Re: PCBSD9.0-x64-DVD and Intel HD Graphics 2000
On 24.07.2012 01:12, David Christensen wrote: On 07/23/2012 03:37 AM, Vladislav wrote: http://wiki.freebsd.org/Intel_GPU Okay. I wrote: I've installed PCBSD9.0-x64-DVD on the following hardware: On 07/23/2012 06:30 AM, Erich Dollansky wrote: this where the problem starts. If nothing changed since I used this, it only supports VESA on i7 CPUs. Okay. I wrote: I have updated the system using Update Manager, and the problems persist. On 07/23/2012 06:30 AM, Erich Dollansky wrote: What does this affect? Also the FreeBSD part? I don't know. I am now running FreeBSD 10 on an i7 without any problems. It should also be possible to get the same result with a current 9.0. Do the same what I have done. Use PC-BSD just to get a machine running and then update to FreeBSD. I was hoping to find an OS distribution that works OOTB. The key features I'm looking for are: 1. Full support of my hardware; notably Enhanced Speed Step, AES-NI, Intel HD Graphics 2000 dual head, and SSD TRIM. 2. ZFS on encrypted partitions, including root. I guess I'll have to wait for PC-BSD 10 or FreeBSD 10. Thanks! David ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Hi, What about the new Xorg(make.conf WITH_NEW_XORG=true) and drivers Intel? I have heard that this solution works, OpenGL too... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
GTK30 failed install
Hello! configure: error: *** Can't find cairo-pdf.h. You must build Cairo with the pdf *** backend enabled. === Script configure failed unexpectedly. Please run the gnomelogalyzer, available from http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/gnomelogalyzer.sh;, which will diagnose the problem and suggest a solution. If - and only if - the gnomelogalyzer cannot solve the problem, report the build failure to the FreeBSD GNOME team at gn...@freebsd.org, and attach (a) /usr/obj/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk30/work/gtk+-3.0.12/config.log, (b) the output of the failed make command, and (c) the gnomelogalyzer output. Also, it might be a good idea to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system (i.e. an `ls /var/db/pkg`). Put your attachment up on any website, copy-and-paste into http://freebsd-gnome.pastebin.com, or use send-pr(1) with the attachment. Try to avoid sending any attachments to the mailing list (gn...@freebsd.org), because attachments sent to FreeBSD mailing lists are usually discarded by the mailing list software. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk30. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk30. # ls -l /usr/local/include/cairo total 147 9 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 8698 23 июл 15:57 cairo-deprecated.h 2 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 884 23 июл 15:57 cairo-features.h 3 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 2556 23 июл 15:57 cairo-ft.h 4 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 3527 23 июл 15:57 cairo-gl.h 7 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 6212 23 июл 15:57 cairo-gobject.h 4 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 3108 23 июл 15:57 cairo-pdf.h 5 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 3590 23 июл 15:57 cairo-ps.h 5 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 3852 23 июл 15:57 cairo-script-interpreter.h 4 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 2781 23 июл 15:57 cairo-svg.h 3 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 2164 23 июл 15:57 cairo-tee.h 1 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 148 23 июл 15:57 cairo-version.h 4 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 3197 23 июл 15:57 cairo-xcb.h 3 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 2436 23 июл 15:57 cairo-xlib-xrender.h 4 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 3057 23 июл 15:57 cairo-xlib.h 92 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 93134 23 июл 15:57 cairo.h # uname -psr FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE amd64 # pkg_info |grep cairo cairo-1.10.2_4,2 Vector graphics library with cross-device output support # make config Options for cairo 1.10.2_4,2 [*] GL Enable OpenGL Support [*] XCB Enable XCB (X C-language Binding) Support [*] GLIB Enable GObject Functions Feature Does anyone have any ideas to solve this problem? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Why do I feel like compact flash is more reliable than SSD ?
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 2:13 AM, UFS User ufs.u...@yahoo.com wrote: But everyone I know (including me) has had an SSD fail, usually with no explanation. So is this just chance, or ... are CF cards really a lot more reliable than SSD ? The following pages , and references in them , may be useful : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid-state_drive http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wear_leveling http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Write_amplification http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Solid-state_computer_storage_media http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Solid-state_computer_storage No, these aren't useful at all, and further, the previous response that compared SSDs to spinning disks was also irrelevant. I am asking why compact flash cards (which are flash) seem to be much, much more reliable and durable than SSD (which is also flash). Why do I have CF parts running for 8+ years all over the place, but everyone I know has had SSDs fail (including me) ? There is no mention of spinning hard disks here, nor is this about *how* flash degrades in general - because in this case, they're both flash. Further, the failures I am seeing with SSDs are not because they wore out - they just quit. Comments ? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Why do I feel like compact flash is more reliable than SSD ?
I have run a lot of different FreeBSD systems off (fileservers, firewalls, routers, etc.) off of compact flash cards[1] and have never had a CF part fail. Most of these were read-only mode, but some of them were left mounted 'rw' for years (with no swapping, of course). The bottom line is, they never failed, and some were (and are) in the field for over 8 years now. But everyone I know (including me) has had an SSD fail, usually with no explanation. So is this just chance, or ... are CF cards really a lot more reliable than SSD ? It's sloppy, but I never once considered mirroring my CF boot devices, and now in 2011 I am actually buying two *different* SSDs to put into a boot mirror because I am afraid of mirroring identical ones and they both die at identical times. Comments ? [1] Plain old store-bough Sandisk parts - so a good brand, but nothing special ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
