Re: ATi and Xorg Troubles in FreeBSD 5.3

2005-01-19 Thread Ronny Fischer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Doug

A short update ;-)

I have uninstalled Xorg an installed XF86 from the FreeBSD ports
(was quite tricky because the XF86 ports are not on the official  
freebsd server's)

But,
All in all the same situation at the first start with XF86, 1024x480, 8  
bit colour.
Then I configured XF86 with the GUI version of xf86cfg (easier to  
choose the drivers as in the CLI version  ;-)
After this I shutdown and restart X and the I had 800x600 with 16 Bit.

So this is enough for me, I am quite happy with my FreeBSD 5.3
WindowMaker locks a little bit strange but is is fast and stable.

If I find the time, I will try to tune XF86 to 1024x480.
If I have News about it, I drop ya a Mail.

and btw : If you have slow computers, try windowmaker.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ports/x11-wm/windowmaker/pkg-descr

Fast, needs not a lot of resources and easy to customize.
I love it ;-)

Thanx a lot,
HAVE FUN and
with my best regardz
Ronny
<  /EndOfTransmission  >


Am 12.01.2005 um 00:15 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

As to good ideas Ronnie, I do not think so, but here are some things  
you may not
have tried:

Since you found me you probably have already gone the Google route but  
if you
have not try your exact configuration. Try the FreeBSD mobile and  
hardware
lists. Freshports may help with Xorg as well as XFree86

XFree86 has the advantage of better documentation about bugs, at least
currently.  Try their resource page. The development snapshots list  
pretty
specifically what was fixed in each snapshot. You can download binaries  
for
FreeBSD and these are pretty quick to install (10-15 mins after the  
first
one). The XFree86 newbie list is pretty helpful; subscribe and post your
question there.

If any of the above works, I would then drop back to 4.11 unless you do  
not mind
using ports (rather than packages). My Unix workstations and laptops  
are far too
slow to consider building X or KDE.

BTW if the above is wrong I would sure like to be clued in. Aside from  
the fact
that the packages are built with Xorg, some of the low level  
dependencies have
mutually exclusive version dependencies. Portupgrade may allow the use  
of
packages by rewriting the dependencies. I would think Xorg and XFree  
are still
compatible at the BPI level. Because of processor speed I can start  
from scratch
and build my laptop 4-5 times before Qt would finish building.

On Sun, 9 Jan 2005, Ronny Fischer wrote:

> Hi there
>
> I have updatet to
> xorg-server-6.8.1_1 X.Org X server and related programs via FreeBSD
> Ports..
>
> ..but it is still not possible to get more the 8 bit color on the sony
> c1ve.
> the vesa driver is fine in 640x480 but it is not possible to have it
> with 1024x480 on this machine...
>
> any other ideas ?
> could it work with xfree86 instead of xorg ?
>
> thanx a lot,
> HAVE FUN and
> with my best regardz
> ronny
>
>
>
> Am 08.01.2005 um 18:14 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> Thanks Joe I will try to upgrade. My experience was the same, in that  
> the
> problem tracked X (both projects) across several levels of 4.x and 5.x.
>
> The vesa drive works okay, but I miss the larger screen and better font
> rendering.
>
>
> On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Joe Altman wrote:
>
>> Doug, Ronny...
>>
>> I'm running 4.11 with xorg 6.8.1, built from source on December 28,  
>> 2004
>> using a Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2x on an IBM ThinkPad A20m. I have a  
>> default
>> depth of 24 bits, and a resolution of 1024x768. I am using the ati  
>> driver.
>>
>> Ronny: I see that the query is for 5.3, but I thought that perhaps my
>> experience would indicate that the ATI chip seems to work fine w/ the  
>> most
>> recent version of xorg; or rather, the source as it existed on  
>> December
>> 28th.
>>
>> Doug: I remember that you and I encountered the same issue, back in
>> September or thereabouts, WRT the ATI chip? I'm happy to report what  
>> is
>> above: it seems to be safe to use the ati driver w/ the newest source  
>> for
>> xorg and the chip in question.
>>
>> HTH, best regards,
>>
>> Joe
>>
>
> _
> Douglas Denault
> http://www.safeport.com
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Voice: 301-469-8766
>Fax: 301-469-0601
>
> Beschtae Dank,
> HAFE FUN und
> mit aemae Gruaess
> Ronny
> ---
> http://the.fischerman.ch
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---
> <  /EndOfTransmission  >
>
>
> ### 
> #
> This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and  
> cleared
> by NetIQ MailMarshal, the e-mail content security solution
> ### 
> #
>  Output from pgp 
> Signature by unknown keyid: 0x5E41EEFB
>
>

_
Douglas Denault
http://www.safeport.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: 301-469-8766
   Fax: 301-469-0601


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQA/AwUBQe6x3cAf475eQe77EQ

Re: ATi and Xorg Troubles in FreeBSD 5.3

2005-01-11 Thread doug
As to good ideas Ronnie, I do not think so, but here are some things you may not
have tried:

Since you found me you probably have already gone the Google route but if you
have not try your exact configuration. Try the FreeBSD mobile and hardware
lists. Freshports may help with Xorg as well as XFree86

XFree86 has the advantage of better documentation about bugs, at least
currently.  Try their resource page. The development snapshots list pretty
specifically what was fixed in each snapshot. You can download binaries for
FreeBSD and these are pretty quick to install (10-15 mins after the first
one). The XFree86 newbie list is pretty helpful; subscribe and post your
question there.

If any of the above works, I would then drop back to 4.11 unless you do not mind
using ports (rather than packages). My Unix workstations and laptops are far too
slow to consider building X or KDE.

BTW if the above is wrong I would sure like to be clued in. Aside from the fact
that the packages are built with Xorg, some of the low level dependencies have
mutually exclusive version dependencies. Portupgrade may allow the use of
packages by rewriting the dependencies. I would think Xorg and XFree are still
compatible at the BPI level. Because of processor speed I can start from scratch
and build my laptop 4-5 times before Qt would finish building.

On Sun, 9 Jan 2005, Ronny Fischer wrote:

> Hi there
>
> I have updatet to
> xorg-server-6.8.1_1 X.Org X server and related programs via FreeBSD
> Ports..
>
> ..but it is still not possible to get more the 8 bit color on the sony
> c1ve.
> the vesa driver is fine in 640x480 but it is not possible to have it
> with 1024x480 on this machine...
>
> any other ideas ?
> could it work with xfree86 instead of xorg ?
>
> thanx a lot,
> HAVE FUN and
> with my best regardz
> ronny
>
>
>
> Am 08.01.2005 um 18:14 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> Thanks Joe I will try to upgrade. My experience was the same, in that the
> problem tracked X (both projects) across several levels of 4.x and 5.x.
>
> The vesa drive works okay, but I miss the larger screen and better font
> rendering.
>
>
> On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Joe Altman wrote:
>
> > Doug, Ronny...
> >
> > I'm running 4.11 with xorg 6.8.1, built from source on December 28, 2004
> > using a Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2x on an IBM ThinkPad A20m. I have a default
> > depth of 24 bits, and a resolution of 1024x768. I am using the ati driver.
> >
> > Ronny: I see that the query is for 5.3, but I thought that perhaps my
> > experience would indicate that the ATI chip seems to work fine w/ the most
> > recent version of xorg; or rather, the source as it existed on December
> > 28th.
> >
> > Doug: I remember that you and I encountered the same issue, back in
> > September or thereabouts, WRT the ATI chip? I'm happy to report what is
> > above: it seems to be safe to use the ati driver w/ the newest source for
> > xorg and the chip in question.
> >
> > HTH, best regards,
> >
> > Joe
> >
>
> _
> Douglas Denault
> http://www.safeport.com
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Voice: 301-469-8766
>Fax: 301-469-0601
>
> Beschtae Dank,
> HAFE FUN und
> mit aemae Gruaess
> Ronny
> ---
> http://the.fischerman.ch
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---
> <  /EndOfTransmission  >
>
>
> 
> This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared
> by NetIQ MailMarshal, the e-mail content security solution
> 
>  Output from pgp 
> Signature by unknown keyid: 0x5E41EEFB
>
>

_
Douglas Denault
http://www.safeport.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: 301-469-8766
  Fax: 301-469-0601
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: ATi and Xorg Troubles in FreeBSD 5.3

2005-01-09 Thread Ronny Fischer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi there

I have updatet to
xorg-server-6.8.1_1 X.Org X server and related programs via FreeBSD 
Ports..

..but it is still not possible to get more the 8 bit color on the sony 
c1ve.
the vesa driver is fine in 640x480 but it is not possible to have it 
with 1024x480 on this machine...

any other ideas ?
could it work with xfree86 instead of xorg ?

thanx a lot,
HAVE FUN and
with my best regardz
ronny



Am 08.01.2005 um 18:14 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Thanks Joe I will try to upgrade. My experience was the same, in that 
the
problem tracked X (both projects) across several levels of 4.x and 5.x.

The vesa drive works okay, but I miss the larger screen and better font
rendering.


On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Joe Altman wrote:

> Doug, Ronny...
>
> I'm running 4.11 with xorg 6.8.1, built from source on December 28,
> 2004 using a Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2x on an IBM ThinkPad A20m. I have
> a default depth of 24 bits, and a resolution of 1024x768. I am using
> the ati driver.
>
> Ronny: I see that the query is for 5.3, but I thought that perhaps my
> experience would indicate that the ATI chip seems to work fine w/ the
> most recent version of xorg; or rather, the source as it existed on
> December 28th.
>
> Doug: I remember that you and I encountered the same issue, back in
> September or thereabouts, WRT the ATI chip? I'm happy to report what
> is above: it seems to be safe to use the ati driver w/ the newest
> source for xorg and the chip in question.
>
> HTH, best regards,
>
> Joe
>

_
Douglas Denault
http://www.safeport.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: 301-469-8766
   Fax: 301-469-0601

Beschtae Dank,
HAFE FUN und
mit aemae Gruaess
Ronny
- ---
http://the.fischerman.ch
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- ---
<  /EndOfTransmission  >

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQA/AwUBQeGLHMAf475eQe77EQLuEwCeN8ctUcGauhDrvwhSBBvPaEj5dDoAn0M3
U3WzgtvNIWAcIVVchYfeWC5z
=CJzL
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared 
by NetIQ MailMarshal, the e-mail content security solution

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: ATi and Xorg Troubles in FreeBSD 5.3

2005-01-08 Thread Ronny Fischer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Doug, hi Joe

Thanx a lot for your answer's ;.-)
The problem on my Laptop is that strange resolution of 1024x480 which 
is not proper working with the vesa driver.

I will also try to upgarde my Xorg and report to you if it is working 
or not.

Thanx again,
have a nice weekend,
HAVE FUN and
with my best regards
Ronny


Am 08.01.2005 um 18:14 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Thanks Joe I will try to upgrade. My experience was the same, in that 
the
problem tracked X (both projects) across several levels of 4.x and 5.x.

The vesa drive works okay, but I miss the larger screen and better font
rendering.


On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Joe Altman wrote:

> Doug, Ronny...
>
> I'm running 4.11 with xorg 6.8.1, built from source on December 28,
> 2004 using a Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2x on an IBM ThinkPad A20m. I have
> a default depth of 24 bits, and a resolution of 1024x768. I am using
> the ati driver.
>
> Ronny: I see that the query is for 5.3, but I thought that perhaps my
> experience would indicate that the ATI chip seems to work fine w/ the
> most recent version of xorg; or rather, the source as it existed on
> December 28th.
>
> Doug: I remember that you and I encountered the same issue, back in
> September or thereabouts, WRT the ATI chip? I'm happy to report what
> is above: it seems to be safe to use the ati driver w/ the newest
> source for xorg and the chip in question.
>
> HTH, best regards,
>
> Joe
>

_
Douglas Denault
http://www.safeport.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: 301-469-8766
   Fax: 301-469-0601

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQA/AwUBQeArk8Af475eQe77EQI9OwCg0NTvIgno9uS14wIt68+h6j8923MAoMfT
EWWT7AQqSdCr8M/x78NkozOR
=sLMj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared 
by NetIQ MailMarshal, the e-mail content security solution

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: ATi and Xorg Troubles in FreeBSD 5.3

2005-01-08 Thread doug
Thanks Joe I will try to upgrade. My experience was the same, in that the
problem tracked X (both projects) across several levels of 4.x and 5.x.

The vesa drive works okay, but I miss the larger screen and better font
rendering.


On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Joe Altman wrote:

> Doug, Ronny...
>
> I'm running 4.11 with xorg 6.8.1, built from source on December 28,
> 2004 using a Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2x on an IBM ThinkPad A20m. I have
> a default depth of 24 bits, and a resolution of 1024x768. I am using
> the ati driver.
>
> Ronny: I see that the query is for 5.3, but I thought that perhaps my
> experience would indicate that the ATI chip seems to work fine w/ the
> most recent version of xorg; or rather, the source as it existed on
> December 28th.
>
> Doug: I remember that you and I encountered the same issue, back in
> September or thereabouts, WRT the ATI chip? I'm happy to report what
> is above: it seems to be safe to use the ati driver w/ the newest
> source for xorg and the chip in question.
>
> HTH, best regards,
>
> Joe
>

_
Douglas Denault
http://www.safeport.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: 301-469-8766
  Fax: 301-469-0601
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: ATi and Xorg Troubles in FreeBSD 5.3

2005-01-07 Thread Joe Altman
Doug, Ronny...

I'm running 4.11 with xorg 6.8.1, built from source on December 28,
2004 using a Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2x on an IBM ThinkPad A20m. I have
a default depth of 24 bits, and a resolution of 1024x768. I am using
the ati driver.

Ronny: I see that the query is for 5.3, but I thought that perhaps my
experience would indicate that the ATI chip seems to work fine w/ the
most recent version of xorg; or rather, the source as it existed on
December 28th.

Doug: I remember that you and I encountered the same issue, back in
September or thereabouts, WRT the ATI chip? I'm happy to report what
is above: it seems to be safe to use the ati driver w/ the newest
source for xorg and the chip in question.

HTH, best regards,

Joe
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: ATi and Xorg Troubles in FreeBSD 5.3

2005-01-06 Thread doug
No magic and little more than the first sentence said:

   FYI - there is a work around for this. The vesa driver works okay. I just
   ran xorgconfig and added Mode and DefaultDepth statements. The driver seems
   kind of funky in that the screen is scrambled for a second or so and then
   seems to work okay.

My memory was that I just ran 'Xorg -configure' and changed the driver and
added the screen section. I included the file because a 'diff -u' with a left
over xorg.conf does not seem to bear that out. Still, that's all I did.

I am running xorg 6.7 using the vesa driver. At some point I intend to try 6.8
of xorg.  It appears the ati driver has been updated but information is a bit
difficult (at least for me) to come by from the Xorg site.

On my hardware, the vesa driver works pretty well, the only problems being the
default X fonts are not rendered as well, I can not use 1400x1050 resolution,
and the screen memory does not seem be handled as well as with the ati driver.
This later is not really a problem (for me) as it results in the screen from a
previous session appearing when xorg start after a reboot and some funky
patterns starting xdm.

Hope this helps.

On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Ronny Fischer wrote:

> Hi Doug
>
> I saw your answer at
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2004-November/065330.html
>
> and would like to ask, where can I found this workaround ?
>
> I have a Sony PCG-C1VE with an ATi 3D Rage Mobility and a screen resolution 
> of 1024x480
> (specs here : 
> http://reviews.zdnet.co.uk/hardware/notebooks/0,39023984,1247,00.htm)
>
> Xorg is working with 8 bit colour. If I switch to 16 or 24 I see only a grey 
> monitor.
> I have also tryed the vesa driver. This is only working with 640x480
>
> Please, please, please, do you have any hint for me where I can found a 
> solution ?
> I search the web since three day´s and have not found any solution that is 
> working.
>
> Thanx a lot in avance,
> HAVE FUN and
> with my best regards
> Ronny
> http://the.fischerman.ch
> mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> 
> This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared
> by NetIQ MailMarshal, the e-mail content security solution
> 
>

_
Douglas Denault
http://www.safeport.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: 301-469-8766
  Fax: 301-469-0601# File generated by xf86config.

#
# Copyright (c) 2004, by the X.Org
#
# Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
# copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
# to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
# the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
# and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
# Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
# 
# The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
# all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
# 
# THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
# IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
# FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.  IN NO EVENT SHALL
# THE XFREE86 PROJECT BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY,
# WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF
# OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
# SOFTWARE.
# 
# Except as contained in this notice, the name of X.Org shall
# not be used in advertising or otherwise to promote the sale, use or other
# dealings in this Software without prior written authorization from the
# X.Org.
#

# **
# Refer to the XF86Config(4/5) man page for details about the format of 
# this file.
# **

# **
# Module section -- this  section  is used to specify
# which dynamically loadable modules to load.
# **
#
Section "Module"

# This loads the DBE extension module.

Load"dbe"   # Double buffer extension

# This loads the miscellaneous extensions module, and disables
# initialisation of the XFree86-DGA extension within that module.
SubSection  "extmod"
  Option"omit xfree86-dga"   # don't initialise the DGA extension
EndSubSection

# This loads the Type1 and FreeType font modules
Load"type1"
Load"speedo"
Load"freetype"
#Load"xtt"

# This loads the GLX module
#Load   "glx"
# This loads the DRI module
#Load   "dri"

EndSection

# **
# Files section.  This