Re: FreeBSD installation on AMD64

2008-04-16 Thread sergio lenzi
I use an ACER notebook 5050 with 2 partitions (one i386, and other
amd64)
the amd64 is faster,  the software is very stable, and everything
works...

I do not use the sleep mode, the freebsd kernel keeps the processor
halted when not
in use, so the battery lasts longer, and the boot (total boot is less
than 30 seconds...)
to have the gnome 2.22 up and ready... with all I need in my working day
(office, 
emai, multimedia, games, software develop, voip,  phone calls...
and internet)is 

This weekend I will format the i386 partition and install amd64 over
it ..  I am very satisfied
with the amd64 of FreeBSD, indeed is now working in all 6 notebooks if
the family (brothers,
sons, daughters...) The only "slow"  thing we have was the evolution (in
gnome) now it
is as faster as other applications in the computer


Sergio
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: FreeBSD installation on AMD64

2008-04-16 Thread Dominic Fandrey

Sébastien Morand wrote:

Hi,

...

So before reinstalling everything, I'd like to know :
Is it a reasonable choice (in terme of performance, reliability, and
compatibility terms) to install i386 over amd64 arch?


For a desktop i386 is still the better choice and unless you have more than 3G 
of RAM there are no downsides, but many advantages. E.g. acpi sleep states are 
only implemented for i386. I'm running amd64 on my notebook and the price is 
high. No suspend to ram or to disk (even though I have s4bios support), and 
not even cpu stepping (at least not the clock speed stepping only idle calls 
and they make /no/ difference at all).


All these things would work if I ran i386, but I want to be there when they 
start working on amd64.


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: FreeBSD installation on AMD64

2008-04-01 Thread Danny Pansters
On Tuesday 01 April 2008 15:06:24 Ivan Voras wrote:
> Sébastien Morand wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm new in FreeBSD, I'm used to GNU/Linux from many years but I'm trying
> > to migrate to FreeBSD.
> > My hardware is AMD64 / 1GB RAM / envy24ht network car / nVidia 7300GS GC
> > / USB Scanner / HP 660 Printer
>
> This looks like a desktop computer, with multimedia capabilities. It's
> very likely you won't be able to use some or all of the non-essential
> components.
>
> > So nothing to worry about except the AMD64. I read that FreeBSD i386
> > installation is faster on AMD64 than amd64.
>
> This is not very likely, or at least as valid as in any other comparison
> between a 32-bit and a 64-bit operating systems.
>
> > I installed amd64 and was quite
> > disappointed by the performance issue, particularly because the nv driver
> > is not good, and I got a lot of slowdown when some operations are made
> > within X server.
>
> Yes, nVidia doesn't have good FreeBSD drivers, and I think they don't
> have any drivers for 64-bit FreeBSD. You're probably using the default

As you should know, they have a published wishlist of certain kernel 
requirements that "we" have yet to implement.

> X.Org drivers, which have only basic functionality.

I found that with a gforce (SLI) card in my amd64 box I have to disable any 
and all HW acceleration. The xorg drivers have more functionality but it 
needs to be disabled for xorg to work at all without freezing (with anything 
multithreaded -- this last observation is mine).

People send one complaint after another but no one seems to be able to connect 
the dots let alone look at the real problems. And no, I don't care enough 
about my spare (testing) box to fix it but the problems are real.

>
> > So before reinstalling everything, I'd like to know :
> > Is it a reasonable choice (in terme of performance, reliability, and
> > compatibility terms) to install i386 over amd64 arch?
> > Will I be able to install nvidia drivers and every i386 tools? (I got
> > "only working under i386" several times when installing port)
> > Are there other issues I should be aware of using such an installation?
>
> While there are people using FreeBSD for a graphical desktop, and some
> of them are even using the 64-bit version, they are few and far between,
> and most of them are satisfied with the bare essentials. For X.Org
> issues you might try the freebsd-x11@ mailing list. For issues with
> specific ports, try stable@ or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be ready for a lot of
> manual configuration (as compared to Linux).

It's considered TIER-1. It doesn't come close.

Dan
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: FreeBSD installation on AMD64

2008-04-01 Thread Bob Johnson
On 4/1/08, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sébastien Morand wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm new in FreeBSD, I'm used to GNU/Linux from many years but I'm trying
> to
> > migrate to FreeBSD.
> > My hardware is AMD64 / 1GB RAM / envy24ht network car / nVidia 7300GS GC /
> > USB Scanner / HP 660 Printer
>
> This looks like a desktop computer, with multimedia capabilities. It's
> very likely you won't be able to use some or all of the non-essential
> components.

I rarely run into that, but the Envy24ht does seem to be a candidate
for that problem. And I think it's a sound card, not network. USB
scanners are another potential problem, but if your scanner has a SANE
driver, it ought to work. See
http://www.sane-project.org/sane-supported-devices.html

[...]
> While there are people using FreeBSD for a graphical desktop, and some
> of them are even using the 64-bit version, they are few and far between,
> and most of them are satisfied with the bare essentials. For X.Org
> issues you might try the freebsd-x11@ mailing list. For issues with
> specific ports, try stable@ or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be ready for a lot of
> manual configuration (as compared to Linux).

There seem to be lots of people using FreeBSD with a graphical
desktop. I do, and it works fine. If you are big into watching Flash
videos or playing Flash games on assorted web sites, you may have
problems, as Flash 7 is the latest version that works well and many
websites want Flash 9, which still has stability issues. YouTube works
with Flash 7, FWIW.

There may be some Linux programs you are accustomed to that either
don't run right on FreeBSD, or are not in the ports system so you have
to manually install them.

Installing FreeBSD i386 on an amd64 machine also works fine - and in
some respects it is better than running amd64 on an amd64 machine. At
present, there are some programs you are likely to want to use that
work on FreeBSD i386 but not FreeBSD amd64. And some have said that
amd64 uses more memory (maybe bigger word size means bigger
structures?) -- if so, that's a good reason to install FreeBSD i386 if
you only have 1 g of memory.

I've had trouble with the latest nVidia proprietary driver, but I was
upgrading an old system and haven't yet tried to see what happens with
a fresh install of the nVidia driver. The open source "nv" driver
works, but has very limited feature support (doesn't support multiple
monitors, for instance). I've also had problems with the ATI
"radeonhd" driver on one system, but not on another with a very
similar video card (the problems appear when I use multi-headed
displays). In other words, the only way to be sure what will happen
with your particular video card is to try it.

Good luck. A test installation of FreeBSD should go quickly enough
that it is not a big deal. If you use KDE, install it from packages
(precompiled) rather than compiling the port and you will save heaps
of time.

- Bob
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: FreeBSD installation on AMD64

2008-04-01 Thread Ivan Voras
Sébastien Morand wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm new in FreeBSD, I'm used to GNU/Linux from many years but I'm trying to
> migrate to FreeBSD.
> My hardware is AMD64 / 1GB RAM / envy24ht network car / nVidia 7300GS GC /
> USB Scanner / HP 660 Printer

This looks like a desktop computer, with multimedia capabilities. It's
very likely you won't be able to use some or all of the non-essential
components.

> So nothing to worry about except the AMD64. I read that FreeBSD i386
> installation is faster on AMD64 than amd64. 

This is not very likely, or at least as valid as in any other comparison
between a 32-bit and a 64-bit operating systems.

> I installed amd64 and was quite
> disappointed by the performance issue, particularly because the nv driver is
> not good, and I got a lot of slowdown when some operations are made within X
> server.

Yes, nVidia doesn't have good FreeBSD drivers, and I think they don't
have any drivers for 64-bit FreeBSD. You're probably using the default
X.Org drivers, which have only basic functionality.

> So before reinstalling everything, I'd like to know :
> Is it a reasonable choice (in terme of performance, reliability, and
> compatibility terms) to install i386 over amd64 arch?
> Will I be able to install nvidia drivers and every i386 tools? (I got "only
> working under i386" several times when installing port)
> Are there other issues I should be aware of using such an installation?

While there are people using FreeBSD for a graphical desktop, and some
of them are even using the 64-bit version, they are few and far between,
and most of them are satisfied with the bare essentials. For X.Org
issues you might try the freebsd-x11@ mailing list. For issues with
specific ports, try stable@ or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be ready for a lot of
manual configuration (as compared to Linux).



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


FreeBSD installation on AMD64

2008-04-01 Thread Sébastien Morand
Hi,

I'm new in FreeBSD, I'm used to GNU/Linux from many years but I'm trying to
migrate to FreeBSD.
My hardware is AMD64 / 1GB RAM / envy24ht network car / nVidia 7300GS GC /
USB Scanner / HP 660 Printer

So nothing to worry about except the AMD64. I read that FreeBSD i386
installation is faster on AMD64 than amd64. I installed amd64 and was quite
disappointed by the performance issue, particularly because the nv driver is
not good, and I got a lot of slowdown when some operations are made within X
server.

So before reinstalling everything, I'd like to know :
Is it a reasonable choice (in terme of performance, reliability, and
compatibility terms) to install i386 over amd64 arch?
Will I be able to install nvidia drivers and every i386 tools? (I got "only
working under i386" several times when installing port)
Are there other issues I should be aware of using such an installation?

thanks by advance for any help
Sébastien
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"