On 03/05/05 05:43:52, Kjell B. wrote:
I sent the below question a month ago, but received no answer.
Therefore, I resend it in the hope of getting one now.
--
I'm considering turning on Tagged Command Queuing in my ATA system.
My
disks are all Hitachi 7K250 (two HDS722512VLAT80 and one
HDS722516VLAT80) which according to Hitachi support this feature
(queue
depth = 32).
However, I read in
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2003-July/007378.html
that there may be problems doing this and not really improving
performance.
Is that recommendation still valid or should I go for it?
My uname:
[homebell] ~ uname -a
FreeBSD homebell.dyndns.org 4.10-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE-p2
#0:
Mon Oct 18 21:48:34 CEST 2004
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HOMEBELLapmipfw
i386
--
Kjell
___
Iread some where FreeBSD only supported ibm drives for that, but then
all support was throuwn out because nobody used it. If you want
performance try a NCQ SATA II drive. If you only have ATA TCQ then get
a raptor for max performance. If it is a desktop then leave it off,
TCQ is a server feature and slows down normal desktop workloads.
www.storagereview.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
