Network: not found problem
I have been having a problem as of late with programs not running at startup. When I finally goto to my local startup directory and call the scripts directly I get an error of: Network: not found. I can ping properly out to the Internet, traceroute etc. The only firewall I have on my box is IPF version 3.4.35 . Sudoing and also SUing produce the same error message. More specifically I am getting the error message the ports package 'milter-greylist'. I have also got this error message from other programs in the past; although off the top of my head I can't think of what these binaries are. This leads me to believe that it is some esoteric network config issue. -Thank you in advance for your suggestions ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
System lockup building 6.0 RELEASE SMP-GENERIC kernel
Hello All; I'm trying to compile the SMP-GENERIC 6.0 Kernel and my system completely locks up (requires a hard reset) at different points in the compilation process. The system is built around a Super Micro P3TDLE MOBO dual p3-1Ghz - 512 MB Regesitered ECC ram box. Bios is the most recent. HD Config - 3 SCSI U320 drives - RAID5 on an Adaptec 2130SLP RAID Controller. Secondary Drives - 1 SCSI CD Rom 1 SCSI Tape Drive connected to an Adaptec 29160 SCSI controller. NIC(s) Intel Pro 1000 Gigabit Ethernet an intengrated 10/100 Ethernet adapter. I've tried disabling ACPI , the integrated NIC, and IDE controller. I've also removed the Gigabit NIC, the secondary SCSI controller, and tried only using one P3 CPU indstead of both. I've run 2 different memory testers against the DRAM and both came back clean. I CAN compile a plain GENERIC kernel. But if I try to compile the SMP GENERIC kernel: cd /usr/src make buildkernel KERNCONF=SMP it locks up tighter than a Nun on Sunday ( no offense intended ; ). CVSup'ing buildworld but that also locks up the box. SoftUpdates have been turned off. As you can see from the enclosed dmesg I get a whole slew of ACPI errors - that's the only hint I have ( before starting the build ) that there's a problem. From what I've seen via googling people tend to ignore the ACPI errors or talk about interrupt storms but I've not seen anybody post a solution to to these issues. The MD5 of the iso downloads checked out fine. Did I miss something? Have I zigged when I should've zagged? I can't go to the 4.x series due to the need to run SAMBA 3x on this box. Is it worth trying NetBSD or OpenBSD or do they share too much of the same code? Any suggestions are greatly appriciated - thanks in advance. Please CC this e-mail address, I'm not a member of this discussion group. DavidH aac0: shutting down controller...done Shutting down ACPI Rebooting... Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Thu Nov 3 09:36:13 UTC 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC ACPI APIC Table: RCC RCCNILE Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel Pentium III (999.52-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0x68a Stepping = 10 Features=0x387fbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,PN,MMX,FXSR,SSE real memory = 536805376 (511 MB) avail memory = 515960832 (492 MB) ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [DEB_] had invalid type (Integer) for Scope operator, changed to (Scope) ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [MLIB] had invalid type (Integer) for Scope operator, changed to (Scope) ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [IO__] had invalid type (Integer) for Scope operator, changed to (Scope) ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [DATA] had invalid type (String) for Scope operator, changed to (Scope) ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [SIO_] had invalid type (String) for Scope operator, changed to (Scope) ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [SB__] had invalid type (String) for Scope operator, changed to (Scope) ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [PM__] had invalid type (String) for Scope operator, changed to (Scope) ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [ICNT] had invalid type (String) for Scope operator, changed to (Scope) ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [ACPI] had invalid type (String) for Scope operator, changed to (Scope) ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [OSB4] had invalid type (String) for Scope operator, changed to (Scope) ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [PM__] had invalid type (String) for Scope operator, changed to (Scope) ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [BIOS] had invalid type (Integer) for Scope operator, changed to (Scope) ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [CMOS] had invalid type (Integer) for Scope operator, changed to (Scope) MADT: Forcing active-low polarity and level trigger for SCI ioapic0 Version 1.1 irqs 0-15 on motherboard ioapic1 Version 1.1 irqs 16-31 on motherboard npx0: [FAST] npx0: math processor on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: RCC RCCNILE on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) pci_link0: ACPI PCI Link LN00 irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link1: ACPI PCI Link LN01 irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link2: ACPI PCI Link LN02 irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link3: ACPI PCI Link LN03 irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link4: ACPI PCI Link LN04 on acpi0 pci_link5: ACPI PCI Link LN05 irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link6: ACPI PCI Link LN06 on acpi0 pci_link7: ACPI PCI Link LN07 irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link8: ACPI PCI Link LN08 on acpi0 pci_link9: ACPI PCI Link LN09 irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link10: ACPI PCI Link LN10 on acpi0 pci_link11: ACPI PCI Link LN11 irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link12: ACPI PCI Link LN12 irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link13: ACPI PCI Link
Re: Internal vs. External domains and e-mail
Actually I thought of rerouting the mail to /dev/null but our IT Manager didn't think much of that idea I've run across http://untroubled.org/qmail-qfilter/ which may fit the bill. --- Ivailo Tanusheff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just reroute mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] This must do the job for you :) Ivailo Tanusheff Senior System administrator ProCredit Bank (Bulgaria) AD tel. +359 2 921 7161 fax +359 2 921 7110 http://www.procreditbank.bg Disclaimer: The information contained in this message is intended solely for the use of individual or entity to whom it is addressed and other authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by responding to this email and then delete it from your system. ProCredit Bank is neither liable for the proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this message nor for any delay in its receipt. DH [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/11/2005 06:25 PM To freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc Subject Internal vs. External domains and e-mail Hello; We are going to migrate to an Interal Windows 2003 AD structure which will also entail changing our Internal DNS to a non-routeable domain. Currently we are using qmail qmail-scanner to relay mail to an Internal Exchange Server. mydomain.com | |---| I-Net - FBSD4.11/qmail/qmail-scanner - MS Exchange I am looking for a way to rewrite the From header on mail originating from the Exchange box to change the non-routeable domain name to that of our External domain. mydomain.com newdomain.local | | I-Net - FBSD4.11/qmail/qmail-scanner - MS Exchange Any mail originating from the Exchange Server and going to the I-Net should have its From header rewritten: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] to From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've seen a number of postings at various sites ( qmail.org etc) and very little in the way of answers vis a vie qmail. If anyone has experience with this problem I'd sure appriciate some guidance. If I have to migrate to another e-mail packack such as ProcMail I'm willing to do so but would rather not ( a lot of effort spent on my qmail-attachments.txt file ). Thank you for your time - Please CC any response to my address - I am not a member of this group. David Hutchens III Network Technician DRS Surveillance Support Systems - A division of DRS Technologies. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] David Hutchens III Network Technician DRS Surveillance Support Systems - A division of DRS Technologies. Sell on Yahoo! Auctions no fees. Bid on great items. http://auctions.yahoo.com/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internal vs. External domains and e-mail
Hello; We are going to migrate to an Interal Windows 2003 AD structure which will also entail changing our Internal DNS to a non-routeable domain. Currently we are using qmail qmail-scanner to relay mail to an Internal Exchange Server. mydomain.com | |---| I-Net - FBSD4.11/qmail/qmail-scanner - MS Exchange I am looking for a way to rewrite the From header on mail originating from the Exchange box to change the non-routeable domain name to that of our External domain. mydomain.com newdomain.local | | I-Net - FBSD4.11/qmail/qmail-scanner - MS Exchange Any mail originating from the Exchange Server and going to the I-Net should have its From header rewritten: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] to From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've seen a number of postings at various sites ( qmail.org etc) and very little in the way of answers vis a vie qmail. If anyone has experience with this problem I'd sure appriciate some guidance. If I have to migrate to another e-mail packack such as ProcMail I'm willing to do so but would rather not ( a lot of effort spent on my qmail-attachments.txt file ). Thank you for your time - Please CC any response to my address - I am not a member of this group. David Hutchens III Network Technician DRS Surveillance Support Systems - A division of DRS Technologies. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vexing IPF problem
I'm having a problem with IPF blocking packets that appear should be let through. I've sent quite a bit of time going through the Handbook, man pages, etc I must be missing something so any help is greatly appriciated. uname -a freebsd 4.11-release #0 SMP kernel, dual PIII processor, 512 MB ECC RAM, SCSI HDs execerpt from rule set: Kernel compiled with default allow until I finish getting the ruleset rewritten. Rule #1 block in log from any to any pass in quick on lo0 pass out quick on lo0 block in log quick on fxp0 from any to any with ipopts block in log quick proto tcp from any to any with short ... pass in log first proto tcp from any to any port = 80 flags S keep state pass in log first proto tcp from any port = 80 to any flags S keep state pass out log first proto tcp from any to any port = 80 flags S keep state netstat -m = 129/576/16384 9% of mb_map in use Proxy Server - Squid 2.5.stable10 The behavior I'm seeing is out going connections to websites on port 80 are being passed but the in bound traffic is being blocked. The ipflog entries look like this: my ip = s theirs = d @0:390 p s.s.s.s,3601 - d.d.d.d,80 PR tcp len 20 60 -S K-S OUT @0:1 b d.d.d.d,80 - s.s.s.s,3601 PR tcp len 20 43 -AR IN Thanks in advance to those giving their time to lend a hand, I know you time is valuable. Please CC my address in your reply. David Hutchens III Network Technician - Yahoo! Sports Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Vexing IPF problem
Nuke pave unfortunately is not a desireable option - there are a hair over 1k rules in the total rule set ( 99 % are address blocks of evil doers ). I'm observing the blocking behavior relative to addresses that are not specifically blocked. Looking at the log entries it looks as though the inbound ACK packet gets dropped after the ogoing connection request is made. Thank You for your rsvp. David Hutchens III Network Technician fbsd_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. Best thing is scrap your firewall rules and use the IPF rules listed in the firewall/ipfilter section of the official handbook. 2. There are a lot of spoof packets using port 80 on the public internet and that may be what you are seeing. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of DH Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 11:13 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Vexing IPF problem I'm having a problem with IPF blocking packets that appear should be let through. I've sent quite a bit of time going through the Handbook, man pages, etc I must be missing something so any help is greatly appriciated. uname -a freebsd 4.11-release #0 SMP kernel, dual PIII processor, 512 MB ECC RAM, SCSI HDs execerpt from rule set: Kernel compiled with default allow until I finish getting the ruleset rewritten. Rule #1 block in log from any to any pass in quick on lo0 pass out quick on lo0 block in log quick on fxp0 from any to any with ipopts block in log quick proto tcp from any to any with short ... pass in log first proto tcp from any to any port = 80 flags S keep state pass in log first proto tcp from any port = 80 to any flags S keep state pass out log first proto tcp from any to any port = 80 flags S keep state netstat -m = 129/576/16384 9% of mb_map in use Proxy Server - Squid 2.5.stable10 The behavior I'm seeing is out going connections to websites on port 80 are being passed but the in bound traffic is being blocked. The ipflog entries look like this: my ip = s theirs = d @0:390 p s.s.s.s,3601 - d.d.d.d,80 PR tcp len 20 60 -S K-S OUT @0:1 b d.d.d.d,80 - s.s.s.s,3601 PR tcp len 20 43 -AR IN Thanks in advance to those giving their time to lend a hand, I know you time is valuable. Please CC my address in your reply. David Hutchens III Network Technician - Yahoo! Sports Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] David Hutchens III Network Technician DRS Surveillance Support Systems - A division of DRS Technologies. - Yahoo! Sports Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
