Re: 9.0, Samba and two NICs

2012-02-27 Thread Ronny Mandal
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Da Rock
freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote:
 On 02/24/12 21:39, Ronny Mandal wrote:

 Hi!

 I have been running Samba on FreeBSD 9.0 with a wireless card. A share
 is connected to my W7 computer. To get more speed between the
 computers, I decided to activate the 1GBit- Ethernet on the FreeBSD
 and establish a direct connection (cross-link) to the W7. I gave the
 new connection a static IP/subnet: 10.0.0.2/255.0.0.0 for the FreeBSD
 and 10.0.0.1/255.0.0.0 for the W7. SSH works fine, however Samba is
 utilizing the wireless card.

 My smb.conf looks something like this:

 ..
 ;The 192-address is the wireless, ath0. 10.0.0.2 is age0
 interfaces = 127.0.0.1 192.168.0.232 10.0.0.2
 bind interfaces only = yes
 ; the two latter is the IPs of the W7
 hosts allow = 127.0.0.1 192.168.0.117 10.0.0.1


 If I remove the 192* in the hosts allow, my W7 looses access via smb.

 netstat tells me that it is listening to both interfaces.

 What might be wrong?

 What address is the w7 using?

 If it is using 192.X, that could be the problem. That or some variation...
 such as the w7 using wireless and 192.x?

Sorry about the late answer and missing info. The W7 is using both,
i.e. wireless and wired.

Strangely enough, it works now. Here is what I did:

The interface parameter; I put the 10.* before the 192.* and stopped
and started the samba-service. After that, the wired card were
utilized when I copied to and from the share.

interfaces = 192.168.0.232 10.0.0.2 127.0.0.1 changed to interfaces =
10.0.0.2 192.168.0.232 127.0.0.1

(I tried this earlier, but it seems that /usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba
restart did not properly re-read the configuration.)


Regards,

Ronny Mandal
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


9.0, Samba and two NICs

2012-02-24 Thread Ronny Mandal
Hi!

I have been running Samba on FreeBSD 9.0 with a wireless card. A share
is connected to my W7 computer. To get more speed between the
computers, I decided to activate the 1GBit- Ethernet on the FreeBSD
and establish a direct connection (cross-link) to the W7. I gave the
new connection a static IP/subnet: 10.0.0.2/255.0.0.0 for the FreeBSD
and 10.0.0.1/255.0.0.0 for the W7. SSH works fine, however Samba is
utilizing the wireless card.

My smb.conf looks something like this:

..
;The 192-address is the wireless, ath0. 10.0.0.2 is age0
interfaces = 127.0.0.1 192.168.0.232 10.0.0.2
bind interfaces only = yes
; the two latter is the IPs of the W7
hosts allow = 127.0.0.1 192.168.0.117 10.0.0.1


If I remove the 192* in the hosts allow, my W7 looses access via smb.

netstat tells me that it is listening to both interfaces.

What might be wrong?


Thanks.


-- 
Best regards,

Ronny Mandal
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: 9.0, Samba and two NICs

2012-02-24 Thread Da Rock

On 02/24/12 21:39, Ronny Mandal wrote:

Hi!

I have been running Samba on FreeBSD 9.0 with a wireless card. A share
is connected to my W7 computer. To get more speed between the
computers, I decided to activate the 1GBit- Ethernet on the FreeBSD
and establish a direct connection (cross-link) to the W7. I gave the
new connection a static IP/subnet: 10.0.0.2/255.0.0.0 for the FreeBSD
and 10.0.0.1/255.0.0.0 for the W7. SSH works fine, however Samba is
utilizing the wireless card.

My smb.conf looks something like this:

..
;The 192-address is the wireless, ath0. 10.0.0.2 is age0
interfaces = 127.0.0.1 192.168.0.232 10.0.0.2
bind interfaces only = yes
; the two latter is the IPs of the W7
hosts allow = 127.0.0.1 192.168.0.117 10.0.0.1


If I remove the 192* in the hosts allow, my W7 looses access via smb.

netstat tells me that it is listening to both interfaces.

What might be wrong?

What address is the w7 using?

If it is using 192.X, that could be the problem. That or some 
variation... such as the w7 using wireless and 192.x?

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org