Re: Boot manager clarification

2003-11-23 Thread Jud 
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 11:49:21 -0800, Craig Caughlin  
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi folks,
I have 2 hard disks, each on their own channel. I have XOSL installed as  
my
boot manager, in Drive 1, Partition 1. I have Windows 2000-Pro on Drive  
1,
Partition 2. I want to install FreeBSD 5.0 on Drive 2, but use XOSL to  
load
it.

Should I install FreeBSD using the "Standard" MBR option, or should I use
the "BootMgr" option? I *think* I would want to use the standard,  
because it
seems like the BootMgr option would install in the MBR of Disk 1 and NOT
Disk 2, thereby goofing up XOSL (which is what I'm trying to avoid!).
You think correctly.  :)

Jud
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Boot manager clarification

2003-11-23 Thread Craig Caughlin 
Hi folks,
I have 2 hard disks, each on their own channel. I have XOSL installed as my
boot manager, in Drive 1, Partition 1. I have Windows 2000-Pro on Drive 1,
Partition 2. I want to install FreeBSD 5.0 on Drive 2, but use XOSL to load
it. 

Should I install FreeBSD using the "Standard" MBR option, or should I use
the "BootMgr" option? I *think* I would want to use the standard, because it
seems like the BootMgr option would install in the MBR of Disk 1 and NOT
Disk 2, thereby goofing up XOSL (which is what I'm trying to avoid!).

Thank you,
Craig

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"