Re: Install FreeBSD using Windows desktop and PXE

2011-10-24 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 24/10/2011 02:18, Eir Nym wrote:
 I want to install FreeBSD to my second box and I have only Windows 7
 x64 desktop without CD drives.
 1. I have access to remote FreeBSD server (via SSH) where I can make
 custom FreeBSD installation in any format.
 2. I know how to create TFTP/DHCPD/PXE server to boot loader and kernel.
 
 So questions are:
 1) Do I able to boot some minimal FreeBSD environment without NFS aka
 embedded BSD to install fully functional environment? What things
 should I do to boot up it?
 How can I use Crunch/MFS_ROOT ??

You should be able to PXE boot FreeBSD and then mount a copy of one of
the install DVDs by NFS from where you can run the system installer.
That is, you mount the root filesystem via NFS while you're running the
installer.

In principle this should be enough for you to install FreeBSD locally on
your second machine.  This is quite unusual stuff, and probably not as
well tested as more orthodox installation mechanisms.

It might be simpler if you can install from a USB memory stick image.

 2) How can I write it to Flash drive in Windows 7?
 dd/flashnul/rawrite/rawcopy/etc are not working under this OS: it
 blocks access to drives even administrative rights.

If you can boot the install media, then you aren't running Windows 7 any
more, and the restrictions imposed by that OS simply don't apply.

Cheers,

Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   7 Priory Courtyard
  Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk   Kent, CT11 9PW



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Install FreeBSD using Windows desktop and PXE

2011-10-24 Thread Eir Nym
-- Eir Nym



On 24 October 2011 13:23, Eir Nym eir...@gmail.com wrote:


 ✪

 On 24 Oct 2011, at 11:10, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk 
 wrote:

 On 24/10/2011 02:18, Eir Nym wrote:
 I want to install FreeBSD to my second box and I have only Windows 7
 x64 desktop without CD drives.
 1. I have access to remote FreeBSD server (via SSH) where I can make
 custom FreeBSD installation in any format.
 2. I know how to create TFTP/DHCPD/PXE server to boot loader and kernel.

 So questions are:
 1) Do I able to boot some minimal FreeBSD environment without NFS aka
 embedded BSD to install fully functional environment? What things
 should I do to boot up it?
 How can I use Crunch/MFS_ROOT ??

 You should be able to PXE boot FreeBSD and then mount a copy of one of
 the install DVDs by NFS from where you can run the system installer.
 That is, you mount the root filesystem via NFS while you're running the
 installer.


 There's simple tftp server for Windows with dhcpd features. But NFS server 
 becomes available only in Windows 2008 platform.

 In principle this should be enough for you to install FreeBSD locally on
 your second machine.  This is quite unusual stuff, and probably not as
 well tested as more orthodox installation mechanisms.

 It might be simpler if you can install from a USB memory stick image.

 I'm looking for USB image

I'm looking for USB image writer which works in Windows 7 to write raw
image to USB drive


 2) How can I write it to Flash drive in Windows 7?
 dd/flashnul/rawrite/rawcopy/etc are not working under this OS: it
 blocks access to drives even administrative rights.

 If you can boot the install media, then you aren't running Windows 7 any
 more, and the restrictions imposed by that OS simply don't apply.

    Cheers,

    Matthew

 --
 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.                   7 Priory Courtyard
                                                  Flat 3
 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey     Ramsgate
 JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk               Kent, CT11 9PW


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Install FreeBSD using Windows desktop and PXE

2011-10-24 Thread John Kotrla

On 10/24/11 04:29, Eir Nym wrote:

-- Eir Nym



On 24 October 2011 13:23, Eir Nymeir...@gmail.com  wrote:



✪

On 24 Oct 2011, at 11:10, Matthew Seamanm.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk  
wrote:


On 24/10/2011 02:18, Eir Nym wrote:

I want to install FreeBSD to my second box and I have only Windows 7
x64 desktop without CD drives.
1. I have access to remote FreeBSD server (via SSH) where I can make
custom FreeBSD installation in any format.
2. I know how to create TFTP/DHCPD/PXE server to boot loader and kernel.

So questions are:
1) Do I able to boot some minimal FreeBSD environment without NFS aka
embedded BSD to install fully functional environment? What things
should I do to boot up it?
How can I use Crunch/MFS_ROOT ??


You should be able to PXE boot FreeBSD and then mount a copy of one of
the install DVDs by NFS from where you can run the system installer.
That is, you mount the root filesystem via NFS while you're running the
installer.



There's simple tftp server for Windows with dhcpd features. But NFS server 
becomes available only in Windows 2008 platform.


In principle this should be enough for you to install FreeBSD locally on
your second machine.  This is quite unusual stuff, and probably not as
well tested as more orthodox installation mechanisms.

It might be simpler if you can install from a USB memory stick image.


I'm looking for USB image


I'm looking for USB image writer which works in Windows 7 to write raw
image to USB drive


https://launchpad.net/win32-image-writer






2) How can I write it to Flash drive in Windows 7?
dd/flashnul/rawrite/rawcopy/etc are not working under this OS: it
blocks access to drives even administrative rights.


If you can boot the install media, then you aren't running Windows 7 any
more, and the restrictions imposed by that OS simply don't apply.

Cheers,

Matthew

--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   7 Priory Courtyard
  Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk   Kent, CT11 9PW




___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Install FreeBSD using Windows desktop and PXE

2011-10-23 Thread Eir Nym
Hi,

I want to install FreeBSD to my second box and I have only Windows 7
x64 desktop without CD drives.
1. I have access to remote FreeBSD server (via SSH) where I can make
custom FreeBSD installation in any format.
2. I know how to create TFTP/DHCPD/PXE server to boot loader and kernel.

So questions are:
1) Do I able to boot some minimal FreeBSD environment without NFS aka
embedded BSD to install fully functional environment? What things
should I do to boot up it?
How can I use Crunch/MFS_ROOT ??

2) How can I write it to Flash drive in Windows 7?
dd/flashnul/rawrite/rawcopy/etc are not working under this OS: it
blocks access to drives even administrative rights.

-- Eir Nym
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Turion64 x2 vs Centrino Duo 2 which is faster for FreeBSD and KDE Desktop?

2007-01-21 Thread Abdullah Al-Marrie

Hello,

I plan to buy a new notebook and will use FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE, I have
2 choices, Turion64 x2 with 2.0 GHz and Centrino Duo 2 with 2.0 GHz,
but with 2 GB DDR2 ram, with the same speed of the hd 5400 RPM.

So which of them will buildworld, and ports from source faster? both
of them will use AC not on battery when do these stuff.

--
Regards,

-Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri
Arab Portal
http://www.WeArab.Net/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Turion64 x2 vs Centrino Duo 2 which is faster for FreeBSD and KDE Desktop?

2007-01-21 Thread Christian Baer
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 11:12:25 +0300 Abdullah Al-Marrie wrote:

[broken up Xpost]

 I plan to buy a new notebook and will use FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE, I have
 2 choices, Turion64 x2 with 2.0 GHz and Centrino Duo 2 with 2.0 GHz,
 but with 2 GB DDR2 ram, with the same speed of the hd 5400 RPM.

 So which of them will buildworld, and ports from source faster? both
 of them will use AC not on battery when do these stuff.

I doubt that you will notice any big difference. While the AMD64 port is
quite nicely tested and very swift by now, the optimizations towards
Intel aren't bad either - even though this isn't true 64Bit processor.

In this case the HD will probably be the bottle-neck, not being able to
read and write the data quick enough to cause 100% CPU load. You would
have to 'make -j 4' at least to get anywhere near 100% load (I even have
to do that for 2 UltraSPARC II CPUs with 450MHz). And that really causes
load on a hard drive.

Just my 2 cents...
Chris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: About to install FreeBSD as a Desktop...

2002-09-21 Thread Bjarne Wichmann Petersen

On Saturday 21 September 2002 00:13, MET wrote:

 Other than that I just need some
 productivity apps, but nothing particularly special.  S, what's the
 REAL difference between 4.5 and 4.6.2?

Well, bugfixes for one thing, but also some added functionality (FBSD keeps 
improving ;)). Best thing is to run -STABLE (read the FreeBSD Handbook on how 
to do this), and keep your ports-tree current.

So, just install 4.6.2, update to -STABLE, update your portstree, and then 
install KDE, X and all the other needed stuff. Voila, you've got neat 
Desktop-computer. ;)

 And finally, I've really only used FreeBSD as a work environment so I've
 never had the chance to answer this question myself.can I view
 DVD's?  And if so what program should I use?

Yes, I prefer mplayer. But there is VLC, Xine and Ogle as well (all in ports).

Bjarne
-- 
Homepage: http://www.mekanix.dk

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: About to install FreeBSD as a Desktop...

2002-09-21 Thread Bjarne Wichmann Petersen

On Saturday 21 September 2002 19:17, Gary W. Swearingen wrote:

  Yes, I prefer mplayer. But there is VLC, Xine and Ogle as well (all in
  ports).
 I thought DVD playing required the use of patented mathematics (I know
 it's mathematics, even if they call it algorithms or methods or even
 software), secret country codes, etc.  What's the current situation?
 How do the above players manage it?  Are they legal in most countries?

Xine is quite legal in all countries, but some of it's plugins are not. VLC, 
mplayer and Ogle breaks CSS, and is possible illegal in the US ... and with 
the infosoc directive in all EU-countries by 22nd december.

That means, by 22nd of december I will become a criminal... civil 
disobedience is the path I'll choose.

Bjarne
-- 
Homepage: http://www.mekanix.dk

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



About to install FreeBSD as a Desktop...

2002-09-20 Thread MET

So, following up the subject, I'm getting (finally) MY OWN laptop.  Not
a company owned or school loaned.  It's a very nice machine that is
shipping with XP Pro and I CANNOT wait to get it off.  So here's the
problem, do I install FreeBSD 4.5-1 which is what I've been running on
my servers for quite some time now.  I have no issues with it, it makes
me happy.  Or do I install 4.6.2 which has been released on CD and
everything (as was 4.5).  I'd like to use the machine for development
(KDE apps and Web) which would naturally require me to run the latest
versions of XFree86 and KDE.  Other than that I just need some
productivity apps, but nothing particularly special.  S, what's the
REAL difference between 4.5 and 4.6.2?

And finally, I've really only used FreeBSD as a work environment so I've
never had the chance to answer this question myself.can I view
DVD's?  And if so what program should I use?

~ Matthew

 
/**
 
  Matthew Metnetsky
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
**/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



FreeBSD as a Desktop

2002-07-25 Thread MET
Title: Message



There is without a doubt that FreeBSD is an amazing server OS, but how 
well does it stand as a desktop, or rather a laptop. To be blunt, I'm 
tired of Microsoft and was wondering how feasible it is to run FreeBSD as my 
Laptop OS. I will do some searching, but are there good GUI environments 
for word processing, C/C++ development, email, ICQ, some port of AOL Instant 
Messenger (I can't believe I'm putting this here), MP3 players/converters, web 
browsers that actually keep up to date with the standards, and anything else 
commonly used ?

- 
Matthew



/**

 
Matthew Metnetsky

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

**/




Re: FreeBSD as a Desktop

2002-07-25 Thread Jason Porter

Yeah, it works great, I use it for a desktop.  I too was tired of 
Windows so I decided to switch.  For wordprocessing StarOffice / 
OpenOffice is out there (be warned though it takes a while to make) they 
work great.  For programing I don't use an IDE, personally I'm a vi guy 
(I use vim and gvim) they work well for what I do.  Some people use 
emacs, it's a preference thing.  Email and web surfing can be done with 
mozilla.  ICQ and AIM can be handled with gabber or gaim or some other 
ones out there.  For mp3 players there are a lot out there in the ports 
colleciton.  I use xmms and wmusic to dock it in WindowMaker.  I'm quite 
pleased with FreeBSD as a desktop.  It boots faster, shuts down faster. 
  And I can use it for a test bed (I do web development).  Probably the 
best thing so far is that it hasn't crashed too often, I think once or 
twice.  And you can always rebuild the things that break :)  So there's 
my little spiel on it.

MET wrote:
 There is without a doubt that FreeBSD is an amazing server OS, but how 
 well does it stand as a desktop, or rather a laptop.  To be blunt, I'm 
 tired of Microsoft and was wondering how feasible it is to run FreeBSD 
 as my Laptop OS.  I will do some searching, but are there good GUI 
 environments for word processing, C/C++ development, email, ICQ, some 
 port of AOL Instant Messenger (I can't believe I'm putting this here), 
 MP3 players/converters, web browsers that actually keep up to date with 
 the standards, and anything else commonly used ?
  
 - Matthew
  
  
 /**
  
   Matthew Metnetsky
  
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 **/
  
  


-- 
-Jason Porter

Real programmers are secure enough to write
readable code, which they then self-righteously
refuse to explain.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: FreeBSD as a Desktop

2002-07-25 Thread Michael J. Turner

 - Response ~

 You can allmost do the same thing on FreeBSD as Windows
 just not the crazy support windows has. Your common stuff like
 Office, AIM, ICQ, C/C++ programming, etc. Can all be done
 on FreeBSD just as well as Windows.
 
 

 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Jud [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 1:27 PM
 Subject: Re: FreeBSD as a Desktop
 
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: MET [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 14:23:10 -0400
 Subject: FreeBSD as a Desktop
 
 There is without a doubt that FreeBSD is an amazing server OS, but how
 well does it stand as a desktop, or rather a laptop.  To be blunt, I'm
 tired of Microsoft and was wondering how feasible it is to run FreeBSD
 as my Laptop OS.  I will do some searching, but are there good GUI
 environments for word processing, C/C++ development, email, ICQ, some
 port of AOL Instant Messenger (I can't believe I'm putting this here),
 MP3 players/converters, web browsers that actually keep up to date with
 the standards, and anything else commonly used ?
  
 - Matthew
  
  
 /**
  
   Matthew Metnetsky
  
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 **/
  
 See http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html .
 
 Regarding running on your laptop, see 
 
 http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.6R/hardware-i386.html
 
 Yes, that's a bit cryptic, but these pages will 
 give you some answers, and allow you to ask more 
 specific questions.
 
 HTH,
 
 Jud
 
 
 
 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
 
 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: FreeBSD as a Desktop

2002-07-25 Thread Kent Stewart



Jud wrote:

 
 -Original Message-
 From: MET [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 14:23:10 -0400
 Subject: FreeBSD as a Desktop
 
 There is without a doubt that FreeBSD is an amazing server OS, but how
 well does it stand as a desktop, or rather a laptop.  To be blunt, I'm
 tired of Microsoft and was wondering how feasible it is to run FreeBSD
 as my Laptop OS.  I will do some searching, but are there good GUI
 environments for word processing, C/C++ development, email, ICQ, some
 port of AOL Instant Messenger (I can't believe I'm putting this here),
 MP3 players/converters, web browsers that actually keep up to date with
 the standards, and anything else commonly used ?


You may find that having a dual boot is the only satisfactory 
solution. I have because it isn't the browsers that cause the 
problems. It is the web pages. For example, one of the sites that I 
use for a reference is 
http://www.llanera.com/musica/instrumentos.html. The URL has some 
musical instruments that many of us have never heard about. If you 
visit with Internet Explorer, you can see them. If you visit using 
anything else, you can't. There are many sites like this but 
Llanera.com was the first one to come to mind.

I trust the full blown messengers so well that I have them on a 
sacrificial system. The rest are hidden behind a natd'ed firewall. The 
document processors aren't there. For example, if you want DTP, you 
need something like Adobe PageMaker and I don't have a version that 
will run on FreeBSD. It is fully functional on Macs and Windows. I am 
using a version of Kword to print text from FreeBSD. A letter to 
someone important is printed on XP or W2K using WordPerfect.

If I don't trust a site, I connect using KDE-3's Kongueror on FreeBSD. 
It is on a system behind me as I type this. I just swing around and 
enter the URL.

YMMV

Kent


  
 - Matthew
  
  
 /**
  
   Matthew Metnetsky
  
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 **/
  
 See http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html .
 
 Regarding running on your laptop, see 
 
 http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.6R/hardware-i386.html
 
 Yes, that's a bit cryptic, but these pages will 
 give you some answers, and allow you to ask more 
 specific questions.
 
 HTH,
 
 Jud
 
 
 
 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
 
 .
 
 


-- 
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA

http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: FreeBSD as a Desktop

2002-07-25 Thread Mark Rowlands

On Thu July 25 2002 20:51, Kent Stewart wrote:
 Jud wrote:
  -Original Message-
  From: MET [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 14:23:10 -0400
  Subject: FreeBSD as a Desktop
 
  There is without a doubt that FreeBSD is an amazing server OS, but how
  well does it stand as a desktop, or rather a laptop.  To be blunt, I'm
  tired of Microsoft and was wondering how feasible it is to run FreeBSD
  as my Laptop OS.  I will do some searching, but are there good GUI
  environments for word processing, C/C++ development, email, ICQ, some
  port of AOL Instant Messenger (I can't believe I'm putting this here),
  MP3 players/converters, web browsers that actually keep up to date with
  the standards, and anything else commonly used ?



Something nobody else seems to mentioned. you can run ipfilter or ipfw. As 
my laptop gets plugged into a lot of windows environments, running ipfilter 
and only opening up what I need when I need it is kind of comforting.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: FreeBSD as a Desktop

2002-07-25 Thread Kent Stewart



Mark Rowlands wrote:

 On Thu July 25 2002 20:51, Kent Stewart wrote:
 
Jud wrote:

-Original Message-
From: MET [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 14:23:10 -0400
Subject: FreeBSD as a Desktop

There is without a doubt that FreeBSD is an amazing server OS, but how
well does it stand as a desktop, or rather a laptop.  To be blunt, I'm
tired of Microsoft and was wondering how feasible it is to run FreeBSD
as my Laptop OS.  I will do some searching, but are there good GUI
environments for word processing, C/C++ development, email, ICQ, some
port of AOL Instant Messenger (I can't believe I'm putting this here),
MP3 players/converters, web browsers that actually keep up to date with
the standards, and anything else commonly used ?

 
 
 Something nobody else seems to mentioned. you can run ipfilter or ipfw. As 
 my laptop gets plugged into a lot of windows environments, running ipfilter 
 and only opening up what I need when I need it is kind of comforting.


I rarely agree 100% with anything. I can always find something wrong. 
I use FreeBSD because it handles source in a consistent manner, i.e., 
cvsup and one source (VERY IMPORTANT), and ipfw for a firewall. I 
could probably use Darren's program but got started on ipfw.

What other OS can you exchange email with the developer and get a 
solution to a problem in 15 minutes. The fix is also available to 
everyone in the world at the same time. The first bug I found in 
Windows 98 was 6 months before I had a fix. I beta tested NT and its 
versions and problems on my systems were fixed before it was released.

Kent



-- 
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA

http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: FreeBSD as a Desktop

2002-07-25 Thread Jeff Jirsa

On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, Ed Yu wrote:

 4. Things like right click to change resolution and
 wizards to help setup things, and various other small
 things. But once you get the hang of it, you will
 stick with FreeBSD, trust me.

This type of thing is what still bothers me, after years of using various
systems... X, by its very nature, is not made to be reconfigured once it's
running. If someone would take the time to make it
1) easy to configure (linux installers have basically done this)
2) easy to reconfigure while running (if it exists, I haven't seen it)
X would instantly become more usable.

 You can find substitutes for AIM (I know there is one
 because I used it before, not Jabber, sorry I don't
 remember the name) and Yahoo IM has FreeBSD version.

Gaim and Everybuddy work well (read: acceptable as long as AOL/Yahoo/MSN
have not changed their protocol in the last week).

- Jeff Jirsa


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: FreeBSD as a Desktop

2002-07-25 Thread Brian T. Schellenberger

On Thursday 25 July 2002 06:41 pm, Jeff Jirsa wrote:
| On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, Ed Yu wrote:
|  4. Things like right click to change resolution and
|  wizards to help setup things, and various other small
|  things. But once you get the hang of it, you will
|  stick with FreeBSD, trust me.
|
| This type of thing is what still bothers me, after years of using various
| systems... X, by its very nature, is not made to be reconfigured once it's
| running. If someone would take the time to make it
| 1) easy to configure (linux installers have basically done this)
| 2) easy to reconfigure while running (if it exists, I haven't seen it)
| X would instantly become more usable.

On the other hand, for laptop use you never want to do this.  Sometimes under 
Windows you do to deal with broken applications, but it's always a terrible 
idea to use any resolution other than the native hardware resolution on an 
LCD display--the resampling always looks vastly inferior to the native 
resolution.


-- 
Brian, the man from Babble-On . . . .   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (personal)
http://www.babbleon.org

http://www.eff.org  http://www.programming-freedom.org 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: FreeBSD as a Desktop

2002-07-25 Thread Brian T. Schellenberger

On Thursday 25 July 2002 02:23 pm, MET wrote:
| There is without a doubt that FreeBSD is an amazing server OS, but how
| well does it stand as a desktop, or rather a laptop.  To be blunt, I'm
| tired of Microsoft and was wondering how feasible it is to run FreeBSD
| as my Laptop OS.  I will do some searching, but are there good GUI
| environments for word processing, C/C++ development, email, ICQ, some
| port of AOL Instant Messenger (I can't believe I'm putting this here),
| MP3 players/converters, web browsers that actually keep up to date with
| the standards, and anything else commonly used ?

I think that at this point, FreeBSD with KDE3 is probably better than Windows 
for the desktop.

It still lags on games, though.

But if you don't need actual commercial software, OpenOffice has great office 
programs (it's a sort of branch from StarOffice), ogle plays DVDs, mplayer 
plays anything that Windows Media Player plays (and future versions will 
support quicktime-sorenson 1 and realplayer).   Flash and realplayer and all 
that jazz runs under FreeBSD.

And if you have a few windows apps you have to use, there's always wine.

So, yes, I think it's up to snuff.

-- 
Brian, the man from Babble-On . . . .   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (personal)
http://www.babbleon.org

http://www.eff.org  http://www.programming-freedom.org 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message