Re: (8.2) share lib and ldconfig problem.
Le Fri, 28 Oct 2011 12:49:45 -0400, "b. f." a écrit : > > Portgrade did a copy of the lib into /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg and > > run ldconfig. But the lib does not appear in the listing of the > > ldconfig cache : > > You mean portupgrade, probably? Yes, it was in the sentence :) > Since your broken binary seems to need *.so.46, you can try adding > symlinks between the corresponding *.so.46 and *.so.46.1, or you can > rebuild the dependent port. I've made a script to add the missing symlinks. Thanks for your explanations. Regards. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: (8.2) share lib and ldconfig problem.
> Hello, > > 8.2 STABLE/i386 > > I'm hit by something strange. > > Basically ldconfig does not take care of some libs > in /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg > > By sample I've updated icu (via portupgrade) and libreoffice does not > start anymore. > > $ libreoffice > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libicuuc.so.46" not found, > required by "libsvtfi.so" > > Portgrade did a copy of the lib into /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg and run > ldconfig. But the lib does not appear in the listing of the ldconfig > cache : You mean portupgrade, probably? > > # cd /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/ > # ls -m *icu* > libicudata.so.46*, libicudata.so.46.1*, libicui18n.so.46.1*, > libicuio.so.46.1*, libicule.so.46.1*, libiculx.so.46.1*, > libicutest.so.46.1*, libicutu.so.46.1*, libicuuc.so.46.1* > > # ldconfig -r | grep pkg | grep icu > 664:-licudata.46 => /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libicudata.so.46 > > Note that there is only one icu lib in the ldconfig's cache. The one > named libicudata.so.46 (which is a copy of libicudata.so.46.1). > > Questions are : > > - Why theses libs are not in the ldconfig cache ? > - Why a copy named libicudata.so.46 is in the cache and not > libicudata.so.46.1? Unlike the hints for the old aout format, there aren't any filename hashes in the elf hints file, just a header and a list of search directories. The 'ldconfig -r' output is faked, and displays (see list_elf_hints() in src/sbin/ldconfig/elfhints.c) what it thinks rtld(1) will look for: shared libraries in the search directories with filenames of the form lib*.so., followed by a string of numbers corresponding to the major version of the shared library. *.so.46.1 don't fit this pattern, because of the extra dots separating the major and minor version numbers in those filenames. Since your broken binary seems to need *.so.46, you can try adding symlinks between the corresponding *.so.46 and *.so.46.1, or you can rebuild the dependent port. b. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
(8.2) share lib and ldconfig problem.
Hello, 8.2 STABLE/i386 I'm hit by something strange. Basically ldconfig does not take care of some libs in /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg By sample I've updated icu (via portupgrade) and libreoffice does not start anymore. $ libreoffice /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libicuuc.so.46" not found, required by "libsvtfi.so" Portgrade did a copy of the lib into /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg and run ldconfig. But the lib does not appear in the listing of the ldconfig cache : # cd /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/ # ls -m *icu* libicudata.so.46*, libicudata.so.46.1*, libicui18n.so.46.1*, libicuio.so.46.1*, libicule.so.46.1*, libiculx.so.46.1*, libicutest.so.46.1*, libicutu.so.46.1*, libicuuc.so.46.1* # ldconfig -r | grep pkg | grep icu 664:-licudata.46 => /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libicudata.so.46 Note that there is only one icu lib in the ldconfig's cache. The one named libicudata.so.46 (which is a copy of libicudata.so.46.1). Questions are : - Why theses libs are not in the ldconfig cache ? - Why a copy named libicudata.so.46 is in the cache and not libicudata.so.46.1? I've checked the permission and ownership of the libs, they are good. I've got also some backups of old libs which are not in the cache too. Any clue? Thanks, regards. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
