
Destination  Gateway  Flags   Refs   Use   NetifExpire
127.0.0.1  127.0.0.1  UH  1  3  lo0
172.16.0/20   link#2   UC   3   0   rl0
I dot see the gateway here  (Flags: G) but it should work for 
127.0.0.1 without it.

ARP is also working, the physical connection is okay on the LAN:
messiasarp 172.16.0.26
? (172.16.0.26) at 00:50:1d:5f:18:20 on rl0 [ethernet]
I also tried this:
messiasroute add default 172.16.0.1
The default gateway  became 172.16.0.1  UGSc rl0. Despite this:
messiasping 172.16.0.26
PING 172.16.0.26 (172.16.0.26): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: No route to host
named does not work either. It is started but when I start nslookup 
it says 'No response from server'.

Is it a missing 'options' from the kernel config? The same machine was 
working before with the same setting
but a different kernel (GENERIC). Unfortunately, I need to do this 
within 1 hour. Employees are coming
and they will cut my neck

  Laci
Try to turn off your firewall first. ( pfctl -d or something similar if 
using ipfw ) I hope this helps.

Vladimir
Vladimir Dvorak
--
* VDSOFT.ORG   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  *
* (+420) 602 944 941 http://www.vdsoft.org *
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: no route to host - urgent problem

2005-03-16 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Laszlo Zsolt Nagy wrote:

Try to turn off your firewall first. ( pfctl -d or something similar 
if using ipfw ) I hope this helps.

Vladimir
Vladimir Dvorak

I set
firewall_enable=NO
in /etc/rc.conf
Did not work. Please also note that I did not change my configuration 
on this machine, I just compiled a new kernel.
All the networking configuration remained the same. In theory, my 
firewall rules are good. I believe the problem is with
the kernel since I did not change anything else. Why it says 'no 
route' when I added the default route?

  Laci
What did you changed in kernel CONFIG ?
One important remark - if you are in stress, reboot to old working 
kernel (hope that will work :-) ) and wait till evening.

Vladimir
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]