CVSup/Ports Question

2006-04-12 Thread Adam Stroud
I just have a quick question on some of the documentation I have read 
about FreeBSD and it's ports collection.  I read in the handbook that 
the cvsup tag for the ports-* collection should be ..


In particular, use only tag=. for the ports-* collections.

However, when I was reading the ports(7) man page I saw:

It is possible to download and use ports from the FreeBSD repository 
that are newer than the installed system; however it is important to 
install the appropriate ``Upgrade Kit'' from 
http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/ first!  The portcheckout(1) 
(ports/devel/portcheckout) script (also a port, of course!) will help to 
download new ports.


When I went to the webpage that the man page referenced I found a 
paragraph that stated


The Ports Collection supports the latest release on the FreeBSD-CURRENT 
and FreeBSD-STABLE branches. Older releases are not supported and may or 
may not work correctly with an up-to-date ports collection. Over time, 
changes to the ports collection may rely on features that are not 
present in older releases. Wherever convenient, we try not to 
gratuitously break support for recent releases, but it is sometimes 
unavoidable. When this occurs, patches contributed by the user community 
to maintain support for older releases will usually be committed.


My question is should I keep tag=. in my ports supfile even though I 
am running the RELENG_6_0 and from my understanding that is different 
from the -STABLE branch.


Or, am I just mixed up on the branching structure?

Thanks
A
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: CVSup/Ports Question

2006-04-12 Thread wc_fbsd

At 11:09 PM 4/12/2006, you wrote:
question on . ports collection.  I read in the handbook that the 
cvsup tag for the ports-* collection should be .. In particular, 
use only tag=. for the ports-* collections.


As I understand it, there is no most recent version of port that 
still works with my very old FBSD version.  You either get the ports 
snapshot that was out at the same time your release was released.  Or 
you get the *most* recent version of the port, with no guarantee it 
will work on an exceedingly old FBSD version.


In any case, don't screw with cvsup for ports;  look into 
portsnap.  It's included in 6.x and available in ports for older 
releases.  It's easier, faster, and lower bandwidth.


  -Wayne
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


cvsup ports question Freebsd 5.2

2004-02-06 Thread jens
Hi folks,
I have build the ports tree using the default ports-sup file tag 
tag=.

I want to understand why my ports tree is wiped off when i change the tag 
value to 
RELENG_5_2_0_RELEASE
or 
RELENG_5
or 
RELENG_5_2

in order to get the ports updating. I followed the instructions of the bsd  
manual assuming to stick to the latest stable version/branch.

Exerpt of the ports sup_file

# IMPORTANT: Change the next line to use one of the CVSup mirror sites
# listed at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/mirrors.html.
*default host=cvsup2.FreeBSD.org
*default base=/usr
*default prefix=/usr
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_2_0_RELEASE
*default delete use-rel-suffix


does that mean there is no upgrade of the ports. I assume not because the 
whole tree is wiped off. 


Thanks. 


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: cvsup ports question Freebsd 5.2

2004-02-06 Thread Kent Stewart
On Friday 06 February 2004 10:32 am, jens wrote:
 Hi folks,
 I have build the ports tree using the default ports-sup file tag
 tag=.

 I want to understand why my ports tree is wiped off when i change the
 tag value to
 RELENG_5_2_0_RELEASE
 or
 RELENG_5
 or
 RELENG_5_2

 in order to get the ports updating. I followed the instructions of
 the bsd manual assuming to stick to the latest stable version/branch.

 Exerpt of the ports sup_file

 # IMPORTANT: Change the next line to use one of the CVSup mirror
 sites # listed at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/mirrors.html.
 *default host=cvsup2.FreeBSD.org
 *default base=/usr
 *default prefix=/usr
 *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_2_0_RELEASE
 *default delete use-rel-suffix


 does that mean there is no upgrade of the ports. I assume not because
 the whole tree is wiped off.

That is what it means. The only tag for ports is tag=.. They may build 
packages for 5.2-release but cvsup only knows about tag=. for 
ports-all.

Kent
-- 
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA

http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: cvsup ports question Freebsd 5.2

2004-02-06 Thread Lowell Gilbert
jens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Hi folks,
 I have build the ports tree using the default ports-sup file tag 
 tag=.
 
 I want to understand why my ports tree is wiped off when i change the tag 
 value to 
 RELENG_5_2_0_RELEASE
 or 
 RELENG_5
 or 
 RELENG_5_2

Quoted from some of the example supfiles:

###
#
# DANGER!  WARNING!  LOOK OUT!  VORSICHT!
#
# If you add any of the ports or doc collections to this file, be sure to
# specify them with a tag value set to ., like this:
#
#   ports-all tag=.
#   doc-all tag=.
#
# If you leave out the tag=. portion, CVSup will delete all of
# the files in your ports or doc tree.  That is because the ports and doc
# collections do not use the same tags as the main part of the FreeBSD 
# source tree.
#
###
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: cvsup ports question Freebsd 5.2

2004-02-06 Thread jens
On Friday 06 February 2004 21:24, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Ok 
thanks

 jens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  Hi folks,
  I have build the ports tree using the default ports-sup file tag
  tag=.
 
  I want to understand why my ports tree is wiped off when i change the tag
  value to
  RELENG_5_2_0_RELEASE
  or
  RELENG_5
  or
  RELENG_5_2

 Quoted from some of the example supfiles:


 ###
 #
 # DANGER!  WARNING!  LOOK OUT!  VORSICHT!
 #
 # If you add any of the ports or doc collections to this file, be sure
 to # specify them with a tag value set to ., like this:
 #
 #   ports-all tag=.
 #   doc-all tag=.
 #
 # If you leave out the tag=. portion, CVSup will delete all of
 # the files in your ports or doc tree.  That is because the ports and
 doc # collections do not use the same tags as the main part of the FreeBSD
 # source tree.
 #

 ###
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]